[sw-issues] [Issue 2593] cross-references from Word documents; not possible to refer on paragraph number
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2593 User rbos changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'alexl,bill_leach,brozen,b|'alexl,bill_leach,brozen,b |ulbul,cornouws,eberlein,gn|ulbul,cornouws,eberlein,gn |ustavo,iavor,jbfaure,joerg|ustavo,iavor,jbfaure,joerg |wartenberg,masayan,od,pink|wartenberg,masayan,od,pink |ernell,tuharsky' |ernell,rbos,tuharsky' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 78297] Empty page inserted by sty le
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78297 --- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 22 11:31:51 + 2009 --- Hi Greyham, you're the one that voted for this issue: But this issue has got a vote too. You should move your vote to issue 47111 and then close this issue as duplicate. I have voted on issue 47111 now, as it seems to be same issue indeed. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 86256] Crash: Table created with 2.3.1 can not be opened with 2.3.0
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86256 Issue #|86256 Summary|Crash: Table created with 2.3.1 can not be opened with | 2.3.0 Component|Word processor Version|OOo 2.3.1 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|formatting Assigned to|mru Reported by|rbos --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 20 09:25:46 + 2008 --- A table that has been created with OO.org-2.3.1 can not be read with OO.org-2.3.0 A document that shows this phenomenon can be obtained from this url: http://www.openoffice.org/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/51526/ooo-prob-with-table.tar.bz2 The message that OO.org shows, when opening the document is: Due to an unexpected error, OpenOffice.org crashed. All the files you were working on will be saved. The next time OO.org is launched, your files will be recovered automatically. PS: please remove the word unexpected from that message. Even when I expected the error OO.org crashed! Of course one could update to a newer version of OO.org (which is not too difficult), but the document containing the table is actually a subdocument of a master document. As the master document contains many (over 200 subdocuments) that are maintained by many people, it is not so trivial to have all people use the latest greatest OO.org. Besides that a minor update 2.3.0 to 2.3.1 should not result in such a major functionality update BTW: the master document crashed too Anyway this bug is also opened to make others aware of this problem. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 86119] In table: when inserting r ows from last row, result is different compare d to preceeding rows
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86119 Issue #|86119 Summary|In table: when inserting rows from last row, result is | different compared to preceeding rows Component|Word processor Version|OOo 2.3.1 Platform|Other URL| OS/Version|Windows NT Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|formatting Assigned to|mru Reported by|rbos --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 15 09:49:33 + 2008 --- When inserting rows from last row in the table in the attached document, the ontained result is different compared to inserting rows from the preceeding rows. When inserting rows from the last row, additional lines are inserted in the first column. While interting rows from the preceeding row(s), no additional lines are inserted in the first column. The table has been created with the OO.org table wizard, by configuring the required number of columns and rows. After that cells have been merged to obtain the desired table layout (see attached document). Playing around with inserting and deleting rows from row number 1 or 2, does not help to get a desired effect from the last row - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 86119] In table: when inserting r ows from last row, result is different compare d to preceeding rows
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86119 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 15 09:51:18 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=51525) Example document for issue 86119 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 86119] In table: when inserting r ows from last row, result is different compare d to preceeding rows
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86119 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 15 09:56:38 + 2008 --- Hmm, I just saw that this document has more rows ;) The problem is seen when inserting rows from: 1) Steps number 16 and 2) Expected result step number 20 When doing the same command in other steps the result is different. The command to be performed is: - Right click in row - row - insert - Amount: 3 (check: after) - ok - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 86122] Table from a subdocument m isses lines in master document
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86122 Issue #|86122 Summary|Table from a subdocument misses lines in master docume |nt Component|Word processor Version|OOo 2.3.1 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|formatting Assigned to|mru Reported by|rbos --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 15 10:07:53 + 2008 --- In the attached combination of master - and sub documents, the last part of the table in the master document is not shown correctly. The line on the left side of the first column next to the steps 18, 19, and 20 are missing (on the bottom of the column as well). The table has been created with the OO.org table wizard, by configuring the required number of columns and rows. After that cells have been merged to obtain the desired table layout (see attached odt document). When some rows are deleted the problem disappears. When enough text is removed from the some cells, so the last rows ends on the previous page (the number of cells remains the same), the problem seems to be gone as well. It is unfortenately very hard to predict when the problem happens. Hopefully the attached document combo, reveals what's wrong. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 86122] Table from a subdocument m isses lines in master document
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86122 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 15 10:08:29 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=51526) Example document for issue 86122 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 70748] RFE: inserting headings in to text documents
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70748 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 27 12:53:01 + 2007 --- rbos-od I don't think I encountered a bug, it seems to work as designed. I though it does not work as it is not intuitive what is currently happening. I changed a setting via: Styles and Formatting (F11) - Heading 1 (modify) The Paragraph Style: Heading 1 pops up - in the tab numbering Numbering style is blank. Change change Numbering Style to none. This removes the number in front of the Heading 1 texts. Now to get this back one has to go to tools - outline numbering - numbering - Change paragraph style from none to Heading 1. While one would expect to be able to change this via the Styles and Formatting (F11) - Heading 1 (modify) The Paragraph Style: Heading 1 widget. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 70748] RFE: inserting headings in to text documents
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70748 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 16 08:06:11 + 2007 --- For some reason the paragraph style - numering style has been changed from blank to none, which results in no numbering. It is however not possible at the moment to change the numbering style back to blank. Is there a possible workaround, to set the numbering style back to blank? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 70748] RFE: inserting headings in to text documents
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70748 User rbos changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'andreschnabel,fl,gercokee|'andreschnabel,fl,gercokee |s,joergwartenberg,laurentg|s,joergwartenberg,laurentg |odard,masayan,mru,ufi'|odard,masayan,mru,rbos,ufi | |' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 75686] sub document modify inform ation is overwritten by the amaster document
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75686 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 18 11:02:55 + 2007 --- @es and @os: the script that I used to remove the modify tag (from the sub doc) becomes rather complex, as I now have to take into account sub documents in different directories, as well as external images in the master document and external images in sub documents. Hence, it would be nice to know whether the solution for this bug (or is it a feature) can be made part of a upcoming OO.org release. More people start to use ODM documents over here and they want to give the credit to the people that wrote the sub documents as such the master document should not overwrite the Author information (among others) in a sub document. With the solution for this present, people will appreciate OO.org even more :)) ! - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 25072] Specification: Cross-Refer ences to Headings
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25072 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 18 20:19:09 + 2007 --- To give an idea of how important this feature is for the OO.org community have a look at this url: http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/buglist.cgi?resort=1issue_type=FEATURE;component=Word%20processor;issue_status=UNCONFIRMED;issue_status=NEW;issue_status=STARTED;issue_status=REOPENED;issue_status=RESOLVED;issue_status=VERIFIED;email1=;emailtype1=exact;emailassigned_to1=1;email2=;emailtype2=exact;emailreporter2=1;issueidtype=include;issue_id=;changedin=;votes=50;chfieldfrom=;chfieldto=;chfieldvalue=;short_desc=;short_desc_type=allwords;long_desc=;long_desc_type=allwords;issue_file_loc=;issue_file_loc_type=fulltext;status_whiteboard=;status_whiteboard_type=fulltext;keywords=;keywords_type=anytokens;field0-0-0=noop;type0-0-0=noop;value0-0-0=;newqueryname=;Submit%20query=Submit%20queryorder=issues.votes%20desc%2C%20issues.priority%2C%20issues.issue_type From this list it can be determined that the bug needs at least 5 more people to vote for this bug to make it to number 2 and 12 more to make it to the first spot. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 25072] Specification: Cross-Refer ences to Headings
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25072 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 13 07:01:14 + 2007 --- How many legislators are going to back ODF mandates when all MS has to do is say You can't write your legislation using ODF? A remark like this does not help to solve this bug (probably). Anyway, what is holding them back to use ODF? If it is this (cross referencing headings); in case of OO.org they can use a macro: http://www.ooomacros.org/user.php#113812 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 77456] main-entry-style-name cont ains 24000+ characters
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77456 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 13 12:54:32 + 2007 --- Created an attachment (id=45875) Test document for bug 77546 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 77456] main-entry-style-name cont ains 24000+ characters
