Re: [arch-dev-public] CVS links in AUR?
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Thomas Bächler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, is there a reason we had to break CVS links in the AUR interface? I guess one could get the community tree from here: http://www.archlinux.org/cvs/, but the information is wrong as well (cvs.archlinux.org does not exist). Sweet, so once again my local CVS checkouts are broken. I hate to always play the role of the complainer, but this is becoming a pain. Does no one else still have changes cached locally they never checked in or anything else like that? I understand killing off the ViewCVS instance, but the whole subdomain being gone kinda sucks when it wasn't even announced. Something like this worked for me for any of you guys that may have checked it out from cvs.archlinux.org rather than plain archlinux.org: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/projects/repos/core $ find -name Root | xargs sed -i 's/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/archlinux.org/g' -Dan
Re: [arch-dev-public] CVS links in AUR?
On 4/26/08, Dan McGee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Thomas Bächler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, is there a reason we had to break CVS links in the AUR interface? I guess one could get the community tree from here: http://www.archlinux.org/cvs/, but the information is wrong as well (cvs.archlinux.org does not exist). Sweet, so once again my local CVS checkouts are broken. I hate to always play the role of the complainer, but this is becoming a pain. Does no one else still have changes cached locally they never checked in or anything else like that? I understand killing off the ViewCVS instance, but the whole subdomain being gone kinda sucks when it wasn't even announced. Something like this worked for me for any of you guys that may have checked it out from cvs.archlinux.org rather than plain archlinux.org: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/projects/repos/core $ find -name Root | xargs sed -i 's/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/archlinux.org/g' This one was my fault. I asked aaron if I could kill the web intance, and he said 'whenever'. I just assumed nothing was using that domain anymore. I just added it back into the bind config. It should replicate out to the slave nameservers in an hour or so..
Re: [arch-dev-public] CVS links in AUR?
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:36 AM, eliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/26/08, Dan McGee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Thomas Bächler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, is there a reason we had to break CVS links in the AUR interface? I guess one could get the community tree from here: http://www.archlinux.org/cvs/, but the information is wrong as well (cvs.archlinux.org does not exist). Sweet, so once again my local CVS checkouts are broken. I hate to always play the role of the complainer, but this is becoming a pain. Does no one else still have changes cached locally they never checked in or anything else like that? I understand killing off the ViewCVS instance, but the whole subdomain being gone kinda sucks when it wasn't even announced. Something like this worked for me for any of you guys that may have checked it out from cvs.archlinux.org rather than plain archlinux.org: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/projects/repos/core $ find -name Root | xargs sed -i 's/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/archlinux.org/g' This one was my fault. I asked aaron if I could kill the web intance, and he said 'whenever'. I just assumed nothing was using that domain anymore. I just added it back into the bind config. It should replicate out to the slave nameservers in an hour or so.. Not a problem- I was mad at first but the workaround above made it relatively painless. Thanks though, I appreciate your quick fix. :) -Dan
Re: [arch-dev-public] CVS links in AUR?
eliott schrieb: http://www.archlinux.org/cvs/, but the information is wrong as well (cvs.archlinux.org does not exist). I just added it back into the bind config. It should replicate out to the slave nameservers in an hour or so.. The information on the website should be updated anyway. Issues right now: 1) There is no public SVN checkout method yet 2) The description should reflect that we use SVN and that community uses CVS (should mention where one can checkout community) 3) There is no web based viewing for community anymore I think these should be fixed. How they should be fixed depends on how to quick community can move to SVN. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-dev-public] CVS links in AUR?
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Dan McGee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does no one else still have changes cached locally they never checked in or anything else like that? Why do you still have uncommitted changes in CVS when we initially began this move something like 4 or 5 weeks ago. Please commit them if they are important - if they are not important enough to commit after 5 weeks, I automatically assume they are insignificant. And yes, I'm pretty sure you're the only one still using CVS. Travis and I spent about an hour (most of it was Travis though) making CVS workable just for you, when you were one of the more vocal people for moving away from CVS. Please stop using it so we can stop wasting time fixing it when it breaks for you. On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Thomas Bächler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Issues right now: 1) There is no public SVN checkout method yet I sent you a personal email about getting rid of the autowifi svn repo so we could repurpose the public svn stuff. Until you give me the go-ahead on that, this can't happen. 2) The description should reflect that we use SVN and that community uses CVS (should mention where one can checkout community) Which description? In the wiki? 3) There is no web based viewing for community anymore Sure there is. repos.archlinux.org can display ALL of the old CVS repos too I think these should be fixed. How they should be fixed depends on how to quick community can move to SVN.
Re: [arch-dev-public] CVS links in AUR?
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Thomas Bächler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3) There is no web based viewing for community anymore Sure there is. repos.archlinux.org can display ALL of the old CVS repos too For reference: http://repos.archlinux.org/viewvc.cgi/community/?root=community
Re: [arch-dev-public] CVS links in AUR?
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Dan McGee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does no one else still have changes cached locally they never checked in or anything else like that? Why do you still have uncommitted changes in CVS when we initially began this move something like 4 or 5 weeks ago. Please commit them if they are important - if they are not important enough to commit after 5 weeks, I automatically assume they are insignificant. Well when i redid the udev stuff ages ago, I had to let it langish because people told me to. And since CVS can't do offline diffs, I don't even know if I have changes in places. I'm sorry my workflow isn't quite like yours and that I sometimes like to view history through command line tools. I haven't had the chance to do a full checkout and pull the attached patch over and apply it to SVN, but maybe I'll get a chance sometime. And yes, I'm pretty sure you're the only one still using CVS. Travis and I spent about an hour (most of it was Travis though) making CVS workable just for you, when you were one of the more vocal people for moving away from CVS. Please stop using it so we can stop wasting time fixing it when it breaks for you. On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Thomas Bächler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Issues right now: 1) There is no public SVN checkout method yet I sent you a personal email about getting rid of the autowifi svn repo so we could repurpose the public svn stuff. Until you give me the go-ahead on that, this can't happen. 2) The description should reflect that we use SVN and that community uses CVS (should mention where one can checkout community) Which description? In the wiki? The link from the front page: http://archlinux.org/cvs/ I'm normally a fan of progress and change, but I have to disagree with your tone in this email and how you've managed to move all wrongs to Thomas and I. Makes my work feel wanted around here. -Dan small-updates.diff Description: Binary data
Re: [arch-dev-public] CVS links in AUR?
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Dan McGee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Dan McGee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does no one else still have changes cached locally they never checked in or anything else like that? Why do you still have uncommitted changes in CVS when we initially began this move something like 4 or 5 weeks ago. Please commit them if they are important - if they are not important enough to commit after 5 weeks, I automatically assume they are insignificant. Well when i redid the udev stuff ages ago, I had to let it langish because people told me to. And since CVS can't do offline diffs, I don't even know if I have changes in places. I'm sorry my workflow isn't quite like yours and that I sometimes like to view history through command line tools. Couldn't you just use diff? cvs diff would only give you a diff against the latest CVS, not the SVN repo, which may have changes since your changes were made?
Re: [arch-dev-public] CVS links in AUR?
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Thomas Bächler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aaron Griffin schrieb: On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Thomas Bächler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Issues right now: 1) There is no public SVN checkout method yet I sent you a personal email about getting rid of the autowifi svn repo so we could repurpose the public svn stuff. Until you give me the go-ahead on that, this can't happen. I replied you on jabber that day, thought you saw that (as you replied). I have no problem with autowifi in git, I would actually prefer it. But I have no idea how to convert it properly, as the conversion tool iirc responds badly to missing trunk/ directory (I had no trunk/ tags/ etc until one of the last revisions). Ok, will do. There's two git svn conversion tools. One of them fails like you said - the other is easier. I can't recall which is which, but I can convert it later (I'm painting right now, heh) No, on the homepage: there is a CVS link leading to a site which explains how to use CVS and check out core/extra. I actually didn't even notice the dropdown field on the right until right now. Anyway, the links in AUR do not point to that site. These two were oversights on my part - we got the packages links changed, but totally forgot the AUR. Whoops. I will make that change later today unless Simo gets to it rikki-tick 8)
Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] wget 1.11.1-1
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote: On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Andreas Radke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: in testing for both arches Seems to work fine here - signed off x86_64 signoff both arches -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] tar 1.20-1
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote: On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Andreas Radke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: in testing for both arches Seems to work fine, x86_64 I didn't test --lzma, but that is badass! man page is installed in /usr/man -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
[arch-dev-public] Courier-MTA packages
Hi Gang, I maintained the courier* packages for a long time and I still think it is a very solid mail server suite. I was using it happyly on my own server but recently fell for a tarmail/dovecot combination. Abandoning the usage of courier makes it harder to maintain the package, which is rather complex. I understand that courier-imap is a very popular imap/pop solution and should stay in extra as it is one of the big three(dovecot,courier, cyrus) used in production environments. Courier-MTA is a complete suite consisting of courier-imap, courier-maildorp an ESMTP server (hence the name courier-mta) a webconfiguration frontend etc. I still think it is a very capable solution, technically on par with exim or postfix based deployments. But it is not as popular, probably because the learning curve, just like for every other MTA, is rather steep. However, it will need an active maintainer who stays uptodate with the development. That pretty much means you have to use it yourself. Anyone who wants to take that package? I also will put all my knowledge into the wiki where my old little setup is explained. I'll need to update it though. I will also answer any questions another potential maintainer has. If nobody wants to take it, I say let's keep courier-authlib, maildrop and imap and let courier-mta go to community. I'm also open to other solutions. Cheers, -T
