[amsat-bb] AO-51 Mode V/S schedule should start 10:45Z 21Jun10

2010-06-21 Thread Andrew Glasbrenner
Please submit any reports to -bb or the website at 
http://oscar.dcarr.org/ . Of particular interest are reports between 
10:45 and 11:29 today. We may need a few passes to get the scheduling 
working right, so please send those reports, and bear with us.

73, Drew KO4MA
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] SO-67 back on air!

2010-06-21 Thread Jan-Albert Koekemoer
Hello

 

After much delay we are now in a position to re-activate the SA-AMSAT payload
schedules on a regular basis again!  

 

During the downtime we conducted several experiments in order to investigate
possible alternatives for the cut-off problem experienced by many at the
end of last year / beginning of this year.  The cut-off is caused by SW
running on piggyback electronics that continues to gate the received audio
onto the transmitter for about 3s after a specific ground transmission has
ended, whereafter the received audio is cut off.  The SW then waits for the
next ground transmission with a valid transponder tone embedded, before
gating the audio onto the transmitter again.  So if a second transmission
starts within the 3s tail period, it will be cut off when the 3s expires.
Listen to this mp3 recording as an example:  http://tinyurl.com/38vvg3o 

 

Unfortunately the piggyback electronics does not have reprogramming
functionality, so we are not able to change the SW.  We did however manage to
implement a mechanism on the satellite transponder (used by the piggyback)
that should be of some assistance when using the payload:  the PTT of the
transmitter now STAYS ON for the duration of the payload activation (i.e. 15
min), regardless of a valid transponder tone received.  Note that this does
not get rid of the cut-off problem, nor of the requirement to embed a valid
tone when you want to use the payload - see detailed explanation below.

 

The following example depicts the ideal usage scenario of the payload:

1.   As the satellite comes over the horizon, an unmodulated carrier
(quieting) will be received by all on UHF

2.   Person A starts to transmit on VHF (with valid transponding tone
embedded in the transmission) and the transmission is relayed on UHF

3.   When Person A releases his/her PTT, the satellite will continue to
transmit what it is receiving (usually this will be noise) for a further
±3s.  Nobody should start to transmit during this time!

4.   At the end of the ±3s period, everybody will again hear the
unmodulated carrier.

5.   NB: only when this unmodulated carrier is heard should Person B
start to transmit.  Listen to this mp3 recording as an example of valid
usage:  http://tinyurl.com/32rjbxm 

 

I suppose this will take some getting use to - at least the system has a
built-in punishment mechanism for the impatient! ;-)

 

Please refer to previous posts on general voice quality optimization when
using the SA-AMSAT payload on SO-67.  

 

I will request Gladys Magagula at the Satellite Application Centre to obtain
regular schedules from the regional coordinators as soon as possible.  We
will start off with day passes only, transmit on 2.5W and see how things go.

 

Enjoy!

 

Regards
Jan-Albert

 



Jan-Albert Koekemoer, PrEng

Sun Space  Information Systems (Pty) Ltd.

Stellenbosch, South Africa

www.sunspace.co.za http://www.sunspace.co.za 

+27 21 880 8117 (tel)

+27 83 461 6643 (cell)

+27 21 880 1703 (fax)

 



E-mail Disclaimer
http://www.sunspace.co.za/emaildisclaimer.htm

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Batteries for FT 817

2010-06-21 Thread Ron Overdrive
What you are seeing is over-charge which is normal. The battery should
settle around the 9.6v mark and last a while there. Even when charging my
Sanyo Superlatice Evo Cell 2700mah batteries I see over-charge. A good page
to look at regarding power consumption in the FT817 is
http://www.ka7oei.com/ft817_pwr.html . He sums up that a good way to
conserve power is to turn the IPO On, keep the NB Off, keep the Screen
Backlight Off, and stick to using the Front BNC connector will save the most
power. Wearing headphones and transmitting on lower power helps out too.

