[amsat-bb] Re: FO-29

2011-01-23 Thread Bob- W7LRD


Kevin 

I worked "myself" the whole pass.  The satellite covered the western half of 
the country. 

73 Bob W7LRD 
- Original Message - 
From: "Kevin Deane"  
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org 
Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 9:24:32 PM 
Subject: [amsat-bb]  FO-29 


Hello, 
  
    I was wondering if anyone has been/going to be making any latenight 
contacts on the FO-29? 
  
Rookie 
Kevin 
KF7MYK        
___ 
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. 
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! 
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] FO-29

2011-01-23 Thread Kevin Deane

Hello,
 
I was wondering if anyone has been/going to be making any latenight 
contacts on the FO-29?
 
Rookie
Kevin
KF7MYK
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Tracking with parallel to USB converter

2011-01-23 Thread Gary "Joe" Mayfield
Wayne,

 I have had good luck adding a parallel port for use with FODTrack, but
I used a PCI card, not a USB adapter.

73,
Joe kk0sd

-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Wayne Estes
Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 5:27 PM
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Tracking with parallel to USB converter

I want to use my HalloRotor parallel-port rotor interface with a new PC 
that doesn't have a parallel port.  Has anybody had success using a 
parallel-to-USB converter with a parallel port rotor interface?

In the past I used a parallel-to-USB converter and Windows device 
manager decided that it was a "USB printer", not LPT2.  Is there a model 
of parallel-to-USB converter that Windows recognizes as a LPTx ?

Wayne Estes W9AE
Oakland, Oregon, USA, CN83ik


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Antenna Observations/Question

2011-01-23 Thread Rocky Jones

Rick.

on the "cheap" antenna front I've tried and had pretty good success with two 
things.

First there is a 5 element Yagi design that was published in QST that 
uses/modifies an Archer 5 element FM yagi.  I built one and added some 70 cm 
elements 90 out of phase and thats worked great.  My home QTH is in a bit of 
flux (we are moving to a farm out by Santa Fe Tx from my home QTH in Clear Lake 
TX) so I built another one, put them both on a boom 90 degrees out in an X 
configuration, stuck them at 33 degrees and they work well.  I will keep them 
once we move into the perm QTH.

I've also used the crossed dipoles and Lindenblad antenna from QST (not the 
AMSAT one) and they work great.  I modified one for WX satellite reception and 
am very happy with them.

I am in Nigeria now and have a modified Lindenblad for my WX station here but 
its copied really well most of the two meter Oscars including AO-7.   I didnt 
have Nigerian operating authority when I left the states (but now have a five 
year license) so I didnt bring any transmit equipment...but from the roof of 
the Sheraton in Abuja the WX version works great.  I've got permission to set 
up permanent antennas on the Sheraton and I will be back so am going to have 
some good operating here.

I would upload pictures, but I tried to upload some of the really big HF array 
on the road to the airport and they never showed up...if you want some pictures 
of what I have at home I will be happy to send them to you.  IN about two weeks!

Robert G. Oler WB5MZO Life member Amsat/ARRL

> Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 12:47:10 -0500
> From: rjl...@gmail.com
> To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
> Subject: [amsat-bb]  Antenna Observations/Question
> 
> I've been on the birds off an on for years. I have an M2 cir. polarized pair
> at home QTH and am looking into a more modest installation for a summer
> cottage. I've built the K5OE eggbeater imitations and founds them to be only
> fair.I could by M2 eggbeater pair but I'm trying to do this on less $. I
> also have an Arrow antenna which I've tried some with a HT with only fair
> results. Any other suggestions out there? Mount the Arrow more permanently
> but at a fixed elevation and use a simple rotor to change azimuth? How about
> a homebrewed quagi? Any suggestions appreciated.
> 
> Rick
> W2JAZ
> ___
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: KD8KSN/8 EN90/EM99 Next Saturday (29th)

2011-01-23 Thread Zachary Beougher
Change of plans.

Instead of working 2 eastern passes and only one western pass, I thought I 
would switch it around.  Here are the corrected pass/times:

AO27 - 1952z (favors west)

AO51 - 2012z (favors east)
AO51 - 2149z (favors west)

I will only be running 5w as usual, so please have patience, especially if 
the activity on the birds is anything like it has been the past month.

