[AMRadio] It Happened Again!

2007-10-27 Thread Anthony W. DePrato

At 08:18 PM 10/26/2007, Bob Macklin wrote:
At 00:01Z 20M came alive with CQ CONTEST! The band has been dead 
for weeks, At least here in Puget Sound.
that is an understatement hi hi.. for the past 2 days 15 and 10 mts 
has been alive and well here in Ky. heard HC8N for hours on 10 mts 
from s5 to s9+ also  CE0Y/9A4X


they were working JA's as fast as they could. just goes to show you 
the bands are open to somewhere about all the time just no one lives 
there or no one is on.
could not believe the mess on 40 cw last night. ssb stations all the 
way down to 7005. contest are ok but this is not. they got the phone 
bands extended but they want it all. and it was US hams got to PJ and 
P4 doing it. yes it is only for the weekend but some hams can only 
get on during the weekends. but that is just MHO

73Tony



QBE  ZUT  DE WA4JQS

ANTHONY W. (Tony) DePrato WA4JQS EXTRA - HEAVY
Since 1962
CQ DX HALL OF FAME # 35
A1-OP  FISTS  # 10573   SKCC #1227 F.O.P.
DXCC PHONE- DXCC CW- DXCC RTTY- DXCC MIXED
DXCC 40, 20, 15, 10 METERS
South Sandwich Island Dxpedition Group
CALLS HELD:
WA4JQS/ZS1, WA4JQS/KC4, WA4JQS/4K1
ZD8JQS, V31SS, VP8BZL, VP8SSI, 3Y0PI

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] Re: IARU Band Plan

2007-10-27 Thread D. Chester

PLEASE!  Enough of this.  My mailbox has been jammed for 3 days!  Just
let the issue die or discuss it direct.

Thanks and 73,

John,  W4AWM


Doesn't your e-mail program have a delete button?

I opted for the Digest mode for all my e-mailing lists to avoid clogging 
my inbox.  If I received every message on every list separately, I would 
literally have hundreds of e-mails to sift through every day.  As it is, I 
just click on the Digest, look at the topics list, read the ones that 
interest me, and when I finish, I delete the whole digest.  Sometimes I 
delete the whole digest without reading anything and other times I read 
every message, depending on the topics being discussed.  Depending on the 
amount of traffic, I may receive one digest per day or sometimes several, 
but rarely more than four or five.  During quiet periods I may not even 
receive a digest on some days.


The disadvantage of the Digest mode is that I don't see messages instantly 
as soon as they are posted. The Digest goes out after enough messages have 
accumulated to fill it, or after a certain period of time  has passed.  Some 
digests may arrive with over a dozen messages, and at times, others may 
contain only one message.  But the delay, which never exceeds 24 hours, is 
worth the benefit of not having to deal with each and every message posted 
as a separate e-mail.


Public, open-forum discussion of this issue by the AM community, mainly over 
the internet via this reflector and on the AM Forum, plus some discussion on 
QRZ.com, have already resulted in enough correspondence from the ham 
community that IARU has added new AM segments to the band plan on 40m and 
20m.


This type of discussion is precisely what these mailing lists are for.

Don, k4kyv 


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Re: IARU Band Plan

2007-10-27 Thread A.R.S. - WA5AM
On 10/27/07, D. Chester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  PLEASE!  Enough of this.  My mailbox has been jammed for 3 days!  Just
  let the issue die or discuss it direct.
 
  Thanks and 73,
 
  John,  W4AWM

 Doesn't your e-mail program have a delete button?


Precisely Don.  John, please use your delete key for any subject
headers you don't wish to read.  Demanding that members STOP posting
or relying on the subject is the job of the moderators or admins of
this email list.  This email list was created for the discussion of AM
equipment, AM operation, and ANY issue that could effect the operation
of AM now or in the future.  No one is made to be a member of this
email list, nor do you have to read all the email sent to the list.
Simply hit the delete button, or leave the email list entirely.

