[android-developers] How to query more than one phone in the Contacts Content Provider
Hi all!
I am using this code to get the phone from the android address book:
Uri myContactURI = Uri.withAppendedPath(Contacts.People.CONTENT_URI,
"Some contact ID");
Cursor cur = managedQuery(myContactURI, null, null, null, null);
if (cur.moveToFirst()) {
Log.d("DEBUGTAG", "first");
String name;
String phoneNumber;
int nameColumn = cur.getColumnIndex(People.NAME);
int phoneColumn = cur.getColumnIndex(People.NUMBER);
String imagePath;
do {
// Get the field values
name = cur.getString(nameColumn);
phoneNumber = cur.getString(phoneColumn);
// Do something with the values.
Log.d("DEBUGTAG", "Contact: name:" + name +" phone:"+
phoneNumber);
} while (cur.moveToNext());
}
But all I get is the default phone. I want to get all phone numbers
including those who have TYPE_OTHER.
Thanks!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Questin about gmail intents
Hi! Is it possible to get an intent when the user recieves a mail and to cancel the gmail notification? I want to filter some messages and I do not want te get notifications from them. Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Saving Activity state when pressing "Home"
How do you store that variable? On 19 Ноем, 17:18, jax wrote: > I need to store a variable that contains my application state > "restoredClockTime" > > I do this in onSaveInstanceState and onRestoreInstanceState and it > works when I flip the screen on the G1. > > The problem is when I press the Home button and then re-enter the > activity it does not work. > > why is this? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Getting a Gmail new message intent
Hi! Is there a way to intercept when a new message arrives at Gmail, read the subject and if the subject contains "word" to archive and label the message and to bypass the notification and if not - to notify the user. I want to make an application that prevents the user to get notifications for certain messages, but I don`t know if this is possible. Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Creating Gmail filters
I am building a program for Android and I need to create a filter that makes labels to messages which contains in the subjects a special word. Is this possible through the imap interface or any other interface? I am talking to Gmail. Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Problem with HttpURLConnection
I am coding for Android, but since it uses java based language I guess
here is the right place to post. I think that this is either a bug in
java or I can`t manage to do something wright.
Here is the code snippet
URL url;
HttpURLConnection conn = null;
try {
url = new URL("http://mtel.bg/sms/send_sms.php";);
conn = (HttpURLConnection) url.openConnection();
}catch (MalformedURLException e1) {
}catch (IOException e) {
}
// Set the Browser Agent
conn.setInstanceFollowRedirects(false);
try {
Log.d("DEBUGTAG", Integer.toString(
conn.getResponseCode() ));
} catch (IOException e1) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e1.printStackTrace();
}
StringBuilder buffer = new StringBuilder("");
BufferedReader in = null;
InputStreamReader deni = null;
try{
Log.d("DEBUGTAG", "Lenght:" +conn.getContentLength());
deni = new InputStreamReader(conn.getInputStream());
in = new BufferedReader( deni );
String inputLine;
while((inputLine = in.readLine()) != null){
buffer.append(inputLine);
}
deni.close();
in.close();
conn.disconnect();
}catch (Exception e) {
Log.d("DEBUGTAG", "exception");
}finally{
try {
if( deni != null) deni.close();
if( in != null) in.close();
} catch (IOException e) {
Log.d("DEBUGTAG", "exception");
}
conn.disconnect();
}
Log.d("DEBUGTAG", buffer.toString());
url = null;
conn = null;
try {
url = new URL("http://mtel.bg/sms/send_sms.php";);
conn = (HttpURLConnection) url.openConnection();
}catch (MalformedURLException e1) {
}catch (IOException e) {
}
conn.setUseCaches(true);
// Set the Browser Agent
conn.setInstanceFollowRedirects(true);
try {
Log.d("DEBUGTAG", Integer.toString(
conn.getResponseCode() ));
} catch (IOException e1) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e1.printStackTrace();
}
Log.d("DEBUGTAG", "Lenght:" +conn.getContentLength());
buffer = new StringBuilder("");
try{
//BufferedReader in;
in = new BufferedReader( new InputStreamReader
(conn.getInputStream()) );
String inputLine;
while((inputLine = in.readLine()) != null){
buffer.append(inputLine);
}
conn.disconnect();
in.close();
}catch (Exception e) {
}
Where is the problem? I am connecting to http://mtel.bg/sms/send_sms.php
with conn.setInstanceFollowRedirects(false); because I want to read
some cookies and this pages redirects to another with HTTP code 302,
but since setInstanceFollowRedirects is false, there is no redirection
and the page is blank. The ContentLength is 0, but I am trying to read
the page. I get no error here in = new BufferedReader( new
InputStreamReader(conn.getInputStream()) ); . Until now everything is
ok.