~73, KC2WQW

On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:12 PM, ANTHONY JAPHA tjja...@earthlink.netwrote:

 I use 2 FT817s for portable ops, and have been disappointed in the battery
 performance.  Last year, I bought replacement batteries from Batteries
 America, the FNB-72xe, rated at 9.6v. at 2000mAh.  There's no noticable
 difference between these new batteries and the originals.

 The batteries charge to just over 11.0 volts, but quickly drop through 10
 volts, as indicated by the voltage reading that appears when the rigs are
 turned on.  Maybe this is just normal behavior for a 9.6 v. battery.  Is
 this what you would expect?  Has anyone found a battery with a higher
 voltage rating and/or one that will maintain a higher voltage for an
 appreciable period--and fits into the 817?  Every bit of power helps!

 Many tnx and 73,
 Tony, N2UN
 LM 183
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: [Sumbandila: 250] SO-67 back on air!

2010-06-21 Thread Madhukar KR
Dear Sumbandila Team,

Congrats and Thanks for getting SO-67 back on the air again.  Will certainly
look forward to work through the Satellite again.

We fully understand the requirement for activation during Day time passes.
Since most of us here in India use simple Fixed antenna setups - please
consider the Higher Elevation Angles ahead of the lower ones - if all the
passes cannot be activated.  Personal request from the small group here in
South India.

The Sked required for the Day Passes over Indian Subcontinent is a follows:

 Satellite Start time IST START UTC Start AZ Peak AZ Peak EL END - UTC End
Az SUMBANDILA (SO-67) 22-Jun-10 08:31:56 03:01 31 101 20 03:12:51 167
SUMBANDILA
(SO-67) 22-Jun-10 10:06:07 04:36 338 282 11 04:45:42 229 SUMBANDILA (SO-67)
23-Jun-10 08:13:52 02:43 43 99 10 02:53:27 153 SUMBANDILA (SO-67) 23-Jun-10
09:46:51 04:16 350 280 21 04:27:41 215 SUMBANDILA (SO-67) 24-Jun-10 07:56:20
02:26 59 98 4 02:33:30 135 SUMBANDILA (SO-67) 24-Jun-10 09:27:50 03:57 0 278
41 04:09:25 203 SUMBANDILA (SO-67) 25-Jun-10 09:09:03 03:39 10 196 88
03:50:53 191 SUMBANDILA (SO-67) 26-Jun-10 08:50:28 03:20 20 106 41 03:32:08
179 SUMBANDILA (SO-67) 26-Jun-10 10:26:04 04:56 324 284 4 05:03:19 246
SUMBANDILA
(SO-67) 27-Jun-10 08:32:08 03:02 31 101 21 03:13:03 167 SUMBANDILA (SO-67)
27-Jun-10 10:06:21 04:36 338 282 10 04:45:51 229

Request an early confirmation so that the same can be published among the
Local Hams and hope good activity from India.

Further sked for the next week will be emailed on Friday before 1200Z

Madhukar – VU2MUD
Yahoo Mail: vu2...@yahoo.co.uk
Gmail: vu2...@gmail.com
General Blog: http://vu2mud.blogspot.com
Satellite Blog: http://workingtheoscars.blogspot.com
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Jan-Albert Koekemoer 
jan.koekem...@sunspace.co.za wrote:

  Hello



 After much delay we are now in a position to re-activate the SA-AMSAT
 payload schedules on a regular basis again!



 During the downtime we conducted several experiments in order to
 investigate possible alternatives for the “cut-off” problem experienced by
 many at the end of last year / beginning of this year.  The cut-off is
 caused by SW running on piggyback electronics that continues to gate the
 received audio onto the transmitter for about 3s after a specific ground
 transmission has ended, whereafter the received audio is cut off.  The SW
 then waits for the next ground transmission with a valid “transponder” tone
 embedded, before gating the audio onto the transmitter again.  So if a
 second transmission starts within the 3s “tail” period, it will be cut off
 when the 3s expires.  Listen to this mp3 recording as an example:
 http://tinyurl.com/38vvg3o* *



 Unfortunately the piggyback electronics does not have reprogramming
 functionality, so we are not able to change the SW.  We did however manage
 to implement a mechanism on the satellite transponder (used by the
 piggyback) that should be of some assistance when using the payload:  the
 PTT of the transmitter now STAYS ON for the duration of the payload
 activation (i.e. 15 min), regardless of a valid “transponder” tone
 received.  Note that this does not get rid of the “cut-off” problem, nor of
 the requirement to embed a valid tone when you want to use the payload – see
 detailed explanation below.



 The following example depicts the ideal usage scenario of the payload:

 1.   As the satellite comes over the horizon, an unmodulated carrier
 (“quieting”) will be received by all on UHF

 2.   Person A starts to transmit on VHF (with valid “transponding”
 tone embedded in the transmission) and the transmission is relayed on UHF

 3.   When Person A releases his/her PTT, the satellite will continue
 to transmit what it is receiving (usually this will be “noise”) for a
 further ±3s.  Nobody should start to transmit during this time!

 4.   At the end of the ±3s period, everybody will again hear the
 unmodulated carrier.

 5.   NB: only when this unmodulated carrier is heard should Person B
 start to transmit.  Listen to this mp3 recording as an example of valid
 usage:  http://tinyurl.com/32rjbxm* *



 I suppose this will take some getting use to – at least the system has a
 built-in “punishment” mechanism for the impatient! ;-)



 Please refer to previous posts on general voice quality optimization when
 using the SA-AMSAT payload on SO-67.



 I will request Gladys Magagula at the Satellite Application Centre to
 obtain regular schedules from the regional coordinators as soon as
 possible.  We will start off with day passes only, transmit on 2.5W and see
 how things go.



 Enjoy!



 Regards
 Jan-Albert



 

 *Jan-Albert Koekemoer, PrEng***

 *Sun Space  Information Systems (Pty) Ltd.*

 Stellenbosch, South Africa

 www.sunspace.co.za

 +27 21 880 8117 (tel)

 +27 83 461 6643 (cell)

 +27 21 880 1703 (fax)



 E-mail Disclaimer
 http://www.sunspace.co.za/emaildisclaimer.htm

 

[amsat-bb] Re: Batteries for FT 817

2010-06-21 Thread G0MRF
 
In a message dated 21/06/2010 17:27:29 GMT Standard Time,  
tjja...@earthlink.net writes:

I use 2  FT817s for portable ops, and have been disappointed in the battery 
 performance.  Last year, I bought replacement batteries from Batteries  
America, the FNB-72xe, rated at 9.6v. at 2000mAh.  There's no noticable  
difference between these new batteries and the originals.

The batteries  charge to just over 11.0 volts, but quickly drop through 10 
volts, as  indicated by the voltage reading that appears when the rigs are 
turned  on.  Maybe this is just normal behavior for a 9.6 v. battery.  Is  
this what you would expect?  Has anyone found a battery with a higher  voltage 
rating and/or one that will maintain a higher voltage for an  appreciable 
period--and fits into the 817?  Every bit of power  helps!

Many tnx and 73,
Tony, N2UN
LM  183



Hi Tony.
 
Not sure about fitting in the FT817But there are a lot of people over  
here participating in summits on the air driving / walking /  climbing to 
the top of a peak and making some QSOs. The FT817 is very  popular and they 
all seem to be using 3 series Lithium polymer cells.
According to the hype, the lithium polymers weigh nothing hold nearly  
infinate charge and finally discharge within a few seconds of the natural  
lifespan of the operators radio.
 
Whatever the reality, they may be worth investigating.
 
Regards
 
David  G0MRF  
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Electronics parts in space?