Brian / wa5am
Owner of the AMRadio list
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] Re: AM recognition in the IARU Band Plan

2007-10-27 Thread D. Chester



What happened to the AM calling windows on 1885, 3885, and especially 7290
which is now an emergency frequency?? I am on 7290 quite a bit on AM. You
must realize that here in the US AM is big and getting bigger all the time?

Bob KB1OKL


Another point worth bringing up is a reminder that most commercially built 
transceivers, whether US-built or made in Japan, now have the AM mode 
included, and these radios are used world-wide.


If there were no demand for AM capability, in the highly competitive field 
of ham radio transceivers the companies would not be driving up the selling 
prices of their products in order to include a mode that they thought no-one 
was interested in using.


Don, k4kyv

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] Clegg 99'er FS on QTH

2007-10-27 Thread crawfish
Bill, W9VC, has a Clegg 99'er for sale on QTH(ad#625276) for $50.00 plus 
shipping from Richmond, IN.Usual disclaimers apply, but have done lots of 
trading with Bill over last 2 years or so.He says it puts out 5 watts on 6m AM.

Joe W4AAB
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] DX-40/VF1 FS on QTH

2007-10-27 Thread crawfish
Pete W2HP is selling a Heath DX-40 and VF-1 on QTH.com(ad#625952).It is from 
the estate of KI2J.Usual disclaimers apply.
 Joe 
W4AAB
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] Low-pass audio filter for transmitting

2007-10-27 Thread D. Chester

Don/K4KYV runs a -great- signal at 3.1kc, when he's in the 'narrow' mode
with active and passive band-pass and band-width filters (homebrewed, of
course)

-Geoff/W5OMR


Actually, the narrow filter cuts off 3400~, with an extremely sharp cutoff. 
Since that's an audio, not rf filter, the total bandwidth would be 6800~ 
including both sidebands.  I use it only when the band is so congested that 
I can't get good reception using the 8 kHz mechanical filter in the 
receiver.  When I can  receive well with the 8 kHz filter, I switch to 5000~ 
cutoff, which is more gradual, with complete attenuation somewhere around 
7500~.  I could run with no filter in line at all, but the undistorted 
frequency response of all my transmitters is at least 40-11,000~.


Wider bandwidth is no problem, if you use it sensibly.  We use variable 
selectivity with our receivers, and adjust according to band condition, so 
why not do the same with our transmitters?  We don't keep the receiver in 
the narrow selectivity position, which severely restricts audio quality, 
when QRM is not present.  So why should we limit ourselves to 6000~ 
transmitting bandwidth when the band is lightly occupied?


My passive low pass audio filter modules themselves are not homebrew, but 
surplus items, potted in cases like small transformers.  One is rated at 
10,000 ohms in/out and the other is 50,000 ohms in/out.  The low-pass filter 
unit is homebrew and rack mounted, built upon the remains of a late 30's 
Gates broadcast studio audio line amplifier.  I drive the filter modules 
with a cathode follower, and terminate them into a resistor at the rated 
load impedance.  That way, I get the same signal level at the output, 
regardless of which filter is in line, and each filter is properly 
terminated.  The filter module is followed by a triode connected 6J7 output 
stage working into a UTC LS series (broadcast quality) plate-to-line output 
transformer. I use a simple double-pole switch to change filters.




__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] Re: AMRadio Digest, Vol 45, Issue 66

2007-10-27 Thread D. Chester


___

This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout.

http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak/
http://gigliwood.com/abcd/
- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Thursday, 25 October, 2007 03:01
Subject: AMRadio Digest, Vol 45, Issue 66



Send AMRadio mailing list submissions to
amradio@mailman.qth.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of AMRadio digest...


Today's Topics:

  1. Re: AM vs SSB! (Peter Markavage)
  2. Re: Re:  IARU bandplan ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  3. Re: AM vs SSB! (Bob Macklin)
  4. Re: Re: GB Re:  IARU bandplan ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  5. Re: Re:  IARU bandplan ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  6. Re: Re: GB Re:  IARU bandplan (Bob Macklin)
  7. Re:  IARU bandplan ([EMAIL PROTECTED])


--

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:44:00 -0400
From: Peter Markavage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] AM vs SSB!
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

And it was at the peak of the largest solar cycle on record.

Pete, wa2cwa

On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:07:14 -0700 Bob Macklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:

One of the primary thing that caused SSB to take over as the main
mode of phone operation was the hetrodyning caused by AM when the
bands were busy. And in 1957 and 58 the bands were very busy every
night! And at times they were very noisy.

SSB solved 2 problems. A given QSO only took 1/2 the space and the
hetrodynes were eliminated.

Unless the bands are very crowed, AM at 6KHz (KC/S) is really not a
problem.

Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa,
Real Radios Glow in the Dark



--

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:34:09 EDT
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Re:  IARU bandplan
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

PLEASE!  Enough of this.  My mailbox has been jammed for 3 days!  Just
let the issue die or discuss it direct.

Thanks and 73,

John,  W4AWM


**
See what's new at
http://www.aol.com


--

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:57:17 -0700
From: Bob Macklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] AM vs SSB!
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

And at that time I had a S-38 and a BC-312. Neither was worth a damn on 
75M

at night. But I was able to use the S-38 for my Novice CW work on 40M at
night. It was another 2 years before I got a decent receiver!

Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa,
Real Radios Glow in the Dark
- Original Message - 
From: Peter Markavage [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 7:44 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] AM vs SSB!



And it was at the peak of the largest solar cycle on record.

Pete, wa2cwa

On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:07:14 -0700 Bob Macklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
 One of the primary thing that caused SSB to take over as the main
 mode of phone operation was the hetrodyning caused by AM when the
 bands were busy. And in 1957 and 58 the bands were very busy every
 night! And at times they were very noisy.

 SSB solved 2 problems. A given QSO only took 1/2 the space and the
 hetrodynes were eliminated.

 Unless the bands are very crowed, AM at 6KHz (KC/S) is really not a
 problem.

 Bob Macklin
 K5MYJ
 Seattle, Wa,
 Real Radios Glow in the Dark
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.





--

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:09:25 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Re: GB Re:  IARU bandplan
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed



Geoff wrote:


Don/K4KYV runs a -great- signal at 3.1kc, when he's in the 'narrow'

mode

with active and passive band-pass and band-width filters (homebrewed,

of

course)


I'm sure Don sounds great but isn't it the modulating audio that is
being limited to 3.1 kHz?  That means the total bandwidth would be 6.2
kHz plus.


Steve WD8DAS

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.wd8das.net/

Re: [AMRadio] Tube substitute

2007-10-27 Thread Jim Candela
Rick,

   Look into the EF86 and the need to rewire the socket.

http://lists.radiolists.net/pipermail/broadcast/2005-February/002278.html

Jim
- Original Message 
From: Rick Brashear [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 1:34:51 PM
Subject: [AMRadio] Tube substitute


Does anyone know if there is a direct substitute fro a 5879 pentode? 

Thanks,
Rick/K5IAR

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.



__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] Do I Remember??

2007-10-27 Thread Bob Macklin
Do I remember correctly.

During the HOT TIME in 1957/58 people in the States were working Austraila on 
10M with low power transmitter. gennerally 25w or less.

That was also the period of the first Class D CB service. And even CBers were 
working Austrailia on 5W.

At that time 10M was a common mobile band so lower power transmitter were also 
common.

Do I remember that in that peroiod that high power transmitters were not common 
on 15M and 10M. Remember, those were the days before the high power linears 
that became popular in the 60's.

Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa,
Real Radios Glow in the Dark
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] RE: [Boatanchors] Do I Remember??

2007-10-27 Thread Bob Peters
Bob and all...I remember back in 1958 that we had a CD Unit in Bangor,
Maine and we all had 10 Watt 
transmitters on 29.520 and we would have a transmitter hunt every
Wednesday night. Many times guys from Australia, New Zeeland and other
countries would break in for signal reports and say they could copy our
hidden transmitter better then we could. One of our group owned a home
oil delivery company using High Band and he would dispatch trucks in
Australia and they would dispatch trucks in Maine...

A the good old days  HI  

Bob W1PE

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Macklin
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 2:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Boatanchors list; AM Radio
Subject: [Boatanchors] Do I Remember??


Do I remember correctly.

During the HOT TIME in 1957/58 people in the States were working
Austraila on 10M with low power transmitter. gennerally 25w or less.

That was also the period of the first Class D CB service. And even CBers
were working Austrailia on 5W.

At that time 10M was a common mobile band so lower power transmitter
were also common.

Do I remember that in that peroiod that high power transmitters were not
common on 15M and 10M. Remember, those were the days before the high
power linears that became popular in the 60's.

Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa,
Real Radios Glow in the Dark
___
Boatanchors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/boatanchors
** List Administrator - Duane Fischer, W8DBF/W9WZE **   
** For Assistance: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** 
$ For vintage radio info, see the HCI web site $  
http://www.w9wze.net   

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


RE: [AMRadio] Tube substitute

2007-10-27 Thread Rick Brashear
Thanks Jim.  Unfortunately, it's on an old PC board that I'd rather not
alter.  I guess I'll see if I can locate one or two the rascals.  It's my
understanding they are not the best of choices for audio preamps, but it's
what Gates used in the Studioette console, so I'll stick with the old boys.

73,
Rick/K5IAR


Rick,

   Look into the EF86 and the need to rewire the socket.

http://lists.radiolists.net/pipermail/broadcast/2005-February/002278.html

Jim

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Do I Remember??

2007-10-27 Thread Peter Markavage
That was during the largest recorded sunspot cycle. Guys on 6 meters were
working all over the country and even worldwide although there weren't
that many countries that had lots of 6 meter privileges. AM was still the
predominant mode on 6 although there were a few that were dabbling in
DSB. This period, and 6 meters, is what sparked my interest in amateur
radio.

Pete, wa2cwa

On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:02:09 -0700 Bob Macklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
 Do I remember correctly.
 
 During the HOT TIME in 1957/58 people in the States were working 
 Austraila on 10M with low power transmitter. gennerally 25w or 
 less.
 
 That was also the period of the first Class D CB service. And even 
 CBers were working Austrailia on 5W.
 
 At that time 10M was a common mobile band so lower power transmitter 
 were also common.
 
 Do I remember that in that peroiod that high power transmitters were 
 not common on 15M and 10M. Remember, those were the days before the 
 high power linears that became popular in the 60's.
 
 Bob Macklin
 K5MYJ
 Seattle, Wa,
 Real Radios Glow in the Dark
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Do I Remember??

2007-10-27 Thread Kim Elmore
I wasn't around for that time, though my Dad remembered it and used 
to talk about it a bit.  Of course, when I got my ticket, I used his 
equipment. The rx was a Hammarlund HQ-170A and I learned to tune in 
SSB using a BFO. I have always arrogantly sneered at the term 
clarifier, believing it to be uncouth and a term used mainly by the 
benighted.  :)


Kim Elmore, N5OP

But on a lighter note

At 03:41 PM 10/27/2007, you wrote:

In this period AM was the predominant phone mode period. SSB was the new kid
on the block. And most of us were receiving SSB on normal (non-SSB)
recievers by tweaking the BFO.

Now they make SSB rigs with a CLARIFER. I guse that is just an adjustble
BFO!

Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa,
Real Radios Glow in the Dark
- Original Message -
From: Peter Markavage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Do I Remember??


 That was during the largest recorded sunspot cycle. Guys on 6 meters were
 working all over the country and even worldwide although there weren't
 that many countries that had lots of 6 meter privileges. AM was still the
 predominant mode on 6 although there were a few that were dabbling in
 DSB. This period, and 6 meters, is what sparked my interest in amateur
 radio.

 Pete, wa2cwa

 On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:02:09 -0700 Bob Macklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 writes:
  Do I remember correctly.
 
  During the HOT TIME in 1957/58 people in the States were working
  Austraila on 10M with low power transmitter. gennerally 25w or
  less.
 
  That was also the period of the first Class D CB service. And even
  CBers were working Austrailia on 5W.
 
  At that time 10M was a common mobile band so lower power transmitter
  were also common.
 
  Do I remember that in that peroiod that high power transmitters were
  not common on 15M and 10M. Remember, those were the days before the
  high power linears that became popular in the 60's.
 
  Bob Macklin
  K5MYJ
  Seattle, Wa,
  Real Radios Glow in the Dark
 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] WWV (funny!)

2007-10-27 Thread Kim Elmore

OK, this is funny:

WWV Taken Over By Clear Channel

Word on the street is that the National Institute of Standards and
Technology is close to signing a Lease Management Agreement with Clear
Channel Communications, Inc. for its flagship Time and Frequency station
WWV, Fort Collins, Colorado.

Clear Channel Radio's consultants have demanded some changes to the
sound of the station, which broadcasts time of day, standard frequency,
and other information 24 hours per day, saying that the old format is
dull and predictable.

Additionally, WWV's traditional modulation level of 50 percent for the
steady tones, 50 percent for the BCD time code and 75 percent for the
voice announcements was deemed not loud enough. The station will
reformulate itself as The Tick.

WWV's program director Hickory Zeitgeist says that the station has
already added some snappy new announcements to the rotation, which can
be heard by clicking the clock in this link:

http://www.lownoiserecords.com/wwv_the_tick.html

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Re: AM recognition in the IARU Band Plan

2007-10-27 Thread SBJohnston
Don writes:

 Another point worth bringing up is a reminder that most commercially built 
 transceivers, whether US-built or made in Japan, now have the AM mode 
 included, and these radios are used world-wide.

I keep being surprised how many people are running AM these days.  Not but a 
few years ago it was pretty rare to hear an AM QSO on the bands, especially 
beyond 3885 and 7290.  But there are lots of operators working AM now.  

The other night one of the guys was actually complaining about there being 
too many AMers now.  He was bemoaning the fact that slopbucket ops were 
starting to get on AM.  I just smiled...

Steve WD8DAS







**
 See what's new at http://www.aol.com
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Do I Remember??

2007-10-27 Thread Bob Macklin
Clarifier is what the contol on my Uniden AM/SSB tranceiver I used to use
when we went camping.

I put it up last year to see if there was any local CB activity to see what
the conditions for 10M AM might be. The 11M band was just as dead as
everyting else. And local acifity is not a function of the solar cycle
except that no DX is coming in.

If Low Band FM works for local communication, then 10M can be used for local
communication. Even our 2M FM repaeters are dead except at comute times and
druing the local repeater nets. And that's only a couple times a week. It
lools like the old art of RAG CHEWING is fading into history.

Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa,
Real Radios Glow in the Dark
- Original Message - 
From: Kim Elmore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Do I Remember??


 I wasn't around for that time, though my Dad remembered it and used
 to talk about it a bit.  Of course, when I got my ticket, I used his
 equipment. The rx was a Hammarlund HQ-170A and I learned to tune in
 SSB using a BFO. I have always arrogantly sneered at the term
 clarifier, believing it to be uncouth and a term used mainly by the
 benighted.  :)

 Kim Elmore, N5OP

 But on a lighter note

 At 03:41 PM 10/27/2007, you wrote:
 In this period AM was the predominant phone mode period. SSB was the new
kid
 on the block. And most of us were receiving SSB on normal (non-SSB)
 recievers by tweaking the BFO.
 
 Now they make SSB rigs with a CLARIFER. I guse that is just an
adjustble
 BFO!
 
 Bob Macklin
 K5MYJ
 Seattle, Wa,
 Real Radios Glow in the Dark
 - Original Message -
 From: Peter Markavage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 1:27 PM
 Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Do I Remember??
 
 
   That was during the largest recorded sunspot cycle. Guys on 6 meters
were
   working all over the country and even worldwide although there weren't
   that many countries that had lots of 6 meter privileges. AM was still
the
   predominant mode on 6 although there were a few that were dabbling in
   DSB. This period, and 6 meters, is what sparked my interest in amateur
   radio.
  
   Pete, wa2cwa
  
   On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:02:09 -0700 Bob Macklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   writes:
Do I remember correctly.
   
During the HOT TIME in 1957/58 people in the States were working
Austraila on 10M with low power transmitter. gennerally 25w or
less.
   
That was also the period of the first Class D CB service. And even
CBers were working Austrailia on 5W.
   
At that time 10M was a common mobile band so lower power transmitter
were also common.
   
Do I remember that in that peroiod that high power transmitters were
not common on 15M and 10M. Remember, those were the days before the
high power linears that became popular in the 60's.
   
Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa,
Real Radios Glow in the Dark
   __
   Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
   AMRadio mailing list
   List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
   List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
   Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
   Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
   To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
   the word unsubscribe in the message body.
  
 
 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.

 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Re: AM recognition in the IARU Band Plan

2007-10-27 Thread Bob Macklin
I have been watching the sales of BoatAnchor AM receivers and transmitters
on ebay. I can't afford them anymore. But 10 years ago you could not give
them away!

But I am still not hearing any AM hear in Puget Sound.

Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa,
Real Radios Glow in the Dark
- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Re: AM recognition in the IARU Band Plan


 Don writes:

  Another point worth bringing up is a reminder that most commercially
built
  transceivers, whether US-built or made in Japan, now have the AM mode
  included, and these radios are used world-wide.

 I keep being surprised how many people are running AM these days.  Not but
a
 few years ago it was pretty rare to hear an AM QSO on the bands,
especially
 beyond 3885 and 7290.  But there are lots of operators working AM now.

 The other night one of the guys was actually complaining about there being
 too many AMers now.  He was bemoaning the fact that slopbucket ops were
 starting to get on AM.  I just smiled...

 Steve WD8DAS







 **
  See what's new at http://www.aol.com
 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] WWV (funny!)

2007-10-27 Thread KB2WIG
guess the time, win  $1,000 

- Original Message -
From: Kim Elmore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, October 27, 2007 6:35 pm
Subject: [AMRadio] WWV (funny!)
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net

 OK, this is funny:
 
 WWV Taken Over By Clear Channel
 
 Word on the street is that the National Institute of Standards and
 Technology is close to signing a Lease Management Agreement with 
Clear
 Channel Communications, Inc. for its flagship Time and Frequency 
 stationWWV, Fort Collins, Colorado.
 
 Clear Channel Radio's consultants have demanded some changes to the
 sound of the station, which broadcasts time of day, standard 
 frequency,and other information 24 hours per day, saying that the 
 old format is
 dull and predictable.
 
 Additionally, WWV's traditional modulation level of 50 percent for 
the
 steady tones, 50 percent for the BCD time code and 75 percent for the
 voice announcements was deemed not loud enough. The station will
 reformulate itself as The Tick.
 
 WWV's program director Hickory Zeitgeist says that the station has
 already added some snappy new announcements to the rotation, which 
can
 be heard by clicking the clock in this link:
 
 http://www.lownoiserecords.com/wwv_the_tick.html
 
 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.
 
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] WWV (funny!)

2007-10-27 Thread Jose HF Silva

OK, how does it work?

Joe - CT1AXG


--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 guess the time, win  $1,000 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Kim Elmore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Saturday, October 27, 2007 6:35 pm
 Subject: [AMRadio] WWV (funny!)
 To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
 
  OK, this is funny:
  
  WWV Taken Over By Clear Channel
  
  Word on the street is that the National Institute
 of Standards and
  Technology is close to signing a Lease Management
 Agreement with 
 Clear
  Channel Communications, Inc. for its flagship Time
 and Frequency 
  stationWWV, Fort Collins, Colorado.
  
  Clear Channel Radio's consultants have demanded
 some changes to the
  sound of the station, which broadcasts time of
 day, standard 
  frequency,and other information 24 hours per day,
 saying that the 
  old format is
  dull and predictable.
  
  Additionally, WWV's traditional modulation level
 of 50 percent for 
 the
  steady tones, 50 percent for the BCD time code and
 75 percent for the
  voice announcements was deemed not loud enough.
 The station will
  reformulate itself as The Tick.
  
  WWV's program director Hickory Zeitgeist says that
 the station has
  already added some snappy new announcements to the
 rotation, which 
 can
  be heard by clicking the clock in this link:
  
  http://www.lownoiserecords.com/wwv_the_tick.html
  
 

__
  Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
  AMRadio mailing list
  List Rules (must read!):
 http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
  List Home:
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
  Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
  To unsubscribe, send an email to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
  the word unsubscribe in the message body.
  

__
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 List Rules (must read!):
 http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home:
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Re: AM recognition in the IARU Band Plan

2007-10-27 Thread Peter Markavage
Actually, ten years ago, the auction sites were starting to take hold,
nostalgia (my first station, etc.) was starting to be the big buzzword.
Boatanchor pricing was already starting to climb. But 15 to 20 years ago,
I would agree, boatancher stuff was cheap, by the curb every week, and
calls for please come take it away; I can't lift it anymore were
common. My best boatanchor acquisitions (price wise) came during the late
80's to early 90's.

Pete, wa2cwa

On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 15:51:22 -0700 Bob Macklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
 I have been watching the sales of BoatAnchor AM receivers and 
 transmitters
 on ebay. I can't afford them anymore. But 10 years ago you could not 
 give
 them away!
 
 But I am still not hearing any AM hear in Puget Sound.
 
 Bob Macklin
 K5MYJ
 Seattle, Wa,
 Real Radios Glow in the Dark
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Re: AM recognition in the IARU Band Plan

2007-10-27 Thread Peter Markavage
I seriously doubt that the pricing of the amateur transceivers on the
market was driven up with the addition of the AM mode on their equipment.
Actually Kenwood (and only for several of their 70's transceivers) and
Yaesu included the AM mode for most of their HF transceivers on most of
their rigs over the past 35 years. Icom was the late comer in adding AM
into their rigs. They introduced their first HF SSB/CW rig into the U.S.
marketplace around 1970 or 71. I don't think they started adding the AM
mode to their rigs until the late 80's or early 90's. The U. S.
manufactures remaining during this time frame were generally a mixed bag
of offerings, but most moving just to SSB. Ten-Tec didn't include AM for
the longest time and Elecraft, with their new K3, now offers AM. Adding
AM, and probably currently undefined modes, to the new DSP class of
transceivers is probably just a few lines of code to the firmware.

The mode never left most of the rigs; amateurs left the mode.

Pete, wa2cwa

On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:54:18 -0500 D. Chester [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:



 Another point worth bringing up is a reminder that most commercially 
 built 
 transceivers, whether US-built or made in Japan, now have the AM 
 mode 
 included, and these radios are used world-wide.
 
 If there were no demand for AM capability, in the highly competitive 
 field 
 of ham radio transceivers the companies would not be driving up the 
 selling 
 prices of their products in order to include a mode that they 
 thought no-one 
 was interested in using.
 
 Don, k4kyv
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] WWV (funny!)

2007-10-27 Thread J.D. Mac Aulay, WQ8U
That is really funny :-)))
  thanks
  73
  Mac
  WQ8U
  Hillsborough, NC

Kim Elmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  OK, this is funny:

WWV Taken Over By Clear Channel

Word on the street is that the National Institute of Standards and
Technology is close to signing a Lease Management Agreement with Clear
Channel Communications, Inc. for its flagship Time and Frequency station
WWV, Fort Collins, Colorado.

Clear Channel Radio's consultants have demanded some changes to the
sound of the station, which broadcasts time of day, standard frequency,
and other information 24 hours per day, saying that the old format is
dull and predictable.

Additionally, WWV's traditional modulation level of 50 percent for the
steady tones, 50 percent for the BCD time code and 75 percent for the
voice announcements was deemed not loud enough. The station will
reformulate itself as The Tick.

WWV's program director Hickory Zeitgeist says that the station has
already added some snappy new announcements to the rotation, which can
be heard by clicking the clock in this link:

http://www.lownoiserecords.com/wwv_the_tick.html

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


 __
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.