Re: [Apertium-stuff] English-Santali Plural form not working

2021-12-29 Thread Prasanta Hembram 
STATUS=PROBLEM SOLVED ✅✅✅

Hi, it would be silly but I will share my solved problem I'm currently
learning and experimenting with Apertium, atleset it should be marked as
solved . English-Santali Plural form was not working for me because i
have given wrong input:
Instead of
*echo "cows" | apertium -d . eng-sat-transfer *
If we give* echo "cows" | apertium -d . eng-sat *in my current
English-Santali git (https://github.com/Prasanta-Hembram/apertium-eng-sat)
cutting the last transfer then in the output we will get  ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤᱠᱚ which
is the plural form of ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ


with best regards
Prasanta Hembram


On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 8:57 PM Prasanta Hembram <
prasantahembram...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Kevin, I have corrected it.. Now it's working. :-)
>
> with best regards
> Prasanta Hembram
>
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 12:55 PM Kevin Brubeck Unhammer 
> wrote:
>
>> Make sure you compile (`make -j langs`) before testing, and preferably
>> before each commit as well. The version on github doesn't compile right
>> now:
>>
>> apertium-eng-sat.eng-sat.t1x:69: element rule: validity error :
>> Element rule content does not follow the DTD, expecting (pattern , action),
>> got (pattern action rule )
>>
>> You could check the various stages of the pipeline to see where the
>> problem happens. Do `ls modes/eng-sat*` to see the eng-sat-related
>> debug modes, you can do e.g.
>>
>> echo Gregor woke up | apertium -d . eng-sat-lex
>>
>> to see up until lexical selection (typically the step right before
>> transfer).
>>
>> Prasanta Hembram
>>  čálii:
>>
>> > Thanks for the clarification sir, but I tried changing my rules and
>> paradef
>> > but no luck, no forms including paradef are working for bilingual
>> > English-Santali Dictionary. Only working in a monolingual Dictionary.
>> It is
>> > detected as Plural for Bilingual Dictionary, but with that nouns should
>> be
>> > inflicted as ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ  ᱠᱚ for Cows. I'm not able to find where the
>> problem
>> > lies. But for the monolingual Santali Dictionary it is working fine.
>> After
>> > deleting the dual form there is no luck. I'm following this book and
>> trying
>> > to make rules :-). Luckily I got this from the Internet.
>> >  OCRA-Glimpes-of-Santali-Grammar.pdf
>> > <
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1y7y4-YtkL1tIV29Ri_swY6u1RbTA2HT4/view?usp=drive_web
>> >
>> > with best regards
>> > Prasanta Hembram
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 11:59 PM Hèctor Alòs i Font <
>> hectora...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Prasanta,
>> >>
>> >> I'm delighted you are working on Santali.
>> >>
>> >> I have seen your code in github, and I have seen nothing that could
>> >> generate this kind of error. So, I downloaded your code, I fixed the
>> >> eng-sat.t1x file because it has a syntactic error, and I ran the
>> >> translation of "cows"... but I can't get anything, seemingly because
>> of a
>> >> problem in the postchunk module (although it is standard):
>> >>
>> >> $ echo "cow" | apertium -d . eng-sat-interchunk
>> >> ^ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ$^sent{^᱾$}$
>> >> $ echo "cow" | apertium -d . eng-sat-postchunk
>> >> ^᱾$
>> >>
>> >> In any case, if you somehow get something of the type "X/Y" (like
>> >> "ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱤᱱ/ ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱚ") this is because in the target dictionary
>> there
>> >> are two generations for  ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ. Probably you have:
>> >>
>> >> 
>> >>   
>> >>  ᱠᱤᱱ 
>> >>  ᱠᱚ 
>> >> 
>> >>
>> >> instead of:
>> >>
>> >> 
>> >>   
>> >>  ᱠᱤᱱ 
>> >>  ᱠᱚ 
>> >> 
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Hèctor
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Missatge de Prasanta Hembram <
>> prasantahembram720-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org> del dia dg.,
>> >> 19 de des. 2021 a les 19:09:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi, I'm working on a new language pair English -Santali pair and
>> trying
>> >>> to learn everyday how can i improve this pair. Today I had a few
>> doubts.
>> >>>
>> >>> Doubt 1: Plural rules are not working when translating from English to
>> >>> Santali, The English plural form "Cows" returns output " ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ "
>> instead
>> >>> of "ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱤᱱ/ ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱚ" . I have set up paradef but no luck.
>> How to
>> >>> get the correct output??
>> >>>
>> >>> The correct forms are as follows
>> >>> Cow = ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ
>> >>> Cows = ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱤᱱ  or Two Cows = ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱤᱱ
>> >>> Cows = ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱚ
>> >>>
>> >>> My Santali Monolingual Dictionary link:
>> >>> https://github.com/Prasanta-Hembram/apertium-sat
>> >>>
>> >>> English-Santali Bilingual Dictionary link :
>> >>> https://github.com/Prasanta-Hembram/apertium-eng-sat
>> >>>
>> >>> echo "cows" | apertium -d . eng-sat-transfer
>> >>>
>> >>> returns wrong output: ^ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ$^sent{^᱾$}$
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 
>> >>>  
>> >>>ᱠᱤᱱ  
>> >>>ᱠᱚ 
>> >>> 
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Thanks
>> >>> with best regards
>> >>> Prasanta Hembram
>> >>> ___
>> >>> Apertium-stuff mailing list
>> >>> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
>> >>>

