Re: DIS: Proposals 331-341
On 25 Jun 2013 21:52, Fool fool1...@gmail.com wrote: 331 (omd): I propose that Rule 214 be amended to read: The Speaker shall choose Judges randomly from the set of qualified players. The players qualified to judge a statement are the Speaker and those Voters who voted on the rule change whose voting period most recently ended, except for the player who invoked judgement, and the player (if any) most recently selected as the statement's Judge. [Proposal comment: i.e. judges now selected from active players rather than always being the Speaker. I vote AGAINST Prop. 331. 332 (omd): I propose that Rule 302 be amended to read: When a proposal is adopted, each Voter who voted against it shall receive 5 points, and its author shall receive 10 points. When a proposal's voting period ends, each Voter who voted on it shall receive 5 points, unless they received points by this clause in the last 24 hours. [Proposal comment: Reward for voting.] I vote FOR Prop. 332. 333 (omd): I propose that Rule 205 be amended to read: The Speaker shall make one proposal distribution per 24 hours, numbering and publishing the text of each proposal submitted since the last distribution. This starts each such proposal's prescribed voting period, which lasts 24 hours. [Proposal comment: Fewer distributions and overlapping voting periods = more votes?] I vote AGAINST Prop 333. It's blitz nomic ain't it? It's supposed to feel chaotic. 334 (omd): I propose that Rules 217 (game custom, spirit of the game) be made immutable. I vote AGAINST Prop 334. 335 (omd): I propose that Rule 213 (judgements) be made immutable. I vote AGAINST Prop 335. 336 (omd): I propose that Rule 210 (timing of rule changes) be made immutable. I vote AGAINST Prop 336. 337 (omd): I propose that Rule 102 (initial mutability) be made mutable (because I would like to repeal it). I vote FOR Prop 337. 338 (omd): I propose that Rule 111 (conflict between mutable and immutable rules) be made mutable (ditto, I would like to make numerical precedence apply to all conflicts). I vote FOR Prop 338. 339 (omd): I propose that Rule 109 be made mutable (because I would like to make rule numbers stable rather than changing after every amendment). I vote FOR Prop 339. 340 (Steve): Enact a new Rule which reads: Within 24 hours of this Rule being enacted, the Speaker shall publish the names and email addresses of all registered players of Agora XX. I vote FOR Prop 340. Though I already did. 341 (scshunt): I propose the following rule: At 12:00 July 1 2013 UTC+1200, Agora XX ends and the player with the most points wins the game. In the event of a tie, the tied player who most recently had more points than each other tied player wins. I vote AGAINST Prop 341.
Re: DIS: Proposals 331-341
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 4:51 AM, Fool fool1...@gmail.com wrote: Voting on 326-329 has closed and voting on 330 closes in half an hour. Full report at that time. Here I just number and repeat 11 new proposals. -Dan 331 (omd): I propose that Rule 214 be amended to read: The Speaker shall choose Judges randomly from the set of qualified players. The players qualified to judge a statement are the Speaker and those Voters who voted on the rule change whose voting period most recently ended, except for the player who invoked judgement, and the player (if any) most recently selected as the statement's Judge. [Proposal comment: i.e. judges now selected from active players rather than always being the Speaker.] FOR 332 (omd): I propose that Rule 302 be amended to read: When a proposal is adopted, each Voter who voted against it shall receive 5 points, and its author shall receive 10 points. When a proposal's voting period ends, each Voter who voted on it shall receive 5 points, unless they received points by this clause in the last 24 hours. [Proposal comment: Reward for voting.] FOR 333 (omd): I propose that Rule 205 be amended to read: The Speaker shall make one proposal distribution per 24 hours, numbering and publishing the text of each proposal submitted since the last distribution. This starts each such proposal's prescribed voting period, which lasts 24 hours. [Proposal comment: Fewer distributions and overlapping voting periods = more votes?] FOR 334 (omd): I propose that Rules 217 (game custom, spirit of the game) be made immutable. AGAINST 335 (omd): I propose that Rule 213 (judgements) be made immutable. AGAINST 336 (omd): I propose that Rule 210 (timing of rule changes) be made immutable. AGAINST 337 (omd): I propose that Rule 102 (initial mutability) be made mutable (because I would like to repeal it). FOR 338 (omd): I propose that Rule 111 (conflict between mutable and immutable rules) be made mutable (ditto, I would like to make numerical precedence apply to all conflicts). FOR 339 (omd): I propose that Rule 109 be made mutable (because I would like to make rule numbers stable rather than changing after every amendment). AGAINST 340 (Steve): Enact a new Rule which reads: Within 24 hours of this Rule being enacted, the Speaker shall publish the names and email addresses of all registered players of Agora XX. AGAINST 341 (scshunt): I propose the following rule: At 12:00 July 1 2013 UTC+1200, Agora XX ends and the player with the most points wins the game. In the event of a tie, the tied player who most recently had more points than each other tied player wins. AGAINST
