Re: DIS: Re-require officers

2013-04-11 Thread Benjamin Schultz
I think you're missing the point.  So bring back points.

-- 
OscarMeyr


Re: DIS: Re-require officers

2013-04-10 Thread Sean Hunt
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
 Hi folks,

 I think the current officer system is a key point of our malaise.

 To wit, we've figured out that offices can lie vacant, and then
 someone can deputize when they feel like it, and no game penalties.
 This leads to out-of-sight, out-of-mind; I think lapses in Props
 and Rubles can be traced to when those reports stopped happening.

 I think we need to go back to requiring that all offices be held
 by *someone* (a first-class someone).

 -G.

I support.


Re: DIS: Re-require officers

2013-04-10 Thread Tysger B.
But what do we do with Offices that are Vacant right now? I mean you can't
force first-class players to held Offices i think.

Tomas







2013/4/10 Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca

 On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu
 wrote:
  Hi folks,
 
  I think the current officer system is a key point of our malaise.
 
  To wit, we've figured out that offices can lie vacant, and then
  someone can deputize when they feel like it, and no game penalties.
  This leads to out-of-sight, out-of-mind; I think lapses in Props
  and Rubles can be traced to when those reports stopped happening.
 
  I think we need to go back to requiring that all offices be held
  by *someone* (a first-class someone).
 
  -G.

 I support.



Re: DIS: Re-require officers

2013-04-10 Thread Kerim Aydin


On Wed, 10 Apr 2013, Tysger B. wrote:
 But what do we do with Offices that are Vacant right now? I mean you can't 
 force first-class players to held Offices i think.
 Tomas

Not right now.

In the past we had an office (the Speaker) which wasn't allowed
to be vacant.  The person holding it wasn't allowed to deregister or
resign the office, and they were responsible for any office that wasn't
held by anyone else.  The Speaker got enough perks to make it worth
their while to hold the office (so players would actually try to get
elected for it) so no force involved.

This time around, it might be hard to convince someone to voluntarily
take such an office to begin with, since things are so far behind!
It depends on generally willingness of others to be in office, so 
that the Speaker doesn't regularly get stuck with everything.

I'm very open to ideas.

-G.