[amsat-bb] Re: Advice for transponder ops
I noticed it, too. I was up at the top-end all by my lonesome because I didn't want to step on anybody! Jim KQ6EA --- On Sun, 6/28/09, Andrew Glasbrenner glasbren...@mindspring.com wrote: From: Andrew Glasbrenner glasbren...@mindspring.com Subject: [amsat-bb] Advice for transponder ops To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Date: Sunday, June 28, 2009, 7:25 AM I took this screen grab of this morning's eastern FO-29 pass, and what it shows is in my opinion very illustrative of a problem that is getting worse even on days other than Field Day. http://i139.photobucket.com/albums/q305/glasbrenner/radio/FO-29FDanotated.jpg Spread out! There is no good reason that we should have a dozen operators fighting over the center 15 kHz of a 100 kHz wide transponder. Remember the gentlemen's agreement is the lower third is for CW, middle 1/3 is for mixed ops, and the upper 1/3 is for SSB. There is nothing magic about the Doppler shift at the very center of the passband that simple addition and subtraction can't duplicate elsewhere. Just my opinion, and please take it constructively. 73, Drew KO4MA ___ Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb ___ Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
[amsat-bb] Re: Advice for transponder ops
AMEN brother! I called CQ multiple times on AO-7 in CW last night between 145.940 and 145.944 (downlink), and NOBODY was tuning down that far. I found that very disappointing, as I did the close proximity of all the stations on FO-29 and VO-52. I believe a lot of us could have made a lot more contacts on the linear satellites if we'd just used the passband. Thanks for this post Drew! 73 to all, Tim - N3TL -- Original message from Andrew Glasbrenner glasbren...@mindspring.com: -- I took this screen grab of this morning's eastern FO-29 pass, and what it shows is in my opinion very illustrative of a problem that is getting worse even on days other than Field Day. http://i139.photobucket.com/albums/q305/glasbrenner/radio/FO-29FDanotated.jpg Spread out! There is no good reason that we should have a dozen operators fighting over the center 15 kHz of a 100 kHz wide transponder. Remember the gentlemen's agreement is the lower third is for CW, middle 1/3 is for mixed ops, and the upper 1/3 is for SSB. There is nothing magic about the Doppler shift at the very center of the passband that simple addition and subtraction can't duplicate elsewhere. Just my opinion, and please take it constructively. 73, Drew KO4MA ___ Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb ___ Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
[amsat-bb] Re: Advice for transponder ops
I also noticed a lot of warbling on the AO-7 stations I heard. I'm assuming this is the FM'ing I've read about. I cranked my power down to about 10 Watts on the AO-7 passes I tried to work, and my downlink sounded OK, but some guys had a very 'watery' sound. I also noticed a couple of sats where the downlink seemed to drop out after I heard some very LOUD stations on them. I don't think it was receive blockage causing me to lose the signal, but it was something I never heard before. Jim --- On Sun, 6/28/09, n...@bellsouth.net n...@bellsouth.net wrote: From: n...@bellsouth.net n...@bellsouth.net Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Advice for transponder ops To: Andrew Glasbrenner glasbren...@mindspring.com, amsat-bb@amsat.org Date: Sunday, June 28, 2009, 8:45 AM AMEN brother! I called CQ multiple times on AO-7 in CW last night between 145.940 and 145.944 (downlink), and NOBODY was tuning down that far. I found that very disappointing, as I did the close proximity of all the stations on FO-29 and VO-52. I believe a lot of us could have made a lot more contacts on the linear satellites if we'd just used the passband. Thanks for this post Drew! 73 to all, Tim - N3TL -- Original message from Andrew Glasbrenner glasbren...@mindspring.com: -- I took this screen grab of this morning's eastern FO-29 pass, and what it shows is in my opinion very illustrative of a problem that is getting worse even on days other than Field Day. http://i139.photobucket.com/albums/q305/glasbrenner/radio/FO-29FDanotated.jpg Spread out! There is no good reason that we should have a dozen operators fighting over the center 15 kHz of a 100 kHz wide transponder. Remember the gentlemen's agreement is the lower third is for CW, middle 1/3 is for mixed ops, and the upper 1/3 is for SSB. There is nothing magic about the Doppler shift at the very center of the passband that simple addition and subtraction can't duplicate elsewhere. Just my opinion, and please take it constructively. 73, Drew KO4MA ___ Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb ___ Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb ___ Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