73!

Zack
KD8KSN

-Original Message- 
From: Zachary Beougher
Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 5:04 PM
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] KD8KSN/8 EN90/EM99 Next Saturday (29th)

Hi All,

Due to the fact that several stations that wanted either EN90 or EM99 or 
both did not get to work me last time since I went during the week, I have 
decided to make another trip out to the boundary next Saturday (29th) from 
about 1800z – 2030z.  I plan to be on the following passes from this 
boundary:

AO27 – 1817z
AO27 – 1952z

AO51 – 2012z

This trip will be a little shorter than last time, but passes should be a 
little more productive since it will be on a weekend.

I will have the D7 beaconing in between passes - http://aprs.fi/kd8ksn-9  I 
will only be running 5w, or 6-7w if it is plugged into the vehicle, so I may 
not be on the internet depending on were I am in relation to a digi.

I will QSL everyone in the log as I did last time, so no need for a return 
card/SASE.

I will post a reminder as the time gets closer.

73!

Zack
KD8KSN
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Tracking with parallel to USB converter

2011-01-23 Thread Wayne Estes
I want to use my HalloRotor parallel-port rotor interface with a new PC 
that doesn't have a parallel port.  Has anybody had success using a 
parallel-to-USB converter with a parallel port rotor interface?

In the past I used a parallel-to-USB converter and Windows device 
manager decided that it was a "USB printer", not LPT2.  Is there a model 
of parallel-to-USB converter that Windows recognizes as a LPTx ?

Wayne Estes W9AE
Oakland, Oregon, USA, CN83ik


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Antenna Observations/Question

2011-01-23 Thread Ted
Hi Rick, I too tried the eggbeaters  and found them worthless. Also tried a
commercial made quadrifilar rx from antenna.us. then...

In the ARRL Satellite Handbook found the Moxon turnstile for the LEOs. Being
a fan of Moxons, I have built both the tx and rx and am quite please with
performance over the past antennas. Built all from pvc and brass tubing from
the hobby shop. You should be able to build both for less than _+ $25.00 and
your junk box.

The article is on the ARRL site or maybe search internet (Moxon turnstile
antenna)

I think this will fill your requirements

GL, Ted K7TRK

-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Richard Lawn
Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 9:47 AM
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Antenna Observations/Question

I've been on the birds off an on for years. I have an M2 cir. polarized pair
at home QTH and am looking into a more modest installation for a summer
cottage. I've built the K5OE eggbeater imitations and founds them to be only
fair.I could by M2 eggbeater pair but I'm trying to do this on less $. I
also have an Arrow antenna which I've tried some with a HT with only fair
results. Any other suggestions out there? Mount the Arrow more permanently
but at a fixed elevation and use a simple rotor to change azimuth? How about
a homebrewed quagi? Any suggestions appreciated.

Rick
W2JAZ
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: EM06/EM07/EM16/EM17

2011-01-23 Thread Tyler Nicholas
I am sorry if anyone was looking for me today. I am having some equipment 
problems and I am working on fixing them. I will try to be on some Sunday 
afternoon passes.

73,
Tyler Nicholas K5TDN

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 21, 2011, at 11:07 PM, Tyler Nicholas  wrote:

> Hello all,
> 
> I will be at the four corners of EM06/EM07/EM16/EM17 tomorrow (1/22) 
> afternoon 

> starting around 2100z.  I can only get to 2 grids at a time, so I think I 
> will 

> do EM06/EM07 and EM16/EM17.  I will be in EM06 when I am not at the corner, 
> so 

> there's a possibility I will be on other sats this weekend.
> 
> 
> Here are the passes that I can be on:
> 
> EM06/EM07
> AO-51 21:30Z - 21:44Z
> FO-29 21:54Z - 22:13Z (look for me around 435.870 +-10)
> 
> EM16/EM17
> AO-51 23:08Z - 23:23Z
> FO-29 23:39Z - 23:59Z
> -
> 
> 73,
> Tyler Nicholas K5TDN
> ___
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] KD8KSN/8 EN90/EM99 Next Saturday (29th)

2011-01-23 Thread Zachary Beougher
Hi All,

Due to the fact that several stations that wanted either EN90 or EM99 or both 
did not get to work me last time since I went during the week, I have decided 
to make another trip out to the boundary next Saturday (29th) from about 1800z 
– 2030z.  I plan to be on the following passes from this boundary:

AO27 – 1817z
AO27 – 1952z

AO51 – 2012z

This trip will be a little shorter than last time, but passes should be a 
little more productive since it will be on a weekend.

I will have the D7 beaconing in between passes - http://aprs.fi/kd8ksn-9  I 
will only be running 5w, or 6-7w if it is plugged into the vehicle, so I may 
not be on the internet depending on were I am in relation to a digi.

I will QSL everyone in the log as I did last time, so no need for a return 
card/SASE.  

I will post a reminder as the time gets closer.  

73!

Zack
KD8KSN 
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: KB3QLK/P FM28 Delaware 1700z 1/30 - 1700z 1/31

2011-01-23 Thread Zachary Beougher
I just realized that Saturday is the 29 and Sunday is the 30.  So, the 
correct times/dates are 1700z January 29 - 1700z January 30.

73!

Zack
KD8KSN

-Original Message- 
From: Zachary Beougher
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 9:58 PM
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] KB3QLK/P FM28 Delaware 1700z 1/30 - 1700z 1/31

Hi,

Jamie, KB3QLK, will be doing a demo(s) for his club during Winter Field Day 
this Saturday-Sunday (30-31).  He will be operating the birds using his 
personal call before the event, then he will be using the club’s call, 
KB3BHL, during the event.  This will be a good opportunity for any stations 
(especially the western stations) to work DE for WAS.

Good luck with the QSOs!

Zack
KD8KSN
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] M2 44 el CP antenna available

2011-01-23 Thread chris pellenz
Hi All,

Its been quite a while since Ive posted here
Ive been lurking again for the last few weeks.
hope all is well for you...

In the early 90's I purchased a M2 440 CP antenna
from a neighbor using it for AO-10.  I was planning to
use it with AO-40... well that didnt happen...

If anyone is interested in purchasing this antenna it is available.
It has been in the barn all these years and I realize I probably 
wont get to setting it up.  I would really like to see someone get
the intended use out of it.  It is about 20 feet long currently in 2 ~10ft. 
pieces.
I thought it was a 44 element I see M2 does 42 element now.. so Id have to 
check.
Somewhere I have the paperwork on it but I cant guarantee I can find it.
It is set up I think for RHCP but you could change that ... it does not 
have the remote switching capability.  You would have to do it manually
or get a switch to do it from the shack.  

Incidentally, I have a bunch of other stuff as well... like silver N connectors 
etc...
and other stuff as well.  Although my Kenpro az/el and FT-736 2M, 220, 440, 1.2 
is long gone
I do have some other stuff that can go.
If someone is interested, I will be glad to take detailed pictures and email 
them.

I really am not interested in disassembling the antenna so I hope it could be 
pickup only
but I can look at it and see if I can get it down to 4 x 5 ft sections (I think 
it will) but I would
not want to remove each element as if you are familiar with these Im sure you 
can understand,
I am near Syracuse, NY USA.

73's,
Chris
KC2BBU


  
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: VUCC QSO costs

2011-01-23 Thread John Neeley
Bruce is the best, and very timely...appreciate all that he does in working 
as a volunteer card checker and awards manager for Amsat...

John W6ZKH







From: Bruce Paige 
To: Zachary Beougher ; John Neeley ; 
Rick - WA4NVM ; Jeff Yanko ; 
amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Sat, January 22, 2011 7:58:40 AM
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC QSO costs


no, if you take or send your cards to an arrl awards manager (i am one for 
vucc, 
was and 5bwas), you do not pay anything other than a check to the arrl for the 
cost of your award plus the postage to return your cards to you (if you did not 
take them in person). we are not allowed to accept any fee for checking cards, 
we volunteer to do this for other hams. i became an awards manager long ago 
when 
there was none in houston and i had to send my cards to san antonio. i have 
checked many a card since then. 


73...bruce






From: Zachary  Beougher 
To: John Neeley ; Rick - WA4NVM ; Jeff Yanko 
; amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Sat, January 22, 2011 8:38:51 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC QSO costs

Do you need to pay the card checker the $.20/QSO, or is that only if you 
send them directly to ARRL??

