[sw-issues] [Issue 112937] linguistic: automigrate u ser dictionaries to latest version on save ?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112937 User sba changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED --- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Tue Nov 16 15:19:05 + 2010 --- OK in DEV300_m93. Closed. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 112937] linguistic: automigrate u ser dictionaries to latest version on save ?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112937 User sba changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED --- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Fri Sep 24 10:04:31 + 2010 --- Verified in CWS tl82. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 112937] linguistic: automigrate u ser dictionaries to latest version on save ?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112937 User es changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|es|sba --- Additional comments from e...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 23 11:44:28 + 2010 --- Reassigned to SBA - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 112937] linguistic: automigrate u ser dictionaries to latest version on save ?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112937 User tl changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|tl|es --- Additional comments from t...@openoffice.org Mon Sep 13 07:32:33 + 2010 --- tl-es: please verify. Thanks! (You probably need to ask me on how to verify this one though.) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 112937] linguistic: automigrate u ser dictionaries to latest version on save ?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112937 --- Additional comments from t...@openoffice.org Wed Jul 7 06:29:12 + 2010 --- Created an attachment (id=70428) Adding a broken standard.dic as reference for testing - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 112937] linguistic: automigrate u ser dictionaries to latest version on save ?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112937 User tl changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|STARTED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Target milestone|--- |OOo 3.4 --- Additional comments from t...@openoffice.org Wed Jul 7 07:41:52 + 2010 --- Fixed in CWS tl82. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 112937] linguistic: automigrate u ser dictionaries to latest version on save ?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112937 User tl changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|''|'fl,sba' --- Additional comments from t...@openoffice.org Tue Jul 6 07:35:46 + 2010 --- tl-cmc: when you mean format 2 do you mean: static const sal_Char* pVerStr2 = WBSWG2; static const INT16 DIC_VERSION_2 = 2; That's pretty old! I've never seen one of those, it's even way before SO5 that this format should have been in use. I seriously doubt that anyone has dictionaries really this old. Also if it were created by SO/OOo anyone who would have entered words with the incorrect encoding should have immediately noticed that those words don't work (with that type of dictionary format). I wonder if that dictionary was created by some private property dictionary creating program/macro. There are a few of them around. On the other hand it is perfectly possible to 'silently' convert all older format dictionaries to the user-readable UTF-8 format. That would be fine with me. But if we do such a code change it better be right at the beginning at the OOO 3.4 code line than 'just before the release'. If I recall correctly I asked a similar question when the also UTF-8 based static const INT16 DIC_VERSION_6 = 6; format was introduced (SO6?) and at that time some silent automatic conversion was not favored. I was told that this should be done upon migration with the next major release. tl-fl,sba: I would be fine with doing it now and silently upon next save (provided we do it early in the new code line), but what do you think about this? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 112937] linguistic: automigrate u ser dictionaries to latest version on save ?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112937 --- Additional comments from c...@openoffice.org Tue Jul 6 07:53:03 + 2010 --- Yup WBSWG2, really :-) Re: I seriously doubt that anyone has dictionaries really this old. They definitely definitely do, I was sent it just yesterday :-) Anyone who would have entered words with the incorrect encoding should have immediately noticed that those words don't work Yes, they noticed immediately, and were baffled. I wonder if that dictionary was created by some private property dictionary What I think might have happened is that the basis for the dictionary might have been one if the ones that were shipped with OOo itself, i.e. examine our standard.dic. In DEV300_m84 $ strings extras/source/wordbook/standard.dic | head -n 1 WBSWG2 so our standard.dic is still in that format, so if it was copied/reused as the basis for a new wordbook then it stays stuck at that version. A related task I guess should be to convert our existing wordbook .dics in extras to the latest format, which as an aside would make them easier to handle/browse in mercurial. If we do such a code change it better be right at the beginning at the OOO 3.4 code line than 'just before the release' Oh definitely, I've left the target intentionally blank, up to someone else to decide the target, 3.4 would seem a natural one. I was told that this should be done upon migration with the next major release. Stuffing an automigrate into e.g. the desktop upgrade feature would likely only affect whatever wordbooks were in ~/.openoffice.org at the time of upgrade and not handle old-format wordbooks that get copied in after an upgrade from other sources. Always saving as OOoUserDict1 version would avoid anything like that. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 112937] linguistic: automigrate u ser dictionaries to latest version on save ?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112937 --- Additional comments from t...@openoffice.org Tue Jul 6 08:02:02 + 2010 --- tl-cmc: about standard.dic in DEV300_m84: *ouch* that's a bummer, especially since that dictionary needs not be part of the installation, because ages ago I already wrote code to create that on the fly if it does not exist. And that way it would have always been in the current format. :-( - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 112937] linguistic: automigrate u ser dictionaries to latest version on save ?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112937 --- Additional comments from t...@openoffice.org Tue Jul 6 08:28:09 + 2010 --- I have now submitted issue 112962 for getting rid of standard.dic and converting the existing dictionaries. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 112937] linguistic: automigrate u ser dictionaries to latest version on save
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112937 User sba changed the following: What|Old value |New value Summary|linguistic: automigrate us|linguistic: automigrate us |er dictionaries to latest |er dictionaries to latest |version on save ? |version on save Target milestone|--- |OOo 3.4 --- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Tue Jul 6 12:06:41 + 2010 --- Sounds like a reasonable and not too dangerous enhancement to me. Set target to OOo 3.4. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 112937] linguistic: automigrate u ser dictionaries to latest version on save ?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112937 User tl changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|NEW |STARTED Summary|linguistic: automigrate us|linguistic: automigrate us |er dictionaries to latest |er dictionaries to latest |version on save |version on save ? Target milestone|OOo 3.4 |--- --- Additional comments from t...@openoffice.org Tue Jul 6 12:17:50 + 2010 --- . - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 112937] linguistic: automigrate u ser dictionaries to latest version on save ?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112937 Issue #|112937 Summary|linguistic: automigrate user dictionaries to latest ve |rsion on save ? Component|Word processor Version|DEV300m84 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|Linux Status|NEW Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|PATCH Priority|P3 Subcomponent|code Assigned to|tl Reported by|cmc --- Additional comments from c...@openoffice.org Mon Jul 5 14:04:49 + 2010 --- I was talking to someone recently, and they were complaining about their user dictionary not working. When I looked at it I saw that it was a format 2 dictionary and all the words in it were simply comprised of ? question marks. What I think happened was that they had an old blank personal dictionary stuck at format 2 and when they added words to it, it stayed in format 2, but they were trying to add Yiddish words to it and they couldn't be saved in the old limited encoding mechanism of the older format and so they ended up with junk. Would it make sense to auto migrate user dictionaries to the latest format when they are saved ?, that would avoid this sort of thing happening. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 112937] linguistic: automigrate u ser dictionaries to latest version on save ?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112937 User cmc changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment is patch| |Created an attachment (id= | |70393) like so, maybe --- Additional comments from c...@openoffice.org Mon Jul 5 14:05:43 + 2010 --- Created an attachment (id=70393) like so, maybe - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
