Re: [AOLSERVER] Responding to SourceForge-generated mail
*cough* should be on their own list *cough* -- Patrick Spence arivenATarivenDOTcom www.RandomRamblings.com www.Ariven.com - Original Message - From: Dossy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 7:03 AM Subject: [AOLSERVER] Responding to SourceForge-generated mail All, Please do not respond to SourceForge-generated mail to the mailing list. It is not a bidirectional interface. Your responses will not be seen by the participants of the ticket. If you'd like to respond, please go to http://sf.net/tracker/index.php?group=3152 and respond directly to the ticket via the web interface. Thanks, -- Dossy -- Dossy Shiobara mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Panoptic Computer Network web: http://www.panoptic.com/ He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on. (p. 70)
Re: [AOLSERVER] Responding to SourceForge-generated mail
Yeah, I agree. Get a flood of these is not much fun. I apologize for not posting on SF. I did go there, couldn't figure out what the hell to do (even though I know I am registered there), probably couldn't remember the password I registered with anyway, so I punted and just replied to the email. I realize this is lame on my part - sorry. Jim *cough* should be on their own list *cough* -- Patrick Spence arivenATarivenDOTcom www.RandomRamblings.com www.Ariven.com - Original Message - From: Dossy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 7:03 AM Subject: [AOLSERVER] Responding to SourceForge-generated mail All, Please do not respond to SourceForge-generated mail to the mailing list. It is not a bidirectional interface. Your responses will not be seen by the participants of the ticket. If you'd like to respond, please go to http://sf.net/tracker/index.php?group=3152 and respond directly to the ticket via the web interface. Thanks, -- Dossy -- Dossy Shiobara mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Panoptic Computer Network web: http://www.panoptic.com/ He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on. (p. 70)
Re: [AOLSERVER] Responding to SourceForge-generated mail
On 2002.10.21, Patrick Spence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: *cough* should be on their own list *cough* Maybe. Although, who'd bother signing up to that list? It's good that people who might not normally participate in answering SF questions see the questions and can contribute if they choose to. If I have to post people's responses directly to SF, that might be the best way of handling it. -- Dossy -- Dossy Shiobara mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Panoptic Computer Network web: http://www.panoptic.com/ He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on. (p. 70)
Re: [AOLSERVER] Responding to SourceForge-generated mail
- Original Message - From: Dossy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 5:16 PM Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] Responding to SourceForge-generated mail On 2002.10.21, Patrick Spence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: *cough* should be on their own list *cough* Maybe. Although, who'd bother signing up to that list? Those interested in seeing the questions and helping with them. Say the various project leaders of the various modules... It's good that people who might not normally participate in answering SF questions see the questions and can contribute if they choose to. If I have to post people's responses directly to SF, that might be the best way of handling it. Its also bad because it takes up list bandwidth for messages that can't be replied to and are in a format that is hard to read... especially when you realise that I am probably not the only person here who killfiles them. :) (thus proving they ARE a waste of bandwidth since -someone- deletes them out of hand) -- Patrick Spence arivenATarivenDOTcom www.RandomRamblings.com www.Ariven.com
Re: [AOLSERVER] Responding to SourceForge-generated mail
The bugs, features, patches tracking email notifications could be sent to a separate list, handled the same way the AOLserver discussion list is. I just checked the SF admin page for the bug tracker, and the email address that the notices are being sent to is the AOLserver discussion group (ok, duh). If someone knows how to create a new listserv mailing list, say '[EMAIL PROTECTED]', we can direct all of the bugs, features, patches traffic to that list, and you'd need to sign up there to see them via email. Failing that, we could set up a Yahoo or other group to direct it to. I'd prefer it be handled the same way the discussion list is, though. There are probably other ways of doing it that might be even better. /s. On Mon, 21 Oct 2002 17:41:01 -0700, Patrick Spence [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: - Original Message - From: Dossy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 5:16 PM Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] Responding to SourceForge-generated mail On 2002.10.21, Patrick Spence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: *cough* should be on their own list *cough* Maybe. Although, who'd bother signing up to that list? Those interested in seeing the questions and helping with them. Say the various project leaders of the various modules... It's good that people who might not normally participate in answering SF questions see the questions and can contribute if they choose to. If I have to post people's responses directly to SF, that might be the best way of handling it. Its also bad because it takes up list bandwidth for messages that can't be replied to and are in a format that is hard to read... especially when you realise that I am probably not the only person here who killfiles them. :) (thus proving they ARE a waste of bandwidth since -someone- deletes them out of hand) -- Patrick Spence arivenATarivenDOTcom www.RandomRamblings.com www.Ariven.com -- Scott Goodwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://scottg.net
