Re: [AMRadio] The QST Doctor

2008-04-25 Thread Peter Markavage
Since the Doctor Is IN column was brought up for discussion here
several days ago (AM Bandwidth - broad is bad et al) you might want to
stop by the Doctor Is IN booth if you plan on attending the Dayton
Hamvention this year and meet all the on-call Doctors. Tell them in
person how you really feel.

From the ARRL Letter: You've read the column in QST for years and
everyone always wants to know who is behind the costume. Here's your
chance to stop by the booth, ask your question and have some one-on-one
time with ARRL's Technical Experts. You might even be able to submit a
stumper and get it published in QST,  This year's Docs On Call will be
QST Contributing Editor Ward Silver, N0AX; QEX Editor Larry Wolfgang,
WR1B; ARRL Senior Technical Editor Joel Hallas, W1ZR; QST Editor Steve
Ford, WB8IMY, and ARRL RF Engineer Mike Gruber, W1MG. On Saturday,
automotive experts Mark Steffka, WW8MS, and Don Hibbard, W8DBH, will be
on hand to answer your questions. They will be at the Doctor Booth.

Pete, wa2cwa
http://www.manualman.com
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] The QST Doctor

2008-04-19 Thread Warren Elly
These are vile people...narrow minded, with the arrl agenda of forcing  
their ham radio down our throats...

Warren W1GUD
Lifelong AMer
Lifetime Member ARRL Disenfranchised by League Policy
On Apr 17, 2008, at 6:29 PM, Joe Crawford wrote:

WB8IMY is his call.I think he is taking his cue from old Johnny  
Johnston, W3BE(ex-K3BNS) the AM-hater who is now retired from the FCC.

   Joe W4AAB
- Original Message - From: Mike Duke, K5XU  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Discussion of AM Radio amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 4:52 PM
Subject: [AMRadio] The QST Doctor


While the ARRL will deny it, scuttlebutt has it that the Doctor is  
Steve

Ford, the QST Editor.





Mike Duke, K5XU
American Council of Blind Radio Amateurs


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] The QST Doctor

2008-04-19 Thread JACK C. SHUTT
Does anybody really understand why there is all of this obsession with band 
width?  We recently had the phone band expanded, activity is noticeably down 
and these would-be bandwidth cops are still ranting about bandwidth 
conservation.  Why don't they just do their own thing and leave us alone?  
There is plenty of room for everyone.
   
  73,  Jack, W9GT

Warren Elly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  These are vile people...narrow minded, with the arrl agenda of forcing 
their ham radio down our throats...
Warren W1GUD
Lifelong AMer
Lifetime Member ARRL Disenfranchised by League Policy
On Apr 17, 2008, at 6:29 PM, Joe Crawford wrote:

 WB8IMY is his call.I think he is taking his cue from old Johnny 
 Johnston, W3BE(ex-K3BNS) the AM-hater who is now retired from the FCC.
 Joe W4AAB
 - Original Message - From: Mike Duke, K5XU 
 
 To: Discussion of AM Radio 
 Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 4:52 PM
 Subject: [AMRadio] The QST Doctor


 While the ARRL will deny it, scuttlebutt has it that the Doctor is 
 Steve
 Ford, the QST Editor.





 Mike Duke, K5XU
 American Council of Blind Radio Amateurs


 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.

 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] The QST Doctor

2008-04-19 Thread Jim Wilhite
Jack, some people have a great need to tell others how to behave or 
live.


Jim/W5JO




Does anybody really understand why there is all of this obsession with 
band width?  We recently had the phone band expanded, activity is 
noticeably down and these would-be bandwidth cops are still ranting 
about bandwidth conservation.  Why don't they just do their own thing 
and leave us alone?  There is plenty of room for everyone.


 73,  Jack, W9GT



__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] The QST Doctor

2008-04-19 Thread AirRadio
Jack, Its the same in the UK we have the RSGB and followers ranting on about 
AM users and such, too many hobby police again. I was amused about the 
wording on the back of the TX5C Clipperton Atoll dxpedition T shirt which 
states 'Split police no qsl for you'... says it all really. vy 73 Max M0GHQ




- Original Message - 
From: Jim Wilhite [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service 
amradio@mailman.qth.net

Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] The QST Doctor



Jack, some people have a great need to tell others how to behave or live.

Jim/W5JO




Does anybody really understand why there is all of this obsession with 
band width?  We recently had the phone band expanded, activity is 
noticeably down and these would-be bandwidth cops are still ranting about 
bandwidth conservation.  Why don't they just do their own thing and leave 
us alone?  There is plenty of room for everyone.


 73,  Jack, W9GT




__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] The QST Doctor

2008-04-19 Thread Peter Markavage
It's actually very simple. Many International amateur organizations
within countries are discussing and/or pushing for defined bandwidths for
all communication modes. As more and more of these become the law of
their land, sooner or later, pressure will be exerted for our own
government to conform. It may take years, but the writing is written on
the wall.

Pete, wa2cwa
http://www.manualman.com

On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 07:09:10 -0700 (PDT) JACK C. SHUTT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Does anybody really understand why there is all of this obsession 
 with band width?  We recently had the phone band expanded, activity 
 is noticeably down and these would-be bandwidth cops are still 
 ranting about bandwidth conservation.  Why don't they just do their 
 own thing and leave us alone?  There is plenty of room for everyone.

   73,  Jack, W9GT
 
 Warren Elly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   These are vile people...narrow minded, with the arrl agenda of 
 forcing 
 their ham radio down our throats...
 Warren W1GUD
 Lifelong AMer
 Lifetime Member ARRL Disenfranchised by League Policy
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] The QST Doctor

2008-04-19 Thread JACK C. SHUTT
Pete,
   
  I would say then...we need to exert pressure right back and do what is best 
for us and our interests.  We do not need to succumb to the so-called wisdom of 
other global  influences. We need to act like leaders and proponents of 
freedom of choice and diversity of interests within our hobby.  We need to 
continue to enjoy our favorite mode (AM) and champion its use by any who wish 
to participate.  At the same time, we should encourage clean operation and 
quality signals. 
   
  A lot of this bandwidth conservation baloney is supposedly based on promotion 
of superior technology, when in fact, it is really selfish 
politically-motivated elitism.  Like I said before, there is room for all of us 
to enjoy our favorite activity without forcing everyone to comply to bandwidth 
restrictions that clearly eliminate or severely restrict some modes.  I'm sure 
that there are a large number of radio amateurs that do not agree with the 
misplaced agenda of the elitists who seem to feel that if it isn't the latest 
technology, it must be abolished.  Gosh, if that were preferable...maybe we 
should all just revert to 100% CW for the ultimate in narrow band 
communications.  It seems to me that when people are enjoying something, there 
always have to be counter forces that continually try to spoil it for them.  
Many, if not most of the complaints against AM are generated by persons who 
seem to delight in creating discourse and ruining other's enjoyment of the 
hobby. 
 Instead of trying to get alongthey want it all their way, or not at all.  
They crowd up close to AM QSOs and then complain about the bandwidth taken up 
by AM.  They continually complain about splatter...when often they are creating 
more havoc themselves by overdriving linear amplifiers and exceeding the 
bandwidth of most properly operating AM transmitters.  This just not 
acceptable!  Just because these other interests are pushing for defined 
bandwidths for all modes, does not mean that we have to agree or knuckle under 
to their demands!
   
  73,  Jack, W9GT

Peter Markavage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  It's actually very simple. Many International amateur organizations
within countries are discussing and/or pushing for defined bandwidths for
all communication modes. As more and more of these become the law of
their land, sooner or later, pressure will be exerted for our own
government to conform. It may take years, but the writing is written on
the wall.

Pete, wa2cwa
http://www.manualman.com

On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 07:09:10 -0700 (PDT) JACK C. SHUTT
writes:
 Does anybody really understand why there is all of this obsession 
 with band width? We recently had the phone band expanded, activity 
 is noticeably down and these would-be bandwidth cops are still 
 ranting about bandwidth conservation. Why don't they just do their 
 own thing and leave us alone? There is plenty of room for everyone.
 
 73, Jack, W9GT
 
 Warren Elly wrote:
 These are vile people...narrow minded, with the arrl agenda of 
 forcing 
 their ham radio down our throats...
 Warren W1GUD
 Lifelong AMer
 Lifetime Member ARRL Disenfranchised by League Policy
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] The QST Doctor

2008-04-19 Thread EP Swynar
Hi Guys,

You'd think that with the graying of the Amateur Radio ranks, there'd be
room enough to embrace any and EVERY devotee of the hobby, rather than try
to cut them from the ranks...

I know what I'm talking about: I just came home from what is supposed to be
the BIGGEST Hamfest in Canada...by times I felt like I was attending some
senior citizens' outing. Everyone --- with the exception of yours truly, of
course (tongue pressed FIRMLY against cheek!) has aged, and there were VERY
few youngsters hanging about the place...

United we stand... correct? We're ALL Hams first, and AM'ers, homebrewers,
WHATEVER, second. Why can't people see this and simply accept the hobby for
the diverse thing that it is...?

~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ





- Original Message - 
From: JACK C. SHUTT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] The QST Doctor


 Pete,

   I would say then...we need to exert pressure right back and do what is
best for us and our interests.  We do not need to succumb to the so-called
wisdom of other global  influences. We need to act like leaders and
proponents of freedom of choice and diversity of interests within our hobby.
We need to continue to enjoy our favorite mode (AM) and champion its use by
any who wish to participate.  At the same time, we should encourage clean
operation and quality signals.

   A lot of this bandwidth conservation baloney is supposedly based on
promotion of superior technology, when in fact, it is really selfish
politically-motivated elitism.  Like I said before, there is room for all of
us to enjoy our favorite activity without forcing everyone to comply to
bandwidth restrictions that clearly eliminate or severely restrict some
modes.  I'm sure that there are a large number of radio amateurs that do not
agree with the misplaced agenda of the elitists who seem to feel that if it
isn't the latest technology, it must be abolished.  Gosh, if that were
preferable...maybe we should all just revert to 100% CW for the ultimate in
narrow band communications.  It seems to me that when people are enjoying
something, there always have to be counter forces that continually try to
spoil it for them.  Many, if not most of the complaints against AM are
generated by persons who seem to delight in creating discourse and ruining
other's enjoyment of the hobby.
  Instead of trying to get alongthey want it all their way, or not at
all.  They crowd up close to AM QSOs and then complain about the bandwidth
taken up by AM.  They continually complain about splatter...when often they
are creating more havoc themselves by overdriving linear amplifiers and
exceeding the bandwidth of most properly operating AM transmitters.  This
just not acceptable!  Just because these other interests are pushing for
defined bandwidths for all modes, does not mean that we have to agree or
knuckle under to their demands!

   73,  Jack, W9GT

 Peter Markavage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   It's actually very simple. Many International amateur organizations
 within countries are discussing and/or pushing for defined bandwidths for
 all communication modes. As more and more of these become the law of
 their land, sooner or later, pressure will be exerted for our own
 government to conform. It may take years, but the writing is written on
 the wall.

 Pete, wa2cwa
 http://www.manualman.com

 On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 07:09:10 -0700 (PDT) JACK C. SHUTT
 writes:
  Does anybody really understand why there is all of this obsession
  with band width? We recently had the phone band expanded, activity
  is noticeably down and these would-be bandwidth cops are still
  ranting about bandwidth conservation. Why don't they just do their
  own thing and leave us alone? There is plenty of room for everyone.
 
  73, Jack, W9GT
 
  Warren Elly wrote:
  These are vile people...narrow minded, with the arrl agenda of
  forcing
  their ham radio down our throats...
  Warren W1GUD
  Lifelong AMer
  Lifetime Member ARRL Disenfranchised by League Policy
 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.

 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net

[AMRadio] The QST Doctor

2008-04-17 Thread Mike Duke, K5XU
While the ARRL will deny it, scuttlebutt has it that the Doctor is Steve 
Ford, the QST Editor.





Mike Duke, K5XU
American Council of Blind Radio Amateurs


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] The QST Doctor

2008-04-17 Thread Joe Crawford
WB8IMY is his call.I think he is taking his cue from old Johnny Johnston, 
W3BE(ex-K3BNS) the AM-hater who is now retired from the FCC.

Joe W4AAB
- Original Message - 
From: Mike Duke, K5XU [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Discussion of AM Radio amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 4:52 PM
Subject: [AMRadio] The QST Doctor



While the ARRL will deny it, scuttlebutt has it that the Doctor is Steve
Ford, the QST Editor.





Mike Duke, K5XU
American Council of Blind Radio Amateurs


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.



__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.