[alto] WGLC for draft-ietf-alto-path-vector-11
Dear all, as discussed during the ALTO session at IETF-108, we are moving forward with all the remaining milestones. Thus, this email starts a WGLC for draft-ietf-alto-path-vector-11. The WGLC will run two weeks, so from today, Monday, September 28, until Monday, Oktober 12, 2020. We would like to have two individual reviews of this document as part of the WGLC. Please send us an email if you are willing review the draft as part of WGLC. We really need these reviews to make progress. - Vijay and Jan ___ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
[alto] WGLC for draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12
Dear all, as discussed during the ALTO session at IETF-108, we are moving forward with all the remaining milestones. Thus, this email starts a WGLC for draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12. The WGLC will run two weeks, so from today, Monday, September 28, until Monday, Oktober 12, 2020. We would like to have two individual reviews of this document as part of the WGLC. Please send us an email if you are willing review the draft as part of WGLC. We really need these reviews to make progress. - Vijay and Jan ___ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
Re: [alto] Interested in reviewing unified-props? And other drafts as well
Hi Vijay, My apologies for my lack of responsiveness, I have had a number of subsequent events impeding me to concentrate on this. My answer is yes, and I take October 9th as hard deadline for providing my review. Is that correct? Apologies again for my late expression of interest on performing it. Best regards Luis De: alto En nombre de Vijay Gurbani Enviado el: lunes, 28 de septiembre de 2020 17:43 Para: Luis M. Contreras CC: IETF ALTO Asunto: [alto] Interested in reviewing unified-props? And other drafts as well Dear Luis: Are you still interested in reviewing unified-props? If so, can you please let Jan and me know as soon as possible? The draft needs an in-depth WGLC review by Oct. 9. All: Since my posting asking for volunteers to review unified-props [1], I have received no offers. Considering that we have performance-metrics draft and the path-vector draft that need to be reviewed for WGLC, the lack of review volunteers do not bode well. One logical conclusion that can be drawn if we do not get any review offers is that the WG does not have the energy to finish existing work. This begs the question on why recharter ALTO if we cannot meet the current deadlines. A subset of you are organizing weekly meetings to further the work on drafts and re-chartering. My advice would be that effort spent on those meetings should be redirected (or at least shared) with reviewing existing drafts so we can finish up the work and get ready for re-chartering. [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/cWi2YNk6odQ_hL-0oF9GRxKyYqs/ Cheers, - vijay Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição ___ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
[alto] Interested in reviewing unified-props? And other drafts as well
Dear Luis: Are you still interested in reviewing unified-props? If so, can you please let Jan and me know as soon as possible? The draft needs an in-depth WGLC review by Oct. 9. All: Since my posting asking for volunteers to review unified-props [1], I have received no offers. Considering that we have performance-metrics draft and the path-vector draft that need to be reviewed for WGLC, the lack of review volunteers do not bode well. One logical conclusion that can be drawn if we do not get any review offers is that the WG does not have the energy to finish existing work. This begs the question on why recharter ALTO if we cannot meet the current deadlines. A subset of you are organizing weekly meetings to further the work on drafts and re-chartering. My advice would be that effort spent on those meetings should be redirected (or at least shared) with reviewing existing drafts so we can finish up the work and get ready for re-chartering. [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/cWi2YNk6odQ_hL-0oF9GRxKyYqs/ Cheers, - vijay ___ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
[alto] Meeting Info for Sep 30, 2020
Hi everyone, As usual, we will have a weekly meeting this Wednesday (Sep 30) at 9:00 am US EST. Topics: 1. WG document: unified property 2. Recharter discussion: ALTO east-west interface Bridge link: https://yale.zoom.us/my/yryang The detailed agenda will be announced later, once we confirm with potential speakers. Important Notice: 1. Agenda bash: Despite the fixed agenda items, it is encouraged that anyone who wants to present or lead a discussion to issue an "agenda bash", i.e., by replying this email or directly sending me a request with the following information: Presenter name: Topic/Document/Presentation: Estimated time: 2. Doodle poll: We have launched a doodle poll to help find the time that works for most people from the working group. However, it only receives 4 submissions at this point. It is much appreciated if you can take a minute to submit your preferences (see [1]), thanks a lot! Best Regards, Kai [1] https://doodle.com/poll/e39rpsm9sr7s4mgi___ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
