[amsat-bb] Re: Email etiquette - was Re: Re: Moon

2010-04-13 Thread Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF
Top posting is the better option.

On 13-Apr-10 06:50, Gordon JC Pearce wrote:

>
> What ever happened to not top-posting, and changing the Subject: header
> when the topic changes? ;-)


-- 
Nigel A. Gunn,  1865 El Camino Drive, Xenia, OH 45385-1115, USA.  tel +1 937 
825 5032
Amateur Radio G8IFF W8IFF (was KC8NHF),  e-mail ni...@ngunn.net   www  
http://www.ngunn.net
Member of  ARRL, GQRP #11396, QRPARCI #11644, SOC #548,  Flying Pigs QRP Club 
International #385,
Dayton ARA #2128, AMSAT-NA LM-1691,  AMSAT-UK 0182, MKARS,  ALC, 
GCARES, XWARN.

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Email etiquette - was Re: Re: Moon

2010-04-13 Thread Tom Azlin N4ZPT
Guess times change. Top posting is the standard on some reflectors. 
Especially with folks reading using small screens.

73, Tom n4zpt

Gordon JC Pearce wrote:
> What ever happened to not top-posting, . ?
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Email etiquette - was Re: Re: Moon

2010-04-13 Thread Tony Langdon
At 04:50 AM 4/14/2010, Tom Azlin N4ZPT wrote:
>Guess times change. Top posting is the standard on some reflectors.
>Especially with folks reading using small screens.

Doesn't bother me either way, provided people trim unnecessary quotes 
from their emails.  I prefer things done in order, like this message, 
but as long as it's possible to follow the conversation, I'm fine with it. :)

In order of increasing annoyance:

Properly quoted messages with trimmed quotes.  May be more than one 
part of quoted text with new comments following.  - This is my 
preferred format.

Top posting with quotes trimmed - Also a good option, and probably 
the easiest for users of Outlook to manage.

No quoting at all - This can cause confusion, as there is no context.

Top posting without trimming quotes - Now we're starting to waste 
bandwidth, especially on mobile devices.  However, this format is a 
good one when forwarding emails, and is in common business usage, 
where it is often the most appropriate format, e.g. "Can you please 
respond to this customer's query...".

Bottom posting without trimming quotes - This is HIGHLY annoying, 
especially for mobile users.  People reading the email have to scroll 
through pages of quotes, to see anything new.  And it's several times 
as many screens on a mobile device to get through all that crud...

Improperly quoted email - Emails where it is difficult to tell quoted 
material from new material (usually because of careless formatting) 
are particularly difficult to follow.

Fully quoted email, no new content - Why repost an email without 
commenting on it?  A total waste of bandwidth, and a waste of the 
reader's time.

In all cases, quoting of mailing list footers is particularly 
annoying, as this adds no useful value.

Think of your readers.  Email rules are changing, IMHO, and compared 
to traditional "Netiquette", you'll notice these tips are very open 
and flexible. :)  We're certainly no longer reading email over a 300 
baud modem, but our screen sizes may be _much_ larger (i.e. just 
about every desktop) or smaller (mobile devices) than the traditional 
40x24 or 80x24 text only formats that were dominant back then.  For 
some of us, mobile bandwidth does cost serious money.

73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Email etiquette - was Re: Re: Moon

2010-04-13 Thread Gordon JC Pearce
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 14:50 -0400, Tom Azlin N4ZPT wrote:
> Guess times change. Top posting is the standard on some reflectors. 
> Especially with folks reading using small screens.
> 

Top posting makes no sense, and on small screens makes it damn near
impossible to follow what's going on.

Gordon MM0YEQ

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Email etiquette - was Re: Re: Moon

2010-04-13 Thread Gregg Wonderly


Gordon JC Pearce wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 14:50 -0400, Tom Azlin N4ZPT wrote:
>> Guess times change. Top posting is the standard on some reflectors. 
>> Especially with folks reading using small screens.
>>
> 
> Top posting makes no sense, and on small screens makes it damn near
> impossible to follow what's going on.

Gordon, I think it depends on what you are replying to, and the content you 
include.  Sometimes, I have something related, but not point-by-point to say 
about a post.  Including some context, and top-posting is a smart thing to do 
in 
that case, because it lets people read your reply, and if they care about the 
subject, they can scroll down to see the details that you are replying too.  If 
they don't care, then no more scrolling is necessary to look for your reply 
verses the content you quoted and posted response to.

Gregg Wonderly
W5GGW
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Email etiquette - was Re: Re: Moon

2010-04-13 Thread John Magliacane
--- On Tue, 4/13/10, Gordon JC Pearce  wrote:

> Top posting makes no sense, and on small screens makes it damn near
> impossible to follow what's going on.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?


73, de John, KD2BD  :-)

--
Visit John on the Web at:

http://kd2bd.ham.org/




  
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Email etiquette - was Re: Re: Moon

2010-04-13 Thread Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604
But I've already read that message, and even can recall what it was
about, usually.  I want to read the NEW contribution without having to
read all that again.

But if you've forgotten what went before, I have made a handy footnote
available to you.

So top posting often wins.

73, doug

   Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:02:39 -0700 (PDT)
   From: John Magliacane 

   > Top posting makes no sense, and on small screens makes it damn near
   > impossible to follow what's going on.

   A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
   Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
   A: Top-posting.
   Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Email etiquette - was Re: Re: Moon

2010-04-13 Thread Idle-Tyme
This getting as bad as the toilet paper roll over or roll under thing  
geez guys.

