Re: [arch-general] Cisco VPN config

2009-07-27 Thread Rafa Griman
On Monday 27 July 2009 04:27:45 Angel Velásquez wrote:
 On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Thomas B�chlertho...@archlinux.org wrote:
  Rafa Griman schrieb:
  I know it sucks, had to patch it and patch it again when I used openSUSE
  because it didn't work. AFAIK they have no 64 bit VPN client, they have
  no up to date Linux VPN client, ... I'm not a Cisco fan, but my company
  has Cisco gateways/firewalls/whatever and I have no voice into that
  matter :(
 
  Many companies have that - which worries me because of the very obvious
  security problems, at least in the xauth protocol.

 Unfortunately their publicity is powerful than their products, I
 really hate cisco and those all noobs who claim about the cisco
 training... in the real world, cisco is attached to a their
 restrictive, not efficient and expensive platform, and that is the
 truth.


Marketing ... There's another company ... can't remember it's name. Think it 
starts with an M and ends with a t. IIRC, they're also very strong in 
marketing but the products ... ;)


 I will save this mail when my boss will decide to buy any cisco crap :S.

 Good luck Rafa!


Thanks. I'll check it out tomorrow (I hope) and let you all know.

Thanks !!!

   Rafa
-- 
We cannot treat computers as Humans. Computers need love.

rgri...@skype.com
rgri...@jabberes.org


Re: [arch-general] how to migrate installs between hard drives?

2009-07-27 Thread solsTiCe d'Hiver
if think dd is the worst way to copy data between disk or partition

i used to copy data from one partition to another the old way by using
tar and a pipe

tar -C /myfirst partition -csSf -|tar -C /mysecondpartition -xSsp

rsync is not bad too.



Re: [arch-general] how to migrate installs between hard drives?

2009-07-27 Thread Andrei Thorp
Excerpts from solsTiCe d'Hiver's message of Mon Jul 27 10:16:21 -0400 2009:
 if think dd is the worst way to copy data between disk or partition

Why, out of curiosity?
-- 
Andrei Thorp, Developer: Xandros Corp. (http://www.xandros.com)


Re: [arch-general] Where can I find the boot log to find out what failed on boot?

2009-07-27 Thread David Rosenstrauch

David C. Rankin wrote:

Weeks ago, I learned that kdm doesn't belong in the DAEMONS LINE and
moved it to inittab.


?  That's always worked fine for me.  (At least with both kdm3 and slim.)

Can you elaborate?  What's the issue?

DR


Re: [arch-general] Where can I find the boot log to find out what failed on boot?

2009-07-27 Thread Xavier
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:56 PM, David Rosenstrauchdar...@darose.net wrote:
 David C. Rankin wrote:

 Weeks ago, I learned that kdm doesn't belong in the DAEMONS LINE and
 moved it to inittab.

 ?  That's always worked fine for me.  (At least with both kdm3 and slim.)

 Can you elaborate?  What's the issue?

 DR


archwiki is your friend :
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Adding_a_login_manager_%28KDM,_GDM,_or_XDM%29_to_automatically_boot_on_startup#Configure_loading_the_Display_Manager


Re: [arch-general] Where can I find the boot log to find out what failed on boot?

2009-07-27 Thread David Rosenstrauch

Xavier wrote:

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:56 PM, David Rosenstrauchdar...@darose.net wrote:

David C. Rankin wrote:

Weeks ago, I learned that kdm doesn't belong in the DAEMONS LINE and
moved it to inittab.

?  That's always worked fine for me.  (At least with both kdm3 and slim.)

Can you elaborate?  What's the issue?

DR



archwiki is your friend :
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Adding_a_login_manager_%28KDM,_GDM,_or_XDM%29_to_automatically_boot_on_startup#Configure_loading_the_Display_Manager


The inittab method is recommended for various reasons, one being that 
it will allow you to boot directly into framebuffer mode from GRUB. This 
is an advantage should the graphics driver crash in X, for example, you 
would not be forced to fix your system from a live cd or through other 
needlessly complex means.