2010-06-21 Thread Andy Brian
what happen with electronics parts in space like
quartz and electrolytic capacitor in vacuum. I have never heard
about how quartz works in space is there any limitations?
I know that some plastic outgasing and  are not suitable for use
in space, but if using COTS technology like hamradio station yaesu vx-series
on cubesats,
I believe that there are many electronics parts which are crytical for
use on the cubesats?

thanks for comments,
 best regards
Andy
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: SO-67 back on air!

2010-06-21 Thread Eric Knaps, ON4HF
Hi there,

Do you really think that the European alligators will wait for 3 seconds?


Op 21/06/2010 16:04, Jan-Albert Koekemoer schreef:
 Hello



 After much delay we are now in a position to re-activate the SA-AMSAT payload
 schedules on a regular basis again!



 During the downtime we conducted several experiments in order to investigate
 possible alternatives for the cut-off problem experienced by many at the
 end of last year / beginning of this year.  The cut-off is caused by SW
 running on piggyback electronics that continues to gate the received audio
 onto the transmitter for about 3s after a specific ground transmission has
 ended, whereafter the received audio is cut off.  The SW then waits for the
 next ground transmission with a valid transponder tone embedded, before
 gating the audio onto the transmitter again.  So if a second transmission
 starts within the 3s tail period, it will be cut off when the 3s expires.
 Listen to this mp3 recording as an example:  http://tinyurl.com/38vvg3o



 Unfortunately the piggyback electronics does not have reprogramming
 functionality, so we are not able to change the SW.  We did however manage to
 implement a mechanism on the satellite transponder (used by the piggyback)
 that should be of some assistance when using the payload:  the PTT of the
 transmitter now STAYS ON for the duration of the payload activation (i.e. 15
 min), regardless of a valid transponder tone received.  Note that this does
 not get rid of the cut-off problem, nor of the requirement to embed a valid
 tone when you want to use the payload - see detailed explanation below.



 The following example depicts the ideal usage scenario of the payload:

 1.   As the satellite comes over the horizon, an unmodulated carrier
 (quieting) will be received by all on UHF

 2.   Person A starts to transmit on VHF (with valid transponding tone
 embedded in the transmission) and the transmission is relayed on UHF

 3.   When Person A releases his/her PTT, the satellite will continue to
 transmit what it is receiving (usually this will be noise) for a further
 ±3s.  Nobody should start to transmit during this time!

 4.   At the end of the ±3s period, everybody will again hear the
 unmodulated carrier.

 5.   NB: only when this unmodulated carrier is heard should Person B
 start to transmit.  Listen to this mp3 recording as an example of valid
 usage:  http://tinyurl.com/32rjbxm



 I suppose this will take some getting use to - at least the system has a
 built-in punishment mechanism for the impatient! ;-)



 Please refer to previous posts on general voice quality optimization when
 using the SA-AMSAT payload on SO-67.



 I will request Gladys Magagula at the Satellite Application Centre to obtain
 regular schedules from the regional coordinators as soon as possible.  We
 will start off with day passes only, transmit on 2.5W and see how things go.



 Enjoy!



 Regards
 Jan-Albert



 

 Jan-Albert Koekemoer, PrEng

 Sun Space  Information Systems (Pty) Ltd.

 Stellenbosch, South Africa

 www.sunspace.co.zahttp://www.sunspace.co.za

 +27 21 880 8117 (tel)

 +27 83 461 6643 (cell)

 +27 21 880 1703 (fax)





 E-mail Disclaimer
 http://www.sunspace.co.za/emaildisclaimer.htm

 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb




-- 
Amateur Radio Station ON4HF
Eric Knaps
Satellite manager UBA

Tel. +32472985876 (mobile)

http://www.on4hf.be

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: SO-67 back on air!

2010-06-21 Thread George Henry
Please consider making it available for all passes over N. America this weekend 
(1800Z 26 June to 2100Z 27 June) for ARRL and AMSAT Field Day use...


