Re: Quick Multiple Tape Question

2002-10-23 Thread Chad Morland

 On Tuesday 22 October 2002 18:04, Chad Morland wrote:
 I am trying to backup a 100G file onto tape. I am wondering if I
  can use amanda for this. Will it span the archive across more
  than one tape? I am using a DLT 7000 drive. If not, what are you
  recommendations?

 Yikes!  For that, you will have to locate a drive and tape format
 that will hold it in one tape.  Or, you have to use a split/join
 utility to break it up into tapable sized pieces that are each an
 independant file to the filesystem.

 Amanda cannot span one file across more than one tape, and because
 of the potentials for a disaster in such things as re-ordering the
 tapes on recovery, or any one of the other things that Mr. Murphy
 is famous for, it isn't likely that amanda ever will have that
 ability programmed in.

 --
 Cheers, Gene
 AMD K6-III500mhz 320M
 Athlon1600XP1400mhz  512M
 99.18% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly

I find that very strange considering that tar, dump and several other
backup utilities support this. Amanda developers don't want to add this
just for the sake of having it? I know I am not the only one that can
find this feature useful. I can keep track of my tapes, and I'm sure it
is not a difficult task for someone who can install, configure and use
Amanda to do the same. Are there any other concrete and real issues for
not including this feature other than operator misuse?

-CM




Re: Quick Multiple Tape Question

2002-10-23 Thread Jerry
Some OSs like AIX can span tapes using their version
of tar by manually asking to mount another volume... I
am not sure if you need to do this on a regular basis
or just as a one time deal.

If one time deal and you have the avail disk space use
split to break it into as many pieces as you need and
cat or join to bring it back together when you need to
restore.

Or you can get a tape drive like the M2 drives from
exabyte that handle 60GB native 150GB compressed
(varies depending on type of data).

Is this database data or text files? or what?

--- Chad Morland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I am trying to backup a 100G file onto tape. I am
 wondering if I can use
 amanda for this. Will it span the archive across
 more than one tape? I
 am using a DLT 7000 drive. If not, what are you
 recommendations?
 
 
 -CM
 


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/



Re: Quick Multiple Tape Question

2002-10-23 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 at 11:03am, Chad Morland wrote

  On Tuesday 22 October 2002 18:04, Chad Morland wrote:
  I am trying to backup a 100G file onto tape. I am wondering if I
   can use amanda for this. Will it span the archive across more
   than one tape? I am using a DLT 7000 drive. If not, what are you
   recommendations?
 
  Yikes!  For that, you will have to locate a drive and tape format
  that will hold it in one tape.  Or, you have to use a split/join
  utility to break it up into tapable sized pieces that are each an
  independant file to the filesystem.

*snip*

 I find that very strange considering that tar, dump and several other
 backup utilities support this. Amanda developers don't want to add this

Err, *can* dump/tar span a single *file* across tapes?  I'm not sure.  A 
single filesystem -- sure.  But a file?

 just for the sake of having it? I know I am not the only one that can
 find this feature useful. I can keep track of my tapes, and I'm sure it
 is not a difficult task for someone who can install, configure and use
 Amanda to do the same. Are there any other concrete and real issues for
 not including this feature other than operator misuse?

Time.  Spanning support has been in the planning stages for a long time.  
But the core AMANDA developers work very hard on lots of things that 
aren't AMANDA.  If you'd like to get in touch with them and start coding, 
the contributions would be welcome.

If you're talking about a *filesystem* rather than a file, then AMANDA can 
handle that easily via multiple disk list entries using tar.

-- 
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University





Re: Quick Multiple Tape Question

2002-10-23 Thread Chad Morland

  I find that very strange considering that tar, dump and several
other
  backup utilities support this. Amanda developers don't want to add
this

 Err, *can* dump/tar span a single *file* across tapes?  I'm not sure.
A
 single filesystem -- sure.  But a file?


From the GNU tar manpage:
Use --multi-volume (-M) on the command line, and then tar will, when it
reaches the end of the tape, prompt for another tape, and continue the
archive. Each tape will have an independent archive, and can be read
without needing the other. (As an exception to this, the *file* that tar
was archiving when it ran out of tape will usually be split between the
two archives..

When I generate a table of context for my tape it shows that the file
has been continued from X byte so it seems as if it is working.

 Time.  Spanning support has been in the planning stages for a long
time.
 But the core AMANDA developers work very hard on lots of things that
 aren't AMANDA.  If you'd like to get in touch with them and start
coding,
 the contributions would be welcome.

 If you're talking about a *filesystem* rather than a file, then AMANDA
can
 handle that easily via multiple disk list entries using tar.

 --
 Joshua Baker-LePain
 Department of Biomedical Engineering
 Duke University

Thanks for the clear answer... it's alot easier to stomache that they
don't have the time rather than the desire. Perhaps I can contribute to
this project and finally give back to the world! ;-)

-CM




RE: Quick Multiple Tape Question

2002-10-23 Thread Spicer, Kevin
 Amanda cannot span one file across more than one tape, and because
 of the potentials for a disaster in such things as re-ordering the
 tapes on recovery, or any one of the other things that Mr. Murphy
 is famous for, it isn't likely that amanda ever will have that
 ability programmed in.

Thats a shame, I've persisted using amanda as it has all the features I want except 
for this one.  I had hoped that this functionality would appear soon.  I always 
thought that one of the best features of Amanda was its ability to enforce correct 
tape usage, therefore I can't see why that should be a big issue.  This is the one 
thing that is stopping me consolidating all my unix/linux backups onto amanda.  I know 
you can split one partition into smaller sections using options to tar, but given the 
way the filesystem changes frequently I'm not happy to trust this (its easier and 
safer to stick with ufsdump)





BMRB International
http://www.bmrb.co.uk +44 (0)20 8566 5000

This message (and any attachment) is intended only for the recipient and may contain 
confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received this in error, please 
contact the sender and delete this message immediately. Disclosure, copying or other 
action taken in respect of this email or in reliance on it is prohibited. BMRB 
International Limited accepts no liability in relation to any personal emails, or 
content of any email which does not directly relate to our business.



Re: Quick Multiple Tape Question

2002-10-23 Thread Greg A. Woods
[ On Wednesday, October 23, 2002 at 11:31:20 (-0400), Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: ]
 Subject: Re: Quick Multiple Tape Question

 Err, *can* dump/tar span a single *file* across tapes?  I'm not sure.  A 
 single filesystem -- sure.  But a file?

Yes, with dump you should be able to put large files on multiple tape
volumes.  Most versions of dump/restore can handle multiple volumes (and
they always could), and they shouldn't care if a file spans multiple
volumes, though it's been some time since I really tested this ability
in any implementation.

However most versions of tar/pax/cpio/afio should _not_ allow you to
span multiple tapes with a single file.  The formal definitions of
ustar, cpio, and now pax archive formats do not allow for multiple
volume support.

There are some proprietary formats (maybe even GNU Tar's) which might
allow spanning a file across multiple tapes.  The issue is that there
really must be a header on the second and following tapes, and normally
in the tar/ustar/pax/cpio formats a header always starts a new file.

So in order to use tar/pax/cpio/afio to archive files larger than a
single tape you either have to split large file first into just slightly
smaller than tape-sized chunks, or you have to create the archive on
disk, then split it into just less than tape-sized chunks and either
write each chunk to tape and very very very very carefully label the
tapes so that you can read the archive back in in the right order, or
then subsquently again use a version of pax or tar or cpio which does
support multiple volumes to put the archive chunks onto multiple tapes.

-- 
Greg A. Woods

+1 416 218-0098;[EMAIL PROTECTED];   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Planix, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Quick Multiple Tape Question

2002-10-23 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:53:08AM -0400, Chad Morland wrote:
 
   I find that very strange considering that tar, dump and several
 other
   backup utilities support this. Amanda developers don't want to add
 this
 
  Err, *can* dump/tar span a single *file* across tapes?  I'm not sure.
 A
  single filesystem -- sure.  But a file?
 
 
 From the GNU tar manpage:
 Use --multi-volume (-M) on the command line, and then tar will, when it
 reaches the end of the tape, prompt for another tape, and continue the
 archive. Each tape will have an independent archive, and can be read
 without needing the other. (As an exception to this, the *file* that tar
 was archiving when it ran out of tape will usually be split between the
 two archives..


In a discussion of whether tar/dump/... can handle multiple volumes you
forget one thing, generally those programs are not handling the tape
themselves in an amanda backup.  The dump has been made to a file with
an amanda header and then transfered to the tape.  Even when going
directly to the tape, the dumps are generally going through other
programs like gzip and the indexer and ???  They are not writing
to the tape itself.

From long ago discussion I recall that one of the biggest problems
those that looked into multi-volume dumps was determining just
exactly what part of the dump file actually made it successfully
onto the tape.


-- 
Jon H. LaBadie  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 JG Computing
 4455 Province Line Road(609) 252-0159
 Princeton, NJ  08540-4322  (609) 683-7220 (fax)



Quick Multiple Tape Question

2002-10-22 Thread Chad Morland
I am trying to backup a 100G file onto tape. I am wondering if I can use
amanda for this. Will it span the archive across more than one tape? I
am using a DLT 7000 drive. If not, what are you recommendations?


-CM




Re: Quick Multiple Tape Question

2002-10-22 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 22 October 2002 18:04, Chad Morland wrote:
I am trying to backup a 100G file onto tape. I am wondering if I
 can use amanda for this. Will it span the archive across more
 than one tape? I am using a DLT 7000 drive. If not, what are you
 recommendations?

Yikes!  For that, you will have to locate a drive and tape format 
that will hold it in one tape.  Or, you have to use a split/join 
utility to break it up into tapable sized pieces that are each an 
independant file to the filesystem.

Amanda cannot span one file across more than one tape, and because 
of the potentials for a disaster in such things as re-ordering the 
tapes on recovery, or any one of the other things that Mr. Murphy 
is famous for, it isn't likely that amanda ever will have that 
ability programmed in.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
AMD K6-III500mhz 320M
Athlon1600XP1400mhz  512M
99.18% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly