Re: [amsat-bb] Dual IC706 MKII-G operation

2014-07-31 Thread Tom Warren


  Eric,

Thanks for you input. I do have an additional question…... about the 
need of CT-17 level converter as noted in
 the owners manual, but I think Mike will answer it when he replies.   This, to 
me, is the last piece of the puzzle
 (and my confusion). Is the ‘Y' adaptor cable to be used ‘in conjunction’ with 
the CI-V level converter or…..’in place
 of ' the CI-V level converter?

Again, I’m really impressed with the helpful responses I’ve received from this 
group, thank you.
I feel like I’m almost there ;0)

73
Tom
ps; from the looks of the archives, you have been involved in helping others 
for a long time !!




 
On Jul 31, 2014, at 1:50 AM, Erich Eichmann erich.eichm...@t-online.de wrote:

 
 Tom,
 as Paul wrote already change the Icom address of one of the IC-706MKIIGs and 
 enter the two addresses in the Radio 1 section of menu Radio Setup.
 
 You can connect both radios to a single Icom CAT cable  by using an Y-adapter 
 on the radio side of the CAT cable. Make sure that the CAT cable works on 
 Windows 7 and 8, see the reply of Mike, W4UOO. 

 
 When the program starts the radio with the first of the two addresses will 
 run as the RX.
 In menu Radio Setup check the option Autom. RX/TX Change. The program 
 will then automatically change the roles of both radios as RX and TX. when 
 you switch between u/v and v/u sats  and you don't need to switch the 2m/70cm 
 antennas between the radios.
 
 Leave option Satellite mode and all other options in the menu un-checked.
 
 73s, Erich, DK1TB
 
 
 Am 30.07.2014 14:09, schrieb Tom Warren:
  Hello to the group……..
 
  Does anyone have the specifics on how to setup two IC706 MKII-G’s for 
 satellite ssb/cw operation (duplex).
 
 I’ve done a bit of browsing and read the manual but remain confused on the 
 hardware needed when using
 my Compaq laptop (no serial port), only USB’s.
 
 
 Any advise would be appreciated.
 
 73
 Tom
 W4TMW
 
   
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
 
 

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] UKube-1/FC2 Data warehouse

2014-07-31 Thread David Johnson

Hi,

We had a problem with decoding data for FC2 in the data warehouse this 
morning (31st Nov).


This has been fixed and if you have any bin files which you recorded 
between 0:00 and 14:00 utc, please replay

them into the warehouse.

Many thanks

Dave, G4DPZ
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] AMSAT-NA Election Reminder

2014-07-31 Thread Alan
All AMSAT-NA Members,

The annual election packet was mailed prior to 15 July, and should have been 
received by now.  Many
members have already returned their ballots.  If you have not, please take a 
few minutes to review the
position statements of the various candidates, make your selections, and then 
mail them. This is
especially important if you are in a non-North American QTH.  In that case, it 
is strongly recommended
that you use air mail or other expedited means. This is your opportunity to 
select the AMSAT-NA
leadership and help chose the future direction of our organization.  Due to 
unusual circumstances, we
are electing 4 full Board members, in addition to the usual 2 Alternates, so 
you may vote for up to 4
candidates.  

73s,

Alan Biddle
WA4SCA
AMSAT Corporate Secretary

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] AO-7 CW Telemetry

2014-07-31 Thread John Papay

It is very rare to hear clear CW from the AO-7B
telemetry beacon around 145.972.  Most of the time
there is no beacon at all.  Sometimes there is
jibberish.  Usually the signal is very weak.

With AO-7 going through eclipse on every orbit, the
satellite can come out of eclipse in different modes/
options.  Recently there have been times where the
beacon has transmitted clear CW over North America,
something I have not heard over the years.

According to the DK3WN website, there was some cw
telemetry back in 2002 when the satellite was discovered
to be working again.  And there was some discussion about
what is valid data based on the last 3 digits sent in the
24 group block of data.  If the value is 649, 650, or 651,
the data is likely valid.

I first heard the image of the cw signal around 958.  It was
so loud I thought it was a valid user at first.  But since
the cw was all numbers I tuned up to the beacon frequency and
there the signal was louder than anything I have ever heard
on AO-7.  It took a while for me to get the recorder running
but I managed to capture some data.  After playing it back I
found that there was only one block of data where the last
group was valid, a 649.  Other later transmissions were loud
but the data was much different and the last group was not
correct.

I couldn't locate a telemetry calculator at first so I decided to
build one on Excel using the formulae provided by DK3WN.  The
data follows:

AO-7B Telemetry 24July2014   2318UTC
POS  ParameterRange Raw  Real

1A Total Solar Array Current  0-3000ma  171 2094.5ma
1B +X Solar Panel Current 0-2000ma  193  110ma
1C -X Solar Panel Current 0-2000ma  157  830ma
1D +Y Solar Panel Current 0-2000ma  108  1810ma
2A -Y Solar Panel Current 0-2000ma  286  250ma
2B RF Power Out 70/2  0-8watts  204 7.3728W
2C 24 Hour Clock Time 0-1440min 201 15.16min
2D Batt Ch/Discharge Current-2000/+2000 207  -1720ma
3A Batt Voltage   6.5-16.4  361  12.7V
3B Half Batt Voltage  0-10v 397   9.7V
3C Batt Charge Reg #1 0-15v 340   6V
3D Batt Temperature -30 to +50C 300   95.8C
4A Baseplate Temperature-30 to +50C 446   27.72C
4B PA Temperature 2/10  -30 to +50C 401   94.32C
4C +X Face Temperature  -30 to +50C 430   51.4C
4D +Z Face Temperature  -30 to +50C 498  -49.24C
5A PA Temp 70/2 -30 to +50C 545   29.2C
5B PA Emitter Current 2/100-1167ma  502   92.84MA
5C Module Temp 70/2 -30 to +50C 543   32.16C
5D Inst. SW Regulator 0-93ma527   33.14MA
6A RF Power Out 2/10 0-10,000mw 606   23.076MW
6B RF Power Out 435   0-1000mw  643   219.9MW
6C RF Power Out 2304  0-100mw   679   255.881MW
6D Midrange Telemetry Cal 0-.5v 649   0.49

There are some values which are obviously not correct.
Some sensors might not be working properly since some
values are out of range.  However, the solar panel numbers
might be somewhat correct.  I wouldn't doubt it if the
transmitter was putting out 7 watts at the time.

Perhaps there are those who are familiar with the AO-7
telemetry that can make some sense out of the data.
Unfortunately we don't have multiple blocks of good data
to compare readings.  Maybe some have recorded recent CW
data and can find some good blocks that can be shared here.

The data was copied on my Arizona remote and Skype was being
used to listen.  But I am fairly confident that the cw copied
is correct.

73,
John K8YSE






___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Round-the-world M0XER-4

2014-07-31 Thread Robert Bruninga
That is why I want so much to continue the 145.825 digipeater on as many
satellites as we can*.



But we can’t seem to inspire any of the other HUNDREDS of satellite
building groups to consider it.

I think there were over 100 cubesats launched last year.  None with 145.825
APRS…



*(and convince the leave-it-on-24/7/365-not-moving user satellite stations
to stop beaconing unattended!)



Bob, WB4APR



*From:* aprsi...@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* RE: [aprsisce] North America M0XER-4



Too bad we can't get the balloon to switch to the ISS frequency and use the
digi off of it when over the oceans and arctic!



 Original message 
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:23 PM, 'Steve' wrote:

 Seems the balloon enjoyed itself so much it’s going round again.
 Congratulations are in order to Leo M0XER
 AFAIK this has never been done before.
 Be interesting to see if it makes it twice

We're a tough crowd to please...

First circumnavigation of the globe by an amateur radio carrying
balloon, and as it passes the milestone...

So, can you get another lap out of it?

What about poor old M0XER-3? It's still out there! Sure it got waylaid
in Nunavut for a while, and let M0XER-4 slip on by... It needs some
encouragement too!

[ see present track: http://aprs.fi/M0XER* (and click for 7 day tail)]

If the winds are playing nice, and the fates allow, it should be
coming into range fairly soon.

James, VE6SRV
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] Round-the-world M0XER-4

2014-07-31 Thread M5AKA
http://amsat-uk.org/2014/07/31/434-mhz-balloon-b-64-completes-epic-journey/

73 Trevor M5AKA
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] Round-the-world M0XER-4

2014-07-31 Thread Robert Bruninga
Trevor,

The M0XER-4 (I thought) did frequency shifting (APRS 144 MHz national
channels over Europe and the US), and so I thought it had more complexity.
The image shown on the link below only has 434 MHz antennas, no obvious
GPS and no VHF antennas.  Can you clarify and help us get an idea of what
this M0XER4 payload actually looked like?  Thanks, Bob, WB4aPR

-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of M5AKA
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 4:06 PM
To: AMSAT BB
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Round-the-world M0XER-4

http://amsat-uk.org/2014/07/31/434-mhz-balloon-b-64-completes-epic-journey
/

73 Trevor M5AKA
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Wouxun KG-UV8D

2014-07-31 Thread Craig Gagner
Has anyone tried one of these for portable use ? It has cross band repeater
and also functions in Full Duplex.

 

I just ordered one but need to get another hand held antenna, when I do I'll
post my findings. 

 

73, Craig W1MSG 

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] Round-the-world M0XER-4

2014-07-31 Thread M5AKA
Hi Bob,

Yes, that's a library image of one of Leo's solar powered payloads, I don't 
have a pic of B-64. 

If you send Leo an email I'm sure he'd fill you in on the details - I'm just 
amazed he's managed to get everything into such a small and light package, as 
you might expect the rechargeable cell is the heaviest part.

73 Trevor M5AKA



On Thursday, 31 July 2014, 21:26, Robert Bruninga bruni...@usna.edu wrote:
 


Trevor,

The M0XER-4 (I thought) did frequency shifting (APRS 144 MHz national
channels over Europe and the US), and so I thought it had more complexity.
The image shown on the link below only has 434 MHz antennas, no obvious
GPS and no VHF antennas.  Can you clarify and help us get an idea of what
this M0XER4 payload actually looked like?  Thanks, Bob, WB4aPR


-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of M5AKA
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 4:06 PM
To: AMSAT BB
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Round-the-world M0XER-4

http://amsat-uk.org/2014/07/31/434-mhz-balloon-b-64-completes-epic-journey
/

73 Trevor M5AKA
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] AO-7 CW Telemetry

2014-07-31 Thread EMike McCardel
John,

The December 1974 issue of the AMSAT Newsletter covered AO-7 telemetry fairly 
in depth. Included was a description on reading the telemetry followed by a 
telemetry conversion table.
You can find the issue in Phil Karn's archive
http://www.ka9q.net/AMSAT-Newsletter-1974.pdf
The article begins at about page 100 of the PDF

EMike

EMike McCardel, KC8YLD
VP for Educational Relations AMSAT-NA

Sent from my iPhone

 On Jul 31, 2014, at 2:26 PM, John Papay j...@papays.com wrote:
 
 It is very rare to hear clear CW from the AO-7B
 telemetry beacon around 145.972.  Most of the time
 there is no beacon at all.  Sometimes there is
 jibberish.  Usually the signal is very weak.
 
 With AO-7 going through eclipse on every orbit, the
 satellite can come out of eclipse in different modes/
 options.  Recently there have been times where the
 beacon has transmitted clear CW over North America,
 something I have not heard over the years.
 
 According to the DK3WN website, there was some cw
 telemetry back in 2002 when the satellite was discovered
 to be working again.  And there was some discussion about
 what is valid data based on the last 3 digits sent in the
 24 group block of data.  If the value is 649, 650, or 651,
 the data is likely valid.
 
 I first heard the image of the cw signal around 958.  It was
 so loud I thought it was a valid user at first.  But since
 the cw was all numbers I tuned up to the beacon frequency and
 there the signal was louder than anything I have ever heard
 on AO-7.  It took a while for me to get the recorder running
 but I managed to capture some data.  After playing it back I
 found that there was only one block of data where the last
 group was valid, a 649.  Other later transmissions were loud
 but the data was much different and the last group was not
 correct.
 
 I couldn't locate a telemetry calculator at first so I decided to
 build one on Excel using the formulae provided by DK3WN.  The
 data follows:
 
 AO-7B Telemetry 24July2014   2318UTC
 POS  ParameterRange Raw  Real
 
 1A Total Solar Array Current  0-3000ma  171 2094.5ma
 1B +X Solar Panel Current 0-2000ma  193  110ma
 1C -X Solar Panel Current 0-2000ma  157  830ma
 1D +Y Solar Panel Current 0-2000ma  108  1810ma
 2A -Y Solar Panel Current 0-2000ma  286  250ma
 2B RF Power Out 70/2  0-8watts  204 7.3728W
 2C 24 Hour Clock Time 0-1440min 201 15.16min
 2D Batt Ch/Discharge Current-2000/+2000 207  -1720ma
 3A Batt Voltage   6.5-16.4  361  12.7V
 3B Half Batt Voltage  0-10v 397   9.7V
 3C Batt Charge Reg #1 0-15v 340   6V
 3D Batt Temperature -30 to +50C 300   95.8C
 4A Baseplate Temperature-30 to +50C 446   27.72C
 4B PA Temperature 2/10  -30 to +50C 401   94.32C
 4C +X Face Temperature  -30 to +50C 430   51.4C
 4D +Z Face Temperature  -30 to +50C 498  -49.24C
 5A PA Temp 70/2 -30 to +50C 545   29.2C
 5B PA Emitter Current 2/100-1167ma  502   92.84MA
 5C Module Temp 70/2 -30 to +50C 543   32.16C
 5D Inst. SW Regulator 0-93ma527   33.14MA
 6A RF Power Out 2/10 0-10,000mw 606   23.076MW
 6B RF Power Out 435   0-1000mw  643   219.9MW
 6C RF Power Out 2304  0-100mw   679   255.881MW
 6D Midrange Telemetry Cal 0-.5v 649   0.49
 
 There are some values which are obviously not correct.
 Some sensors might not be working properly since some
 values are out of range.  However, the solar panel numbers
 might be somewhat correct.  I wouldn't doubt it if the
 transmitter was putting out 7 watts at the time.
 
 Perhaps there are those who are familiar with the AO-7
 telemetry that can make some sense out of the data.
 Unfortunately we don't have multiple blocks of good data
 to compare readings.  Maybe some have recorded recent CW
 data and can find some good blocks that can be shared here.
 
 The data was copied on my Arizona remote and Skype was being
 used to listen.  But I am fairly confident that the cw copied
 is correct.
 
 73,
 John K8YSE
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] Wouxun KG-UV8D

2014-07-31 Thread Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)
Hi Craig!

As N8HM mentioned, I have tried the KG-UV8D on SO-50. It will not work
for cross-band, full-duplex operation on this satellite.  Using a group
of memory channels, its receiver is OK for hearing the downlink when
working SO-50 half-duplex, or as a receiver when transmitting with a
second HT (even one of the cheaper Baofeng HTs!). There has been a long
discussion thread about this radio on QRZ.com's satellite forum at:

http://forums.qrz.com/showthread.php?437813-Wouxun-KG-UV8D-for-SO-50-Sure-but-not-full-duplex-by-itself

Like with many Kenwood and Yaesu HTs, you can program a group of memory
channels to work SO-50 half-duplex. Make sure to set up the memories
where the receive/output frequency steps down in 2.5 kHz steps. Otherwise,
there are times, around the point you would change receive frequencies,
where you won't be able to hear the satellite on either frequency when
tuning in 5 kHz steps (i.e., from 436.800 to 436.795 MHz).  All versions
of this radio with firmware at V1.02 or greater tune in 2.5 kHz steps,
so this means you'll end up with twice as many memories for working
SO-50 than with other radios incapable of tuning in steps smaller than
5 kHz.  (To view the firmware version in a KG-UV8D, press and hold the
3 key while turning on the radio)

Beyond SO-50, the KG-UV8D will work OK for V/U cross-band full-duplex
operation, if the 70cm signal you're trying to hear is a lot stronger
than the SO-50 downlink. The receiver is certainly better than the
Alinco DJ-G7T 2m/70cm/23cm HT - another one that was promoted for
cross-band, full-duplex operation a few years ago.  I find myself
grabbing the KG-UV8D more often when I want to have an HT with me,
unless I'm looking to do APRS using a TH-D72A instead.

While at the ARRL Centennial Convention in Hartford a couple of weeks
ago, I did a test with my KG-UV8D and the Fox-1 prototype on display
at the AMSAT booth. The Fox-1 series of satellites (remember 3 have
launches - go AMSAT!) are U/V satellites, the reverse of SO-50.  You
will transmit on 70cm, and receive on 2m.  In this configuration,
and making allowances in an attempt to better simulate working a
Fox-1 satellite in orbit, I was able to work the Fox-1 protoype
full-duplex walking around the main hall and just outside the hall.
I varied my transmit power between high and low, and moved my antenna
around, trying to change how the received signals sounded as I
transmitted.  The Fox-1 prototype used a dummy load as an antenna.
I was able to hear myself without any noticeable desense at either
transmit power level, even when the Fox-1 prototype's downlink
started to sound as weak as SO-50 typically does.  I received good
signal reports from Burns W2BFJ, a member of the Fox software team
at the AMSAT booth who listened to some of my tests.  This gives me
hope that the KG-UV8D - and other radios like the newer versions of
the IC-W32A - might work for cross-band, full-duplex operation with
U/V satellites like the upcoming Fox-1 series, when they don't do
the same for V/U satellites like SO-50.

If you want to discuss this further, and the posts on that QRZ
forum thread didn't answer any other questions you might have about
the radio, please feel free to contact me directly.

Good luck, and 73!





Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK
http://www.wd9ewk.net/




Has anyone tried one of these for portable use ? It has cross band repeater
 and also functions in Full Duplex.


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] Dual IC706 MKII-G operation

2014-07-31 Thread Stephen E. Belter
Tom,

You need one CT-17 or equivalent level converter.  I use the West Mountain 
Radio RIGtalk which is a USB serial port to CI-V interface.  Many people build 
their own (easy for an RS-232 serial port) or buy inexpensive converters from 
ebay.

The CI-V interface is an open-collector party-line.  You can parallel 2-4 
Icom radios using Y-adapters, then connect it to the CI-V output of the CT-17, 
RIGtalk, or other similar interface.

Does that answer your question?

73, Steve N9IP
--
Steve Belter, s...@wintek.com



On Jul 31, 2014, at 10:10 AM, Tom Warren mtn...@hartcom.net wrote:

 
 
  Eric,
 
   Thanks for you input. I do have an additional question…... about the 
 need of CT-17 level converter as noted in
 the owners manual, but I think Mike will answer it when he replies.   This, 
 to me, is the last piece of the puzzle
 (and my confusion). Is the ‘Y' adaptor cable to be used ‘in conjunction’ with 
 the CI-V level converter or…..’in place
 of ' the CI-V level converter?
 
 Again, I’m really impressed with the helpful responses I’ve received from 
 this group, thank you.
 I feel like I’m almost there ;0)
 
 73
 Tom
 ps; from the looks of the archives, you have been involved in helping others 
 for a long time !!
 
 
   
 
 
 On Jul 31, 2014, at 1:50 AM, Erich Eichmann erich.eichm...@t-online.de 
 wrote:
 
 
 Tom,
 as Paul wrote already change the Icom address of one of the IC-706MKIIGs and 
 enter the two addresses in the Radio 1 section of menu Radio Setup.
 
 You can connect both radios to a single Icom CAT cable  by using an 
 Y-adapter on the radio side of the CAT cable. Make sure that the CAT cable 
 works on Windows 7 and 8, see the reply of Mike, W4UOO. 
   
 
 When the program starts the radio with the first of the two addresses will 
 run as the RX.
 In menu Radio Setup check the option Autom. RX/TX Change. The program 
 will then automatically change the roles of both radios as RX and TX. when 
 you switch between u/v and v/u sats  and you don't need to switch the 
 2m/70cm antennas between the radios.
 
 Leave option Satellite mode and all other options in the menu un-checked.
 
 73s, Erich, DK1TB
 
 
 Am 30.07.2014 14:09, schrieb Tom Warren:
 Hello to the group……..
 
 Does anyone have the specifics on how to setup two IC706 MKII-G’s for 
 satellite ssb/cw operation (duplex).
 
 I’ve done a bit of browsing and read the manual but remain confused on the 
 hardware needed when using
 my Compaq laptop (no serial port), only USB’s.
 
 
 Any advise would be appreciated.
 
 73
 Tom
 W4TMW
 
 
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
 
 
 
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] Dual IC706 MKII-G operation

2014-07-31 Thread Mike Sprenger
Tom,

I tested two radios on the Radio Shack USB Scanner cable to 2 ICOM radios
simultaneously.  Works great !

If you Connect, from the 1/8 mono male plug to a 1/8 Female to 2 1/8
Male Mono Y Cord to the *Remote *1/8 connection on each 706 radio as
shown on P.12 of 706MKIIG Manual (make sure that the 2 long Stereo to mono
adapter is in line).

Follow instructions to install drivers, don't plug in the USB cable to the
computer before the instructions say to plug it in, this can be a big
problem in some cases..

On the 706MKII G:

   The goal here is to do 2 things,

   1. To set the CI-V addresses on the 2 radios to 2 different addresses,
   by default, they are set to the same address, which is probably 58H
   1. Thus, you only need to change 1 radio, and confirm the setting on the
  other radio so that you can set up SatPC32 accordingly.
   2. To set the Baud Rate to 19,200 on both radios
   3. Check 2 other settings, make sure they're at the defaults.

*Here we go, steps to get this done:(I verified on my 703, should be
very close)*

*Go into the Setup Menu by doing the following: (This is from the 706
manual)*

D Initial set mode operation
➀*Push [POWER] for 2 sec. to turn power OFF.*

➁*While pushing [LOCK] push [POWER]* to turn power
ON.
•Initial set mode is selected and one of its items appears.

   (These items are on page 50-55)

*.go to Here's your needed Settings*


➂*Push [MENU] one or more times to select the*
*desired item.* * This is how you Scroll through the settings*
•[M-CH] or [Y]/[Z] can also be used.

➃Rotate the main dial to set the values or conditions
for the selected item.  *This is how you change the actual Setting*

*Once complete, hold down the Power button for 2 Seconds to power off, then
power back on.*




*Your *needed Settings

(These options are shown on Manual Page 55)

Scroll to Menu Option 34 by *Pushing the [MENU] one or more times* until
you see:

* 34   CI-V Address:*

   You need to decide which Radio is considered #1 and which is #2

  On Radio #1 set Menu Option 34 to:   58H(Rotate the Main Dial to
change if needed)
  On Radio #2 set Menu Option 34 to:   50H(Rotate the Main Dial to
change)

 Keep these 2 settings handy, you'll need them when configuring
SATPC32.

