[sc-issues] [Issue 84934] ODFF: DAYS360 compliance
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84934 User oc changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 17 09:22:32 + 2008 --- closed because fix available in builds OOO300_m9 and DEV300_m33 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 84934] ODFF: DAYS360 compliance
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84934 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 11 11:16:08 + 2008 --- The number of days Excel returns in this constellation actually depends on two factors: - Whether it is a leap year. - The method given as a 3rd argument to DAYS360. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 84934] ODFF: DAYS360 compliance
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84934 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 11 11:19:50 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=55697) test case illustrating some Feb-28 behavior - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 84934] ODFF: DAYS360 compliance
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84934 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 7 21:40:11 + 2008 --- Adding a MS reference to this issue: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/916004 When you use the DAYS360 function to calculate the number of days between two dates, an unexpected value is returned. The article continues: when you use the DAYS360 function with a start date of February 28 and with an end date of March 28, a value of 28 days is returned. You expect a value of 30 days to be returned for every full month. and I point out that you do actually expect 28 days, not 30. Possibly MS are aware of their bug, but their authors have not explained it properly. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 84934] ODFF: DAYS360 compliance
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84934 User oc changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 4 12:35:26 + 2008 --- verified in internal build cws_odff3 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 84934] ODFF: DAYS360 compliance
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84934 User er changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|er|oc --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 9 16:59:18 + 2008 --- Reassigning to QA for verification. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 84934] ODFF: DAYS360 compliance
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84934 User er changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Subcomponent|code |programming --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 11 19:29:30 + 2008 --- In cws odff03: sc/source/core/tool/interpr2.cxx 1.35.20.1 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 84934] ODFF: DAYS360 compliance
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84934 User fst changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|spreadsheet |er --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 9 15:17:17 + 2008 --- Hi Eike, seems to be yours. Frank - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 84934] ODFF: DAYS360 compliance
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84934 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 9 15:40:22 + 2008 --- Eike, I could give you a diff file for this, but I don't have a CVS acct to give you a cvs diff, so why don't just leave this to you. It's interpr2.cxx:336, change as above. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 84934] ODFF: DAYS360 compliance
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84934 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 9 17:37:35 + 2008 --- No problem with a one line change like the one above. However, to produce a cvs diff -pu you don't need a CVS account, anoncvs does as well, check out sources using cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs ... Are you sure that change doesn't break the other !bFlag case? I didn't check yet. Regarding parameter 3. At the moment it is a boolean. Why not allow an integer argment also. Hence False = 0 = 30/360 Excel True = -1,1 = 30E/360 2= 30/360 SIA compliant. That wouldn't do. While zero is interpreted as False, any other value than zero is interpreted as True. Overloading that in future versions could break already existing documents that don't care if True is 1 or some other value than 0, e.g. as a result of an expression. ANother thing: there once was a reference document SMD_Fields_030802.pdf publicly available at some financial services provider or so that claimed the Excel method was called PSA 30 or NASD 30, and Excel was the only application implementing that. Unfortunately the document isn't available anymore. Do you happen to know if that is some official name, or whether there are public references one could point to? Thanks Eike - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 84934] ODFF: DAYS360 compliance
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84934 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 9 22:22:31 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=50766) Ditto + 3 extra sheets givien 30E/360 test vectors + validation delta - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 84934] ODFF: DAYS360 compliance
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84934 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 9 22:39:59 + 2008 --- However, to produce a cvs diff -pu you don't need a CVS account, anoncvs does as well, check out sources using cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs ... Thanks, I should have thought about anoncvs. This gives enough to google up some references. Are you sure that change doesn't break the other !bFlag case? I didn't check yet. No this guard condition is to do the flip *ONLY* if true. It therefore leaves the true case unchanged. Trust but verify I've added the extra 30E/360 check in the test spreadsheet to cover this one explicitly. The TRUE option used to and still works. ... parameter 3. ... That wouldn't do. While zero is interpreted as False, any other value than zero is interpreted as True. Fine, your the chief engineer for this module. ANother thing: there once was a reference document SMD_Fields_030802.pdf publicly available at some financial services provider or so that claimed the Excel method was called PSA 30 or NASD 30, and Excel was the only application implementing that. Unfortunately the document isn't available anymore. Do you happen to know if that is some official name, or whether there are public references one could point to? No primary references. These still seem to be in paper form only. Google wiki 360 day calendar. I updated the Wikipedia article, and in researching ths came across two good secondary refs: http://www.financialcad.com/support/developerfunc/mathref/Daycount.htm http://www.sifma.org/services/publications/calculations-method-volume2.shtml - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 84934] ODFF: DAYS360 compliance
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84934 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 6 18:51:26 + 2008 --- Here's the patch which makes Calc 100% compatible with Excel on this one: sc/source/core/tool/interpr2.cxx line 335 if (nDate2 nDate1) if (bFlag (nDate2 nDate1)) Tested on my OOo 2.2.1 sandpit, but I don't think module this was changed in 2.3 or 2.3.1 so this same patch should apply. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 84934] ODFF: DAYS360 compliance
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84934 User kpalagin changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'kpalagin'|'er,kpalagin' Issue type|TASK |PATCH --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 6 20:22:35 + 2008 --- terrye, I am not sure if you need to file Joint Copyright Agreement and attach .patch file for one-liner, but suggest doing so to speed-up acceptance of this change. I am also CCing Eike Rathke, project lead for Calc. Thanks for your effort! - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 84934] ODFF: DAYS360 compliance
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84934 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 7 00:09:52 + 2008 --- Already signed the JPA, as this isn't my first fix. I'll submit the patch. One for er to ponder, one way of retaining Excel compatability for this function, plus allowing a 30/360 SIA compliant option would be to over load parameter 3. At the moment it is a boolean. Why not allow an integer argment also. Hence False = 0 = 30/360 Excel True = -1,1 = 30E/360 2= 30/360 SIA compliant. Clearly export to XLS should map arg 3 back to T/F so you lose compliance. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 84934] ODFF: DAYS360 compliance
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84934 User er changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'er,kpalagin' |'kpalagin' Assigned to|spreadsheet |er Ever confirmed| |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Issue type|DEFECT|TASK OS/Version|Windows XP|All Summary|Bug in DAYS360 Algo |ODFF: DAYS360 compliance Target milestone|--- |OOo 3.0 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 3 12:54:46 + 2008 --- Interesting. Needs further investigation, also relevant for ODFF spec. Might also be interesting to compare with older Excel97 implementation to see if anything changed. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 84934] ODFF: DAYS360 compliance
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84934 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 3 14:04:23 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=50643) Version 2 of test cases - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 84934] ODFF: DAYS360 compliance
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84934 User terrye changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|er|spreadsheet --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 3 13:59:37 + 2008 --- kpalagin, I have updated the ODS to V2 to do the extra comparison, This includes the following sheets which evaluate this function for a 36x36 test vector: ExcelEvaluated on Excel 2003 Calc Evaluated on Calc 2.3.1 USDays360Basic implementation of 30/360 (SIA) algo ExDays360Basic implementation of the Excel algo CalcAlgo360 Basic implementation of the Calc algo DiffExcelCalcExcel-Calc Delta DiffExcelUSDays360 Excel-30/360 Delta DiffCalcUSDays360Calc-30/360 Delta DiffExcelExDays360 Excel-Its Basic Implementation Delta(==0) DiffCalcCalcAlgo360 Calc-Its Basic Implementation Delta(==0) Ignore my last post of Wed Jan 2 15:27:10. I had a mind fart. The algorithm is for two dates A,B where AB. Excel gets dates wrong when comparing last days of leap-years. In the defined range Calc and Excel agree, so calc also gets it wrong. Also Microsoft has preserve this same bug since Excel 97 to ensure calculation compatibility. Where they DO differ is in the case where AB, in that neither error but instead adopt different conventions: Calc flips the algo about the origin so DAYS360(A,B)=-DAYS360(B,A) and Excel just extrapolates (meaninglessly) backwards so that the two randomly differ by up to 2 days. The point is that users may use DAYS360 outside of its strict use in actuarial calcs and win such cases we might get AB. In such cases loading a working (that is doing what the user thinks is OK) spreadsheet into Calc will give different results. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