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77456 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 13 13:14:26 + 2007 --- To reproduce the problem, use the attached document called test.odm - Check the precondition: # unzip -p test.odm content.xml | grep text:alphabetical-index-source - Count the number of 5f_ occurences - Open this document - Goto the navigator (F5) - In the navigator use the context mouse button, to click on the term alphabetical Index, in the resulting pop up window click select update indexes - Save the document - Check the content.xml file with: # unzip -p test.odm content.xml | grep text:alphabetical-index-source - Count the number of 5f_ occurences. There are now many more 5f's - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 78297] Empty page inserted by sty le
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78297 User rbos changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|CLOSED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID | --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 12 10:33:00 + 2007 --- Re-opening the bug report. Of course the blank page is a blank page, and that is not what this bug report is about. The problem is about the insertion of a blank page instead of inheriting the page style from the preceding page(s). BTW the solutions that you proposed are not useful, as they do not result in the expected behaviour, being that a new chapter should always start on the right (as enforced by the page characteristic 'right only'). Perhaps this is actually an enhancement request and as such the issue type should be set to enhancement? I'll attach a slighty modified version of the document, that shows what is expected. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 78297] Empty page inserted by sty le
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78297 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 12 10:35:35 + 2007 --- Created an attachment (id=45841) This document shows what the expected result. It is the same as the document with the name insert_page_prob.odt, but with a manually inserted page break. This manually inserted page break inherits the page style. That is what should happen with a 'right only' page style as well - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 78297] Empty page inserted by sty le
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78297 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 12 11:41:36 + 2007 --- Ok! ;) Pfff, fortenately you accept the report. I'm glad you did! But saying blank I was meaning real blank, exactly without any inherentence of a style because the page has no content at all (no page umber, watermark or chapter name). I just had a look at different real books and documentation which always start a new chapter at the right page and the blank page has nothing on it (no header...). I agree it's somhow surprising when working on a computer BUT it seems to be the correct way to display blank pages (with NOTHING on them) in a printed document/book. That might, and I could live with it as well, untill customers started to ask questions or made remarks about the totally blank/empty page. After that I opened this bug report. Nonetheless, forwarding as enhancement. Looking forward to have the enhancement around. I hope it can be impemented. Thanks for the support! - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 25072] Specification: Cross-Refer ences to Headings
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25072 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 10:53:18 + 2007 --- Hi OD, thank you for clarification. I understand that it is hard to predict when things will be available. I saw that OO.org-2.4 is expected to be available in September this year (2007). Does that mean that OO.org-2.0 won't be available for the coming (let's say) 12 months or so? BTW I could not find an expected release date when the spec for ODF-1.2. Is this known already? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 78297] Empty page inserted by sty le
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78297 Issue #|78297 Summary|Empty page inserted by style Component|Word processor Version|OOo 2.2 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|editing Assigned to|mru Reported by|rbos --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 11:19:55 + 2007 --- In a master document I have set that Heading 1 insert a page break. This works almost nicely. The Heading 1 style inserts a page break with a new style that has the characteristic that it always starts on the right page (paragraph style window - text flow: [x] insert type [page] position [before] [x] with page style [new chapter] page number [0]) The New Chapter style has only right page set. This works fine when a preceding chapter ends on a right page, an empty page is inserted and the new chapter starts on the right page as desired. The problem is with the empty inserted page. The pages preceding the empty page have a header, footer and background watermark text that are not printed on the empty page. It seems that the inserted page does not have a style attached to it. The workaround that is now used is to insert a manual page break so there is no need for OO.org to insert an additional page. But this is really a workaround not as how one would expect this feature to work. See for a discussion about this at the openoffice-users emaillist. This http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.openoffice.questions/153836 is a link to the beginnin of the (restarted discussion). - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 78297] Empty page inserted by sty le
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78297 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 19:50:43 + 2007 --- Created an attachment (id=45816) The document shows that page 2 is just an empty page - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 78297] Empty page inserted by sty le
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78297 User rbos changed the following: What|Old value |New value Keywords|needmoreinfo | --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 19:53:21 + 2007 --- Information provided, it should be clear with the provided example document if not please let me know! - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 25072] Specification: Cross-Refer ences to Headings
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25072 User rbos changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'auberger,brozen,bulbul,eb|'auberger,brozen,bulbul,eb |erlein,es,fl,guzzi333,pasc|erlein,es,fl,guzzi333,pasc |2001,pieterwolters,pmike,s|2001,pieterwolters,pmike,r |forbes,troy_rollo,ufi,wisw|bos,sforbes,troy_rollo,ufi |aud' |,wiswaud' --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 7 18:55:59 + 2007 --- According to note date Oct 5 16:36:16 + 2006 the target for this feature/bug is OO.org-2.2 (New target for this feature is now OOo 2.2!) As OO.org-2.2 has been released, it seems this functionality did not make it into 2.2. Is there an idea when this important functionality will be available in OO.org? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 77456] main-entry-style-name cont ains 24000+ characters
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77456 Issue #|77456 Summary|main-entry-style-name contains 24000+ characters Component|Word processor Version|OOo 2.2 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|editing Assigned to|mru Reported by|rbos --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 17 10:40:27 + 2007 --- When I unpack my ODT document there is a very, very long line containing ove 24000 characters. The value is _5f and it is repeated many many times. I assume that this is wrong. This is in the content.xml file and the tag text:alphabetical-index-source, Below a detailed copy of the offending line: tmp grep -R Main_5f * | sed 's/\(Main\).*_\(entry\)/\1...\2/' content.xml:text:alphabetical-index-source text:main-entry-style-name=Main...entry text:sort-algorithm=alphanumeric fo:language=nl fo:country=NL The value Main...entry is shortened by me and looks actually something like: text:main-entry-style-name=Main_5f_5f_5f_5f_5f_5f_5f_5f_5f_5f_5f_5f_5f_5f_5f_5f etc etc 8000x times! The only other file with 5f in it, is styles.xml: styles.xml: style:style style:name=Table_5f_text style:display-name=Table_text style:family=paragraph style:parent-style-name=Standard style:master-page-name= A similar bug is available at: Look at http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56518 but this one is closed and I have still the issue. The documents are mostly editted on MS XP with OOorg-2.2 Document is created from scratch. The document is a master document (.odm). - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 77456] main-entry-style-name cont ains 24000+ characters
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77456 User rbos changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|CLOSED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|DUPLICATE | --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 17 13:46:54 + 2007 --- I can't agree with the 'resolved/closed'' status. Issue 56518 was closed at 27 Oct 2005. That's actually years before I started to create my documents. If #56518 really solved the _5f problem, I would expect that my documents won't show the _5f_5f problem. I followed this logic, when opening this issue. I know how to repair the document(s), as that is explained in #56518 and because I do similar operations on my documents throughout he day. Because of this flexibility I use ODT and is the reason I discovered the _5f_5f line. Please, explain how this problem is fixed while it occured a long time after #56518 has been resolved and closed. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 77456] main-entry-style-name cont ains 24000+ characters
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77456 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 17 15:00:40 + 2007 --- The problem still exists and it is probably only valid for master documents. The problem can be easily reproduced: === Before repair === text:alphabetical-index-source text:main-entry-style-name=Main_5f_5f_5f_entry text:sort-algorithm=alphanumeric fo:language=nl fo:country=NL updating: content.xml (deflated 90%) === After repair === text:alphabetical-index-source text:main-entry-style-name=Main_5f_entry text:sort-algorithm=alphanumeric fo:language=nl fo:country=NL [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/svn/svn oowriter test.odm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/svn/svn ./rm_5f === Before repair === text:alphabetical-index-source text:main-entry-style-name=Main_5f_5f_5f_entry text:sort-algorithm=alphanumeric fo:language=nl fo:country=NL updating: content.xml (deflated 90%) === After repair === text:alphabetical-index-source text:main-entry-style-name=Main_5f_entry text:sort-algorithm=alphanumeric fo:language=nl fo:country=NL The rm_5f script contains: cat rm_5f unzip -p test.odm content.xml content.xml echo === Before repair === grep main-entry-style-name= content.xml sed -i 's/main-entry-style-name=\Main.*_entry\ \(.*\)/main-entry-style-name=\Main_5f_entry\ \1/' content.xml zip test.odm content.xml echo === After repair === unzip -p test.odm content.xml | grep main-entry-style-name= - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 7626] Alter Compare Documents t o work for a Master Documents???