But here comes the problem. After I try to read the page again with
conn.setInstanceFollowRedirects(true); , I get ContentLenght -1 and no
output.
The strange thing is that if I call System.gc(); before opening the
second page, there is no problem, but I don`t want to call System.gc
();
Could you please tell me where the problem is? I am trying different
things to debug, but nothing :(
I posted the topic first at sun`s java forums -
http://forums.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5415660&tstart=0
Thanks!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.0 SDK is here!
Android 2.0 seems to be awesome!!! Will be available for ADP1/G1 ? I am asking, because I have ADP1 and I know that there are some storage problems and there was a discussion about 1.6 if it will be available to ADP1. I am with 1.6, but will 2.0 be available to ADP1? Thanks! And great improvements!!! On 27 Окт, 18:45, Xavier Ducrohet wrote: > Hello everyone! > > We've just announced the Android 2.0 > SDKhttp://android-developers.blogspot.com/2009/10/announcing-android-20-... > > If you already have the 1.6 SDK, note that you can simply use the SDK > Manager to add Android 2.0 to your SDK. Make sure you also get the new > SDK Tools (revision 3), as the SDK Manager in revision 2 (the one that > shipped with 1.6) doesn't enforce dependencies between platforms and > Tools (fixed in rev 3) > > For more information about using the SDK Manager, > see:http://developer.android.com/sdk/adding-components.html > > Have fun! > Xav > -- > Xavier Ducrohet > Android SDK Tech Lead > Google Inc. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Dev Phone and RC33 update
Start a topic there: http://groups.google.com/group/android-platform/browse_thread/thread/a1b7fb4cda42e807 Hope it is not threated as spam :) On 3 Март, 00:22, Jean-Baptiste Queru wrote: > Anyway, we've wandered far off-topic with little chance of coming back > on-topic, this discussion should move to android-platform where it'd > make more sense so that we don't bother people who are just trying to > use the SDK. > > JBQ, self-moderating. > > 2009/3/2 Jean-Baptiste Queru : > > > > > You don't need for wipe the data and cache partitions when flashing > > the boot, recovery or system partitions. > > > JBQ > > > 2009/3/2 vendor : > >> If you flash with the unlocked firmware you should delete the older first? > >> And to format the partition? > > >> 2009/3/3 Jean-Baptiste Queru > > >>> That wouldn't work, as you could download with the "locked" firmware, > >>> flash an "unlocked" firmware, and get the files out. > > >>> JBQ > > >>> 2009/3/2 vendor : > >>> > What do you think about the idea of two firmware versions for ADP1? > > >>> > 2009/3/3 Jean-Baptiste Queru > > >>> >> As far as I know by the time you remove from ADP1 the features that > >>> >> would allow access to forward-locked apps (flashable, root, debuggable > >>> >> system), you have essentially a consumer device. > > >>> >> JBQ > > >>> >> 2009/3/2 vendor.net : > > >>> >> >> Most importantly though, I'm really disappointed in Google's lack of > >>> >> >> communication on the topic. I have to scour the web just to find a > >>> >> >> hint of some idea of what's going on with the dev phone. There is > >>> >> >> no > >>> >> >> official word or anything. Google should at least have a posting on > >>> >> >> the Developer's blog. Where is Google's "Contact Us" link for those > >>> >> >> of us who paid the $25? > >>> >> > Totally agree! > > >>> >> > Hint for some desperate developers who wants to trade ADP1 for G1. > >>> >> > You > >>> >> > can put the G1 firmware. Your phone will be full locked except for > >>> >> > the > >>> >> > sim card I think, but you will have G1 firmware. Just have to flash > >>> >> > it, but still I didn`t think that this is the solution... > > >>> >> > I see one possible solution for dealing with the situation: To have 2 > >>> >> > versions for developers. The first version will be totally unlocked, > >>> >> > but it will not support the full market. The second version will lock > >>> >> > only these dirs which contains the paid apps. The second version of > >>> >> > the firmware will lock only the dirs and the processes which control > >>> >> > the copy/protection of the apps. There could be flaws, but I will be > >>> >> > happy to read your comments about it. It is a possible solution? JQB? > > >>> >> > On 1 Март, 08:08, Sen wrote: > >>> >> >> Well, you all have certainly taken this discussion in an interesting > >>> >> >> direction. > > >>> >> >> I would just like to add to my original posting. Hopefully we still > >>> >> >> have some official Google person's attention. > > >>> >> >> I'm pretty understanding when it comes to deadlines not being met > >>> >> >> when > >>> >> >> it comes to stuff like this. We're all developers here and I'm sure > >>> >> >> we've all experienced this. I would agree though that I think the > >>> >> >> people that went out of their way and paid the extra money for a > >>> >> >> "developer edition" phone, should be the first to get the updates. > > >>> >> >> Most importantly though, I'm really disappointed in Google's lack of > >>> >> >> communication on the topic. I have to scour the web just to find a > >>> >> >> hint of some idea of what's going on with the dev phone. There is > >>> >> >> no > >>> >> >> official word or anyth
[android-developers] Re: Dev Phone and RC33 update
> Most importantly though, I'm really disappointed in Google's lack of > communication on the topic. I have to scour the web just to find a > hint of some idea of what's going on with the dev phone. There is no > official word or anything. Google should at least have a posting on > the Developer's blog. Where is Google's "Contact Us" link for those > of us who paid the $25? Totally agree! Hint for some desperate developers who wants to trade ADP1 for G1. You can put the G1 firmware. Your phone will be full locked except for the sim card I think, but you will have G1 firmware. Just have to flash it, but still I didn`t think that this is the solution... I see one possible solution for dealing with the situation: To have 2 versions for developers. The first version will be totally unlocked, but it will not support the full market. The second version will lock only these dirs which contains the paid apps. The second version of the firmware will lock only the dirs and the processes which control the copy/protection of the apps. There could be flaws, but I will be happy to read your comments about it. It is a possible solution? JQB? On 1 Март, 08:08, Sen wrote: > Well, you all have certainly taken this discussion in an interesting > direction. > > I would just like to add to my original posting. Hopefully we still > have some official Google person's attention. > > I'm pretty understanding when it comes to deadlines not being met when > it comes to stuff like this. We're all developers here and I'm sure > we've all experienced this. I would agree though that I think the > people that went out of their way and paid the extra money for a > "developer edition" phone, should be the first to get the updates. > > Most importantly though, I'm really disappointed in Google's lack of > communication on the topic. I have to scour the web just to find a > hint of some idea of what's going on with the dev phone. There is no > official word or anything. Google should at least have a posting on > the Developer's blog. Where is Google's "Contact Us" link for those > of us who paid the $25? > > Why do I have to ask this question?... we really should be better > informed. > > Thanks > > On Feb 28, 1:16 pm, Jon Colverson wrote: > > > On Feb 28, 6:46 pm, Al Sutton wrote: > > > > method), and, as far as I'm aware, there isn't a method circulating > > > which can be applied to any and every protected application to get a > > > protection free copy by following a simple set of instructions (if there > > > is I'd welcome information on it so we can work on fixing the flaw it > > > uses). > > > I'm not aware of one either, but I expect that a tool would emerge > > very quickly if the AndAppStore takes off when it starts being > > distributed with handsets and such. You could then tweak the system to > > stop the tool from working, but then the attacker would release a new > > version, and you'd be in an arms race. > > > The reason why I say they're equivalent is that while the steps along > > the way may be different, the end result is the same: people who don't > > want to pay will get the apps for free. In my opinion adding extra > > hurdles just wastes the developers' time and provides a juicier > > intellectual challenge for those who are inclined to try to defeat the > > system. > > > -- > > Jon --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] IM notifications How-To?
The preinstalled app in android IM can alert you even when your phone is a sleep. How is done? Does it check every X seconds or what? And when the phone is a sleep is WiFi and GPRS off? Thanks! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Some info about the hardware unlocked ADP1
I have ADP1 and want to flash it with the holiday version, because waiting the official ADP 1.1 is an unofficial waste of time. My question is can I lock my phone if I flash it with a software version which is for locked phones? And how the hardware unlock works? I know that one of the difference of G1 and ADP1 is that ADP1 is hardware unlocked and you can install anything, but how does this work? Is there a chance to lock my phone with some software flash? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Dev Phone and RC33 update
We can compare G1 and ADP1, but the intention of buying ADP1 is more important. People buy ADP1 to develop apps for G1. Not to say: "Hey, I`ve got a hacked G1 and I can do whatever I like.". So in this case ADP1 should do the same things as G1. We develop apps for G1, but test them on ADP1, so we need the same conditions. And we also need to test other developer`s applications like paid ones. On 27 Фев, 04:47, Jean-Baptiste Queru wrote: > The problem is that you're fighting between two conflicting goals here: > > -the need to have a root-capable debuggable and custom-flashable > device like the ADP1 for application development. > > -the need to have a non-root-capable non-debuggable > non-custom-flashable device like a consumer device in order to > maintain forward-locking guarantees. > > Intuitively, it should be theoretically possible to implement a design > that can switch between the two modes with the proper guarantees (i.e. > wiping the relevant partitions clean when going from a > forward-locking-capable build to a non-forward-locking capable one). > That'd require resources, of course, which would then have to be > pulled from other tasks. > > That being said, from the point of view of application development, > you need to expect that the differences from one consumer device to > another (e.g. which apps are installed by each user) will be greater > than the differences between an ADP1 and consumer devices like the G1 > (ignoring for now the issues about 1.0 vs 1.1 on ADP1 that we're > working on). Worrying about the differences between e.g. one ADP1 and > one G1 seems to be ignoring the differences between the thousands of > G1s out there. > > JBQ > > > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Steve Barr wrote: > > >> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 1:48 PM, vendor.net wrote: > >> > JBQ, will ADP1 support copy-protected apps in the future? > > > On 2/26/09, Jean-Baptiste Queru wrote: > >> I'd say that the current design would make this hard, but I have no > >> visibility over what the future plans might be. > > > I think a lot of us just want their Dev Phone to be as close as > > possible to a customer's phone so we can test and have confidence in > > our Java apps before putting them out on the Market. Should we go to > > Holiday and be done with it? It would be great if there was some > > official blessed "upgrade" that would let us have a customer-like > > phone. I'm willing to nuke whatever's currently on the my phone to > > get it to that point. > > > Otherwise, perhaps some return/refund program should be put in place. > > > Steve > > -- > Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru > Android Engineer, Google. > > Please don't contact me directly. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Dev Phone and RC33 update
Totaly agree. This is funny! I believed in google and still believe. I was so excited about android and ADP1 and the opurtunity to explore competitors apps and code mine, but now I can`t do that. I still believe that goolge will come with some solution. And there is one more big issue: install apps on the SD card. 100mb free space is funny for a phone which can cary 16gb and can install tousands of apps. Now I have to delete some to save space... I thought that Android and G1/ADP1 can compete with iPhone, but with the current state it just has no "power". Limited space for apps and developers hand tighten... Jon Colverson написа: > On Feb 26, 10:17 pm, Jean-Baptiste Queru wrote: > > I'd say that the current design would make this hard, but I have no > > visibility over what the future plans might be. > > I think the decision to restrict "copy-protected" apps on the ADP1 is > very unfortunate. It's trivial to break the "protection" on a retail > G1, so I can't imagine that restricting ADP1s will have *any* positive > effect on infringement. Of course, it may have the opposite effect and > encourage developers to seek out alternative ways of getting the apps > that they're not allowed to legitimately purchase. > > Who is this restriction supposed to help? Android application > developers. And who does it hurt? Android application developers. How > about polling all the registered developers to ask whether they > support it? > > -- > Jon --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Dev Phone and RC33 update