I agree with Rick - the wording is not very clear.

Zack
KD8KSN

-Original Message- 
From: John Neeley
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 9:07 AM
To: Rick - WA4NVM ; Jeff Yanko ; amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC QSO costs

Sounds like to me all the better to find a Card Checker in your area before
sending anything to ARRL.  Save on postage, etc.  Hopefully the Card Checker
wont want his cut too now?  Sign of the times, it looks like to me...

John W6ZKH
#37184






From: Rick - WA4NVM 
To: Jeff Yanko ; amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Sat, January 22, 2011 4:54:02 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC QSO costs



Hi Jeff and the BB,

I just found both applications on the ARRL website. (the old form, date
2009,
and the new form, date Jan. 2011)  see following website:

http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Awards/VUCC%20App%202011.pdf

It looks like instead of a flat $10 fee, they now have gone to multiple fees
for postage, the application and number of contacts.   If I'm comprehending
this correctly, if you apply for additional VUCC sticker, in the US and a
ARRL
member, and turn in 60 cards, it would cost you the following:

$1 postage,   $7 application fee, and $.20 x 60 = $12 for a total of $20.00

Is this correct?  I welcome all replies, if not.

73 all,

Rick WA4NVM


> Hi all,
>
> I was just looking over the VUCC award application and noticed that they
> now
> charge 20 cents per QSO.  Is this fee only applicable if cards are sent to
> HQ for submission or in general even if you take them to a card checker?
> Thanks in advance!
>
>
> 73,
>
> Jeff  WB3JFS
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Echoes of Apollo Call for Student Investigators & Adult Engineering Mentors

2011-01-23 Thread JoAnne Maenpaa
I received this request too late to include in this week's ANS-023
bulletins so I'm forwarding the message to the amsat-bb to help get
the word out.

Please send your replies directly to Pat: apollo...@gmail.com

--
73 de JoAnne K9JKM
k9...@amsat.org 
Editor, AMSAT News Service


Echoes of Apollo Call for Student Investigators & Adult Engineering Mentors

Pat Barthelow, AA6EG of the Echoes of Apollo Project (the folks who
brought us the 70cm Arecibo EME activity) is working with kids on the 
Google Science Fair. The students and adult mentors have devised a 
simple experiment to measure the distance to the moon using Moon 
Bounce.  

Pat has several EME stations committed and is looking for more tech-
nical support. He is also looking for additional young Co-Primary 
Investigators (Age 13-18) to participate.  
 
Time is of the essence.  Reply directly to:  apollo...@gmail.com  

Pat says the students will develop the experiment, lead, analyze.  
Adults are needed to nurture, guide, mentor with these goals in mind:

+ Key a CW transmission or alternatively, send an audio impulse via 
  microphone to EME TX.

+ Starting the time clock on the impulse transmission whether Audio 
  "Clack" or CW key.

+ Recording for Science Fair presentation, using Multimedia video/audio 
  eqiupment in the Moon bounce Station.
 
+ Stopping the clock when the audio/RF does RT to moon (~2.5 Seconds) 
  and returns, and is demodulated  by Moon bounce RX and presented at 
  Audio speaker terminals.

+ Pre-measure station delays in TX and RX to develop a constant for
  internal equipment delays.
 
+ Measuring the EME interval as closely as possible,  with simple 
  equipment, say, to millseconds. Probably take the Multimedia video/
  audio to a Video editor, to measure delay, digitally.
 
+ Compare distance to the moon in the NASA, or US Naval Observatory 
  databases for their actual distance to moon, at the moment of the 
  experiment.

+ Student analyzes for errors, error sources, discusses return signal 
  distortion, due to doppler, Libration, pulse stretching, due to 
  spherical moon, etc.

+ Student suggests follow up experiment, to minimize measurement 
  errors, or assuming more sophisticated equipment became available.

QUESTION: For an analog RX to audio output, what would be the best 
way be to measure the internal propagation delay in an [Analog, Digi-
tal] receiver, from the time of arrival of the RF at the Antenna con-
nector to demodulated output [Analog, Digital] at the speaker, or 
computer screen.
 
For analog receivers, is the internal RX propagation delay, in order 
of:  microseconds?   Milliseconds?   For Digital receivers? 