Scroll to Menu Option 35  by *Pushing the [MENU] one or more times* until
you see:

* 35  CI-V Baud:*

 Set to 19200  on both Radios

Scroll to Menu Option 36 by *Pushing the [MENU] one or more times* until
you see:

*   36  CI-V Trn*

   Set to On   (Rotate the Main Dial to change if needed)

Scroll to Menu Option 37 by *Pushing the [MENU] one or more times* until
you see:

*37 CI-V 735*

 Set to Off   (Rotate the Main Dial to change if needed)

Now the 2 radios should have the correct settings:


You can review the settings if you like, by scrolling through
them by Pushing the [MENU] one or more times, then when finished, hold down
the Power button for 2 Seconds to power off, then power back on.

Connect the USB adapter to the Computer (follow the instructions before you
plug in the USB adaptor), then configure the SATPC32 using the CI-V
addresses from above...on which ever Com Port the USB adapter is using

My suggested addresses:
   58 for Radio 1
   50 for Radio 2

Baud Rate:  19,200

Com Port Number will be the same for both radios because they use the same
USB interface.  That is fine...

-- 
Thanks,
Mike Sprenger
W4UOO
(37.9167N  81.1244W is the Summit)


On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Tom Warren mtn...@hartcom.net wrote:



   Eric,

 Thanks for you input. I do have an additional question…... about
 the need of CT-17 level converter as noted in
  the owners manual, but I think Mike will answer it when he replies.
 This, to me, is the last piece of the puzzle
  (and my confusion). Is the ‘Y' adaptor cable to be used ‘in conjunction’
 with the CI-V level converter or…..’in place
  of ' the CI-V level converter?

 Again, I’m really impressed with the helpful responses I’ve received from
 this group, thank you.
 I feel like I’m almost there ;0)

 73
 Tom
 ps; from the looks of the archives, you have been involved in helping
 others for a long time !!



 

 On Jul 31, 2014, at 1:50 AM, Erich Eichmann erich.eichm...@t-online.de
 wrote:

 
  Tom,
  as Paul wrote already change the Icom address of one of the IC-706MKIIGs
 and enter the two addresses in the Radio 1 section of menu Radio Setup.
 
  You can connect both radios to a single Icom CAT cable  by using an
 Y-adapter on the radio side of the CAT cable. Make sure that the CAT cable
 works on Windows 7 and 8, see the reply of Mike, W4UOO.

 
  When the program starts the radio with the first of the two addresses
 will run as the RX.
  In menu Radio Setup check the option Autom. RX/TX Change. The
 program will then automatically change the roles of both radios as RX and
 TX. when you switch between u/v and v/u sats  and you don't need to 

Re: [amsat-bb] Round-the-world M0XER-4

2014-07-31 Thread Andrew Koenig
I'm not sure if this link has been passed around yet, but it has a few
photos and some info on the system.

http://www.leobodnar.com/balloons/B-64/


On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:51 PM, M5AKA m5...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:

 Hi Bob,

 Yes, that's a library image of one of Leo's solar powered payloads, I
 don't have a pic of B-64.

 If you send Leo an email I'm sure he'd fill you in on the details - I'm
 just amazed he's managed to get everything into such a small and light
 package, as you might expect the rechargeable cell is the heaviest part.

 73 Trevor M5AKA



 On Thursday, 31 July 2014, 21:26, Robert Bruninga bruni...@usna.edu
 wrote:



 Trevor,

 The M0XER-4 (I thought) did frequency shifting (APRS 144 MHz national
 channels over Europe and the US), and so I thought it had more complexity.
 The image shown on the link below only has 434 MHz antennas, no obvious
 GPS and no VHF antennas.  Can you clarify and help us get an idea of what
 this M0XER4 payload actually looked like?  Thanks, Bob, WB4aPR


 -Original Message-
 From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
 Behalf Of M5AKA
 Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 4:06 PM
 To: AMSAT BB
 Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Round-the-world M0XER-4

 http://amsat-uk.org/2014/07/31/434-mhz-balloon-b-64-completes-epic-journey
 /

 73 Trevor M5AKA
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb




-- 
Andrew Koenig
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] Round-the-world M0XER-4

