Re: [algogeeks] java

2013-03-13 Thread sulekha metta
oh..ok thank you for replying :)


On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:10 PM, manish untwal manishuntw...@gmail.comwrote:

 according to my understanding the super class object have limited function
 like for example
 Class - animal : methods/behavior : roam() and eat()
 and a sub class hippo : method/behavior : roam(),eat() and swim()
 so a hippo is a animal then according to the polymorphic property of java
 a reference of animal can refer to object of class hippo and animal but
 still the reference can call only the behavior of class animal i.e : animal
 A = new hippo() is legal but you can't call A.swim() because it refer to
 the animal property of class hippo ie roam and eat...not swim. and also u
 can't do this as hippo H = new animal() as this means animal should have
 all the property of hippo because it is referred by a hippo reference do
 H.swim() should not be a NULL.reply if you get it or not.
 P.S :  I tried to explain it through an example

 On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 8:51 PM, sulekha metta metta.sule...@gmail.comwrote:

 what ever data members,member functions present in super class are
 applicable to subclass...subclass may contain more additional
 featuresso its obvious that size of subclass object is more than
 superclass object...now lets take an analogy of float(4 bytes) and double(
 8 bytes) float can be implicitly converted into double( as float size is
 less when compared to double) but not vice versathen why is this not
 applicable to superclass object and subclass object(as size of superclass
 object is less when compared to subclass)? please tell if am wrong!


 On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:37 PM, subramony mahadevan subums...@gmail.com
  wrote:

 i think its just a logical reason  take animal as superclass bird as
 subclass ... since we are talking about inheritance it is  is a
 relationship  ie bird is a animal not vice versa hence we cannot
 implicitly convert to subclass


 On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 6:18 PM, sulekha metta 
 metta.sule...@gmail.comwrote:

 Q) why super class object can't be  implicitly converted to subclass?
 is there any specific reason?
 Thanks in advance!

 --
 sulekha metta
 B.E computer science
 osmania university

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Algorithm Geeks group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Algorithm Geeks group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.






 --
 sulekha metta
 B.E computer science
 osmania university

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Algorithm Geeks group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.






 --
 With regards,
 Manish kumar untwal
 Indian Institute of Information Technology
 Allahabad (2009-2013 batch)

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Algorithm Geeks group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.






-- 
sulekha metta
B.E computer science
osmania university

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Algorithm Geeks group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




[algogeeks] java

2013-03-12 Thread sulekha metta
Q) why super class object can't be  implicitly converted to subclass? is
there any specific reason?
Thanks in advance!

-- 
sulekha metta
B.E computer science
osmania university

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Algorithm Geeks group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: [algogeeks] java

2013-03-12 Thread sulekha metta
what ever data members,member functions present in super class are
applicable to subclass...subclass may contain more additional
featuresso its obvious that size of subclass object is more than
superclass object...now lets take an analogy of float(4 bytes) and double(
8 bytes) float can be implicitly converted into double( as float size is
less when compared to double) but not vice versathen why is this not
applicable to superclass object and subclass object(as size of superclass
object is less when compared to subclass)? please tell if am wrong!


On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:37 PM, subramony mahadevan subums...@gmail.comwrote:

 i think its just a logical reason  take animal as superclass bird as
 subclass ... since we are talking about inheritance it is  is a
 relationship  ie bird is a animal not vice versa hence we cannot
 implicitly convert to subclass


 On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 6:18 PM, sulekha metta metta.sule...@gmail.comwrote:

 Q) why super class object can't be  implicitly converted to subclass? is
 there any specific reason?
 Thanks in advance!

 --
 sulekha metta
 B.E computer science
 osmania university

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Algorithm Geeks group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Algorithm Geeks group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.






-- 
sulekha metta
B.E computer science
osmania university

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Algorithm Geeks group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: [algogeeks] Re: INTERFACES VS ABSTRACT

2012-08-24 Thread sulekha metta
@all thanks

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 6:08 PM, vaibhav shukla vaibhav200...@gmail.comwrote:

 Abstract class are used for Abstraction
 Interface are used for Polymorphism

 On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Amit Tiwari amit.monu...@gmail.comwrote:

 With an abstract class, the subclass of that inheritance tree only can
 and should provide the definitions of the methods. With an interface,
 subclasses of different inheritance tree can also implement the same
 methods. Interface provides a way to separate out and group common behavior
 of different inheritance trees. It is kind of a substitute for the multiple
 inheritance that some other languages provide.

 On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:59 PM, kings dns.bhar...@gmail.com wrote:

 Dear sulekha,

 when u want a default property to get embedded ie u want to force any
 feature use abstract.
 when u want an additional feature need to be added used interface.

 ex:
 For a car the default things are steering, engine, etc... if u want the
 car to compulsory to have A/c then add it in the abstract
 for a car having ABS is optional include it as an interface where ever u
 think its necessary.


 On Tuesday, 21 August 2012 21:20:45 UTC+5:30, sulekha .m wrote:


 hi all,
   why do we separately need interfaces in java?? we can declare all
 the methods in abstract class as abstract this serves the purpose,then why
 do we have interfaces???
 --
 sulekha metta
 B.E computer science
 osmania university

  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Algorithm Geeks group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/algogeeks/-/qI3YhsGoh7wJ.

 To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.


  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Algorithm Geeks group.
 To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.




 --
 best wishes!!
  Vaibhav

  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Algorithm Geeks group.
 To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.




-- 
sulekha metta
B.E computer science
osmania university

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Algorithm Geeks group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.



[algogeeks] MS QUESTION

2012-08-24 Thread sulekha metta
Hi all,
 This was asked in microsoft, question is  write a program to
reverse a linked list.and write it's test cases.
i got very few test cases
1) check if the node is null
2) check if there is only one node
3) check if there is any loop in the linked list.
 can any one tell how to reverse a linked list if loop exits? is it
possible?
and  can any one add few more test cases??


--
Regards
sulekha metta
B.E computer science
osmania university

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Algorithm Geeks group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.



[algogeeks] INTERFACES VS ABSTRACT

2012-08-22 Thread sulekha metta
hi all,
  why do we separately need interfaces in java?? we can declare all the
methods in abstract class as abstract this serves the purpose,then why do
we have interfaces???
-- 
sulekha metta
B.E computer science
osmania university

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Algorithm Geeks group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.