[sc-issues] [Issue 40309] Addin: BESSELJ function re turns slightly bad values
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40309 User kla changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED --- Additional comments from k...@openoffice.org Mon Jun 14 11:56:38 + 2010 --- No relative error anymore. Seen ok in cws calc55 - verified - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 40309] Addin: BESSELJ function re turns slightly bad values
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40309 User er changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|er|oc --- Additional comments from e...@openoffice.org Tue Jun 8 13:13:21 + 2010 --- Reassigning to QA for verification. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 40309] Addin: BESSELJ function re turns slightly bad values
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40309 User er changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|oc|kla --- Additional comments from e...@openoffice.org Tue Jun 8 13:15:47 + 2010 --- To 'kla'. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 40309] Addin: BESSELJ function re turns slightly bad values
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40309 User er changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Additional comments from e...@openoffice.org Mon Jun 7 14:29:26 + 2010 --- In cws calc55: changeset e6c998f166d9 http://hg.services.openoffice.org/cws/calc55/changeset/e6c998f166d9 M offapi/com/sun/star/sheet/makefile.mk M sc/source/core/tool/addincol.cxx M scaddins/source/analysis/analysis.cxx M scaddins/source/analysis/analysis.hxx M scaddins/source/analysis/analysisadd.idl M scaddins/source/analysis/analysisdefs.hxx M scaddins/source/analysis/bessel.cxx M scaddins/source/analysis/bessel.hxx M scaddins/source/analysis/makefile.mk A offapi/com/sun/star/sheet/NoConvergenceException.idl You can observe the progress and possible integration date of CWS calc55 at http://tools.services.openoffice.org/EIS2/cws.ShowCWS?Path=DEV300%2Fcalc55 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 40309] Addin: BESSELJ function re turns slightly bad values
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40309 User er changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|dr|er Status|STARTED |NEW --- Additional comments from e...@openoffice.org Tue Jun 1 11:02:15 + 2010 --- Taking over. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 40309] Addin: BESSELJ function re turns slightly bad values
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40309 User er changed the following: What|Old value |New value Target milestone|OOo Later |OOo 3.3 --- Additional comments from e...@openoffice.org Fri Sep 11 10:00:48 + 2009 --- Retargeting to OOo3.3 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 40309] Addin: BESSELJ function re turns slightly bad values
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40309 User er changed the following: What|Old value |New value Issue type|DEFECT|PATCH --- Additional comments from e...@openoffice.org Mon Sep 7 16:15:19 + 2009 --- Any reason why this issue is still targeted to OOoLater? I guess it's just forgotten, correct? @regina: when attaching patches to an issue please change the issue type to PATCH so that it will stick out in queries. Thanks Eike - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 40309] Addin: BESSELJ function re turns slightly bad values
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40309 --- Additional comments from reg...@openoffice.org Mon Sep 7 16:44:47 + 2009 --- @Eike:change the issue type to PATCH so that it will stick out in queries. You are right, I missed that. The Bessel-function solutions (here and issues 43040 and 31656) are usable, so that they can be integrated. But I don't know, if there can be a solution using the boost library in the foreseeable future and I don't know if such solutions would be better in performance and/or accuracy. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 40309] Addin: BESSELJ function re turns slightly bad values
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40309 User regina changed the following: What|Old value |New value OtherIssuesDependingOnTh|103458|31656,103458 is| | - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 40309] Addin: BESSELJ function re turns slightly bad values
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40309 User er changed the following: What|Old value |New value OtherIssuesDependingOnTh| |103458 is| | - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 40309] Addin: BESSELJ function re turns slightly bad values
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40309 --- Additional comments from reg...@openoffice.org Fri Jul 10 17:16:51 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=63466) idl-file for new exception and patches to sc, scaddins and offapi - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 40309] Addin: BESSELJ function re turns slightly bad values
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40309 --- Additional comments from reg...@openoffice.org Fri Jul 10 17:18:54 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=63467) Testcase in normal range, which show the current bad results near x=30 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 40309] Addin: BESSELJ function re turns slightly bad values
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40309 --- Additional comments from reg...@openoffice.org Fri Jul 10 17:20:00 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=63468) Extreme values with correct results calculated with MuPad - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 40309] Addin: BESSELJ function re turns slightly bad values
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40309 --- Additional comments from reg...@openoffice.org Fri Jul 10 17:50:52 + 2009 --- Hi Eike, the file NoConvergenceException.idl has no $..$ parameters in the license part. I don't know whether they are generated automatically. If not, please add the parameters. The file is not inside a patch, because TortoiseSVN does not include it, when generating the patch of odffapi, but I have sent it here as I have used it. The document 'Test cases with comparison to MuPad' has comments, why some results are not as accurate as one expects. The document 'Test cases relative error and graph' has in column D the difference in digits, relative to the last one. It has conditional formatting to show how accurate the result is. In the charts the black line for BesselJ should be the same as the blue line for MuPad. Open it in OOo3.1 to see how wrong the results are and compare it with the new algorithm. (Don't forget to refresh the charts.) Besides the things mentioned in the mail thread, I have changed the file analysisadd.idl too and added the new exception in the raises list of the getBessel* functions and add an #ifndef part. I hope I got it right. In the current version the case to large arguments to start the loopx not large enough over N to use asymptotic in line 100 in bessel.cxx throws the NoConvergenceException. If you think an unspecific RuntimeException would be more adequate, please change it. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 40309] Addin: BESSELJ function re turns slightly bad values
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40309 User regina changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'regina' |'er,regina' --- Additional comments from reg...@openoffice.org Sat Jul 4 21:26:25 + 2009 --- Hi Eike, this patch is only a draft, but you need it to understand my questions. The algorithm itself is finished, but I need some advise how to handle exceptions. One exception occurs, when neither the normal algorithm nor the asymptotic formula can be used, in the draft the line return 888.88; // throw total loss of accuracy The other exception is, when the algorithm does not converge in the fMaxIteration steps. I think, that this will not happen, because I estimate the iterations at the beginning, but I have no proof. It is at the end the line return 999.99; // throw no convergence - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 40309] Addin: BESSELJ function re turns slightly bad values
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40309 --- Additional comments from reg...@openoffice.org Sat Jul 4 21:29:00 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=63363) draft patch, please try it, especially whether the performance is OK for you - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 40309] Addin: BESSELJ function re turns slightly bad values
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40309 User regina changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|''|'regina' --- Additional comments from reg...@openoffice.org Sun Jun 28 17:00:09 + 2009 --- There problem is more severe than it sounds here. I have taken the test file from issue 9134 and add the relative error. You can see, that the values for x30 and greater order are invalid. The used asymptotic formula is only valid, if x is much larger then order^2. On the other hand, the algorithm which is used for x=30 is invalid for large order for larger x too. I'll discuss the problem on d...@sc.openoffice.org. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 40309] Addin: BESSELJ function re turns slightly bad values
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40309 --- Additional comments from reg...@openoffice.org Sun Jun 28 17:01:28 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=63258) relative error for BESSELJ - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