Re: [Apertium-stuff] English-Santali Plural form not working

2021-12-24 Thread Prasanta Hembram 
Thanks Kevin, I have corrected it.. Now it's working. :-)

with best regards
Prasanta Hembram

On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 12:55 PM Kevin Brubeck Unhammer 
wrote:

> Make sure you compile (`make -j langs`) before testing, and preferably
> before each commit as well. The version on github doesn't compile right
> now:
>
> apertium-eng-sat.eng-sat.t1x:69: element rule: validity error :
> Element rule content does not follow the DTD, expecting (pattern , action),
> got (pattern action rule )
>
> You could check the various stages of the pipeline to see where the
> problem happens. Do `ls modes/eng-sat*` to see the eng-sat-related
> debug modes, you can do e.g.
>
> echo Gregor woke up | apertium -d . eng-sat-lex
>
> to see up until lexical selection (typically the step right before
> transfer).
>
> Prasanta Hembram
>  čálii:
>
> > Thanks for the clarification sir, but I tried changing my rules and
> paradef
> > but no luck, no forms including paradef are working for bilingual
> > English-Santali Dictionary. Only working in a monolingual Dictionary. It
> is
> > detected as Plural for Bilingual Dictionary, but with that nouns should
> be
> > inflicted as ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ  ᱠᱚ for Cows. I'm not able to find where the
> problem
> > lies. But for the monolingual Santali Dictionary it is working fine.
> After
> > deleting the dual form there is no luck. I'm following this book and
> trying
> > to make rules :-). Luckily I got this from the Internet.
> >  OCRA-Glimpes-of-Santali-Grammar.pdf
> > <
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1y7y4-YtkL1tIV29Ri_swY6u1RbTA2HT4/view?usp=drive_web
> >
> > with best regards
> > Prasanta Hembram
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 11:59 PM Hèctor Alòs i Font <
> hectora...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Prasanta,
> >>
> >> I'm delighted you are working on Santali.
> >>
> >> I have seen your code in github, and I have seen nothing that could
> >> generate this kind of error. So, I downloaded your code, I fixed the
> >> eng-sat.t1x file because it has a syntactic error, and I ran the
> >> translation of "cows"... but I can't get anything, seemingly because of
> a
> >> problem in the postchunk module (although it is standard):
> >>
> >> $ echo "cow" | apertium -d . eng-sat-interchunk
> >> ^ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ$^sent{^᱾$}$
> >> $ echo "cow" | apertium -d . eng-sat-postchunk
> >> ^᱾$
> >>
> >> In any case, if you somehow get something of the type "X/Y" (like
> >> "ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱤᱱ/ ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱚ") this is because in the target dictionary
> there
> >> are two generations for  ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ. Probably you have:
> >>
> >> 
> >>   
> >>  ᱠᱤᱱ 
> >>  ᱠᱚ 
> >> 
> >>
> >> instead of:
> >>
> >> 
> >>   
> >>  ᱠᱤᱱ 
> >>  ᱠᱚ 
> >> 
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Hèctor
> >>
> >>
> >> Missatge de Prasanta Hembram <
> prasantahembram720-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org> del dia dg.,