Best Regards,   
Pat Barthelow, Echoes of Apollo
apollo...@gmail.com

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Antenna Observations/Question

2011-01-23 Thread Richard Lawn
I've been on the birds off an on for years. I have an M2 cir. polarized pair
at home QTH and am looking into a more modest installation for a summer
cottage. I've built the K5OE eggbeater imitations and founds them to be only
fair.I could by M2 eggbeater pair but I'm trying to do this on less $. I
also have an Arrow antenna which I've tried some with a HT with only fair
results. Any other suggestions out there? Mount the Arrow more permanently
but at a fixed elevation and use a simple rotor to change azimuth? How about
a homebrewed quagi? Any suggestions appreciated.

Rick
W2JAZ
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Delfi-C3 1000 days in orbit

2011-01-23 Thread wouter weggelaar
Hi All,

Today is the 1000th day in orbit for Delfi-C3. The downlink is still
ok and telemetry shows no big degradations. This means Delfi-C3 is
still in good health.
Apart from the problems with the transponder and some occasional
resets and lockups, scientific data is still being received. Also,
this data is still forwarded by radio amateurs to our server. Once
again our big thanks for receiving Delfi-C3 and your continued support
of the project.

73

On behalf of the Delfi-C3 team
Wouter Weggelaar
PA3WEG
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Fw: UPDATE: DELFI C3 Close Approach

2011-01-23 Thread Peter Portanova
For your observation and information..

73- Pete
WB2OQQ
www.massapequanyweather.com
http://www.qrz.com/db/WB2OQQ?

> 
> The United States Joint Space Operations Center (JSpOC) has updated a
> predicted conjunction between DELFI C3 (SCC# 32789) and SCC# 28811.
> 
> Primary Object: DELFI C3 (SCC# 32789)
> Secondary Object: SCC# 28811
> Time of Closest Approach: 24 JAN 2011 13:39 UTC 
> 
> Overall miss distance: 339 meters
> Radial (dU) miss distance: -117 meters
> In-Track (dV) miss distance: 309 meters
> Cross-track (dW) miss distance: 82 meters 
> 
> Primary Radial Error (U):  10 meters
> Primary In-track Error (V):  98 meters
> Primary Cross-track Error (W):  7 meters 
> 
> Secondary Radial Error (U):  10 meters
> Secondary In-track Error (V):  62 meters 
> Secondary Cross-track Error (W): 4 meters
> 
> 
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Offtopic: Daiwa NS663PA Schematics

2011-01-23 Thread PE0SAT


Hi,

Thanks for reading. I had to replace a LM358 in a Daiwa NS663PA SWR/power
meter and now I have to align the pep circuit.

Is there someone that can send me a copy of the schematics or maybe
the alignment method?

73 Jan PE0SAT

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] AMSAT-BB Rotor Interface Yaesu 5500 Digest, Vol 6, Issue 45

2011-01-23 Thread Louis House, KD5GM
Hi Bill,
I am using the LVB tracker with the G-5500 and controlling them with the 
SatPC-32 software.
My experience with this system has been very pleasing, straight forward and 
plug & play.  The documentation for the LVB is excellent and the same is 
true for SatPC-32.  Setting the calibration between the LVB and the G-5500 
was a snap, with very easy to follow instructions.
Supporting AMSAT by purchasing the LVB is icing on the cake.
My 2 cents.

Best wishes,

LOUIS, KD5GM in EL29kq
CW, The original digital mode
AMSAT #37061: FIST #3606

>>> Message: 18
>>> Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 10:20:10 -0500
>>> From: "Bill Gillenwater" 
>>> Subject: [amsat-bb]  Rotor Interface Yaesu 5500
>>> To: "AmsatBBS" 
>>> Message-ID: <5E846EAFD8F649CCAAB7FD2B51A8@billpc>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="iso-8859-1"
>>>
>>> OK, a newbee question about interfacing rotors. I have a Yaesu 5500
>>> and I run PCSat32. What do I need between the rotor and the
>>> computer? I would like a few options. Do I need the Yaesu 232
>>> interface box or will a generic box do the job. If a generic box
>>> will work, which are the best for satellite work with PCSat32?
>>>
>>> Tnx 73 Bill K3SV
>>
>> ___
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite 
>> program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: oscar 11

2011-01-23 Thread Clive Wallis
Hi Jerry,

As others have said, it's not packet, but simple ASCII. You can decode 
it with MIXW or with hardware decoders.  See my website for full 
details. Look at the latest report, which includes info to get you started.

HTH

73 CliveG3CWV

On 22/01/2011 16:50, jerry wrote:
> I attached an  m wav recording of Oscar 11 on the morning pass . This is what 
> I usually hear on a good pass . Is there
> packet signal in there ? I've tried psk and afsk but never get a print ?
>
> Thanks
> Jerry WB5LHD
>
>
>
> ___
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: VUCC QSO costs

2011-01-23 Thread Jeff Yanko
Hi Rick,

That's the way I'm interpreting it as well.  For me, my fees would add up to 
nearly $50 for my initial application.


73,

Jeff  WB3JFS



- Original Message - 
From: "Rick - WA4NVM" 
To: "Jeff Yanko" ; 
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 4:54 AM
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] VUCC QSO costs


>
>
> Hi Jeff and the BB,
>
> I just found both applications on the ARRL website. (the old form, date 
> 2009,
> and the new form, date Jan. 2011)  see following website:
>
> http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Awards/VUCC%20App%202011.pdf
>
> It looks like instead of a flat $10 fee, they now have gone to multiple 
> fees
> for postage, the application and number of contacts.   If I'm 
> comprehending
> this correctly, if you apply for additional VUCC sticker, in the US and a 
> ARRL
> member, and turn in 60 cards, it would cost you the following:
>
> $1 postage,  $7 application fee, and $.20 x 60 = $12 for a total of $20.00
>
> Is this correct?  I welcome all replies, if not.
>
> 73 all,
>
> Rick WA4NVM
>
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I was just looking over the VUCC award application and noticed that they 
>> now
>> charge 20 cents per QSO.  Is this fee only applicable if cards are sent 
>> to
>> HQ for submission or in general even if you take them to a card checker?
>> Thanks in advance!
>>
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Jeff  WB3JFS
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite 
>> program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>
> 


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: SatPC32 Cat doppler problem

2011-01-23 Thread Erich Eichmann
Richard,
on my website www.dk1tb.de, English page "Downloads, sect. 6, you will find 
detailed instructions about how to add new satellites to SatPC32. See also 
the FAQs file on that page and the tutorial  by Wayne Estes, W9AE, that can 
be downloaded here:
http://www.dk1tb.de/W9AE_Tutorial.htm

73s, Erich, DK1TB

- Original Message - 
From: "Richard Ferryman" 
To: 
Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 10:02 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] SatPC32 Cat doppler problem


>I find SatPC32 is failing to read doppler information for some satellites
>although the doppler.sqf entry seems correct.  The CAT window show no CAT
>data and the 'Data Line' at the bottom  shows the last line of doppler.sqf.
>Any ideas?
> Thanks de Dick G4BBH
> ___
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: SatPC32 Cat doppler problem

2011-01-23 Thread Alan P. Biddle
Richard,

That usually happens when the name of the satellite in the DOPPLER.SQF file
does not EXACTLY match the name of the satellite in the source of Doppler
information.  For instance "AO-51" vice "ECHO (AO-51)."  The Keps
distributed by AMSAT all use the standard designations, but many of the
other sources have other information in the name line.  One way to solve
this is to look at the AMSATNAMES.TXT file in the Auxiliary Files section of
Help, "?."  It allows SATPC32 to identify the satellites from their official
designations and use the common name.

Alan
WA4SCA


-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Richard Ferryman
Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 3:03 AM
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] SatPC32 Cat doppler problem

I find SatPC32 is failing to read doppler information for some satellites
although the doppler.sqf entry seems correct.  The CAT window show no CAT
data and the 'Data Line' at the bottom  shows the last line of doppler.sqf.
Any ideas?
Thanks de Dick G4BBH
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] SatPC32 Cat doppler problem

2011-01-23 Thread Richard Ferryman
I find SatPC32 is failing to read doppler information for some satellites 
although the doppler.sqf entry seems correct.  The CAT window show no CAT data 
and the 'Data Line' at the bottom  shows the last line of doppler.sqf.  Any 
ideas?
Thanks de Dick G4BBH
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb