Re: [AMaViS-user] Multiple recipient question with postfix
Rob, 1) There was no way of specifying system maximums. Eg. drop anything with a spam score higher then 30, or quarentine all virus emails. The user could always override the maximums. If you are talking about SQL lookups for per-recipient settings, you must already have some SQL authentication in place and some value validation when users are updating their settings - one would not let users mess directly with SQL SELECT/UPDATE/INSERT. So if you need to provide some maximum allowed value, the most natural place to do so is in your (G)UI to SQL. 2) If an email was sent to three recipients, and one of them passed it, then all recipients would get it because amavis did not modify the envelope. That is not the case. Both the header tagging and appending address extensions are fully per-recipient capable, and so is *_lovers and setting spam levels (tag/tag2/kill). Does amavis support the lmtp per user responses now? It did not use to. I am using 2.2 with Maia. It does on its server side. The only missing catch was handling the 4xx responses, which came with the 2.3.0 release: - at last: when mail is received through LMTP protocol, gracefully handle a temporary failure 4xx reply from MTA to a RCPT TO command and pass it back to a LMTP client for tempfailed recipients only, instead of returning 450 for _all_ recipients (needed the sending routine to be aware of the receiving side capabilities, which was previously not available); On the amavisd client side (forwarding mail back to MTA), LMTP is currently not supported, mostly because of the lack of a quality Perl module for this protocol. Mark --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click ___ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
Re: [AMaViS-user] Multiple recipient question with postfix
RHutton wrote: It has been a long time since I have worked with Amavis, but there used to be some pretty severe limitations on applying per recipient policies (eg. one recipient dropping, while another recipient quarantines, while another tags and passes) if the email was passed directly from postfix without having the destination expansion done first. Is this still an issue? Thanks, Rob Rob Hutton DataScan Technologies This Postfix thread is related. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=postfix-usersm=113488134818192w=2 Gary V --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click ___ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
Re: [AMaViS-user] Multiple recipient question with postfix
Does amavis support the lmtp per user responses now? It did not use to. I am using 2.2 with Maia. Thanks, Rob Rob Hutton DataScan Technologies Gary V [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/28/2005 11:15 AM To amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net cc Subject Re: [AMaViS-user] Multiple recipient question with postfix RHutton wrote: It has been a long time since I have worked with Amavis, but there used to be some pretty severe limitations on applying per recipient policies (eg. one recipient dropping, while another recipient quarantines, while another tags and passes) if the email was passed directly from postfix without having the destination expansion done first. Is this still an issue? Thanks, Rob Rob Hutton DataScan Technologies This Postfix thread is related. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=postfix-usersm=113488134818192w=2 Gary V --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click ___ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/ --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click ___ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
Re: [AMaViS-user] Multiple recipient question with postfix
The problem used to be twofold. 1) There was no way of specifying system maximums. Eg. drop anything with a spam score higher then 30, or quarentine all virus emails. The user could always override the maximums. 2) If an email was sent to three recipients, and one of them passed it, then all recipients would get it because amavis did not modify the envelope. Thanks, Rob Rob Hutton DataScan Technologies Gary V [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/28/2005 01:16 PM To amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net cc Subject Re: [AMaViS-user] Multiple recipient question with postfix RHutton wrote: Does amavis support the lmtp per user responses now? It did not use to. I am using 2.2 with Maia. Thanks, Rob Rob Hutton DataScan Technologies I'm not sure this answers your question, but read: http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/README.postfix.txt and look for: ALTERNATIVE FOR POSTFIX OLDER THAN 2.2 Gary V --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click ___ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/ --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click ___ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
Re: [AMaViS-user] Multiple recipient question with postfix
RHutton wrote: The problem used to be twofold. 1) There was no way of specifying system maximums. Eg. drop anything with a spam score higher then 30, or quarentine all virus emails. The user could always override the maximums. Well, the first match wins, so someone's setting will be used (someone for example being: [EMAIL PROTECTED], @domain, @., static default), and others that come after will not. In SQL I believe you can give the 'system' (domain or catchall) higher priority, but then the individual would not have a further say for a particular setting. If a user does not configure a given setting, then lower priority settings or defaults will be used. I think to implement what you want may require two separate installations of amavisd-new. The first would (for example) quarantine then drop all viruses and drop anything over 30, then forward it to the second copy where users could do what they wish. The cleanest way may be to set up two separate servers. The downside would be the second server could get very busy if a message had 100 local recipients as I believe it would have to process all 100 of the separate messages. Amavisd-new does cache results however so if it got 100 messages with the same body, it wouldn't have to spam-check or virus check every copy. 2) If an email was sent to three recipients, and one of them passed it, then all recipients would get it because amavis did not modify the envelope. This does not reflect what I have experienced. Thanks, Rob BTW, don't CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gary V --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click ___ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
[AMaViS-user] Multiple recipient question with postfix
It has been a long time since I have worked with Amavis, but there used to be some pretty severe limitations on applying per recipient policies (eg. one recipient dropping, while another recipient quarantines, while another tags and passes) if the email was passed directly from postfix without having the destination expansion done first. Is this still an issue? Thanks, Rob Rob Hutton DataScan Technologies --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click ___ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