> >> 19 de des. 2021 a les 19:09:
> >>
> >>> Hi, I'm working on a new language pair English -Santali pair and trying
> >>> to learn everyday how can i improve this pair. Today I had a few
> doubts.
> >>>
> >>> Doubt 1: Plural rules are not working when translating from English to
> >>> Santali, The English plural form "Cows" returns output " ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ "
> instead
> >>> of "ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱤᱱ/ ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱚ" . I have set up paradef but no luck.
> How to
> >>> get the correct output??
> >>>
> >>> The correct forms are as follows
> >>> Cow = ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ
> >>> Cows = ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱤᱱ  or Two Cows = ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱤᱱ
> >>> Cows = ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱚ
> >>>
> >>> My Santali Monolingual Dictionary link:
> >>> https://github.com/Prasanta-Hembram/apertium-sat
> >>>
> >>> English-Santali Bilingual Dictionary link :
> >>> https://github.com/Prasanta-Hembram/apertium-eng-sat
> >>>
> >>> echo "cows" | apertium -d . eng-sat-transfer
> >>>
> >>> returns wrong output: ^ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ$^sent{^᱾$}$
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 
> >>>  
> >>>ᱠᱤᱱ  
> >>>ᱠᱚ 
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Thanks
> >>> with best regards
> >>> Prasanta Hembram
> >>> ___
> >>> Apertium-stuff mailing list
> >>> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
> >>>
> >> ___
> >> Apertium-stuff mailing list
> >> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
> >>
> ___
> Apertium-stuff mailing list
> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
>


-- 
Thanks
with best regards
Prasanta Hembram
___
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Re: [Apertium-stuff] English-Santali Plural form not working

2021-12-21 Thread Amr Mohamed Hosny Anwar 
Hi Ram,

I get that you are trying to unsubscribe from the list but you are currently 
spamming the inbox of all the people on the mailing list.
If you can't get unsubscribed, then maybe you can add a rule to automatically 
delete mails from this list (or to consider them as junk) and then they won't 
be that annoying to you.

Regards,
Amr

From: Ramansh Sharma 
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2021 11:05:41 AM
To: apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net 
Subject: Re: [Apertium-stuff] English-Santali Plural form not working

Thank you. I unsubscribed but did not receive any confirmation email. Please 
make sure I am removed.

--
Ram


On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 3:30 PM Kevin Brubeck Unhammer 
mailto:unham...@fsfe.org>> wrote:
>  please unsubscribe me

try https://sourceforge.net/projects/apertium/lists/apertium-stuff/unsubscribe



___
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
___
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Re: [Apertium-stuff] English-Santali Plural form not working

2021-12-21 Thread Ramansh Sharma 
Thank you. I unsubscribed but did not receive any confirmation email.
Please make sure I am removed.

--
Ram


On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 3:30 PM Kevin Brubeck Unhammer 
wrote:

> >  please unsubscribe me
>
> try
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/apertium/lists/apertium-stuff/unsubscribe
>
>
>
> ___
> Apertium-stuff mailing list
> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
>
___
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Re: [Apertium-stuff] English-Santali Plural form not working

2021-12-21 Thread Kevin Brubeck Unhammer 
>  please unsubscribe me

try https://sourceforge.net/projects/apertium/lists/apertium-stuff/unsubscribe



___
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Re: [Apertium-stuff] English-Santali Plural form not working

2021-12-21 Thread Kevin Brubeck Unhammer 
>  please unsubscribe me

https://sourceforge.net/projects/apertium/lists/apertium-stuff/unsubscribe



___
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Re: [Apertium-stuff] English-Santali Plural form not working

2021-12-21 Thread Tino Didriksen 
For the 3rd time, you can unsubscribe via:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/apertium/lists/apertium-stuff/unsubscribe

-- Tino Didriksen


On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 at 08:41, Ramansh Sharma  wrote:

> someone please unsubscribe me from this mailing list.
>
> --
> Ram
>
___
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Re: [Apertium-stuff] English-Santali Plural form not working

2021-12-20 Thread Ramansh Sharma 
someone please unsubscribe me from this mailing list.

--
Ram


On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 12:55 PM Kevin Brubeck Unhammer 
wrote:

> Make sure you compile (`make -j langs`) before testing, and preferably
> before each commit as well. The version on github doesn't compile right
> now:
>
> apertium-eng-sat.eng-sat.t1x:69: element rule: validity error :
> Element rule content does not follow the DTD, expecting (pattern , action),
> got (pattern action rule )
>
> You could check the various stages of the pipeline to see where the
> problem happens. Do `ls modes/eng-sat*` to see the eng-sat-related
> debug modes, you can do e.g.
>
> echo Gregor woke up | apertium -d . eng-sat-lex
>
> to see up until lexical selection (typically the step right before
> transfer).
>
> Prasanta Hembram
>  čálii:
>
> > Thanks for the clarification sir, but I tried changing my rules and
> paradef
> > but no luck, no forms including paradef are working for bilingual
> > English-Santali Dictionary. Only working in a monolingual Dictionary. It
> is
> > detected as Plural for Bilingual Dictionary, but with that nouns should
> be
> > inflicted as ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ  ᱠᱚ for Cows. I'm not able to find where the
> problem
> > lies. But for the monolingual Santali Dictionary it is working fine.
> After
> > deleting the dual form there is no luck. I'm following this book and
> trying
> > to make rules :-). Luckily I got this from the Internet.
> >  OCRA-Glimpes-of-Santali-Grammar.pdf
> > <
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1y7y4-YtkL1tIV29Ri_swY6u1RbTA2HT4/view?usp=drive_web
> >
> > with best regards
> > Prasanta Hembram
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 11:59 PM Hèctor Alòs i Font <
> hectora...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Prasanta,
> >>
> >> I'm delighted you are working on Santali.
> >>
> >> I have seen your code in github, and I have seen nothing that could
> >> generate this kind of error. So, I downloaded your code, I fixed the
> >> eng-sat.t1x file because it has a syntactic error, and I ran the
> >> translation of "cows"... but I can't get anything, seemingly because of
> a
> >> problem in the postchunk module (although it is standard):
> >>
> >> $ echo "cow" | apertium -d . eng-sat-interchunk
> >> ^ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ$^sent{^᱾$}$
> >> $ echo "cow" | apertium -d . eng-sat-postchunk
> >> ^᱾$
> >>
> >> In any case, if you somehow get something of the type "X/Y" (like
> >> "ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱤᱱ/ ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱚ") this is because in the target dictionary
> there
> >> are two generations for  ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ. Probably you have:
> >>
> >> 
> >>   
> >>  ᱠᱤᱱ 
> >>  ᱠᱚ 
> >> 
> >>
> >> instead of:
> >>
> >> 
> >>   
> >>  ᱠᱤᱱ 
> >>  ᱠᱚ 
> >> 
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Hèctor
> >>
> >>
> >> Missatge de Prasanta Hembram <
> prasantahembram720-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org> del dia dg.,
> >> 19 de des. 2021 a les 19:09:
> >>
> >>> Hi, I'm working on a new language pair English -Santali pair and trying
> >>> to learn everyday how can i improve this pair. Today I had a few
> doubts.
> >>>
> >>> Doubt 1: Plural rules are not working when translating from English to
> >>> Santali, The English plural form "Cows" returns output " ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ "
> instead
> >>> of "ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱤᱱ/ ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱚ" . I have set up paradef but no luck.
> How to
> >>> get the correct output??
> >>>
> >>> The correct forms are as follows
> >>> Cow = ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ
> >>> Cows = ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱤᱱ  or Two Cows = ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱤᱱ
> >>> Cows = ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱚ
> >>>
> >>> My Santali Monolingual Dictionary link:
> >>> https://github.com/Prasanta-Hembram/apertium-sat
> >>>
> >>> English-Santali Bilingual Dictionary link :
> >>> https://github.com/Prasanta-Hembram/apertium-eng-sat
> >>>
> >>> echo "cows" | apertium -d . eng-sat-transfer
> >>>
> >>> returns wrong output: ^ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ$^sent{^᱾$}$
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 
> >>>  
> >>>ᱠᱤᱱ  
> >>>ᱠᱚ 
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Thanks
> >>> with best regards
> >>> Prasanta Hembram
> >>> ___
> >>> Apertium-stuff mailing list
> >>> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
> >>>
> >> ___
> >> Apertium-stuff mailing list
> >> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
> >>
> ___
> Apertium-stuff mailing list
> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
>
___
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Re: [Apertium-stuff] English-Santali Plural form not working

2021-12-20 Thread Kevin Brubeck Unhammer 
Make sure you compile (`make -j langs`) before testing, and preferably
before each commit as well. The version on github doesn't compile right
now:

apertium-eng-sat.eng-sat.t1x:69: element rule: validity error : Element 
rule content does not follow the DTD, expecting (pattern , action), got 
(pattern action rule )

You could check the various stages of the pipeline to see where the
problem happens. Do `ls modes/eng-sat*` to see the eng-sat-related
debug modes, you can do e.g.

echo Gregor woke up | apertium -d . eng-sat-lex

to see up until lexical selection (typically the step right before
transfer).

Prasanta Hembram
 čálii:

> Thanks for the clarification sir, but I tried changing my rules and paradef
> but no luck, no forms including paradef are working for bilingual
> English-Santali Dictionary. Only working in a monolingual Dictionary. It is
> detected as Plural for Bilingual Dictionary, but with that nouns should be
> inflicted as ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ  ᱠᱚ for Cows. I'm not able to find where the problem
> lies. But for the monolingual Santali Dictionary it is working fine. After
> deleting the dual form there is no luck. I'm following this book and trying
> to make rules :-). Luckily I got this from the Internet.
>  OCRA-Glimpes-of-Santali-Grammar.pdf
> 
> with best regards
> Prasanta Hembram
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 11:59 PM Hèctor Alòs i Font 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Prasanta,
>>
>> I'm delighted you are working on Santali.
>>
>> I have seen your code in github, and I have seen nothing that could
>> generate this kind of error. So, I downloaded your code, I fixed the
>> eng-sat.t1x file because it has a syntactic error, and I ran the
>> translation of "cows"... but I can't get anything, seemingly because of a
>> problem in the postchunk module (although it is standard):
>>
>> $ echo "cow" | apertium -d . eng-sat-interchunk
>> ^ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ$^sent{^᱾$}$
>> $ echo "cow" | apertium -d . eng-sat-postchunk
>> ^᱾$
>>
>> In any case, if you somehow get something of the type "X/Y" (like
>> "ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱤᱱ/ ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱚ") this is because in the target dictionary there
>> are two generations for  ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ. Probably you have:
>>
>> 
>>   
>>  ᱠᱤᱱ 
>>  ᱠᱚ 
>> 
>>
>> instead of:
>>
>> 
>>   
>>  ᱠᱤᱱ 
>>  ᱠᱚ 
>> 
>>
>> Regards,
>> Hèctor
>>
>>
>> Missatge de Prasanta Hembram 
>>  del dia dg.,
>> 19 de des. 2021 a les 19:09:
>>
>>> Hi, I'm working on a new language pair English -Santali pair and trying
>>> to learn everyday how can i improve this pair. Today I had a few doubts.
>>>
>>> Doubt 1: Plural rules are not working when translating from English to
>>> Santali, The English plural form "Cows" returns output " ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ " instead
>>> of "ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱤᱱ/ ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱚ" . I have set up paradef but no luck. How to
>>> get the correct output??
>>>
>>> The correct forms are as follows
>>> Cow = ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ
>>> Cows = ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱤᱱ  or Two Cows = ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱤᱱ
>>> Cows = ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱚ
>>>
>>> My Santali Monolingual Dictionary link:
>>> https://github.com/Prasanta-Hembram/apertium-sat
>>>
>>> English-Santali Bilingual Dictionary link :
>>> https://github.com/Prasanta-Hembram/apertium-eng-sat
>>>
>>> echo "cows" | apertium -d . eng-sat-transfer
>>>
>>> returns wrong output: ^ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ$^sent{^᱾$}$
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>  
>>>ᱠᱤᱱ  
>>>ᱠᱚ 
>>> 
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks
>>> with best regards
>>> Prasanta Hembram
>>> ___
>>> Apertium-stuff mailing list
>>> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
>>>
>> ___
>> Apertium-stuff mailing list
>> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
>>


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Re: [Apertium-stuff] English-Santali Plural form not working

2021-12-20 Thread Prasanta Hembram 
Thanks for the clarification sir, but I tried changing my rules and paradef
but no luck, no forms including paradef are working for bilingual
English-Santali Dictionary. Only working in a monolingual Dictionary. It is
detected as Plural for Bilingual Dictionary, but with that nouns should be
inflicted as ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ  ᱠᱚ for Cows. I'm not able to find where the problem
lies. But for the monolingual Santali Dictionary it is working fine. After
deleting the dual form there is no luck. I'm following this book and trying
to make rules :-). Luckily I got this from the Internet.
 OCRA-Glimpes-of-Santali-Grammar.pdf

with best regards
Prasanta Hembram



On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 11:59 PM Hèctor Alòs i Font 
wrote:

> Hi Prasanta,
>
> I'm delighted you are working on Santali.
>
> I have seen your code in github, and I have seen nothing that could
> generate this kind of error. So, I downloaded your code, I fixed the
> eng-sat.t1x file because it has a syntactic error, and I ran the
> translation of "cows"... but I can't get anything, seemingly because of a
> problem in the postchunk module (although it is standard):
>
> $ echo "cow" | apertium -d . eng-sat-interchunk
> ^ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ$^sent{^᱾$}$
> $ echo "cow" | apertium -d . eng-sat-postchunk
> ^᱾$
>
> In any case, if you somehow get something of the type "X/Y" (like
> "ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱤᱱ/ ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱚ") this is because in the target dictionary there
> are two generations for  ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ. Probably you have:
>
> 
>   
>  ᱠᱤᱱ 
>  ᱠᱚ 
> 
>
> instead of:
>
> 
>   
>  ᱠᱤᱱ 
>  ᱠᱚ 
> 
>
> Regards,
> Hèctor
>
>
> Missatge de Prasanta Hembram  del dia dg.,
> 19 de des. 2021 a les 19:09:
>
>> Hi, I'm working on a new language pair English -Santali pair and trying
>> to learn everyday how can i improve this pair. Today I had a few doubts.
>>
>> Doubt 1: Plural rules are not working when translating from English to
>> Santali, The English plural form "Cows" returns output " ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ " instead
>> of "ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱤᱱ/ ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱚ" . I have set up paradef but no luck. How to
>> get the correct output??
>>
>> The correct forms are as follows
>> Cow = ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ
>> Cows = ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱤᱱ  or Two Cows = ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱤᱱ
>> Cows = ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱚ
>>
>> My Santali Monolingual Dictionary link:
>> https://github.com/Prasanta-Hembram/apertium-sat
>>
>> English-Santali Bilingual Dictionary link :
>> https://github.com/Prasanta-Hembram/apertium-eng-sat
>>
>> echo "cows" | apertium -d . eng-sat-transfer
>>
>> returns wrong output: ^ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ$^sent{^᱾$}$
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>>  
>>ᱠᱤᱱ  
>>ᱠᱚ 
>> 
>>
>> --
>> Thanks
>> with best regards
>> Prasanta Hembram
>> ___
>> Apertium-stuff mailing list
>> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
>>
> ___
> Apertium-stuff mailing list
> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
>


-- 
Thanks
with best regards
Prasanta Hembram
___
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Re: [Apertium-stuff] English-Santali Plural form not working

2021-12-19 Thread Hèctor Alòs i Font 
Hi Prasanta,

I'm delighted you are working on Santali.

I have seen your code in github, and I have seen nothing that could
generate this kind of error. So, I downloaded your code, I fixed the
eng-sat.t1x file because it has a syntactic error, and I ran the
translation of "cows"... but I can't get anything, seemingly because of a
problem in the postchunk module (although it is standard):

$ echo "cow" | apertium -d . eng-sat-interchunk
^ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ$^sent{^᱾$}$
$ echo "cow" | apertium -d . eng-sat-postchunk
^᱾$

In any case, if you somehow get something of the type "X/Y" (like "ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ
ᱠᱤᱱ/ ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱚ") this is because in the target dictionary there are two
generations for  ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ. Probably you have:


  
 ᱠᱤᱱ 
 ᱠᱚ 


instead of:


  
 ᱠᱤᱱ 
 ᱠᱚ 


Regards,
Hèctor


Missatge de Prasanta Hembram  del dia dg., 19
de des. 2021 a les 19:09:

> Hi, I'm working on a new language pair English -Santali pair and trying to
> learn everyday how can i improve this pair. Today I had a few doubts.
>
> Doubt 1: Plural rules are not working when translating from English to
> Santali, The English plural form "Cows" returns output " ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ " instead
> of "ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱤᱱ/ ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱚ" . I have set up paradef but no luck. How to
> get the correct output??
>
> The correct forms are as follows
> Cow = ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ
> Cows = ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱤᱱ  or Two Cows = ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱤᱱ
> Cows = ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱚ
>
> My Santali Monolingual Dictionary link:
> https://github.com/Prasanta-Hembram/apertium-sat
>
> English-Santali Bilingual Dictionary link :
> https://github.com/Prasanta-Hembram/apertium-eng-sat
>
> echo "cows" | apertium -d . eng-sat-transfer
>
> returns wrong output: ^ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ$^sent{^᱾$}$
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>  
>ᱠᱤᱱ  
>ᱠᱚ 
> 
>
> --
> Thanks
> with best regards
> Prasanta Hembram
> ___
> Apertium-stuff mailing list
> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
>
___
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

[Apertium-stuff] English-Santali Plural form not working

2021-12-19 Thread Prasanta Hembram 
Hi, I'm working on a new language pair English -Santali pair and trying to
learn everyday how can i improve this pair. Today I had a few doubts.

Doubt 1: Plural rules are not working when translating from English to
Santali, The English plural form "Cows" returns output " ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ " instead
of "ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱤᱱ/ ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱚ" . I have set up paradef but no luck. How to
get the correct output??

The correct forms are as follows
Cow = ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ
Cows = ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱤᱱ  or Two Cows = ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱤᱱ
Cows = ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ ᱠᱚ

My Santali Monolingual Dictionary link:
https://github.com/Prasanta-Hembram/apertium-sat

English-Santali Bilingual Dictionary link :
https://github.com/Prasanta-Hembram/apertium-eng-sat

echo "cows" | apertium -d . eng-sat-transfer

returns wrong output: ^ᱰᱟᱹᱝᱜᱽᱨᱤ$^sent{^᱾$}$







 
   ᱠᱤᱱ  
   ᱠᱚ 


-- 
Thanks
with best regards
Prasanta Hembram
___
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff