Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Ambassador-at-Large] News from Foreign Nations
On 15 May 2013 15:14, "Jonathan Rouillard" wrote: > > However, marking it as abandoned doesn't feel right - the players > didn't abandon the game, it just ended properly. So, "ended properly" was a possibility not hitherto contemplated by Agora? Another possibility probably not contemplated by that rule is constitutional isolation. I don't know if "neutral" really fits. for example, the new game of "Diplonomic" I am forming at http://sites.google.com/site/diplocat24/diplonomic/game1 It has most of the same players from Omnomnomic, but there is no ruleset continuity. And yes, all that was really just an excuse for me to post the link to the game. We still have space for a player or two. I figure a couple of you might be bored with this happy community nomic stuff and might want to try something where players lie, backstab, and pass rules without regard for fair play. See the link for details, email me if interested. -Daniel Mehkeri
Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Ambassador-at-Large] News from Foreign Nations
On 15 May 2013 15:14, "Jonathan Rouillard" wrote: > In rule 2369, "Foreign Relations", replace "Hostile, and Abandoned" > with "Hostile, Abandoned and Over". Sneakily removing the Oxford comma -- Walker
Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Ambassador-at-Large] News from Foreign Nations
Acknowledged. I'll wait a bit to see if B's gamestate "problem" gets resolved, then I'll make another batch. ~ Roujo On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Jonathan Rouillard wrote: >> > >> > AMBASSADOR-AT-LARGE Recognition-of-Nomics Report > > Once, from the Depths of Machiavellian Nomic World, a Ruleset was Born. > Unlike its Stolid Sibling, the Grand and Pontifical Agora, this Nomic was > built on whimsy and entertainment, flights of delight and, well, fancy. > Now, at an age even older that Agora, it continues to laugh, with rarely > a trouble in its core ruleset to bother its players. > > Therefore, let it hereby be said, that any future Amassador-at-Large > recognition attempts should find the Fantasy Rules Committee to be > Friendly. > > -G. > > >