With the inittab method all you would have to do is to press 'e' for 
edit at the GRUB prompt and just add:


3

to the end of the 'kernel' line to boot directly into framebuffer mode 
in order to fix your system/X (This is also described more thoroughly  
descriptive below.)




Hmmm ... still not sure I get what the problem is.  Any time I've ever 
run into a situation where either X or the DM crashes, it leaves me at a 
console login prompt.  So I can just login to the console and fix things 
from there - no live CD needed.


Incorrect/misleading Wiki page, methinks ...

DR


Re: [arch-general] how to migrate installs between hard drives?

2009-07-27 Thread David Rosenstrauch

solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote:

if think dd is the worst way to copy data between disk or partition

i used to copy data from one partition to another the old way by using
tar and a pipe

tar -C /myfirst partition -csSf -|tar -C /mysecondpartition -xSsp

rsync is not bad too.


I also prefer to handle this type of things using tar, though without 
the pipe.  I generally will generate a full tar archive of the original 
partition, then copy it over to the other disk and either fully untar 
it, or untar portions of it.  The reason I go for the full archive is 
because I like to keep the tarball around afterwards in case I need to 
repeat the process, need to untar additional portions of it, etc.


DR


Re: [arch-general] Where can I find the boot log to find out what failed on boot?

2009-07-27 Thread Damien Churchill
2009/7/27 David Rosenstrauch dar...@darose.net:


 With the inittab method all you would have to do is to press 'e' for edit at
 the GRUB prompt and just add:


Is that pretty much the same as adding single to the kernel line?
Least that's how I normally do it.


Re: [arch-general] How do I re-create a DVD from the backup created by vobcopy?

2009-07-27 Thread David Rosenstrauch

David C. Rankin wrote:

Listmates,

How do I re-create a DVD from the backup created by vobcopy? I have
searched and I have read howto after howto and I still am stuck.
Between ffmpeg this, dvdauthor that, qdvdauthor this to, I'm
confused.


FYI - I've found acidrip to be a good, reasonably user-friendly app for 
burning DVD's from VOB files.


HTH,

DR


Re: [arch-general] Where can I find the boot log to find out what failed on boot?

2009-07-27 Thread Roman Kyrylych
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 19:07, David Rosenstrauchdar...@darose.net wrote:
 Xavier wrote:

 On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:56 PM, David Rosenstrauchdar...@darose.net
 wrote:

 David C. Rankin wrote:

 Weeks ago, I learned that kdm doesn't belong in the DAEMONS LINE and
 moved it to inittab.

 ?  That's always worked fine for me.  (At least with both kdm3 and slim.)

 Can you elaborate?  What's the issue?

 DR


 archwiki is your friend :

 http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Adding_a_login_manager_%28KDM,_GDM,_or_XDM%29_to_automatically_boot_on_startup#Configure_loading_the_Display_Manager

 The inittab method is recommended for various reasons, one being that it
 will allow you to boot directly into framebuffer mode from GRUB. This is an
 advantage should the graphics driver crash in X, for example, you would not
 be forced to fix your system from a live cd or through other needlessly
 complex means.

 With the inittab method all you would have to do is to press 'e' for edit at
 the GRUB prompt and just add:

 3

 to the end of the 'kernel' line to boot directly into framebuffer mode in
 order to fix your system/X (This is also described more thoroughly 
 descriptive below.)



 Hmmm ... still not sure I get what the problem is.  Any time I've ever run
 into a situation where either X or the DM crashes, it leaves me at a console
 login prompt.  So I can just login to the console and fix things from there
 - no live CD needed.

 Incorrect/misleading Wiki page, methinks ...

Yep, the wiki gives wrong reasoning.

The only advantage of inittab over DAEMONS may be
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Start_X_at_boot#Starting_X_as_preferred_user_without_logging_in
but some login managers allow automatic login as well (at least GDM does).

-- 
Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)


Re: [arch-general] Cisco VPN config

2009-07-27 Thread Edgar Kalkowski
Hi!

I don’t want to get your hopes down, but we used to have Cisco’s vpnclient at 
our university. I tried it eventually and got it to compile even under x84_64 
but it would only run for some minutes or so and then kernel panic!