73,

George, KA3HSW



- Original Message 
 From: Jan-Albert Koekemoer jan.koekem...@sunspace.co.za
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Cc: Gladys Magagula gmagag...@csir.co.za; sumband...@googlegroups.com; Hans 
 van de Groenendaal h...@intekom.co.za
 Sent: Mon, June 21, 2010 9:04:52 AM
 Subject: [amsat-bb] SO-67 back on air!
 
 Hello



After much delay we are now in a position to re-activate 
 the SA-AMSAT payload
schedules on a regular basis again!  

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: SO-67 back on air!

2010-06-21 Thread PE0SAT

On Mon, June 21, 2010 20:01, Eric Knaps, ON4HF wrote:
 Hi there,

Hi Eric,


 Do you really think that the European alligators will wait for 3 seconds?


I rest my case :))

Perhaps when the crocodiles have read this, things wil change?

Some self-reflection would be appropriate ...

73 Jan PE0SAT

 Op 21/06/2010 16:04, Jan-Albert Koekemoer schreef:
 Hello



 After much delay we are now in a position to re-activate the SA-AMSAT
 payload
 schedules on a regular basis again!



 During the downtime we conducted several experiments in order to
 investigate
 possible alternatives for the cut-off problem experienced by many at
 the
 end of last year / beginning of this year.  The cut-off is caused by SW
 running on piggyback electronics that continues to gate the received
 audio
 onto the transmitter for about 3s after a specific ground transmission
 has
 ended, whereafter the received audio is cut off.  The SW then waits for
 the
 next ground transmission with a valid transponder tone embedded,
 before
 gating the audio onto the transmitter again.  So if a second
 transmission
 starts within the 3s tail period, it will be cut off when the 3s
 expires.
 Listen to this mp3 recording as an example:  http://tinyurl.com/38vvg3o



 Unfortunately the piggyback electronics does not have reprogramming
 functionality, so we are not able to change the SW.  We did however
 manage to
 implement a mechanism on the satellite transponder (used by the
 piggyback)
 that should be of some assistance when using the payload:  the PTT of
 the
 transmitter now STAYS ON for the duration of the payload activation
 (i.e. 15
 min), regardless of a valid transponder tone received.  Note that this
 does
 not get rid of the cut-off problem, nor of the requirement to embed a
 valid
 tone when you want to use the payload - see detailed explanation below.



 The following example depicts the ideal usage scenario of the payload:

 1.   As the satellite comes over the horizon, an unmodulated carrier
 (quieting) will be received by all on UHF

 2.   Person A starts to transmit on VHF (with valid transponding
 tone
 embedded in the transmission) and the transmission is relayed on UHF

 3.   When Person A releases his/her PTT, the satellite will continue
 to
 transmit what it is receiving (usually this will be noise) for a
 further
 ±3s.  Nobody should start to transmit during this time!

 4.   At the end of the ±3s period, everybody will again hear the
 unmodulated carrier.

 5.   NB: only when this unmodulated carrier is heard should Person B
 start to transmit.  Listen to this mp3 recording as an example of valid
 usage:  http://tinyurl.com/32rjbxm



 I suppose this will take some getting use to - at least the system has a
 built-in punishment mechanism for the impatient! ;-)



 Please refer to previous posts on general voice quality optimization
 when
 using the SA-AMSAT payload on SO-67.



 I will request Gladys Magagula at the Satellite Application Centre to
 obtain
 regular schedules from the regional coordinators as soon as possible.
 We
 will start off with day passes only, transmit on 2.5W and see how things
 go.



 Enjoy!



___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] SatPC32 stopped working!

2010-06-21 Thread Larry Gerhardstein
My SatPC32 stopped working.  I get an error message Warnung: No source 
file was found for group Standard.  Please select a source file for this 
group after the 'OK'.  IMPORTANT: In orcer to store the filename for 
later starts open the menu 'Satelliten' and click on the 'OK' - button.


The SatPC32 application sort of comes up but there is nothing in its window.

What am I supposed to do?  SatPC32ISS gives the same problem with the 
word 'ISS' substituted for 'Standard'.  Should I reinstall?


Larry W7IN

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Batteries for FT 817 - Minigorilla

2010-06-21 Thread Graham Shirville
Hi Tony,

For what it is worth...not internal but very light and stay at a full 12V 
running an FT817 for a long time...
http://www.maplin.co.uk/Module.aspx?ModuleNo=346013TabID=1C=SOU=strat25doy=searchma=Maplin%20Minigorilla%99%20Cheap%20Deals#spec


73

Graham
G3VZV
- Original Message - 
From: g0...@aol.com
To: tjja...@earthlink.net; amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 6:32 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Batteries for FT 817



 In a message dated 21/06/2010 17:27:29 GMT Standard Time,
 tjja...@earthlink.net writes:

 I use 2  FT817s for portable ops, and have been disappointed in the 
 battery
 performance.  Last year, I bought replacement batteries from Batteries
 America, the FNB-72xe, rated at 9.6v. at 2000mAh.  There's no noticable
 difference between these new batteries and the originals.

 The batteries  charge to just over 11.0 volts, but quickly drop through 10
 volts, as  indicated by the voltage reading that appears when the rigs are
 turned  on.  Maybe this is just normal behavior for a 9.6 v. battery.  Is
 this what you would expect?  Has anyone found a battery with a higher 
 voltage
 rating and/or one that will maintain a higher voltage for an  appreciable
 period--and fits into the 817?  Every bit of power  helps!

 Many tnx and 73,
 Tony, N2UN
 LM  183



 Hi Tony.

 Not sure about fitting in the FT817But there are a lot of people over
 here participating in summits on the air driving / walking /  climbing 
 to
 the top of a peak and making some QSOs. The FT817 is very  popular and 
 they
 all seem to be using 3 series Lithium polymer cells.
 According to the hype, the lithium polymers weigh nothing hold nearly
 infinate charge and finally discharge within a few seconds of the natural
 lifespan of the operators radio.

 Whatever the reality, they may be worth investigating.

 Regards

 David  G0MRF
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: SO-67 back on air!

2010-06-21 Thread Tony Langdon
At 12:04 AM 6/22/2010, Jan-Albert Koekemoer wrote:
Hello



After much delay we are now in a position to re-activate the SA-AMSAT payload
schedules on a regular basis again!

Excellent news! :)


73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] HO-68 pass NA 6 June 2010 -- 0100-014 UTC -- Just FM carrier no AFSK

2010-06-21 Thread Bruce Semple


I had my WISP all primed  ready to go --
TNC was ready --

I saw the S meter peak at S9+40 --
but no AFSK heard by me or my TNC ...

Did anybody else hear the BBS?

Bruce
WA3SWJ

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] SO-67 skid times

2010-06-21 Thread John Price
Can anyone tell me were the schedule for this satellite is published.
I don't seem to be able to find it. I listened for it this evening and
heard nothing in FM07. Anyone else heard it since the announced
reactivation. Any info would be appreciated.

I also listened for HO-68 this evening and heard nothing but a solid
carrier. It was supposed to be in FM/Pacsat mode according to the
website. Maybe I missed something. Does this mean it is in digital
mode and running FM modulation or does it mean it is running both FM
voice and pacsat digital at the same time. Anyone got a answer?

73's  John

-- 
N4QWF Amateur Radio Operator
AO-7,AO-27,FO-29,SO-50,AO-51,VO-52,ISS
Email n4...@amsat.org
Formerly KC4AHW  VK3FEZ
Amsat Member #27845
DXCC #33,478
VUCC SAT #135
WAS SAT #296
51 on AO-51 #13
LON -79.256 LAT 37.459 Grid FM07il
From the Foothills of the Blueridge

*Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of
arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to
skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly
proclaiming - WOW, What a ride!
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb