Re: [arch-dev-public] Semi-away till 2019
Damn calendars, how do they even work!? Yes, I meant 2020. On 03/09/2019 18.41, Alad Wenter via arch-dev-public wrote: > ... 2020? > > Time flies. > > Alad > > On 9/3/19 6:36 PM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via arch-dev-public wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> As I have free time shortage lately, I think it's fair to officially say >> I will be in semi-away mode till 2019. I will try my best to keep up >> with uncomplicated pkgver bumps for packages I maintain on my own and >> make sure all keys are properly signed, but that's all I can promise. >> >> It also means I'm unable to give toolchain attention it deserves. Please >> poke me somewhere if you happen to be interested in co-maintaining it. >> >> My responses on IRC or via e-mail may be also delayed so take that into >> account before kicking me out. >> >> Bartłomiej
Re: [arch-dev-public] Semi-away till 2019
... 2020? Time flies. Alad On 9/3/19 6:36 PM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via arch-dev-public wrote: Hi all, As I have free time shortage lately, I think it's fair to officially say I will be in semi-away mode till 2019. I will try my best to keep up with uncomplicated pkgver bumps for packages I maintain on my own and make sure all keys are properly signed, but that's all I can promise. It also means I'm unable to give toolchain attention it deserves. Please poke me somewhere if you happen to be interested in co-maintaining it. My responses on IRC or via e-mail may be also delayed so take that into account before kicking me out. Bartłomiej
[arch-dev-public] Semi-away till 2019
Hi all, As I have free time shortage lately, I think it's fair to officially say I will be in semi-away mode till 2019. I will try my best to keep up with uncomplicated pkgver bumps for packages I maintain on my own and make sure all keys are properly signed, but that's all I can promise. It also means I'm unable to give toolchain attention it deserves. Please poke me somewhere if you happen to be interested in co-maintaining it. My responses on IRC or via e-mail may be also delayed so take that into account before kicking me out. Bartłomiej
Re: [arch-dev-public] packaging hunspell dictionaries converted for qt5-webengine
On 2019-09-02 23:56:39 (-0400), Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote: > I've gotten several positive responses and no negative ones so far. > Although it's been noted that it might be nice to have a more > lightweight convert tool packaged, I think for now we can stick with the > one in qt5-webengine. > > Anyone else have any last-minute objections? Should I create a TODO list > for all our dictionary packages? Not that it is of our direct concern, but qt5-webengine seems to suffer from unresolved questionable licensing issues, which is why e.g. Parabola doesn't package it [1]. I don't know the specifics, but assume, that it is due to the Chromium license [2]. Best, David [1] https://www.parabola.nu/packages/?q=qt5- [2] https://github.com/qt/qtwebengine/blob/5.12/LICENSE.Chromium -- https://sleepmap.de signature.asc Description: PGP signature