2014-07-31 Thread Wouter Weggelaar
Just to confirm,

APRS is used on 70cm at least. Not sure about 2m
And it decodes in the field ;)
http://www.pa3weg.nl/?id=news

*Wouter PA3WEG*


On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Andrew Koenig ke5...@gmail.com wrote:

 I'm not sure if this link has been passed around yet, but it has a few
 photos and some info on the system.

 http://www.leobodnar.com/balloons/B-64/


 On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:51 PM, M5AKA m5...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:

  Hi Bob,
 
  Yes, that's a library image of one of Leo's solar powered payloads, I
  don't have a pic of B-64.
 
  If you send Leo an email I'm sure he'd fill you in on the details - I'm
  just amazed he's managed to get everything into such a small and light
  package, as you might expect the rechargeable cell is the heaviest part.
 
  73 Trevor M5AKA
 
 
 
  On Thursday, 31 July 2014, 21:26, Robert Bruninga bruni...@usna.edu
  wrote:
 
 
 
  Trevor,
 
  The M0XER-4 (I thought) did frequency shifting (APRS 144 MHz national
  channels over Europe and the US), and so I thought it had more
 complexity.
  The image shown on the link below only has 434 MHz antennas, no obvious
  GPS and no VHF antennas.  Can you clarify and help us get an idea of what
  this M0XER4 payload actually looked like?  Thanks, Bob, WB4aPR
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
  Behalf Of M5AKA
  Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 4:06 PM
  To: AMSAT BB
  Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Round-the-world M0XER-4
 
 
 http://amsat-uk.org/2014/07/31/434-mhz-balloon-b-64-completes-epic-journey
  /
 
  73 Trevor M5AKA
  ___
  Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
  Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
 program!
  Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  ___
  Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
  Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
 program!
  Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
 



 --
 Andrew Koenig
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Equatorial Crossing Data (EQX)

2014-07-31 Thread EMike McCardel
Does anyone know of a tracking application or program or some other software or 
existing source that will still produces or publishes equatorial crossing data 
for current satellites?

EMike

EMike McCardel, KC8YLD
VP for Educational Relations AMSAT-NA

Sent from my iPhone
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] Equatorial Crossing Data (EQX)

2014-07-31 Thread Paul Stoetzer
i8CVS posted the directions to calculate EQX and everything else
needed to use an OSCARLATOR from Keplerian elements back in 2003.

http://www.amsat.org/amsat/archive/amsat-bb/200203/msg00749.html

I haven't done any programming in forever, but maybe I'll try to write
a short program to automate those calculations at some point (unless
someone already has).

73,

Paul, N8HM

On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:51 PM, EMike McCardel mccard...@gmail.com wrote:
 Does anyone know of a tracking application or program or some other software 
 or existing source that will still produces or publishes equatorial crossing 
 data for current satellites?

 EMike

 EMike McCardel, KC8YLD
 VP for Educational Relations AMSAT-NA

 Sent from my iPhone
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] Equatorial Crossing Data (EQX)

2014-07-31 Thread Joseph Armbruster
EMike,

If you enjoy diving into code, you can use my very simple python script to
derive this data.  It's 100% free for any and all purposes.  I wrote it
specifically for educational purposes.  Check out the code here:
https://code.google.com/p/ge-satellite-tracker/

Also, see my blog posts from Feb 2012 regarding ARISSat-1.  I generated all
of my plots using the same concept:
http://libjoe.blogspot.com/2012/02/arissat-1-analysis-eclipses-and.html

If you have any questions, let me know.

Joseph Armbruster


On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:51 PM, EMike McCardel mccard...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Does anyone know of a tracking application or program or some other
 software or existing source that will still produces or publishes
 equatorial crossing data for current satellites?

 EMike

 EMike McCardel, KC8YLD
 VP for Educational Relations AMSAT-NA

 Sent from my iPhone
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb