Re: [Ai] Can we change our local library in Sugamya Pustakalaya?
You may have to reapply for membership. On 8/19/17, Akash Kakkar via Ai wrote: > Hi all, > I've registered with Sugamya Pustakalaya and during registration, I > was asked for my local library choice. > I chose Saksham there. > I want to know that can we change this choice in future? and what's > the effect of choosing local library? > will we only get the titles of our chosen library only? > Also, my registration is awaiting approval, thats why I'm asking here > instead of trying by my own. > with regards, > Akash > > Akash Delight Computings INC. > Disclaimer: > 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the > person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; > > 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails > sent through this mailing list.. > > > > To check if the post reached the list or to search for old posting, reach: > https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html > ___ > > > Ai mailing list > Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in > http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai > -- Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. To check if the post reached the list or to search for old posting, reach: https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html ___ Ai mailing list Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai
Re: [Ai] Can we change our local library in Sugamya Pustakalaya?
Dear Dipendra I checked again. When you click on the link as soon as you open the book, it continues to throw the same error. However, I pressed now F6 this time and it opened normally. Harish. On 24-08-2017 11:33, Dipendra Manocha via Ai wrote: Dear Harish I have not been able to replicate your problem. Downloading and playback of Movie Dangal from Sugamya Pustakalaya is working well on my computer. We will be in touch on phone off-list to see why this is happening with you. Thanks Dipendra -Original Message- From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On Behalf Of Harish Kotian via Ai Sent: 20 August 2017 10:22 To: Share, empower &Enrich Cc: Harish Kotian Subject: Re: [Ai] Can we change our local library in Sugamya Pustakalaya? Hi Dipendra I downloaded the audio described Dangal on Sugamyapustakalaya. When I opened it in FSread, it threw an error, cannot open from external site. Internet was working then. What to be done for it. Harish. On 19-08-2017 16:14, Akash Kakkar via Ai wrote: Thanks a lot Shankar bro and Deependra sir. Thanks a lot for the help, now I'm waiting for the approval as I'm eager to listen the audio description version of 3 idiots and pk :-) On 8/19/17, Dipendra Manocha via Ai wrote: Hello Aakash You can register for another secondary library. You can be a member of more than one libraries on Sugamya Pustakalaya. The main function is to get offline services. Example, you can request for a book to be sent to you on a physical media. Your offline request goes to the library that you have chosen. Member of any library will have access to all books available on Sugamya Pustakalaya. You are not restricted to books of any single library. Each library is free to have their own membership fee and rules. Thus, which ever library you choose may have their own terms and conditions for membership. You can follow-up with Saksham for library approvals etc. at libr...@saksham.org I am copying this mail to Abdul at Saksham regarding our pending membership request. Thanks Dipendra -Original Message- From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On Behalf Of shankar shan via Ai Sent: 19 August 2017 14:19 To: Share, empower &Enrich Cc: shankar shan Subject: Re: [Ai] Can we change our local library in Sugamya Pustakalaya? hi Akash, hope you are doing good. as for as my concern, I think, you cant change your local library preference from the sugamya pusthakalaya. but, if the saksham does not aproved your documents with the member ship which you requested, then you can change your preference by requesting with some other libraries. On 8/19/17, Akash Kakkar via Ai wrote: Hi all, I've registered with Sugamya Pustakalaya and during registration, I was asked for my local library choice. I chose Saksham there. I want to know that can we change this choice in future? and what's the effect of choosing local library? will we only get the titles of our chosen library only? Also, my registration is awaiting approval, thats why I'm asking here instead of trying by my own. with regards, Akash Akash Delight Computings INC. Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. To check if the post reached the list or to search for old posting, reach: https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mail li st.html ___ Ai mailing list Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. To check if the post reached the list or to search for old posting, reach: https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maill ist.htm l ___ Ai mailing list Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. To check if the post reached the list or to search for old posting, reach: https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maill ist.html ___ Ai mailing list Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise
Re: [Ai] (no subject)
Hi Tara Prakash, Where are you based? Are you by any chance in the US? George -Original Message- From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On Behalf Of TaraPrakash via Ai Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2017 2:12 AM To: Share, empower &Enrich Cc: TaraPrakash Subject: Re: [Ai] (no subject) Hi all. Looks like the list has moved to a new home and some people who had unsubscribed have been subscribed again. I have no complaints even though I am one of them. It is easy to complain but it is very hard to manage such a vast list. I want to say that Harish Kotian and whoever is assisting him in managing the list, deserve many congratulations and gratitude for doing this work. Thank you Harish. And may be someone can post guidelines for unsubscribing or managing their email preferences. Best regards TaraPrakash Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 21, 2017, at 4:15 PM, PRASANNA PANDA via Ai wrote: > > Please unsubscribe my mail from this group > Disclaimer: > 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking > of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its > veracity; > > 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. > > > > To check if the post reached the list or to search for old posting, reach: > https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailli > st.html ___ > > > Ai mailing list > Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in > http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. To check if the post reached the list or to search for old posting, reach: https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.htm l ___ Ai mailing list Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. To check if the post reached the list or to search for old posting, reach: https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html ___ Ai mailing list Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai
Re: [Ai] bank of Baroda internet banking help
Payal, https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html ___ Ai mailing list Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai
Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have substantive equality
There is no way to verify if the entrance is the same difficulty level as was given to other candidates. This candidate also gets some extra days to prepare which is also unfair on other candidates, and more so if some of the other candidates are in the reserved for PH category. Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 25, 2017, at 5:20 AM, George Abraham via Ai > wrote: > > What do you think? The intervention by the court was a charity act. > > -Original Message- > From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On Behalf Of > avinash shahi via Ai > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 1:36 PM > To: Share, empower &Enrich > Cc: avinash shahi > Subject: Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have substantive > equality > > As far as I know, majority of examination conducting agencies clearily > stipulate in the advertisements that the agencies will not be responsible if > candidates miss the exams at any cost and in any circumstances. I don't know > whether the DU's call for application had this clause or not. > > > >> On 8/25/17, George Abraham via Ai wrote: >> But the real question is whether the court and the people would >> respond the same way if the candidate who missed the interview/exam >> was a nondisabled individual. >> I am sure hundreds of people miss important exams/interviews etc. due >> to break down of public services. >> -Original Message- >> From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On Behalf >> Of avinash shahi via Ai >> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 10:16 AM >> To: Share, empower &Enrich >> Cc: avinash shahi >> Subject: Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have >> substantive equality >> >> The Delhi High Court should have taken stringent action against the >> Railways which was the real culprit. >> >> >> On 8/24/17, George Abraham via Ai >> wrote: >>> I tend to agree at my own risk. >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On >>> Behalf Of Kotian, H P via Ai >>> Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 4:06 PM >>> To: Share, empower &Enrich >>> Cc: Kotian, H P >>> Subject: Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have >>> substantive equality >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> >>> >>> While reading this, I get a weary feeling. I am wondering, is this >>> not taking disability as an excuse and would a judgement would be >>> given to an able bodied in a similar circumstance? >>> >>> >>> >>> If the exam would be so very important, would anyone take a journey >>> for exam with such a thin margin with no backup plan. If the train >>> would have got delayed, it is still the railway problem? How about an >>> ablebodied taking the same train would it be perceived the same way? >>> >>> >>> >>> I suppose, these are questions which are best unanswered. My fear is >>> such rulings would misfire against us when we need it the most. This >>> has made a precedence. The good part of this episode, no one >>> approached the court and the court took it on to itself. >>> >>> >>> >>> Harish. >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On >>> Behalf Of Arun Kumar Dua via Ai >>> Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 2:09 PM >>> To: ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in >>> Cc: Arun Kumar Dua >>> Subject: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have >>> substantive equality >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi all >>> The detailed report of NDTV is pasted below as required by Avinash >>> shahi >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> The bench said the obstruction to the student in accessing the >>> reserved compartment of the train "was in violation of his >>> constitutional right to equality and non-discrimination, and a breach >>> of statutory duty of the respondent (Railway)". >>> >>> >>> New Delhi: Despite the constitutional guarantee of equality before >>> law, the harsh reality is that disabled persons do not have any >>> substantive equality, the Delhi High Court observed on Tuesday. >>> >>> A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari >>> Shankar further said it was the responsibility of every authority and >>> person to ensure social justice and equality to the marginalised as >>> well as implement the provisions of the Rights of Persons with >>> Disabilities Act, 2016. >>> >>> "Despite the constitutional guarantee by Article 14 of equality >>> before law and equal protection of the laws, it is a harsh reality >>> that substantive equality has not been ensured to such disabled >>> persons. It is the responsibility of every authority and person to >>> facilitate the compliance with the constitutional mandate ensuring >>> social justice and equality to marginalised and that the spirit, >>> intendment and purpose of the provisions of the Rights of Persons >>> with Disabilities Act, 2016 are ensured," the court said. >>> >>> The observations came on a PIL initiated by the bench itself on the >>> issue of a visua
Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have substantive equality
Sorry George. You were subjected to an unkind message. You are right. If DU goes to Supreme court challenging this High Court verdict, I am sure DU is going to win the case. Whatever happened with this student was unfortunate, but asking DU to hold the test again is unprecedented. The other thing I noticed in the verdict was a complete ignorance about the civic sense. No matter how much you punish the government agencies, if the society is not going to change, people with disabilities can not avoid discrimination. It was not a government agency that refused to open that reserved coach door. I hope there is no other disabled who took that test and was found qualified. It will be unfair on him/her if he/she passed on the original test but is not selected because someone else who got some extra days to prepare does get through. Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 25, 2017, at 9:05 AM, George Abraham via Ai > wrote: > > The message is simple. Would the court take a similar stand if the person who > missed the exam was not blind. Further the intervention of the court in this > particular case reflects a clear societal mindset. > > I hope I am clear with my post this time. > > > From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On Behalf Of > Kasimani C via Ai > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 2:58 PM > To: Share, empower &Enrich > Cc: Kasimani C > Subject: Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have substantive > equality > > Please e-mail matter should be clear and neatness to read and understand. > Your mail always being as vague, unclear, unsourcefull. Please change the > pattern > > On 25-Aug-2017 2:53 PM, "George Abraham via Ai" > wrote: > What do you think? The intervention by the court was a charity act. > > -Original Message- > From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On Behalf Of > avinash shahi via Ai > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 1:36 PM > To: Share, empower &Enrich > Cc: avinash shahi > Subject: Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have substantive > equality > > As far as I know, majority of examination conducting agencies clearily > stipulate in the advertisements that the agencies will not be responsible if > candidates miss the exams at any cost and in any circumstances. I don't know > whether the DU's call for application had this clause or not. > > > > On 8/25/17, George Abraham via Ai wrote: > > But the real question is whether the court and the people would > > respond the same way if the candidate who missed the interview/exam > > was a nondisabled individual. > > I am sure hundreds of people miss important exams/interviews etc. due > > to break down of public services. > > -Original Message- > > From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On Behalf > > Of avinash shahi via Ai > > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 10:16 AM > > To: Share, empower &Enrich > > Cc: avinash shahi > > Subject: Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have > > substantive equality > > > > The Delhi High Court should have taken stringent action against the > > Railways which was the real culprit. > > > > > > On 8/24/17, George Abraham via Ai > > wrote: > >> I tend to agree at my own risk. > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On > >> Behalf Of Kotian, H P via Ai > >> Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 4:06 PM > >> To: Share, empower &Enrich > >> Cc: Kotian, H P > >> Subject: Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have > >> substantive equality > >> > >> > >> > >> Hi > >> > >> > >> > >> While reading this, I get a weary feeling. I am wondering, is this > >> not taking disability as an excuse and would a judgement would be > >> given to an able bodied in a similar circumstance? > >> > >> > >> > >> If the exam would be so very important, would anyone take a journey > >> for exam with such a thin margin with no backup plan. If the train > >> would have got delayed, it is still the railway problem? How about an > >> ablebodied taking the same train would it be perceived the same way? > >> > >> > >> > >> I suppose, these are questions which are best unanswered. My fear is > >> such rulings would misfire against us when we need it the most. This > >> has made a precedence. The good part of this episode, no one > >> approached the court and the court took it on to itself. > >> > >> > >> > >> Harish. > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On > >> Behalf Of Arun Kumar Dua via Ai > >> Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 2:09 PM > >> To: ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in > >> Cc: Arun Kumar Dua > >> Subject: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have > >> substantive equality > >> > >> > >> > >> Hi all > >> The detailed report of NDTV is pasted below as required by Avinash > >> shahi > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> The bench said the obstruction to the student in accessing the > >> reserved c
Re: [Ai] (no subject)
Hi all. Looks like the list has moved to a new home and some people who had unsubscribed have been subscribed again. I have no complaints even though I am one of them. It is easy to complain but it is very hard to manage such a vast list. I want to say that Harish Kotian and whoever is assisting him in managing the list, deserve many congratulations and gratitude for doing this work. Thank you Harish. And may be someone can post guidelines for unsubscribing or managing their email preferences. Best regards TaraPrakash Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 21, 2017, at 4:15 PM, PRASANNA PANDA via Ai > wrote: > > Please unsubscribe my mail from this group > Disclaimer: > 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the > person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; > > 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails > sent through this mailing list.. > > > > To check if the post reached the list or to search for old posting, reach: > https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html > ___ > > > Ai mailing list > Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in > http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. To check if the post reached the list or to search for old posting, reach: https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html ___ Ai mailing list Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai
Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have substantive equality
Is it not a fact that a non-disabled person can make last minute adjustments like boarding another compartment, checking with the other door etc. much more easily than a blind person? Last minute alternative transport arrangements like taking road transport, break journeys etc are also easy for non-disabled. I'm not commenting on the court's intervention. But accessing public transport is not same for disabled and non-disabled! On 8/25/17, George Abraham via Ai wrote: > The message is simple. Would the court take a similar stand if the person > who missed the exam was not blind. Further the intervention of the court in > this particular case reflects a clear societal mindset. > > > > I hope I am clear with my post this time. > > > > > > From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On Behalf Of > Kasimani C via Ai > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 2:58 PM > To: Share, empower &Enrich > Cc: Kasimani C > Subject: Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have > substantive equality > > > > Please e-mail matter