[installation-issues] [Issue 88051] No mimetype registration f or OOo 3.0 Beta - integrated
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88051 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 12 18:12:14 + 2008 --- Forget that, I realized the files I generally need to open through the mimetype are 90% MS Office files, and the file extensions for those are correctly configured for Windows. So the next thing to try is hacking-up the registry entries for MS Word, MS Excel, etc, to do the same thing for the OOo beta version. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 88051] No mimetype registration f or OOo 3.0 Beta - integrated
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88051 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 12 17:23:46 + 2008 --- Again, as I said in my last comment, just *HOW* do you expect anyone to test the functionality of the "mime type" if you remove it from the beta? You are just inviting serious bugs into the release version if you are doing the same thing elsewhere in the product. If you insist upon this dubious practice, you should instead be providing a way for people to re-instate the functionality, through a registry hack, or some other script or executable to fix it. I for one need this capability; if it's not there, I'll just give up on testing it at all. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 88051] No mimetype registration f or OOo 3.0 Beta - integrated
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88051 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 9 23:03:50 + 2008 --- If this functionality is eventually intended to be part of the Windows version, then it needs to be tested before the product is released. If it has been removed with the intent of never being re-enabled, then that *definitely* is a defect, as it is a crucial function for a Windows application. So I don't see how removing Windows integration is at all a good idea. Especially if someone intends for it to be removed permenantly, which would break the way most people would work with the application. Also, removing integration makes the programme look *less* polished, and likely would remove it from consideration for otherwise interested users. In the end, it would reduce the userbase; not the outcome we're looking for. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 89139] No file type association
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89139 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 7 22:48:49 + 2008 --- I would question writing this one off as "not a defect". If this functionality is eventually intended to be part of the Windows version, then it needs to be tested before the product is released. If it has been removed with the intent of never being re-enabled, then that *definitely* is a defect, as it is a crucial function for a Windows application. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[udk-issues] [Issue 49545] IBM JRE still not recogni zed for Linux
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49545 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 29 20:21:44 -0700 2005 --- In OOo v2.0 Beta2 (build 1.9.125) Confirm that IBM JRE 1.4.2 is now recognized by OO configuration. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[udk-issues] [Issue 49545] IBM JRE still not recogni zed for Linux
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49545 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 5 06:43:54 -0700 2005 --- Nothing to do with being calm or not. But if I've entered a defect, I would like to follow through on the verification. So I'm interested on testing a fix if one is available, but the other issue did not say *how* a regular end-user was supposed to fix this; it gave the impression I would have to re-compile the programme in order to get this to work. So I considered this issue a "users" thread, and the other a "programmers" thread. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[udk-issues] [Issue 49545] IBM JRE still not recogni zed for Linux
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49545 User jelabarre changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|DUPLICATE | --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 4 15:09:41 -0700 2005 --- Validated still a problem with OOo 1.9.122 (Fedora core 4, IBMJava2-142-ia32-SDK-1.4.2-2.0) I have tried to add settings to the OO script ( /usr/bin/openoffice.org-1.9 ) in order to force it to recognize the location of the JRE, as below: #!/bin/sh export JAVA_HOME="/opt/IBMJava2-142/jre" export PATH=$JAVA_HOME/bin:$PATH exec /etc/openoffice.org-1.9/program/soffice "$@" If there are supposed to be other tweaks in order to make this work for end-users off the standard package, these need to be documented. Otherwise this will never be considered resolved. Accodring to /opt/openoffice.org1.9.122/share/config/javavendors.xml, this configuration is supposed to be supported: === . 1.3.1 1.4.2 . === The IBM JRE is the required (and generally the only *allowed*) version of Java for corporate use. It also is necessary to have the IBM version as it is the only *supported* version for some other work-critical tools. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[udk-issues] [Issue 49545] IBM JRE still not recogni zed for Linux
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49545 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 7 12:33:06 -0700 2005 --- Validated still a problem with OOo 1.9.113 (Fedora core 4, BMJava2-SDK-1.4.2-1.0) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[udk-issues] [Issue 49545] IBM JRE still not recogni zed for Linux
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49545 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 21 09:53:47 -0700 2005 --- This is very strange, I put in a reply to this yesterday, and it's not here today. I did confirm this against build M109 under Fedora Core 4, and the problem is still there. For IBMJava2-SDK-1.4.2-1.0, I tried to get this recognized as a JRE, with no success. It *did* seem to be looking for a valid version, as when I selected this item, the entire application was hung for 2 or so munites, and gave the appearance of having died, until the dialogues would start updating again. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[udk-issues] [Issue 49545] New - IBM JRE still not recognized for Linux
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49545 Issue #:|49545 Summary:|IBM JRE still not recognized for Linux Component:|udk Version:|OOo 2.0 Beta Platform:|PC URL:| OS/Version:|Linux Status:|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard:| Keywords:| Resolution:| Issue type:|DEFECT Priority:|P1 Subcomponent:|code Assigned to:|kr Reported by:|jelabarre --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 19 14:31:21 -0700 2005 --- This was previously addressed in defect 32496, but I see no way to reopen that one, so I will have to enter a new one here. (Linux) Fedora Core 3 (Java) IBM Java Runtime 1.4.2 (OOo) 1.9.100 I have the v1.4.2 version of the IBM JRE installed in /opt/IBMJava2-142/jre, and have attempted to configure OpenOffice to use that JRE, but it will not recognize it. Have attempted to point to various levels of the directories, and still no success in configuring it as the JRE for OOo to use. According to the javavendors.xml file in /opt/openoffice.org1.9.100/share/config, this is supposed to be a supported version: 1.3.1 This is possibly a configuration issue for the installed JRE, as the corresponding versions in Windows work fine. I would be interested in investigating this further, with information on just how OOo determines the validity of the installed JRE. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 37020] multiple warnings about disabled Java appear when opening Macro Selector
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=37020 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 21 07:38:45 -0700 2005 --- Sorry, I wanted to add this was in snapshot 1.9.93 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 37020] multiple warnings about disabled Java appear when opening Macro Selector
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=37020 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 21 07:36:34 -0700 2005 --- I saw this as well, it was 15 error messages before the macro dialogue itself would come up (I didn't try anything past that). My major concern had been it was a loop tha you could never escape, but at 15 errors, someone may give up too soon and force-quit the application (which I had done first time I encountered this). - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[porting-issues] [Issue 32524] build with IBM Java, version 1.4
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=32524 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 21 07:32:17 -0700 2005 --- I have just tried this with snapshot 1.9.93 (Linux x86), and I can confirm that the support for the IBMJava runtime is still not in the programme. I had uninstalled all previous builds, and deleted my ~/.openoffice* directories before installing the new version. Not to make a fuss, but running the Sun version violates company policy (and there are good business reasons for this), therefore I have to run the IBMJava runtime (gcj, kaffee, etc could work as well, but their support is further behind). It is entirely possible that it requires a few environment tweaks to make OOo recognize my IBMjre, so documenting that would be an adequate workaround; if someone wants me to try something for that, please forward them on to me. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