What helped were -- I think -- patches from www.tuxx-home.at and I also found 
some patched 64 bit version from some university. I have it lying around 
somewhere. If you want I can send it to you.

Good luck!

Edgar



Am oder ungefähr am Sonntag, 26. Juli 2009, um 21:52:54 schrieb Rafa Griman:
 Hi :)
 
 On Sunday 26 July 2009 18:57:07 Thomas Bächler wrote:
  Rafa Griman schrieb:
   Got a Cisco VPN connection with my office, but can't manage to get it
   running. I've seen that there's a:
  
 - vpnc package: installed it, but it doesn't import the .pcf file,
   says it can't find the file.
 
  pcf2vnc /path/to/file.pcf
 
 
 Didn't know of that command 0:)
 
 
  Seems easy. When it says it can't find the file, then you specified the
  wrong file. So what exactly is the problem?
 
 
 Well the problem is (hope I could write was, but haven't tried it yet ;) that 
 the path is right and so's the file. I'll try now with the pcf2vpnc command.
 
 Thanks for the tip !!!
 
 
 - cisco-vpnclient: but it's out-dated
 
  This software is the greatest piece of shit ever published from what I
  know. But what do you expect from Cisco? A company that solves security
  problems by preventing the details from being published can not be taken
  seriously. And a company that sells a VPN appliance that is insecure by
  design can't either.
 
 
 I know it sucks, had to patch it and patch it again when I used openSUSE 
 because it didn't work. AFAIK they have no 64 bit VPN client, they have no up 
 to date Linux VPN client, ... I'm not a Cisco fan, but my company has Cisco 
 gateways/firewalls/whatever and I have no voice into that matter :(
 
 Thanks once again for your help :)
 
Rafa
 


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [arch-general] Cisco VPN config

2009-07-27 Thread Ray Kohler
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Rafa Grimanrafagri...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi :)

 On Sunday 26 July 2009 18:57:07 Thomas Bächler wrote:
 Rafa Griman schrieb:
  Got a Cisco VPN connection with my office, but can't manage to get it
  running. I've seen that there's a:
 
      - vpnc package: installed it, but it doesn't import the .pcf file,
        says it can't find the file.

 pcf2vnc /path/to/file.pcf


 Didn't know of that command 0:)


 Seems easy. When it says it can't find the file, then you specified the
 wrong file. So what exactly is the problem?


 Well the problem is (hope I could write was, but haven't tried it yet ;) that
 the path is right and so's the file. I'll try now with the pcf2vpnc command.

 Thanks for the tip !!!


      - cisco-vpnclient: but it's out-dated

 This software is the greatest piece of shit ever published from what I
 know. But what do you expect from Cisco? A company that solves security
 problems by preventing the details from being published can not be taken
 seriously. And a company that sells a VPN appliance that is insecure by
 design can't either.


 I know it sucks, had to patch it and patch it again when I used openSUSE
 because it didn't work. AFAIK they have no 64 bit VPN client, they have no up
 to date Linux VPN client, ... I'm not a Cisco fan, but my company has Cisco
 gateways/firewalls/whatever and I have no voice into that matter :(

 Thanks once again for your help :)


I usually recommend strongSwan (which is in AUR) for interoperability
with Cisco concentrators. It works quite well, but it's not simple to
set up initially. I still believe it to be the best technical
solution, but it would be beyond me to explain how to do it, via
email, and for an unfamiliar situation.


Re: [arch-general] Cisco VPN config

2009-07-27 Thread Thomas Bächler

Ray Kohler schrieb:

I usually recommend strongSwan (which is in AUR) for interoperability
with Cisco concentrators. It works quite well, but it's not simple to
set up initially. I still believe it to be the best technical
solution, but it would be beyond me to explain how to do it, via
email, and for an unfamiliar situation.


I was under the impression the only thing that worked with Cisco's 
proprietary xauth protocol was vpnc. (Apart from authentication, it is 
only IPSEC IIRC)



I am so glad now that I don't need that shit anymore, because my 
university is now offering an OpenVPN server as an alternative. It's not 
only free and secure, but also compatible with virtually any platform or 
operating system you could think of - if not, it can be ported to it.




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [arch-general] Cisco VPN config

2009-07-27 Thread Ray Kohler
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Thomas Bächlertho...@archlinux.org wrote:
 Ray Kohler schrieb:

 I usually recommend strongSwan (which is in AUR) for interoperability
 with Cisco concentrators. It works quite well, but it's not simple to
 set up initially. I still believe it to be the best technical
 solution, but it would be beyond me to explain how to do it, via
 email, and for an unfamiliar situation.

 I was under the impression the only thing that worked with Cisco's
 proprietary xauth protocol was vpnc. (Apart from authentication, it is only
 IPSEC IIRC)

strongSwan supports XAUTH, though I've never tested that feature. It
also supports certificate-based authentication, which vpnc doesn't,
and which I actually do use.


[arch-general] Regression in PC Beep when updating to 2.6.30

2009-07-27 Thread Flavio Costa
Is anyone experiencing this too?

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13651

The noise is quite irritating, I'm looking forward a workaround or a way to
shut it down.

-- 
Flávio Coutinho da Costa


Re: [arch-general] Regression in PC Beep when updating to 2.6.30

2009-07-27 Thread Roman Kyrylych
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 21:27, Flavio Costaflavio@gmail.com wrote:
 Is anyone experiencing this too?

 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13651

 The noise is quite irritating, I'm looking forward a workaround or a way to
 shut it down.

Hm, I do remember hearing irritating PC speaker beep during installation,
but not after my system was configured.
Did you try to rebuild your kernel with CONFIG_SND_HDA_INPUT_BEEP=n
and muting the PC speaker in alsamixer?
Anyway it seems that this partially fixed in 2.6.31-rc1 (the
irritating frequency).

-- 
Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)


Re: [arch-general] Cisco VPN config

2009-07-27 Thread Slash
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Rafa Grimanrafagri...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi :)

 Got a Cisco VPN connection with my office, but can't manage to get it running.

My office uses Cisco for VPN as well. The official Cisco VPN client
would give me a kernel panic every few days. I was able to use vpnc
successfully, following this walkthough here:

http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=49502

Good luck,

Slash


Re: [arch-general] Regression in PC Beep when updating to 2.6.30

2009-07-27 Thread b4283

Flavio Costa 提到:

Is anyone experiencing this too?

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13651

The noise is quite irritating, I'm looking forward a workaround or a way to
shut it down.
  

just forbid modules !snd_pcsp !pcspkr within rc.conf
this will turn off your pc speaker permanently.

-
b4.


Re: [arch-general] Regression in PC Beep when updating to 2.6.30

2009-07-27 Thread Flavio Costa
The noise that used to come from 'pcspkr' isn't annoying, but apparently,
for some specific Intel hardware, the soundcard is taking over the beep
and using a very annoying sound.

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:10 PM, b4283 da.mi.spi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Flavio Costa 提到:

 Is anyone experiencing this too?

 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13651

 The noise is quite irritating, I'm looking forward a workaround or a way
 to
 shut it down.


 just forbid modules !snd_pcsp !pcspkr within rc.conf
 this will turn off your pc speaker permanently.

 -
 b4.




-- 
Flávio Coutinho da Costa


Re: [arch-general] Regression in PC Beep when updating to 2.6.30

2009-07-27 Thread Flavio Costa
Muting the PC Beep in alsamixer mutes the beep, but the internel speaker
doesn't come back to life

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Flavio Costa flavio@gmail.com wrote:

 The noise that used to come from 'pcspkr' isn't annoying, but apparently,
 for some specific Intel hardware, the soundcard is taking over the beep
 and using a very annoying sound.


 On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:10 PM, b4283 da.mi.spi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Flavio Costa 提到:

 Is anyone experiencing this too?

 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13651

 The noise is quite irritating, I'm looking forward a workaround or a way
 to
 shut it down.


 just forbid modules !snd_pcsp !pcspkr within rc.conf
 this will turn off your pc speaker permanently.

 -
 b4.




 --
 Flávio Coutinho da Costa




-- 
Flávio Coutinho da Costa