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7626 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 17 15:07:57 + 2007 --- Would it be possible to make 'compare documents' work for Master documents? Master documents are just like regular text documents (.odt), but with the ability to pull in sub documents (.odt files). The text in master documents can change, and it would be very good to have the possibility to see what changed. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 7626] Alter Compare Documents t o work for a Master Documents???
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7626 User rbos changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'cornouws,prgmgr' |'cornouws,prgmgr,rbos' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 75686] sub document modify inform ation is overwritten by the amaster document
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75686 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 27 08:19:56 + 2007 --- Work around: set the mdified field as fixed in the sub document. That does not work as the next time someone modifies the (sub) document the modify information is _not_ updated as it is set to fixed (at least I assume that the modify information is not updated). This workaround does therefor not work. The only workaround is, to process the sub document before it is read in by the master document - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 75686] sub document modify inform ation is overwritten by the amaster document
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75686 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 26 10:44:46 + 2007 --- Perhaps it is possible to remove the tags that refer to the modification settings (like text:modification-date.* and text:creator) upon reading in the sub document. The current clumsy workaround I have now is to process all the sub documents and have those tags removed from the (a copy of) sub document. Would it possible to have bug fixed in OOorg-2.2? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 75686] sub document modify inform ation is overwritten by the amaster document
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75686 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 26 19:25:30 + 2007 --- kpalagin: I'm very much aware that all bugs are equal. I respect that, hence I did not not raise the priority of this one and I asked for some attention for this bug in the comment field and not via a priority setting. The compelling reason why this is an important for me (actually us) is, that we based our software test process on the modification date of an individual test. An individual test is stored as a document and this makes it a sub document of a master document. We want to know what test version is used, during testing so during testing the test (sub document) the test modification date is recorded (written down). The test version = the modification date. Now when the same test is re-used later it is possible to determine whether the test has been updated. This can clarify changes in test results... As I want other people in this (MS indoctrinated) company to use the same process, it should be trivial to load the correctt sub documents into the master document. With the current bug this is not trivial at all. One has to process the individual tests and have the right tags removed from the tests. One has to install e.g. cygwin for this, or has to ship the tests to another system and have the processing done over there With the bug solved, it is just a matter of loading the master document. AFAIK the competition does not have this functionality, if is has this functionality it's in an almost broken state ;) In short to be able to sell our current testplan concept to others in an MS oriented shop it would be very supportive to have this bug fixed, I hope that this is compelling enough! - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 75730] Table properties of subdoc ument are changeable
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75730 Issue #|75730 Summary|Table properties of subdocument are changeable Component|Word processor Version|OOo 2.1 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|Linux Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|editing Assigned to|mru Reported by|rbos --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 25 21:28:51 + 2007 --- Table in subdocument pulled in by a master document: On table with mouse, use context mouse button - table properties. Check for example repeat table header on next page. This seems to be accepted, but it isn't! As the table is part of a sub document. Sub documents are most of the times readonly and as such the table properties can not be changed. The prove of the pudding is that the text inside the table can not be changed. At least oowriter tells me via a warning/error that the text is readonly - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 75534] After inserting frame, cou ld only write inside frame when pressing enter to deselect
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75534 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 20 20:42:52 + 2007 --- This afternoon I actually discovered why I had problems with this at all: - Even knowing now, how to get text inside a frame (with ESC, enter, in and outside clicking frame, etc) I was just not able to get text inside the frame in a certain document. It's the same document I worked yesterday, that resulted in this bug report. It's an existing .odm document. Actually the page that should have the frame is the frontpage, which already contains 3 pictures. Perhaps they are in the way of the new (text) frame? I believe without this problem, I should have been able to get text inside the frame.. Now is this not being able at all to get some text in a frame a (new) bug. I don't have an example document, and as long as I don't have that, I won't create a bug report. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 75534] After inserting frame, cou ld not write inside frame
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75534 Issue #|75534 Summary|After inserting frame, could not write inside frame Component|Word processor Version|OOo 2.1 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|editing Assigned to|mru Reported by|rbos --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 19 20:29:58 + 2007 --- I had a problem with inserting text into a newly created frame. I asked how to do it on the users@openoffice.org email list how to do it. Here is the transcript: From the users@openoffice.org email list: I want to use a frame to center text on the very middle of a page. I performed: Insert - Frame, in the resulting frame I want to put some text, but this is not possible. Is there a special reason that this is not possible, should I enable something to allow text in the frame? This is with OO.org writer-2.1 on MS XP. The trick is: click beside the frame and then inside the frame. Maybe this is worth a request for enhancement, so that the focus is directly inside a frame when is is created? NB When a frame (or graphic, or object) is selected and you press ESC, the selection is ended and the cursor goes to the text beside it. It would be more intuitive when the frame would allow editing right away. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 75534] After inserting frame, cou ld not write inside frame
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75534 User rbos changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|CLOSED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|WORKSFORME| --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 19 21:20:32 + 2007 --- I don't agree with the solution and worksforme mark. I'm a rather experienced computer user, and I don't care much what application to use, as most of them do what I expect them to do. In this case, this wasn't the case. It is not intuitive to start typing with enter in a frame... It should be sufficient to start with a character to get frame focus. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 75280] Opening documents with web dav fails
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75280 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 11 19:46:41 + 2007 --- Just checked what oowriter does after having booted the system. It still does not open the document... BTW: I use konqueror as webbrowser. This browser is capable of using the protocol webdav, like: webdav://localhost/webdav This than shows the webdav directory as a real directory, where files can be created, renamed, etc and folders can be made. Firefox can be used with the http protocol. The same protocol is used by oowriter. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 75280] Opening documents with web dav fails
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75280 Issue #|75280 Summary|Opening documents with webdav fails Component|Word processor Version|OOo 2.1 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|Linux Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|open-import Assigned to|mru Reported by|rbos --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 10 22:40:02 + 2007 --- I experimented a bit with oowriter in combination with webdav and it is not without problems :( The very first time a document is opened (after the system has been booted), usinga webdav repository the document is opened succesfully. Subsequent request to open the document are not honered :( Oowriter flash is shown, but the editor not. This is on an openSUSE-10.2 system using oowriter-2.1 The webdav repository is constructed with apache as described at: http://en.opensuse.org/Webdav The same setup has been tried on another system (and network) with the same results. Not only that, I tried it with oowriter on MS XP and that was even worse :( Trying to open the webdav directory in MS' file explorer did not work. So at least in openSUSE-10.2 oowriter opens the document the very first time, (after enquering for the webdav login and password). The subsequent requests fail. Don't remember what happens with the save action, have to reboot to find out... I than mounted the webdav repository with wdfs, in this case oowriter opens the document succesfully. But saving the document results in a save error and the wbfs mount is broken (it needs to be unmounted and mounted again, to be usefull). The prove of the pudding: everything described above works flawlessly with kword... I'm really looking forward to see webdav working smoothly in oowriter! - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 16211] second level headings in p age header
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=16211 User rbos changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'evdm,fl' |'evdm,fl,rbos' --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 22 10:56:03 + 2007 --- I hope you don't mind asking me the following: what is the status of this issue? It seems about to me finished, at least that is what I conclude from the commands: === --- Additional comments from liz Tue Jul 26 15:40:24 + 2005 --- string review done. Coming via mail. Returning issue to you for reassigning for implementation because it is not a plain string review issue and I don't want it to get lost/untracked --- Additional comments from es Fri Sep 30 12:17:22 + 2005 --- ES-AMA: as discussed, please keep this task until we come to implement it. === Last update concerning code seem around sep 2005. Is there any possibility to have this enhancement in OO.org-2.2 or 2.3? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 74264] Part of table disappears w hen table settings is apllied
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74264 Issue #|74264 Summary|Part of table disappears when table settings is apllie |d Component|Word processor Version|OOo 2.1 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|formatting Assigned to|mru Reported by|rbos --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 7 13:28:42 + 2007 --- - Open attached document - With the cursor on the table, use right mouse button (RMB) and select table - Unselect : allow row to break across pages and columns click OK It looks like nothing is happening, but the 2nd page of document is gone. - Save the document (^s) and quite the document - Open the document, all is fine now. Second part of the table is now located on the second page as expected. The bug is that the document needs to be saved, quit and re-opened to obtain the right view of document. It should not be necessarry to quite the wordprocessor. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 74264] Part of table disappears w hen table settings is apllied
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74264 User rbos changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment data| |Created an attachment (id= | |42825) Test document to be | | used to debug table probl | |em --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 7 13:30:09 + 2007 --- Created an attachment (id=42825) Test document to be used to debug table problem - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 74281] Table from sub doc not cor rectly seperated in master doc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74281 Issue #|74281 Summary|Table from sub doc not correctly seperated in master d |oc Component|Word processor Version|OOo 2.1 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|formatting Assigned to|mru Reported by|rbos --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 7 15:58:45 + 2007 --- A table is not finished correctly in a master document with footers when the table just fits on a page in a sub document (without footers). A part of the table is hidden behind the footer. Hopefully the attached master document and sub document shows the issue clearly. - Open the master document - Say yes to update links - Go to page 4 and discover that step 15 is missing (14 is only shown partly). The same table is shown correctly in the sub document... When the header and the footer are switch off, the table is shown correctly. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 74281] Table from sub doc not cor rectly seperated in master doc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74281 User rbos changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment data| |Created an attachment (id= | |42830) Master document to | |show the problem --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 7 15:59:38 + 2007 --- Created an attachment (id=42830) Master document to show the problem - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 74281] Table from sub doc not cor rectly seperated in master doc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74281 User rbos changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment data| |Created an attachment (id= | |42831) Sub document to sho | |w the issue --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 7 16:00:08 + 2007 --- Created an attachment (id=42831) Sub document to show the issue - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 50818] Masterdocument - Include d ocuments in reverse order
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50818 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 20 07:06:03 -0800 2006 --- I run into a very similar problem. I insert some (sub)documents into my master document and after insertion the 1st subdocument becomes the last one! Of course I checked the order in which the subdocuments are selected and they are in the right (alphabetic) order. The documents are sorted alphabetically, and are all called very similar like: bf1030, bf1034, bf1035 and bf1039. After insertion the order is: bf1034, bf1035, bf103 and bf1030. I hope this information helps to find the root cause of the problem. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 72742] Cursor in navigator should stay at same place after text insertion
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72742 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 20 07:12:13 -0800 2006 --- This one #58963 perhaps. It's not the same, but looks similar. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 72742] Cursor in navigator should stay at same place after text insertion
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72742 Issue #|72742 Summary|Cursor in navigator should stay at same place after te |xt insertion Component|Word processor Version|OOo 2.1 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|editing Assigned to|mru Reported by|rbos --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 19 01:29:16 -0800 2006 --- I'm editing a master document with many subdocuments. As such the navigator (F5) is a very long list. After a text is inserted via one of subdocuments located close to the bottom of the long list in the navigator, the cursor jumps to the top of the list. This is rather uncomfortable is the next action for me is again at the bottom of the such. As such after each (text) insert action I have to scroll down to the bottom of the list. It looks natural to me that the cursor remains at the position where the action occured. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[graphics-issues] [Issue 72417] rotated text not rotated i n ooimpress presentation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72417 Issue #|72417 Summary|rotated text not rotated in ooimpress presentation Component|Presentation Version|OOo 2.0.4 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|Linux Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|viewing Assigned to|wg Reported by|rbos --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 8 11:29:57 -0800 2006 --- There is a problem with rotated text in ooimpress when the later is in presentation mode (F5)! See attached example document. It happens on kubuntu with OO 2.0.4 but not on my SuSE with OO 2.0.0. The problem can also be reproduced in OO by creating a text object and then using Format-Position and Size-Rotation and setting Angle to 180. Press F5 and the problem shows. So it is definitely a OO bug. (problem has been at kde first: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138513) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[graphics-issues] [Issue 72417] rotated text not rotated i n ooimpress presentation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72417 User rbos changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment data| |Created an attachment (id= | |41276) Example document (r | |otated text not rotated du | |ring presentation) --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 8 11:31:44 -0800 2006 --- Created an attachment (id=41276) Example document (rotated text not rotated during presentation) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