should be clear and neatness to read and understand. > Your mail always being as vague, unclear, unsourcefull. Please change the > pattern > > > > On 25-Aug-2017 2:53 PM, "George Abraham via Ai" > wrote: > > What do you think? The intervention by the court was a charity act. > > -Original Message- > From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On Behalf Of > avinash shahi via Ai > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 1:36 PM > To: Share, empower &Enrich > Cc: avinash shahi > Subject: Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have > substantive equality > > As far as I know, majority of examination conducting agencies clearily > stipulate in the advertisements that the agencies will not be responsible if > candidates miss the exams at any cost and in any circumstances. I don't know > whether the DU's call for application had this clause or not. > > > > On 8/25/17, George Abraham via Ai > wrote: >> But the real question is whether the court and the people would >> respond the same way if the candidate who missed the interview/exam >> was a nondisabled individual. >> I am sure hundreds of people miss important exams/interviews etc. due >> to break down of public services. >> -Original Message- >> From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On Behalf >> Of avinash shahi via Ai >> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 10:16 AM >> To: Share, empower &Enrich >> Cc: avinash shahi >> Subject: Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have >> substantive equality >> >> The Delhi High Court should have taken stringent action against the >> Railways which was the real culprit. >> >> >> On 8/24/17, George Abraham via Ai >> wrote: >>> I tend to agree at my own risk. >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On >>> Behalf Of Kotian, H P via Ai >>> Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 4:06 PM >>> To: Share, empower &Enrich >>> Cc: Kotian, H P >>> Subject: Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have >>> substantive equality >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> >>> >>> While reading this, I get a weary feeling. I am wondering, is this >>> not taking disability as an excuse and would a judgement would be >>> given to an able bodied in a similar circumstance? >>> >>> >>> >>> If the exam would be so very important, would anyone take a journey >>> for exam with such a thin margin with no backup plan. If the train >>> would have got delayed, it is still the railway problem? How about an >>> ablebodied taking the same train would it be perceived the same way? >>> >>> >>> >>> I suppose, these are questions which are best unanswered. My fear is >>> such rulings would misfire against us when we need it the most. This >>> has made a precedence. The good part of this episode, no one >>> approached the court and the court took it on to itself. >>> >>> >>> >>> Harish. >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On >>> Behalf Of Arun Kumar Dua via Ai >>> Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 2:09 PM >>> To: ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in >>> Cc: Arun Kumar Dua >>> Subject: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have >>> substantive equality >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi all >>> The detailed report of NDTV is pasted below as required by Avinash >>> shahi >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> The bench said the obstruction to the student in accessing the >>> reserved compartment of the train "was in violation of his >>> constitutional right to equality and non-discrimination, and a breach >>> of statutory duty of the respondent (Railway)". >>> >>> >>> New Delhi: Despite the constitutional guarantee of equality before >>> law, the harsh reality is that disabled persons do not have any >>> substantive equality, the Delhi High Court observed on Tuesday. >>> >>> A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari >>> Shankar further said it was the responsibility of every authority and >>> person to
Re: [Ai] how to save a print page directly from webpage
hi the desired link is http://www.drishtiias.com/hindi/gs-articles/general-studies-articles/privacy-now-a-fundamental-right press insert +f and find print. hit enter on it. I am unable to save page. On 8/25/17, gajendra vyas via Ai wrote: > you enter on print button . press tab tab till ok , then enter. > then if printer is not connected , you will have " save as " dialogue box . > > then you will save as normal. > gajendra vyas > - Original Message - > From: "Vishal Pawle via Ai" > To: "Share, empower &Enrich" > Cc: "Vishal Pawle" > Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 9:54 PM > Subject: Re: [Ai] how to save a print page directly from webpage > > >> Did you try "CTRL plus S" on that web page? >> Using this key combination, you can save the webpage. >> Note: >> It may depend on secure / unsecure conection. >> >> On 8/24/17, Mohit Gupta via Ai >> wrote: >>> Dear friends, >>> some webpage have a article and it gives us a link of print of this >>> article on it. If I hit enter on it, print dialogue box will open. I >>> want to save it instead of print it. How to do it. I use both internet >>> explore and mozila. >>> -- >>> Thanks and Regards, >>> Mohit Gupta. >>> Rajasthan. >>> Disclaimer: >>> 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of >>> >>> the >>> person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; >>> >>> 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the >>> mails >>> sent through this mailing list.. >>> >>> >>> >>> To check if the post reached the list or to search for old posting, >>> reach: >>> https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html >>> ___ >>> >>> >>> Ai mailing list >>> Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in >>> http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai >>> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Vishal Pawle >> >> Skype : vishalpawle >> >> Mobile : +919637290294 >> >> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/vishal.pawle.3 >> Twitter : @vishalpawle91 >> fan of NVDA. >> Disclaimer: >> 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of >> the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its >> veracity; >> >> 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails >> >> sent through this mailing list.. >> >> >> >> To check if the post reached the list or to search for old posting, >> reach: >> https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html >> ___ >> >> >> Ai mailing list >> Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in >> http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai >> > > Disclaimer: > 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the > person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; > > 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails > sent through this mailing list.. > > > > To check if the post reached the list or to search for old posting, reach: > https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html > ___ > > > Ai mailing list > Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in > http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai > -- Thanks and Regards, Mohit Gupta. Rajasthan. Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. To check if the post reached the list or to search for old posting, reach: https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html ___ Ai mailing list Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai
Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have substantive equality
The message is simple. Would the court take a similar stand if the person who missed the exam was not blind. Further the intervention of the court in this particular case reflects a clear societal mindset. I hope I am clear with my post this time. From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On Behalf Of Kasimani C via Ai Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 2:58 PM To: Share, empower &Enrich Cc: Kasimani C Subject: Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have substantive equality Please e-mail matter should be clear and neatness to read and understand. Your mail always being as vague, unclear, unsourcefull. Please change the pattern On 25-Aug-2017 2:53 PM, "George Abraham via Ai" wrote: What do you think? The intervention by the court was a charity act. -Original Message- From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On Behalf Of avinash shahi via Ai Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 1:36 PM To: Share, empower &Enrich Cc: avinash shahi Subject: Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have substantive equality As far as I know, majority of examination conducting agencies clearily stipulate in the advertisements that the agencies will not be responsible if candidates miss the exams at any cost and in any circumstances. I don't know whether the DU's call for application had this clause or not. On 8/25/17, George Abraham via Ai wrote: > But the real question is whether the court and the people would > respond the same way if the candidate who missed the interview/exam > was a nondisabled individual. > I am sure hundreds of people miss important exams/interviews etc. due > to break down of public services. > -Original Message- > From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On Behalf > Of avinash shahi via Ai > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 10:16 AM > To: Share, empower &Enrich > Cc: avinash shahi > Subject: Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have > substantive equality > > The Delhi High Court should have taken stringent action against the > Railways which was the real culprit. > > > On 8/24/17, George Abraham via Ai > wrote: >> I tend to agree at my own risk. >> >> >> >> From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On >> Behalf Of Kotian, H P via Ai >> Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 4:06 PM >> To: Share, empower &Enrich >> Cc: Kotian, H P >> Subject: Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have >> substantive equality >> >> >> >> Hi >> >> >> >> While reading this, I get a weary feeling. I am wondering, is this >> not taking disability as an excuse and would a judgement would be >> given to an able bodied in a similar circumstance? >> >> >> >> If the exam would be so very important, would anyone take a journey >> for exam with such a thin margin with no backup plan. If the train >> would have got delayed, it is still the railway problem? How about an >> ablebodied taking the same train would it be perceived the same way? >> >> >> >> I suppose, these are questions which are best unanswered. My fear is >> such rulings would misfire against us when we need it the most. This >> has made a precedence. The good part of this episode, no one >> approached the court and the court took it on to itself. >> >> >> >> Harish. >> >> >> >> From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On >> Behalf Of Arun Kumar Dua via Ai >> Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 2:09 PM >> To: ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in >> Cc: Arun Kumar Dua >> Subject: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have >> substantive equality >> >> >> >> Hi all >> The detailed report of NDTV is pasted below as required by Avinash >> shahi >> >> >> >> >> The bench said the obstruction to the student in accessing the >> reserved compartment of the train "was in violation of his >> constitutional right to equality and non-discrimination, and a breach >> of statutory duty of the respondent (Railway)". >> >> >> New Delhi: Despite the constitutional guarantee of equality before >> law, the harsh reality is that disabled persons do not have any >> substantive equality, the Delhi High Court observed on Tuesday. >> >> A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari >> Shankar further said it was the responsibility of every authority and >> person to ensure social justice and equality to the marginalised as >> well as implement the provisions of the Rights of Persons with >> Disabilities Act, 2016. >> >> "Despite the constitutional guarantee by Article 14 of equality >> before law and equal protection of the laws, it is a harsh reality >> that substantive equality has not been ensured to such disabled >> persons. It is the responsibility of every authority and person to >> facilitate the compliance with the constitutional mandate ensuring >> social justice and equality to marginalised and that the spirit, >> intendment and purpose of the provisions of the Rights of Persons
Re: [Ai] bank of Baroda internet banking help
Dear friend, Since last month in our Bank software has been updating, so net banking & mobile banking are not working properly, so you have to wait for another 1 or 2 weeks, afterwords, you can contact to our branch, they will provide your net banking password. thanks & regards N.Madhuchandra Bank of Baroda staff. Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. To check if the post reached the list or to search for old posting, reach: https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html ___ Ai mailing list Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai
Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have substantive equality
Please e-mail matter should be clear and neatness to read and understand. Your mail always being as vague, unclear, unsourcefull. Please change the pattern On 25-Aug-2017 2:53 PM, "George Abraham via Ai" < ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in> wrote: > What do you think? The intervention by the court was a charity act. > > -Original Message- > From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On Behalf Of > avinash shahi via Ai > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 1:36 PM > To: Share, empower &Enrich > Cc: avinash shahi > Subject: Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have > substantive equality > > As far as I know, majority of examination conducting agencies clearily > stipulate in the advertisements that the agencies will not be responsible > if candidates miss the exams at any cost and in any circumstances. I don't > know whether the DU's call for application had this clause or not. > > > > On 8/25/17, George Abraham via Ai > wrote: > > But the real question is whether the court and the people would > > respond the same way if the candidate who missed the interview/exam > > was a nondisabled individual. > > I am sure hundreds of people miss important exams/interviews etc. due > > to break down of public services. > > -Original Message- > > From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On Behalf > > Of avinash shahi via Ai > > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 10:16 AM > > To: Share, empower &Enrich > > Cc: avinash shahi > > Subject: Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have > > substantive equality > > > > The Delhi High Court should have taken stringent action against the > > Railways which was the real culprit. > > > > > > On 8/24/17, George Abraham via Ai > > wrote: > >> I tend to agree at my own risk. > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On > >> Behalf Of Kotian, H P via Ai > >> Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 4:06 PM > >> To: Share, empower &Enrich > >> Cc: Kotian, H P > >> Subject: Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have > >> substantive equality > >> > >> > >> > >> Hi > >> > >> > >> > >> While reading this, I get a weary feeling. I am wondering, is this > >> not taking disability as an excuse and would a judgement would be > >> given to an able bodied in a similar circumstance? > >> > >> > >> > >> If the exam would be so very important, would anyone take a journey > >> for exam with such a thin margin with no backup plan. If the train > >> would have got delayed, it is still the railway problem? How about an > >> ablebodied taking the same train would it be perceived the same way? > >> > >> > >> > >> I suppose, these are questions which are best unanswered. My fear is > >> such rulings would misfire against us when we need it the most. This > >> has made a precedence. The good part of this episode, no one > >> approached the court and the court took it on to itself. > >> > >> > >> > >> Harish. > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On > >> Behalf Of Arun Kumar Dua via Ai > >> Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 2:09 PM > >> To: ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in > >> Cc: Arun Kumar Dua > >> Subject: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have > >> substantive equality > >> > >> > >> > >> Hi all > >> The detailed report of NDTV is pasted below as required by Avinash > >> shahi > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> The bench said the obstruction to the student in accessing the > >> reserved compartment of the train "was in violation of his > >> constitutional right to equality and non-discrimination, and a breach > >> of statutory duty of the respondent (Railway)". > >> > >> > >> New Delhi: Despite the constitutional guarantee of equality before > >> law, the harsh reality is that disabled persons do not have any > >> substantive equality, the Delhi High Court observed on Tuesday. > >> > >> A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari > >> Shankar further said it was the responsibility of every authority and > >> person to ensure social justice and equality to the marginalised as > >> well as implement the provisions of the Rights of Persons with > >> Disabilities Act, 2016. > >> > >> "Despite the constitutional guarantee by Article 14 of equality > >> before law and equal protection of the laws, it is a harsh reality > >> that substantive equality has not been ensured to such disabled > >> persons. It is the responsibility of every authority and person to > >> facilitate the compliance with the constitutional mandate ensuring > >> social justice and equality to marginalised and that the spirit, > >> intendment and purpose of the provisions of the Rights of Persons > >> with Disabilities Act, 2016 are ensured," the court said. > >> > >> The observations came on a PIL initiated by the bench itself on the > >> issue of a visually-impaired man missing his M.Phil entrance exam as > >> he could not board a reserved compartmen
Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have substantive equality
What do you think? The intervention by the court was a charity act. -Original Message- From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On Behalf Of avinash shahi via Ai Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 1:36 PM To: Share, empower &Enrich Cc: avinash shahi Subject: Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have substantive equality As far as I know, majority of examination conducting agencies clearily stipulate in the advertisements that the agencies will not be responsible if candidates miss the exams at any cost and in any circumstances. I don't know whether the DU's call for application had this clause or not. On 8/25/17, George Abraham via Ai wrote: > But the real question is whether the court and the people would > respond the same way if the candidate who missed the interview/exam > was a nondisabled individual. > I am sure hundreds of people miss important exams/interviews etc. due > to break down of public services. > -Original Message- > From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On Behalf > Of avinash shahi via Ai > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 10:16 AM > To: Share, empower &Enrich > Cc: avinash shahi > Subject: Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have > substantive equality > > The Delhi High Court should have taken stringent action against the > Railways which was the real culprit. > > > On 8/24/17, George Abraham via Ai > wrote: >> I tend to agree at my own risk. >> >> >> >> From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On >> Behalf Of Kotian, H P via Ai >> Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 4:06 PM >> To: Share, empower &Enrich >> Cc: Kotian, H P >> Subject: Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have >> substantive equality >> >> >> >> Hi >> >> >> >> While reading this, I get a weary feeling. I am wondering, is this >> not taking disability as an excuse and would a judgement would be >> given to an able bodied in a similar circumstance? >> >> >> >> If the exam would be so very important, would anyone take a journey >> for exam with such a thin margin with no backup plan. If the train >> would have got delayed, it is still the railway problem? How about an >> ablebodied taking the same train would it be perceived the same way? >> >> >> >> I suppose, these are questions which are best unanswered. My fear is >> such rulings would misfire against us when we need it the most. This >> has made a precedence. The good part of this episode, no one >> approached the court and the court took it on to itself. >> >> >> >> Harish. >> >> >> >> From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On >> Behalf Of Arun Kumar Dua via Ai >> Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 2:09 PM >> To: ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in >> Cc: Arun Kumar Dua >> Subject: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have >> substantive equality >> >> >> >> Hi all >> The detailed report of NDTV is pasted below as required by Avinash >> shahi >> >> >> >> >> The bench said the obstruction to the student in accessing the >> reserved compartment of the train "was in violation of his >> constitutional right to equality and non-discrimination, and a breach >> of statutory duty of the respondent (Railway)". >> >> >> New Delhi: Despite the constitutional guarantee of equality before >> law, the harsh reality is that disabled persons do not have any >> substantive equality, the Delhi High Court observed on Tuesday. >> >> A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari >> Shankar further said it was the responsibility of every authority and >> person to ensure social justice and equality to the marginalised as >> well as implement the provisions of the Rights of Persons with >> Disabilities Act, 2016. >> >> "Despite the constitutional guarantee by Article 14 of equality >> before law and equal protection of the laws, it is a harsh reality >> that substantive equality has not been ensured to such disabled >> persons. It is the responsibility of every authority and person to >> facilitate the compliance with the constitutional mandate ensuring >> social justice and equality to marginalised and that the spirit, >> intendment and purpose of the provisions of the Rights of Persons >> with Disabilities Act, 2016 are ensured," the court said. >> >> The observations came on a PIL initiated by the bench itself on the >> issue of a visually-impaired man missing his M.Phil entrance exam as >> he could not board a reserved compartment of a train since it was >> locked from inside. >> >> The bench said the obstruction to the student in accessing the >> reserved compartment of the train "was in violation of his >> constitutional right to equality and non-discrimination, and a breach >> of statutory duty of the respondent (Railway)". >> >> In the case, the court said that while the Railway was responsible >> for the impairment of the rights of the disabled student, the Delhi >> U
Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have substantive equality
As far as I know, majority of examination conducting agencies clearily stipulate in the advertisements that the agencies will not be responsible if candidates miss the exams at any cost and in any circumstances. I don't know whether the DU's call for application had this clause or not. On 8/25/17, George Abraham via Ai wrote: > But the real question is whether the court and the people would respond the > same way if the candidate who missed the interview/exam was a nondisabled > individual. > I am sure hundreds of people miss important exams/interviews etc. due to > break down of public services. > -Original Message- > From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On Behalf Of > avinash shahi via Ai > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 10:16 AM > To: Share, empower &Enrich > Cc: avinash shahi > Subject: Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have > substantive equality > > The Delhi High Court should have taken stringent action against the Railways > which was the real culprit. > > > On 8/24/17, George Abraham via Ai > wrote: >> I tend to agree at my own risk. >> >> >> >> From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On Behalf >> Of Kotian, H P via Ai >> Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 4:06 PM >> To: Share, empower &Enrich >> Cc: Kotian, H P >> Subject: Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have >> substantive equality >> >> >> >> Hi >> >> >> >> While reading this, I get a weary feeling. I am wondering, is this not >> taking disability as an excuse and would a judgement would be given to >> an able bodied in a similar circumstance? >> >> >> >> If the exam would be so very important, would anyone take a journey >> for exam with such a thin margin with no backup plan. If the train >> would have got delayed, it is still the railway problem? How about an >> ablebodied taking the same train would it be perceived the same way? >> >> >> >> I suppose, these are questions which are best unanswered. My fear is >> such rulings would misfire against us when we need it the most. This >> has made a precedence. The good part of this episode, no one >> approached the court and the court took it on to itself. >> >> >> >> Harish. >> >> >> >> From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On Behalf >> Of Arun Kumar Dua via Ai >> Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 2:09 PM >> To: ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in >> Cc: Arun Kumar Dua >> Subject: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have >> substantive equality >> >> >> >> Hi all >> The detailed report of NDTV is pasted below as required by Avinash >> shahi >> >> >> >> >> The bench said the obstruction to the student in accessing the >> reserved compartment of the train "was in violation of his >> constitutional right to equality and non-discrimination, and a breach >> of statutory duty of the respondent (Railway)". >> >> >> New Delhi: Despite the constitutional guarantee of equality before >> law, the harsh reality is that disabled persons do not have any >> substantive equality, the Delhi High Court observed on Tuesday. >> >> A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari Shankar >> further said it was the responsibility of every authority and person >> to ensure social justice and equality to the marginalised as well as >> implement the provisions of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, >> 2016. >> >> "Despite the constitutional guarantee by Article 14 of equality before >> law and equal protection of the laws, it is a harsh reality that >> substantive equality has not been ensured to such disabled persons. It >> is the responsibility of every authority and person to facilitate the >> compliance with the constitutional mandate ensuring social justice and >> equality to marginalised and that the spirit, intendment and purpose >> of the provisions of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 >> are ensured," the court said. >> >> The observations came on a PIL initiated by the bench itself on the >> issue of a visually-impaired man missing his M.Phil entrance exam as >> he could not board a reserved compartment of a train since it was locked >> from inside. >> >> The bench said the obstruction to the student in accessing the >> reserved compartment of the train "was in violation of his >> constitutional right to equality and non-discrimination, and a breach >> of statutory duty of the respondent (Railway)". >> >> In the case, the court said that while the Railway was responsible for >> the impairment of the rights of the disabled student, the Delhi >> University (DU) cannot isolate itself from taking measures to secure his >> rights. >> It said that DU will have to grant the student a chance to participate >> in the entrance exam for M.Phil (Sanskrit) course for the academic >> year 2017-18 like all other candidates. >> >> The court said it was issuing the direction "to ensure equality and >> non-discrimination of a disabled person who is visually impaire
Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have substantive equality
But the real question is whether the court and the people would respond the same way if the candidate who missed the interview/exam was a nondisabled individual. I am sure hundreds of people miss important exams/interviews etc. due to break down of public services. -Original Message- From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On Behalf Of avinash shahi via Ai Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 10:16 AM To: Share, empower &Enrich Cc: avinash shahi Subject: Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have substantive equality The Delhi High Court should have taken stringent action against the Railways which was the real culprit. On 8/24/17, George Abraham via Ai wrote: > I tend to agree at my own risk. > > > > From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On Behalf > Of Kotian, H P via Ai > Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 4:06 PM > To: Share, empower &Enrich > Cc: Kotian, H P > Subject: Re: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have > substantive equality > > > > Hi > > > > While reading this, I get a weary feeling. I am wondering, is this not > taking disability as an excuse and would a judgement would be given to > an able bodied in a similar circumstance? > > > > If the exam would be so very important, would anyone take a journey > for exam with such a thin margin with no backup plan. If the train > would have got delayed, it is still the railway problem? How about an > ablebodied taking the same train would it be perceived the same way? > > > > I suppose, these are questions which are best unanswered. My fear is > such rulings would misfire against us when we need it the most. This > has made a precedence. The good part of this episode, no one > approached the court and the court took it on to itself. > > > > Harish. > > > > From: Ai [mailto:ai-boun...@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in] On Behalf > Of Arun Kumar Dua via Ai > Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 2:09 PM > To: ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in > Cc: Arun Kumar Dua > Subject: [Ai] Delhi HC observed: Differently-abled don’t have > substantive equality > > > > Hi all > The detailed report of NDTV is pasted below as required by Avinash > shahi > > > > > The bench said the obstruction to the student in accessing the > reserved compartment of the train "was in violation of his > constitutional right to equality and non-discrimination, and a breach > of statutory duty of the respondent (Railway)". > > > New Delhi: Despite the constitutional guarantee of equality before > law, the harsh reality is that disabled persons do not have any > substantive equality, the Delhi High Court observed on Tuesday. > > A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari Shankar > further said it was the responsibility of every authority and person > to ensure social justice and equality to the marginalised as well as > implement the provisions of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. > > "Despite the constitutional guarantee by Article 14 of equality before > law and equal protection of the laws, it is a harsh reality that > substantive equality has not been ensured to such disabled persons. It > is the responsibility of every authority and person to facilitate the > compliance with the constitutional mandate ensuring social justice and > equality to marginalised and that the spirit, intendment and purpose > of the provisions of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 > are ensured," the court said. > > The observations came on a PIL initiated by the bench itself on the > issue of a visually-impaired man missing his M.Phil entrance exam as > he could not board a reserved compartment of a train since it was locked from > inside. > > The bench said the obstruction to the student in accessing the > reserved compartment of the train "was in violation of his > constitutional right to equality and non-discrimination, and a breach > of statutory duty of the respondent (Railway)". > > In the case, the court said that while the Railway was responsible for > the impairment of the rights of the disabled student, the Delhi > University (DU) cannot isolate itself from taking measures to secure his > rights. > It said that DU will have to grant the student a chance to participate > in the entrance exam for M.Phil (Sanskrit) course for the academic > year 2017-18 like all other candidates. > > The court said it was issuing the direction "to ensure equality and > non-discrimination of a disabled person who is visually impaired and > has been exposed to the most callous treatment because the respondents > (DU and > Railway) did not take effective steps as mandated under the Rights of > Persons with Disabilities Act". > > It directed DU to conduct, within 10 days from Tuesday, an entrance > exam for the student for admission to the M.Phil (Sanskrit) 2017-18 > session and declare his result. > > The bench said that if the student qualifies in t