The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com

On 4/13/2010 5:50 PM, Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 wrote:
> But I've already read that message, and even can recall what it was
> about, usually.  I want to read the NEW contribution without having to
> read all that again.
>
> But if you've forgotten what went before, I have made a handy footnote
> available to you.
>
> So top posting often wins.
>
> 73, doug
>
> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:02:39 -0700 (PDT)
> From: John Magliacane
>
> >  Top posting makes no sense, and on small screens makes it damn near
> >  impossible to follow what's going on.
>
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> A: Top-posting.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
> ___
> Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
>
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Email etiquette - was Re: Re: Moon

2010-04-13 Thread Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604
That depends on whether you have cats or not.

73, doug

   Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:06:09 -0500
   From: Idle-Tyme 
   This getting as bad as the toilet paper roll over or roll under thing  
   geez guys.

   On 4/13/2010 5:50 PM, Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 wrote:
   > But I've already read that message, and even can recall what it was
   > about, usually.  I want to read the NEW contribution without having to
   > read all that again.
   >
   > But if you've forgotten what went before, I have made a handy footnote
   > available to you.
   >
   > So top posting often wins.
   >
   > 73, doug
   >
   > Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:02:39 -0700 (PDT)
   > From: John Magliacane
   >
   > >  Top posting makes no sense, and on small screens makes it damn near
   > >  impossible to follow what's going on.
   >
   > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
   > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
   > A: Top-posting.
   > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
   > ___
   > Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
   > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
   > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
   >
   >
   >
   ___
   Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
   Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
   Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Email etiquette - was Re: Re: Moon

2010-04-13 Thread Steve Meuse
Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF expunged (ni...@ngunn.net):

> Top posting is the better option.

My favorite annoyance are people who post 1 line of text but have 5 lines of a 
.sig :)

> -- 
> Nigel A. Gunn,  1865 El Camino Drive, Xenia, OH 45385-1115, USA.  tel +1 937 
> 825 5032
> Amateur Radio G8IFF W8IFF (was KC8NHF),  e-mail ni...@ngunn.net   www  
> http://www.ngunn.net
> Member of  ARRL, GQRP #11396, QRPARCI #11644, SOC #548,  Flying Pigs QRP Club 
> International #385,
> Dayton ARA #2128, AMSAT-NA LM-1691,  AMSAT-UK 0182, MKARS,  ALC, 
> GCARES, XWARN.


-Steve
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Email etiquette - was Re: Re: Moon

2010-04-14 Thread Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF
Only 4 lines of sig. The 2 dashes are the delimiter put in by the e-mail client.
Could be worse. I could put the sig at the top!
Also bugs me when people dont crop the recipient list.


On 14-Apr-10 04:39, Steve Meuse wrote:
> Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF expunged (ni...@ngunn.net):
>
>> Top posting is the better option.
>
> My favorite annoyance are people who post 1 line of text but have 5 lines of 
> a .sig :)


-- 
Nigel A. Gunn,  1865 El Camino Drive, Xenia, OH 45385-1115, USA.  tel +1 937 
825 5032
Amateur Radio G8IFF W8IFF (was KC8NHF),  e-mail ni...@ngunn.net   www  
http://www.ngunn.net
Member of  ARRL, GQRP #11396, QRPARCI #11644, SOC #548,  Flying Pigs QRP Club 
International #385,
Dayton ARA #2128, AMSAT-NA LM-1691,  AMSAT-UK 0182, MKARS,  ALC, 
GCARES, XWARN.

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Email etiquette - was Re: Re: Moon

2010-04-14 Thread Jonathan Guthrie
The last time I set up a mailing list, the list manager was insistent 
that I did not want to set the "reply-to" address to the list address, 
noting that doing that removed any "reply-to" field that the sender put 
in there, which was a loss of important data for those users who put 
data in that header field.  It also pointed out that it made private 
messages harder to do, and gave it a nonzero probability that you would 
respond to the group when you intended to respond to the individual. 
The configuration pages linked to a newsgroup post somewhere of someone 
ranting about the practice and proving that it was the wrong thing to do.

Nevertheless, I selected that option and I will do it again.  Because 
unless you choose that option, the most efficient way for me to reply to 
the group is to do a reply all.  (Well, it was.  This new version of 
Thunderbird has a "reply to group" option.  Woot!) At that point, I have 
to trim the recipient list in order to send it only to the group, which 
is almost always what I'm trying to do.  It's a pain, so most of the 
time I don't bother.

Since most responses to list messages are intended for the list and not 
to the individual who wrote the message you're responding to, not 
abusing "reply-to" in that fashion deoptimizes the typical case in order 
to be technically correct.  That is, in my opinion, a dumb thing to do 
in order to preserve the information in the rarely-used reply-to field.

I mention this because this list is set up in the technically correct 
way, and I have several times sent messages to individuals when I 
intended them to go to the list.  That is MY particular annoyance.

On 04/14/2010 07:54 AM, Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF wrote:
> Only 4 lines of sig. The 2 dashes are the delimiter put in by the e-mail 
> client.
> Could be worse. I could put the sig at the top!
> Also bugs me when people dont crop the recipient list.
>
>
> On 14-Apr-10 04:39, Steve Meuse wrote:
>> Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF expunged (ni...@ngunn.net):
>>
>>> Top posting is the better option.
>>
>> My favorite annoyance are people who post 1 line of text but have 5 lines of 
>> a .sig :)
>
>


!DSPAM:117,4bc5f018191152065711076!


___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb