Re: [arch-dev-public] extra x86_64 database breakage (graphviz maintainer please fix it)
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Thomas Bächler wrote: Aaron Griffin schrieb: On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 5:23 AM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is a problem in our current version of initscripts: If a package is added in staging, but the PKGBUILD shows an older version, the package and database data become inconsistent: Still not fixed, I fixed those errors several times, but won't do it now to increase the maintainer's awareness of the problem. FTR, I reported that problem a few days ago: http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2008-April/005726.html Unfortunately, graphviz is not the only package with this problem. Weird... this should be checked, but maybe I fugged it up with the dbscripts changes. No, I fucked it up when I moved our scripts to the -$ARCH suffix. Or it was fucked up before. Ah, well, I'm rewriting them anyway. Make it fast. :) -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: [arch-dev-public] extra x86_64 database breakage (graphviz maintainer please fix it)
Man, you and your format=flowed makes gmail act funny. On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Aaron Griffin schrieb: > > Ah, well, I'm rewriting them anyway. > > Make it fast. :) I will make it my sole priority this week. I am partially waiting for Eliott's backend changes to move to gerolde. I dunno is reporead.py is on there or not - when it is, then I will be gung-ho about this.
Re: [arch-dev-public] extra x86_64 database breakage (graphviz maintainer please fix it)
Aaron Griffin schrieb: On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 5:23 AM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is a problem in our current version of initscripts: If a package is added in staging, but the PKGBUILD shows an older version, the package and database data become inconsistent: Still not fixed, I fixed those errors several times, but won't do it now to increase the maintainer's awareness of the problem. Weird... this should be checked, but maybe I fugged it up with the dbscripts changes. No, I fucked it up when I moved our scripts to the -$ARCH suffix. Or it was fucked up before. Ah, well, I'm rewriting them anyway. Make it fast. :) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-dev-public] extra x86_64 database breakage (graphviz maintainer please fix it)
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 5:23 AM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a problem in our current version of initscripts: If a package is > added in staging, but the PKGBUILD shows an older version, the package and > database data become inconsistent: Weird... this should be checked, but maybe I fugged it up with the dbscripts changes. Ah, well, I'm rewriting them anyway.
[arch-dev-public] extra x86_64 database breakage (graphviz maintainer please fix it)
This is a problem in our current version of initscripts: If a package is added in staging, but the PKGBUILD shows an older version, the package and database data become inconsistent: $ cat /var/lib/pacman/sync/extra/graphviz-2.16.1-3/desc %FILENAME% graphviz-2.18-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz %NAME% graphviz %VERSION% 2.16.1-3 %DESC% Creates acircular graph images %CSIZE% 1304315 %MD5SUM% 47e014aa4dc7f3976db49ede4621af97 %FORCE% This causes problems during the upgrade. Please be more careful until our dbscripts have more checks included and never forget to add the PKGBUILD properly. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