So the users who have ADP1 and want to develop apps will be stuck and won`t have the chance to test the competitors apps? This is cruel... Jean-Baptiste Queru написа: > I'd say that the current design would make this hard, but I have no > visibility over what the future plans might be. > > JBQ > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 1:48 PM, vendor.net wrote: > > > > JBQ, will ADP1 support copy-protected apps in the future? > > > > Jean-Baptiste Queru написа: > >> Indeed, copy-protected apps aren't offered on devices where the > >> copy-protection is known to be ineffective. > >> > >> JBQ > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Sena Gbeckor-Kove wrote: > >> > > >> > I can't remember off the top of my head but I believe that was > >> > something to do with copy protection. I don't think ADP1 Market > >> > displays copy protected apps. Despite the copy protection not being > >> > very effective. Somebody back me up here. > >> > > >> > S > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On 26 Feb 2009, at 20:28, vendor.net wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> Is this the reason why I can not see/download these apps - Phonebook, > >> >> Bomberman, Pac-Man, de Blob and many other apps? > >> >> > >> >> P.S. Phonebook and others are not paid, so I should see them? > >> >> > >> >> Sena Gbeckor-Kove написа: > >> >>> Yeah, there was a comment on the article which makes a lot of sense > >> >>> to > >> >>> me. How does Google give the 30%, and who does it give it to, on the > >> >>> ADP 1. Accounting and admin nightmare. > >> >>> > >> >>> S > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> On 26 Feb 2009, at 10:06, Al Sutton wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> I'm personally wondering if they'll be another firmware update for > >> >>>> the > >> >>>> G1 which introduces proper DRM (something like > >> >>>> http://andappstore.com/AndroidPhoneApplications/licensing.jsp) > >> >>>> before > >> >>>> the ADP gets access to paid apps. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> I know there are other issues to overcome with the ADP1, but > >> >>>> allowing > >> >>>> access to paid apps for users with a device that easily copy them I > >> >>>> suspect would go down worse than not allowing access to paid apps at > >> >>>> all. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Al. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> roland wrote: > >> >>>>> Check this out guys, > >> >>>>> http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2009/02/25/google-blocking-paid-market-apps-from-dev-phone-1-users/ > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> It seems Google has to do more work on the ADP 1.1 than G1, ADP > >> >>>>> owner > >> >>>>> could be the private of paid apps. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> On 26 fév, 01:26, "vendor.net" wrote: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>>> I know that you can`t tell us a date for the release, but can you > >> >>>>>> tell > >> >>>>>> us if it will be released next month or something? > >> >>>>>> Is this the reaseon, why I can`t download some of the apps at the > >> >>>>>> market? > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> I thought that the update for the T-Mobile users came a long time > >> >>>>>> ago. > >> >>>>>> This delay for ADP1 could make some problems. After all we use > >> >>>>>> ADP1 to > >> >>>>>> develop apps for G1, but we haven`t the newest version and we have > >> >>>>>> nothing to do except to wait... > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> I don`t want to install the T-Mobile RC, because of what you > >> >>>>>> wrote, > >> >>>>>> but the waiting is too long... > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>&
[android-developers] Re: Dev Phone and RC33 update
JBQ, will ADP1 support copy-protected apps in the future? Jean-Baptiste Queru написа: > Indeed, copy-protected apps aren't offered on devices where the > copy-protection is known to be ineffective. > > JBQ > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Sena Gbeckor-Kove wrote: > > > > I can't remember off the top of my head but I believe that was > > something to do with copy protection. I don't think ADP1 Market > > displays copy protected apps. Despite the copy protection not being > > very effective. Somebody back me up here. > > > > S > > > > > > > > On 26 Feb 2009, at 20:28, vendor.net wrote: > > > >> > >> Is this the reason why I can not see/download these apps - Phonebook, > >> Bomberman, Pac-Man, de Blob and many other apps? > >> > >> P.S. Phonebook and others are not paid, so I should see them? > >> > >> Sena Gbeckor-Kove написа: > >>> Yeah, there was a comment on the article which makes a lot of sense > >>> to > >>> me. How does Google give the 30%, and who does it give it to, on the > >>> ADP 1. Accounting and admin nightmare. > >>> > >>> S > >>> > >>> > >>> On 26 Feb 2009, at 10:06, Al Sutton wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> I'm personally wondering if they'll be another firmware update for > >>>> the > >>>> G1 which introduces proper DRM (something like > >>>> http://andappstore.com/AndroidPhoneApplications/licensing.jsp) > >>>> before > >>>> the ADP gets access to paid apps. > >>>> > >>>> I know there are other issues to overcome with the ADP1, but > >>>> allowing > >>>> access to paid apps for users with a device that easily copy them I > >>>> suspect would go down worse than not allowing access to paid apps at > >>>> all. > >>>> > >>>> Al. > >>>> > >>>> roland wrote: > >>>>> Check this out guys, > >>>>> http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2009/02/25/google-blocking-paid-market-apps-from-dev-phone-1-users/ > >>>>> > >>>>> It seems Google has to do more work on the ADP 1.1 than G1, ADP > >>>>> owner > >>>>> could be the private of paid apps. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On 26 fév, 01:26, "vendor.net" wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> I know that you can`t tell us a date for the release, but can you > >>>>>> tell > >>>>>> us if it will be released next month or something? > >>>>>> Is this the reaseon, why I can`t download some of the apps at the > >>>>>> market? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I thought that the update for the T-Mobile users came a long time > >>>>>> ago. > >>>>>> This delay for ADP1 could make some problems. After all we use > >>>>>> ADP1 to > >>>>>> develop apps for G1, but we haven`t the newest version and we have > >>>>>> nothing to do except to wait... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I don`t want to install the T-Mobile RC, because of what you > >>>>>> wrote, > >>>>>> but the waiting is too long... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Can you tell us what features will include the Android 1.1 for > >>>>>> ADP1? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> P.S. I guess that it takes time and that you have a lot of work, > >>>>>> but > >>>>>> just wanted to know... weeks/months till the release? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 25 Фев, 15:59, Jean-Baptiste Queru wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> PLAT-RC33 is the variant of Android 1.1 ported to Dream (G1) and > >>>>>>> customized for T-Mobile US, so it's not the appropriate build for > >>>>>>> the > >>>>>>> ADP1. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> There's no news on that subject as there isn't anything to > >>>>>>> announce > >>>>>>> yet. We're still pushing hard to get 1.1 available for A
[android-developers] Re: Dev Phone and RC33 update
Is this the reason why I can not see/download these apps - Phonebook, Bomberman, Pac-Man, de Blob and many other apps? P.S. Phonebook and others are not paid, so I should see them? Sena Gbeckor-Kove написа: > Yeah, there was a comment on the article which makes a lot of sense to > me. How does Google give the 30%, and who does it give it to, on the > ADP 1. Accounting and admin nightmare. > > S > > > On 26 Feb 2009, at 10:06, Al Sutton wrote: > > > > > I'm personally wondering if they'll be another firmware update for the > > G1 which introduces proper DRM (something like > > http://andappstore.com/AndroidPhoneApplications/licensing.jsp) before > > the ADP gets access to paid apps. > > > > I know there are other issues to overcome with the ADP1, but allowing > > access to paid apps for users with a device that easily copy them I > > suspect would go down worse than not allowing access to paid apps at > > all. > > > > Al. > > > > roland wrote: > >> Check this out guys, > >> http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2009/02/25/google-blocking-paid-market-apps-from-dev-phone-1-users/ > >> > >> It seems Google has to do more work on the ADP 1.1 than G1, ADP owner > >> could be the private of paid apps. > >> > >> > >> On 26 fév, 01:26, "vendor.net" wrote: > >> > >>> I know that you can`t tell us a date for the release, but can you > >>> tell > >>> us if it will be released next month or something? > >>> Is this the reaseon, why I can`t download some of the apps at the > >>> market? > >>> > >>> I thought that the update for the T-Mobile users came a long time > >>> ago. > >>> This delay for ADP1 could make some problems. After all we use > >>> ADP1 to > >>> develop apps for G1, but we haven`t the newest version and we have > >>> nothing to do except to wait... > >>> > >>> I don`t want to install the T-Mobile RC, because of what you wrote, > >>> but the waiting is too long... > >>> > >>> Can you tell us what features will include the Android 1.1 for ADP1? > >>> > >>> Thanks! > >>> > >>> P.S. I guess that it takes time and that you have a lot of work, but > >>> just wanted to know... weeks/months till the release? > >>> > >>> On 25 Фев, 15:59, Jean-Baptiste Queru wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> PLAT-RC33 is the variant of Android 1.1 ported to Dream (G1) and > >>>> customized for T-Mobile US, so it's not the appropriate build for > >>>> the > >>>> ADP1. > >>>> > >>>> There's no news on that subject as there isn't anything to announce > >>>> yet. We're still pushing hard to get 1.1 available for ADP1 owners, > >>>> but some things take time and no matter how quickly we want them > >>>> done > >>>> we can't skip the necessary steps. > >>>> > >>>> There's no need to clear data during upgrade, the system > >>>> applications > >>>> are designed to deal with and convert their data from the old to > >>>> the > >>>> new version (though there is such a need during a downgrade or a > >>>> "sidegrade"). > >>>> > >>>> You're not the only one frustrated about this. I am too. > >>>> > >>>> JBQ > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Sen > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Can anyone please enlighten me on to why there is so little news > >>>>> concerning the RC33 update for G1 dev phone owners? > >>>>> > >>>>> I'd rather not do it manually as it sounds like you have to > >>>>> clear out > >>>>> your phone. > >>>>> > >>>>> Why aren't we getting an update? and why is there no news on the > >>>>> subject? > >>>>> > >>>>> Why did I pay $25 dollars for a developer account when we seem > >>>>> to not > >>>>> only get no benefits, but there is ABSOLUTELY NO support for us > >>>>> from > >>>>> the company? > >>>>> > >>>>> Am I the only one frustrated about this? > >>>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru > >>>> Android Engineer, Google. > >>>> > >>>> Please don't contact me directly. > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > -- > > > > * Written an Android App? - List it at http://andappstore.com/ * > > > > == > > Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the > > company number 6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House, > > 152-160 City Road, London, EC1V 2NX, UK. > > > > The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not > > necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's > > subsidiaries. > > > > > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Will ADP1 support payed apps from the store
Android Market is one of the powers of Android. One market for all android apps. The other companies like Samsung, Motorola and etc. have no big interest to make a different Markets. The center market is a big plus. There is no need to decentralize it. But this is not the point. My question is in other direction. Will be there a support for paid apps in ADP1. This problem should be solved. Amir Alagic написа: > I really don't belive that Android Market has bright future. > Everything is going slow and it is strange that developers can spend > 400 dollars plus shipping... but we can't sell applications. > > But that is not the only reason I think that Android Market is going > to loose its role. In future Samsung, LG and probably all other phone > manufacturers will have their own Markets. > Android OS is open source project and Samsung and other will probably > remove Android Market from their phones and will put shortcut to their > Market. Why to loose such opportunity? > They want money and don't want to give 30% to Google when they can > earn that money instead. > > I guess that phone manufacturers will create much better markets and > when they do that it will be faster and better because they need to > earn money now when phone sales are down. > So we'll have to wait few more months but I guess that from october or > november we'll have few first class markets available and only smaller > companies that don't have its own Markets will > let Google to ear 30%... But how long it will take before even smaller > players create their Markets is just question of time. In the > meanwhile switch to iPhone, Symbian or just continue to write > Android applications and the real markets will come... > > > > On Feb 26, 12:48 pm, "vendor.net" wrote: > > I am writing this, because of this news > > ->http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2009/02/25/google-blocking-paid-market-... > > . Is this true? And will ADP1 support buying payed apps? I am truly > > hopping that it will, because otherwise we will be not able to see the > > competition`s apps and many more features which will be missing if > > there is no payed apps on the phone. > > > > Thanks! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Dev Phone and RC33 update
WoW! This sounds creepy!!! Could someone of google confirm it? And will ADP1 support payed apps? It is redicilus not to. After all we should be able to explore the competitions apps... and this is only one of the things I came up to right now. I have started a new post here-> http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers/browse_thread/thread/875f56a7af29a20 P.S. Ok, no payed apps for now, but why can`t I see some other apps like Pac-Man, Phonebook, de Blob ? On 26 Фев, 10:50, roland wrote: > Check this out > guys,http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2009/02/25/google-blocking-paid-market-... > > It seems Google has to do more work on the ADP 1.1 than G1, ADP owner > could be the private of paid apps. > > On 26 fév, 01:26, "vendor.net" wrote: > > > I know that you can`t tell us a date for the release, but can you tell > > us if it will be released next month or something? > > Is this the reaseon, why I can`t download some of the apps at the > > market? > > > I thought that the update for the T-Mobile users came a long time ago. > > This delay for ADP1 could make some problems. After all we use ADP1 to > > develop apps for G1, but we haven`t the newest version and we have > > nothing to do except to