Re: LTO drives

2008-10-27 Thread Roy Heimbach

We've had great luck with equipment from Overland Storage.  We've
kept a Neo-2000 library with dual LTO-3 drives busy for 3 years now
with no problems so far.  Other departments here have had similar
experience with Overland equipment: not fancy, but very solid.

-Roy

On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Nick Brockner wrote:

Howdy,

Time to replace the aging DAT changer.

Just looking for some input on what LTO3/4 drives (or libraries) work well 
with amanda.


Thanks in advance,
Nick






client times out

2006-02-10 Thread Roy Heimbach

We're running amanda-2.4.5p1 server on a white box under debian/sarge.

We're backing up from 8 hosts without any problems beyond an occasional
client timeout.  Working clients are running debian/sarge, RHAS 2.1,
and AIX 5, and the same 2.4.5p1 release of amanda.

We have a CentOS 4.1 client that is failing consistently with client-side
timeouts.  The client starts, dumps 35 MB to the server, then times out.
The partition being dumped is around 1 GB.  The time out occurs when
iptables on the client is turned on, and also when it is turned off.
Gtar is 1.15.1.

Timeout messages in /tmp/amanda/sendbackup.* on the client look like
this:
---
sendbackup: debug 1 pid 18885 ruid 518 euid 518: start at Fri Feb 10 02:20:02 
2006
[snip]
sendbackup: time 0.001: got all connections
[snip]
sendbackup-gnutar: time 0.062: doing level 0 dump from date: 1970-01-01 0:00:00 
GMT
[snip]
sendbackup-gnutar: time 0.064: /usr/local/amanda/2.4.5p1/libexec/runtar: pid 
18889
sendbackup: time 958.026: index tee cannot write [Connection timed out]
sendbackup: time 958.026: pid 18887 finish time Fri Feb 10 02:36:00 2006
sendbackup: time 958.026: 125: strange(?): sendbackup: index tee cannot write 
[Connection timed out]
sendbackup: time 958.028: error [/usr/local/amanda/2.4.5p1/bin/gtar got signal 
13]
sendbackup: time 958.028: pid 18885 finish time Fri Feb 10 02:36:00 2006
---

We reduced the keepalive interval on both client and server but didn't
see a change.

Any suggestions would be welcome.

Thanks,
Roy Heimbach
--
Roy Heimbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 505-277-8348
User Services / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / University of New Mexico


amanda performance

2005-12-16 Thread Roy Heimbach

We have amanda 2.4.5p1 server running under debian linux on a dual
opteron that's driving a new overland tape library with an ultrium3
drive.  For now, the holding disk is a dedicated local 120 GB drive.

There's an amanda 2.4.5p1 client also running under debian linux on
another dual opteron that's connected to the amanda server host via
a dedicated gig network.  This host is a moderately loaded fileserver
with hardware raid.

Backing up a 10 GB test partition, we're seeing dumper and taper
performance around 2.5 MB/sec, a fraction of what the hardware is
capable of.

The amanda server was configured with max tape blocksize set to
8192kb.  None of the other configure script options are unusual--
prefix, user, group, amandahosts, db=text, gnutar.  The dumptype
does not specify software commpression on either end.

Feels like we're overlooking something basic, but so far we're not
seeing what it is.

Any suggestions would be welcome.

Roy Heimbach
--
Roy Heimbach 505-277-8348 / User Services / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of New Mexico, Albuquerque


Re: amanda performance

2005-12-16 Thread Roy Heimbach

Thanks, and thanks also to everyone who replied.

Turns out dma was disabled.  With dma disabled, read/write rates
on the holding disk were a little over 3 MB/sec.

The dumper and taper reported different average performance, but
both were in the same ballpark, from 2.4 to 2.6 something MB/sec.
Not bad at all, considering the speed of the holding disk.

Thanks again to everyone who replied.

Roy Heimbach
--
Roy Heimbach 505-277-8348 / User Services / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Gene Heskett wrote:

On Friday 16 December 2005 13:30, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:

On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 at 1:08pm, Gene Heskett wrote


That almost sounds like he would need a dedicated hardware raid to
use as a holdng disk then.  Ouch. And maybe futile unless that same
controller can also handle the tape  library, in which case the
devices could negotiate their own transfers between themselves, at


I've got a 4 disk SATA RAID0 on a 3ware controller for the holding
disk.


And what speeds are reported by hdparm -tT /dev/md0?


whatever the limiting speed of the cable might be.  This library is
I take it, a scsi3 wide interface? 320mb/sec rated?


Yep.  In my case, the library is the only thing on the SCSI chain.


Which means the data has to piped thru the pci bus, so the maximum on a
non-pci-x buss is 133MB/sec.  And the average will be somethat less
than that when the handshaking is factored in.  But only 2.5MB/Sec
says there is a very small pinhole someplace its being forced through.