RE: [AMRadio] Physical Reality of Sidebands

2005-01-17 Thread John Coleman, ARS WA5BXO
Yep, I know Larry, but I had already gotten deeper than I intended to.
Because most of the video is motionless, the sidebands come out at
multiples of the sweep rate.  The color sub carrier frequency which is
only transmitted in burst mode as previously describe, was chosen at the
odd frequency that it is, so that in spectrum, most of the sideband
energy containing the color info, would fall between the energy of the
black and white info.  This was in hope of having less "intermodulation"
at the detector.  As for I know, it was not until Magnavox produced the
first COMB FILTER that we were able to make use of this bit of spectrum
conservation.  It is interesting to note that the color sidebands were
500KHz of upper and lower sideband spectrum except at the phase
difference of around 80-100 deg where the flesh tones are produced and
at that phase difference  the band width is much greater but only on one
sideband.  The RCA CTC 4 chassis made use of this with the "I and Q"
demodulation system, a very difficult sweep / band pass alignment
procedure.

This is all getting off the subject, but it was interesting to me that
all this could be kept separate with the fast switching on and off of
the burst and changing bandwidth of the I and Q modulated signal.

I love all this type of discussion.  I am afraid I would have to lean
towards the theory, that it is what ever fits the need of the detector.

At what wavelength does Electro-magnetic radiation become a particle? 

Is the Universe homogeneous or chaotic?  That depends upon how it is
observed.  

John, 
WA5BXO 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 2:40 PM
To: Discussion of AM Radio
Subject: RE: [AMRadio] Physical Reality of Sidebands

John,

You are close. That was the old black and white days.  Since color its
divided 
down from 3.579454 to 15, 726.xx (approx) and vertical is 59,94 not
60.00.

Larry W3LW


On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 22:58:04 -0600, "John Coleman ARS WA5BXO" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :

> 
> Don, I have often pondered the same thing here is another example.
> 
>   The Horizontal sweep rate of a TV is 15750 hz.  Every 1/15000 of
> a sec there is a sync pedestal, and on the back porch of it is a burst
> of a few cycles (as I remember it was 8 to 10 cycles in length) of the
> color sub carrier (3.579545 MHz).  This burst is removed and processed
> by an amplifier that is key on by the horizontal retrace pulse which
has
> been synced to the horizontal sync pulse that rides atop the sync
> pedestal just in front of the color burst.  The 8 cycle color burst is
> phase compared to a crystal oscillator in a phase locked loop.  A good
> synchronized scope can look at the full video detected signal and
spread
> the back porch of the sync pedestal out and view the 8-10 cycles of
the
> burst.  I often wondered what a spectrum analyzer would look like when
> monitoring the output of the burst amplifier with the phase detector
> diodes remove.  
> 
>   The burst amplifier was a simple tetrode whose plate circuit had
> a parallel tank tuned to 3.58 MHZ and where the detected video was
> applied to the grid through a small coupling capacitor that would
> differentiate and pass the frequencies higher than 3 MHz. The grid
leak
> was returned to a circuit where a positive pulse from the fly back was
> present to trigger the tube on.  The output tank was link coupled to
the
> phase detector.  
> 
> 
> John,
> WA5BXO
> 
> 
> 
> __
> AMRadio mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
> 
> 
> 
__
AMRadio mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net







RE: [AMRadio] Physical Reality of Sidebands

2005-01-17 Thread Patrick Jankowiak
An interesting aside is that burst is a shade of green, and 
appears a somewhat sickly green at that.


>The 8 cycle color burst is
phase compared to a crystal oscillator in a phase locked loop.


RE: [AMRadio] Physical Reality of Sidebands

2005-01-17 Thread lwill
John,

You are close. That was the old black and white days.  Since color its divided 
down from 3.579454 to 15, 726.xx (approx) and vertical is 59,94 not 60.00.

Larry W3LW


On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 22:58:04 -0600, "John Coleman ARS WA5BXO" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :

> 
> Don, I have often pondered the same thing here is another example.
> 
>   The Horizontal sweep rate of a TV is 15750 hz.  Every 1/15000 of
> a sec there is a sync pedestal, and on the back porch of it is a burst
> of a few cycles (as I remember it was 8 to 10 cycles in length) of the
> color sub carrier (3.579545 MHz).  This burst is removed and processed
> by an amplifier that is key on by the horizontal retrace pulse which has
> been synced to the horizontal sync pulse that rides atop the sync
> pedestal just in front of the color burst.  The 8 cycle color burst is
> phase compared to a crystal oscillator in a phase locked loop.  A good
> synchronized scope can look at the full video detected signal and spread
> the back porch of the sync pedestal out and view the 8-10 cycles of the
> burst.  I often wondered what a spectrum analyzer would look like when
> monitoring the output of the burst amplifier with the phase detector
> diodes remove.  
> 
>   The burst amplifier was a simple tetrode whose plate circuit had
> a parallel tank tuned to 3.58 MHZ and where the detected video was
> applied to the grid through a small coupling capacitor that would
> differentiate and pass the frequencies higher than 3 MHz. The grid leak
> was returned to a circuit where a positive pulse from the fly back was
> present to trigger the tube on.  The output tank was link coupled to the
> phase detector.  
> 
> 
> John,
> WA5BXO
> 
> 
> 
> __
> AMRadio mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
> 
> 
> 


Re: [AMRadio] Physical Reality of Sidebands

2005-01-17 Thread lwill
Bob,

You are correct.  If I was home I'd send along the basic formula for 
modulation.  In FLA right now on vacation. It is multiplication just as a mixer 
is 
(the formula is the same really).  All AM modulation and demodulation is 
multiplication but in vector notation.  Check any college text on information 
theory.

regards,

Larry W3LW


On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:17:54 -0500, "Bob Bruhns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote :

> Hi Gary,
> 
> The carrier is not multiplied with the sideband frequencies to
> generate AM, it is multiplied with the baseband modulating
> frequency.  In my example, three sine waves corresponding to a
> carrier and two sideband frequencies are added together to produce
> the AM signal, but a relatively low frequency is multiplied with the
> carrier in the AM transmitter to produce the carrier and sideband
> frequencies in the reverse example.  Interestingly, if the AM
> signal, with or without carrier, is multiplied at the receiver with
> a regenerated carrier of proper frequency and phase, then the
> baseband modulating signal is recovered.
> 
> In the transmitter, the multiplication occurs in the modulated
> stage.  In plate-modulated AM, the carrier is multiplied by the
> plate voltage.  Normalizing plate voltage to unity, it is multiplied
> by +1 without modulation.  Modulation varies the B+, and therefore
> the multiplication factor.  The normalized multiplication factor
> varies from 0 to +2 with 100% sine wave modulation.
> 
>   Bacon, WA3WDR
> 
> 
> __
> AMRadio mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
> 
> 
> 


Re: [AMRadio] Physical Reality of Sidebands

2005-01-17 Thread Bob Bruhns
Hi Gary,

The carrier is not multiplied with the sideband frequencies to
generate AM, it is multiplied with the baseband modulating
frequency.  In my example, three sine waves corresponding to a
carrier and two sideband frequencies are added together to produce
the AM signal, but a relatively low frequency is multiplied with the
carrier in the AM transmitter to produce the carrier and sideband
frequencies in the reverse example.  Interestingly, if the AM
signal, with or without carrier, is multiplied at the receiver with
a regenerated carrier of proper frequency and phase, then the
baseband modulating signal is recovered.

In the transmitter, the multiplication occurs in the modulated
stage.  In plate-modulated AM, the carrier is multiplied by the
plate voltage.  Normalizing plate voltage to unity, it is multiplied
by +1 without modulation.  Modulation varies the B+, and therefore
the multiplication factor.  The normalized multiplication factor
varies from 0 to +2 with 100% sine wave modulation.

  Bacon, WA3WDR




Re: [AMRadio] Physical Reality of Sidebands

2005-01-17 Thread Gary Schafer



Jim Wilhite wrote:
Out of curiosity Gary, where do you think the multiplication occurs?  In 
the plate of the final(s), at the juncture of the plate and output 
network, or in the final network?


I have pondered this one and have an opinion, but would like yours and 
others opinions.


73  Jim
W5JO



Hi Jim,

I should have figured you would come up with that one. :>)
In an oscillator it is really the tuned circuit that is the oscillator 
and the tube is just a switch that keeps the oscillation going in the 
tank. Same for the output tank on an amplifier. The tube is a switch 
that excites the tank.
However with modulation you can do it with a diode and a resistor for 
the load so I would have to say that modulation takes place as a 
function of the switch action. But without the load there is no current 
so nothing happens. So it seems it may occur at the junction of the load 
and the switch?


73
Gary  K4FMX




Re: [AMRadio] Physical Reality of Sidebands

2005-01-17 Thread Jim Wilhite
Out of curiosity Gary, where do you think the multiplication occurs?  In the 
plate of the final(s), at the juncture of the plate and output network, or 
in the final network?


I have pondered this one and have an opinion, but would like yours and 
others opinions.


73  Jim
W5JO

- Original Message - 
From: "Gary Schafer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: "Discussion of AM Radio" 
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 10:01 AM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Physical Reality of Sidebands





Bob Bruhns wrote:

Indeed, 'tis a puzzlement.  I can draw three continuous sine waves of
apppropriate amplitude, frequency and phase, corresponding to carrier, 
upper

sideband and lower sideband, and I can add them point by point, and I can
duplicate a 100% modulated AM signal waveform as we understand it.  I 
have
to believe that this works backwards; if I make this waveform by 
modulating
a carrier in an AM transmitter, then I am synthesizing the same 
continuous

sine waves.







Re: [AMRadio] Physical Reality of Sidebands

2005-01-17 Thread Gary Schafer



Bob Bruhns wrote:

Indeed, 'tis a puzzlement.  I can draw three continuous sine waves of
apppropriate amplitude, frequency and phase, corresponding to carrier, upper
sideband and lower sideband, and I can add them point by point, and I can
duplicate a 100% modulated AM signal waveform as we understand it.  I have
to believe that this works backwards; if I make this waveform by modulating
a carrier in an AM transmitter, then I am synthesizing the same continuous
sine waves.  


Hi Bob,

The three sin waves look like what is happening but in reality the am 
signal is not produced by adding sin waves. It is produced by 
multiplying them. It just happens that when you add them you come out 
with the same result so it appears that they are added.
And to keep things simple that is how it has been taught over the years 
as another poster mentioned.


73
Gary  K4FMX




[AMRadio] coils needed

2005-01-17 Thread ronnie.hull

Howdy Men

I am in need of a 40jel and a 80jel coil set.. I have sockets. Even if they 
need repair..

anyone have any of these to part with?

thanks

Ronnie



Re: [AMRadio] Physical Reality of Sidebands

2005-01-17 Thread Bob Bruhns
I am convinced that sidebands exist.  But as for whether the carrier goes
away at 100% negative modulation...

How's this: a carrier should be considered to exist during the period when
it has recently been detected, and we are actually receiving modulation from
it.  It should not be considered to exist when it is clearly not being
generated.

So in the example of an AM signal at the instant of 100% negative
modulation, we should consider the zero to represent zero percent of the
carrier, averaged over time during recent history.  We can see that this
will result in appropriate demodulation of the actual signal.

But when the AM transmission is over, either after the end of a
transmission, or after the end of a broadcast day, or in most cases if the
signal fades out due to propagation, etc, we should consider the carrier not
to be present.  This gets a little tricky, because we can not really be
certain (Don's Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle thought here) that the
transmitter is not sending us a very, very long zero.  But we can be pretty
sure, pretty quick.

A synchronous detector is a good flywheel that tracks the known carrier
frequency and holds the reference for us during zeros and noise bursts.  We
set up a synchronous detector to detect the carrier and hold the reference
for a short period of time.  This works pretty well for the signals we
actually transmit.

Now take the example of a 1 KHz sinewave transmitted as double sideband
suppressed carrier.  You get pulses of alternating carrier polarity.  During
any given pulse, for about 500 microseconds at a time, you get an AM signal
with a carrier, transmitting one half of a sine wave.  When the pulse is
over and the signal passes through zero, it goes negative and the next pulse
appears - pretty much identical to the first pulse, but with reverse carrier
polarity.  You would not know the carrier polarity reversed except for your
flywheel reference.  But demodulating with the flywheel reference gives you
the 1 KHz sinewave.  It is evident to the observer that the flywheel
reference was correct.

With a very low modulating frequency, a DSBSC signal would just look like a
fading carrier.  The transmit frequency stability and the reference flywheel
precision would have to be very high to determione that the carrier polarity
had reversed.  At some point this becomes irrelevant, because the
transmission path varies in length, there is drift and phase noise in TX and
RX, and the signal is not received well enough to know for sure that the
carrier polarity flipped.  (Uncertainty again.)

And although with DSBSC we keep getting pulses of carrier, they keep
reversing, and on average they balance out to zero.  We accept that the
carrier is suppressed, we don't hear a heterodyne where we would usually
hear one, etc, yet we see the carrier dancing on the oscilloscope.  But over
the appropriate integration time, its frequent polarity reversals cause it
to balance out to zero.

For most real signals, a very long time base is inappropriate.  In some
cases though, such as slow synchronous CW, a long time base is appropriate.
So the receiver time scale should be appropriate to the signal being sought.

So it's a reality check issue.  Surely a carrier was not transmitted for all
time, just because it existed for less than a second at some point.  But
just as surely, the instant of 100% negative modulation should not be
reproduced as a glitch.  The application of the appropriate time scale is
the key, and it is up to the listener to determine what happened.

  Bacon, WA3WDR




Re: [AMRadio] Physical Reality of Sidebands

2005-01-17 Thread Mark Miller

At 02:25 PM 1/16/2005, you wrote:
there is no correct yes or no answer to the age-old question whether or 
not sidebands are physical reality, or exist only in the mathematics of 
modulation theory. It all depends on how you physically observe the 
signal.  Sidebands physically exist only if you use an instrument 
selective enough to observe them.



The only pure frequency is the sine wave.  ANY amplitude distortion is the 
result of OTHER sine waves in the composite signal.  I think the question 
above arises from the way AM theory has been taught.  The simple, no math 
version which has been taught to technicians primarily takes into 
consideration the envelope as a single entity and is easier for the 
majority of people to understand.


73,

Mark N5RFX





Re: [AMRadio] Physical Reality of Sidebands

2005-01-17 Thread Bob Bruhns
Indeed, 'tis a puzzlement.  I can draw three continuous sine waves of
apppropriate amplitude, frequency and phase, corresponding to carrier, upper
sideband and lower sideband, and I can add them point by point, and I can
duplicate a 100% modulated AM signal waveform as we understand it.  I have
to believe that this works backwards; if I make this waveform by modulating
a carrier in an AM transmitter, then I am synthesizing the same continuous
sine waves.  It seems to me that an on-off sequence would only differ from
the sine wave modulated condition in the complexity of the sideband
spectrum.

But in the real world, sometimes theory does not produce results.  For
example, if there was some FM audio subchannel modulating the on-off
carrier, I would simply not be able to receive it while the transmitter was
off, even if I was positive that the carrier was theoretically still
present.  So as Dennis asked on the amradio mailing list - if a tree falls
in the forest, and nobody sees it or hears it... did it really fall?

When I am receiving zero, I can only know that I am receiving zero.  And if
there is interference,  I may not even be sure I am receiving zero!

And as Don pointed out, there is the question of reality, and the appearance
of reality. If I took the time scale to infinity, then if a carrier was EVER
transmitted, even for only a second, I would have to say that it existed for
all of time.  That's ridiculous!  I only think that because I am integrating
over all time, and then generalizing.

I guess it's off when it's off, and it's signalling us when it's on.  So the
question becomes, at what time scale do we stop seeing beat notes, and start
seeing variations and on-off switching?

  Bacon, WA3WDR




[AMRadio] Help with Audio driver

2005-01-17 Thread Don Moore R Moore
To All,
Thanks so much for all your comets on the conversion of the BC-1 F audio
driver to solid state.  I really appreciated your comments, and learned a
lot.  I think the best is to leave it as it is as long as I got tubes and
driver transformer.  Don,K4KYV's comments and theory really was great, it
was exactly what I wanted to know. My I wish I had the knowledge he has,
now I know who to go to with questions.
Don Moore W5FFK


RE: [AMRadio] Physical Reality of Sidebands

2005-01-17 Thread John Coleman ARS WA5BXO

Don, I have often pondered the same thing here is another example.

The Horizontal sweep rate of a TV is 15750 hz.  Every 1/15000 of
a sec there is a sync pedestal, and on the back porch of it is a burst
of a few cycles (as I remember it was 8 to 10 cycles in length) of the
color sub carrier (3.579545 MHz).  This burst is removed and processed
by an amplifier that is key on by the horizontal retrace pulse which has
been synced to the horizontal sync pulse that rides atop the sync
pedestal just in front of the color burst.  The 8 cycle color burst is
phase compared to a crystal oscillator in a phase locked loop.  A good
synchronized scope can look at the full video detected signal and spread
the back porch of the sync pedestal out and view the 8-10 cycles of the
burst.  I often wondered what a spectrum analyzer would look like when
monitoring the output of the burst amplifier with the phase detector
diodes remove.  

The burst amplifier was a simple tetrode whose plate circuit had
a parallel tank tuned to 3.58 MHZ and where the detected video was
applied to the grid through a small coupling capacitor that would
differentiate and pass the frequencies higher than 3 MHz. The grid leak
was returned to a circuit where a positive pulse from the fly back was
present to trigger the tube on.  The output tank was link coupled to the
phase detector.  


John,
WA5BXO