wait... > > > I don`t want to install the T-Mobile RC, because of what you wrote, > > but the waiting is too long... > > > Can you tell us what features will include the Android 1.1 for ADP1? > > > Thanks! > > > P.S. I guess that it takes time and that you have a lot of work, but > > just wanted to know... weeks/months till the release? > > > On 25 Фев, 15:59, Jean-Baptiste Queru wrote: > > > > PLAT-RC33 is the variant of Android 1.1 ported to Dream (G1) and > > > customized for T-Mobile US, so it's not the appropriate build for the > > > ADP1. > > > > There's no news on that subject as there isn't anything to announce > > > yet. We're still pushing hard to get 1.1 available for ADP1 owners, > > > but some things take time and no matter how quickly we want them done > > > we can't skip the necessary steps. > > > > There's no need to clear data during upgrade, the system applications > > > are designed to deal with and convert their data from the old to the > > > new version (though there is such a need during a downgrade or a > > > "sidegrade"). > > > > You're not the only one frustrated about this. I am too. > > > > JBQ > > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Sen wrote: > > > > > Can anyone please enlighten me on to why there is so little news > > > > concerning the RC33 update for G1 dev phone owners? > > > > > I'd rather not do it manually as it sounds like you have to clear out > > > > your phone. > > > > > Why aren't we getting an update? and why is there no news on the > > > > subject? > > > > > Why did I pay $25 dollars for a developer account when we seem to not > > > > only get no benefits, but there is ABSOLUTELY NO support for us from > > > > the company? > > > > > Am I the only one frustrated about this? > > > > -- > > > Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru > > > Android Engineer, Google. > > > > Please don't contact me directly. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Will ADP1 support payed apps from the store
I am writing this, because of this news -> http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2009/02/25/google-blocking-paid-market-apps-from-dev-phone-1-users/ . Is this true? And will ADP1 support buying payed apps? I am truly hopping that it will, because otherwise we will be not able to see the competition`s apps and many more features which will be missing if there is no payed apps on the phone. Thanks! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Dev Phone and RC33 update
I know that you can`t tell us a date for the release, but can you tell us if it will be released next month or something? Is this the reaseon, why I can`t download some of the apps at the market? I thought that the update for the T-Mobile users came a long time ago. This delay for ADP1 could make some problems. After all we use ADP1 to develop apps for G1, but we haven`t the newest version and we have nothing to do except to wait... I don`t want to install the T-Mobile RC, because of what you wrote, but the waiting is too long... Can you tell us what features will include the Android 1.1 for ADP1? Thanks! P.S. I guess that it takes time and that you have a lot of work, but just wanted to know... weeks/months till the release? On 25 Фев, 15:59, Jean-Baptiste Queru wrote: > PLAT-RC33 is the variant of Android 1.1 ported to Dream (G1) and > customized for T-Mobile US, so it's not the appropriate build for the > ADP1. > > There's no news on that subject as there isn't anything to announce > yet. We're still pushing hard to get 1.1 available for ADP1 owners, > but some things take time and no matter how quickly we want them done > we can't skip the necessary steps. > > There's no need to clear data during upgrade, the system applications > are designed to deal with and convert their data from the old to the > new version (though there is such a need during a downgrade or a > "sidegrade"). > > You're not the only one frustrated about this. I am too. > > JBQ > > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Sen wrote: > > > Can anyone please enlighten me on to why there is so little news > > concerning the RC33 update for G1 dev phone owners? > > > I'd rather not do it manually as it sounds like you have to clear out > > your phone. > > > Why aren't we getting an update? and why is there no news on the > > subject? > > > Why did I pay $25 dollars for a developer account when we seem to not > > only get no benefits, but there is ABSOLUTELY NO support for us from > > the company? > > > Am I the only one frustrated about this? > > -- > Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru > Android Engineer, Google. > > Please don't contact me directly. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] The current version of ADP1
I have an ADP1 with this software version: Firmware version: 1.0 Baseband version: 62.33.20.08H_1.22.12.29 Kernel version: 2.6.25-01843-gfea26b0 android-bu...@apa27#6 Build number: dream_devphone-userdebug 1.0 Unlocked 116222 test-keys Which is the current version? And how can I obtain it? I think that my version is very old, because I can`t see some of the applications on the market. Thanks! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
