Re: please check your config and use a config file for chg-scsi
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 11:13:01AM -0700, Richard Pyne wrote: > On 1 Dec 2005 at 8:16, Richard Pyne wrote: > > > I'll give chg-zd-mtx a try. > > Well, I have chg-zd-mtx working. In the process, I remembered > why I had chosen chg-scsi originally. The main reason is that it > detectes when a drive is requesting to be cleaned and will > initiate a clean cycle when needed rather than by access count. I've not looked at the code, but if chg-scsi detects it via the status request it might show up in the "mtx status" output. If so, then it would be 'easy' :) to add that capability to chg-zd-mtx. > > It is too bad that neither ch-zd-mtx nore chg-scsi support RAIT > as that is the way I would like to eventially go. > Amanda does support a form of it own RAIT. But I don't think it is well tested as few people report trying or using it. > My desire is to set up automated backups that back up everything > that was changed on a daily basis and does a complete backup of > the production file systems at least once a week. I also want to > be able to do system file systems (/etc, /, /usr, etc.) on > demand. > > Again, any configuration suggestions will be greatly dumpcycle 7 tapecycle "something greater than 14" runspercycle 5 or 6 or 7 Amdump can be run anytime by hand specifying the hosts and DLEs. You can also force, with amadmin, a level 0 of any DLEs for the next amdump run. A separate config could be setup sharing many of the control files (disklist, indexes, curinfo, tapelist, changer.conf, ...) but with record set to no and a dumpcycle of 0 (always level 0). Then you could run amdump for that config and leave the standard one alone. Be careful they don't try to run at the same time. -- Jon H. LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] JG Computing 4455 Province Line Road(609) 252-0159 Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)
Re: please check your config and use a config file for chg-scsi
On 1 Dec 2005 at 8:16, Richard Pyne wrote: > On 1 Dec 2005 at 13:25, Alexander Jolk wrote: > > > Richard Pyne wrote: > > > I am STILL trying to get amanda set up to run with an adic > > > Scalar 458 changer with three DLT4000 drives. > > [...] > > > I decided to try to label a tape. After that failed > > > miserably, I decided to take a step back and just try to get > > > chg-scsi to work. > > > > Is there a reason you cannot use chg-zd-mtx? If your changer > > works with mtx, that might be simpler to set up. > > > > Alex > > No reason at all other than there is nothing in the > documentation that would indicate that it is a better choice. The > docs seem to indicate that the chg-scsi is a more direct > interface, especially for the Linux 2.6 kernel that has changer > support. > > I am still baffled that my earlier request for configuration > suggestions only got one reply and that was to say "read the > wiki" which provided no more insight than the other docs. Is no > one out there using an adic Scalar tape library? It seems odd > that if no one is using it that chg-scsi recognizes it > specifically. > > I'll give chg-zd-mtx a try. Well, I have chg-zd-mtx working. In the process, I remembered why I had chosen chg-scsi originally. The main reason is that it detectes when a drive is requesting to be cleaned and will initiate a clean cycle when needed rather than by access count. It is too bad that neither ch-zd-mtx nore chg-scsi support RAIT as that is the way I would like to eventially go. My desire is to set up automated backups that back up everything that was changed on a daily basis and does a complete backup of the production file systems at least once a week. I also want to be able to do system file systems (/etc, /, /usr, etc.) on demand. Again, any configuration suggestions will be greatly appreciated. --Richard
Re: please check your config and use a config file for chg-scsi
On 1 Dec 2005 at 13:25, Alexander Jolk wrote: > Richard Pyne wrote: > > I am STILL trying to get amanda set up to run with an adic > > Scalar 458 changer with three DLT4000 drives. > [...] > > I decided to try to label a tape. After that failed miserably, I > > decided to take a step back and just try to get chg-scsi to > > work. > > Is there a reason you cannot use chg-zd-mtx? If your changer works with > mtx, that might be simpler to set up. > > Alex No reason at all other than there is nothing in the documentation that would indicate that it is a better choice. The docs seem to indicate that the chg-scsi is a more direct interface, especially for the Linux 2.6 kernel that has changer support. I am still baffled that my earlier request for configuration suggestions only got one reply and that was to say "read the wiki" which provided no more insight than the other docs. Is no one out there using an adic Scalar tape library? It seems odd that if no one is using it that chg-scsi recognizes it specifically. I'll give chg-zd-mtx a try. --Richard
Re: please check your config and use a config file for chg-scsi
Richard Pyne wrote: I am STILL trying to get amanda set up to run with an adic Scalar 458 changer with three DLT4000 drives. [...] I decided to try to label a tape. After that failed miserably, I decided to take a step back and just try to get chg-scsi to work. Is there a reason you cannot use chg-zd-mtx? If your changer works with mtx, that might be simpler to set up. Alex -- Alexander Jolk * BUF Compagnie * [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel +33-1 42 68 18 28 * Fax +33-1 42 68 18 29
