Re: [arch-general] Need translations for small project
ok i uploaded the localized version to the AUR[1]. We got translations for: en de el_GR (95%) es_AR fi pt_BR ro tr zh_CN (89%) Thanks to all translators. Please fix wrong or missing translations on transifex[2] And yell at me if python throws a UnicodeEncodeError. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56876 [2]https://www.transifex.net/projects/p/local-repo/
Re: [arch-general] Need translations for small project
On 28/02/12 13:02, martin kalcher wrote: ok i uploaded the localized version to the AUR[1]. We got translations for: en de el_GR (95%) Done 100% es_AR fi pt_BR ro tr zh_CN (89%) Thanks to all translators. Please fix wrong or missing translations on transifex[2] And yell at me if python throws a UnicodeEncodeError. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56876 [2]https://www.transifex.net/projects/p/local-repo/ -- Tasos Latsas gpg: 0x219810C9 http://www.kodama.gr https://github.com/tlatsas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] Using Shift + F1 on XFCE
On 28-02-2012 09:14, Vitor Garcia wrote: Good morning. I have an Arch Linux x86_64 installation on my laptop, and I use a couple of programs that requires me to use Shift + F1 to start a few functions, but every time I do that I'm dropped to the Virtual Console, and then I have to use Ctrl + Alt + F7 to get back to XFCE. It is not possible to change the shortcuts of the softwares I use, so I need to disable this feature in XFCE, but so far I haven't found anything on Google/Arch Wiki. Any ideas of how to do that? My system is: Arch x86_64 XFCE4 (started with startx, I don't use a login manager) Cheers, Vitor Shift + F1 does nothing here, are you sure you didn't configure xfce or something else to use Shift + F1 to change to a virtual console? -- Mauro Santos
Re: [arch-general] Using Shift + F1 on XFCE
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:12:58 + Mauro Santos registo.maill...@gmail.com wrote: Shift + F1 does nothing here, are you sure you didn't configure xfce or something else to use Shift + F1 to change to a virtual console? I have other 2 laptops and 3 workstations at the office, all of them with Arch Linux x86_64 + xfce4, and all of them behave the same way. If I hit shift + F1 it goes to the virtual console. I have installed them all from scratch (following to beginners guide), and I'm sure I haven't configured anything to do that. Could it have anything related to the NVIDIA proprietary driver? Regards, Vitor
Re: [arch-general] Using Shift + F1 on XFCE
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Vitor Garcia vitorlopesgar...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:12:58 + Mauro Santos registo.maill...@gmail.com wrote: Shift + F1 does nothing here, are you sure you didn't configure xfce or something else to use Shift + F1 to change to a virtual console? I have other 2 laptops and 3 workstations at the office, all of them with Arch Linux x86_64 + xfce4, and all of them behave the same way. If I hit shift + F1 it goes to the virtual console. I have installed them all from scratch (following to beginners guide), and I'm sure I haven't configured anything to do that. Could it have anything related to the NVIDIA proprietary driver? I'm on a laptop with Arch Linux x86_64 + xfce4 and shift+F1 does nothing too. I don't have a Nvidia card. -- thiagoc O povo não deveria temer o governo. O governo é quem deveria temer o povo. V de Vingança
Re: [arch-general] Using Shift + F1 on XFCE
El 28/02/12 15:32, Thiago Coutinho escribió: I'm on a laptop with Arch Linux x86_64 + xfce4 andshift+F1 does nothing too. I don't have a Nvidia card. Same here. Laptop with Arch x86_64 and XFCE. Nothing happens. $(Figue)
Re: [arch-general] Using Shift + F1 on XFCE
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Vitor Garcia vitorlopesgar...@gmail.comwrote: On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:12:58 + Mauro Santos registo.maill...@gmail.com wrote: Shift + F1 does nothing here, are you sure you didn't configure xfce or something else to use Shift + F1 to change to a virtual console? I have other 2 laptops and 3 workstations at the office, all of them with Arch Linux x86_64 + xfce4, and all of them behave the same way. If I hit shift + F1 it goes to the virtual console. I have installed them all from scratch (following to beginners guide), and I'm sure I haven't configured anything to do that. What keymap are you using? -- Cédric Girard
Re: [arch-general] Using Shift + F1 on XFCE
Am Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:14:13 +0100 schrieb Vitor Garcia vitorlopesgar...@gmail.com: Any ideas of how to do that? I can't reproduce this, too. But maybe you could check if you have set a keyboard shortcut to Shift+F1 in Xfce here: Settings - Keyboard - Application Shortcuts Settings - Window Manager - Keyboard Switching from X to a virtual console is usually done by Ctrl+Alt+F1. So maybe you or an application has changed this setting somehow. Heiko
Re: [arch-general] Using Shift + F1 on XFCE
On 28-02-2012 15:04, Heiko Baums wrote: Am Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:14:13 +0100 schrieb Vitor Garcia vitorlopesgar...@gmail.com: Any ideas of how to do that? I can't reproduce this, too. But maybe you could check if you have set a keyboard shortcut to Shift+F1 in Xfce here: Settings - Keyboard - Application Shortcuts Settings - Window Manager - Keyboard Switching from X to a virtual console is usually done by Ctrl+Alt+F1. So maybe you or an application has changed this setting somehow. Heiko This is a long shot but, might a login manager be responsible for that? Here I'm not using any login manager. -- Mauro Santos
Re: [arch-general] Need translations for small project
Catalan translation done!! Hector
Re: [arch-general] Using Shift + F1 on XFCE
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:52:37 +0100 Cédric Girard girard.ced...@gmail.com wrote: What keymap are you using? Thanks for the clue. The keymap was the problem. I had a custom keyboard layout that had a few bugs. Using the default keymap solves the problem. Thanks for the help!
Re: [arch-general] Using Shift + F1 on XFCE
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Vitor Garcia wrote: On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:52:37 +0100 Cédric Girard wrote: What keymap are you using? Thanks for the clue. The keymap was the problem. I had a custom keyboard layout that had a few bugs. Using the default keymap solves the problem. Thanks for the help! You're welcome! -- Cédric Girard
Re: [arch-general] Using Shift + F1 on XFCE
Am 28.02.2012 10:14, schrieb Vitor Garcia: Good morning. I have an Arch Linux x86_64 installation on my laptop, and I use a couple of programs that requires me to use Shift + F1 to start a few functions, but every time I do that I'm dropped to the Virtual Console, and then I have to use Ctrl + Alt + F7 to get back to XFCE. It is not possible to change the shortcuts of the softwares I use, so I need to disable this feature in XFCE, but so far I haven't found anything on Google/Arch Wiki. Any ideas of how to do that? Without knowing the cause of this undefined behaviour, you could be able to work around it by disabling VT switching via keyboard in the X server. Create /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/99-disable-vtswitch.conf with the following contents: Section ServerFlags Option DontVTSwitch EndSection You can still switch VTs by running 'chvt 1' as root. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[arch-general] Howto prevent LDFLAGS --sort-common, --as-needed, snip, --hash-style=gnu
Guys, I'm working on building kwin-style-crystal and I have patched acinclude.m4, aclocal.m4 and configure to remove references to --as-needed, but when I run configure, I still get the three unwanted LDFLAGS put back in the makefile somehow? Example: Makefile:LDFLAGS = -Wl,-O1,--sort-common,--as-needed,-z,relro,--hash-style=gnu I just want it to read: Makefile:LDFLAGS = -Wl,-O1,-z,relro What magic autotool does this and how do I fix it? The flags show up in the Makefiles and the config.status file. I have completely searched the source code with grep -r and after patching none of the unwanted flags are present before starting the build. When the build craters, I check the Makefiles and config.status and the unwanted flags are back. This results in the build failing with: /bin/sh ../libtool --silent --mode=link --tag=CXX g++ -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wl,-O1,--sort-common,--as-needed,-z,relro,--hash-style=gnu -o embedtool -L/opt/trinity/lib -L/opt/qt3/lib -L/opt/trinity/lib/trinity embedtool.o -lqt-mt -lz -lpng -lz -lm -lXext -lX11 -lSM -lICE -lpthread g++: error: unrecognized option '--sort-common' g++: error: unrecognized option '--as-needed' g++: error: unrecognized option '--hash-style=gnu' What's the trick? Thanks. Extra info: For those interested, the source is: http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=13969 and the patch I'm applying to try and get rid of the flags is: http://www.3111skyline.com/dl/dt/trinity/arch/src/crystal-1.patch -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Re: [arch-general] Need translations for small project
Op 27-02-12 13:55, martin kalcher schreef: Am 27.02.2012 11:17, schrieb Axilleas P: On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Frikilinuxlis...@frikilinux.com.arwrote: On Dom 26 Feb 2012 17:29:34 martin kalcher escribió: Am 26.02.2012 17:13, schrieb rafael ff1: 2012/2/26 martin kalchermartin.kalc...@googlemail.com: Am 26.02.2012 16:58, schrieb Jesse Juhani Jaara: sunnuntai, 26. helmikuuta 2012 12:55:51 rafael ff1 kirjoitti: Suggestion: you could provide translations strings in Transifex, so translators would have an easier way to follow the progress of translation and to deliver translations to you (instead of many emails for all languages). IMO, it is a very nice solution. And if I'm not wrong, it is free for opensource projects. Well it isin't that hard to do clone the repo in github and and setup up git on your machine and push the trabslation to github :D I think thats true. But why no making it as easy as possible for translators? Yep, that's the idea. Rafael Hmm, ok. I think it's done. GitHub users can do: fork - add - pull request Transifex users can contribute here: https://www.transifex.net/projects/p/local-repo/r/local-repo-1-4/ Hope everything is set up fine... Hi, added spanish (es_AR) translation in Transifex. Greek is finished :) Thank you! You people are great! I finished Dutch.
Re: [arch-general] Need translations for small project
Am 28.02.2012 16:30, schrieb Hector Martinez-Seara: Catalan translation done!! Hector Thank you and thanks to the dutch guy. I'll push it soon.
Re: [arch-general] Ways to power on broadcom bcm4311 wireless adaptor without booting into windows
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 14:41:05 +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote: Not quite sure what you mean by touch panel, I guess mine is not though. It is a Fn+something combination. Cheers, Tom My wifi switch is not a button, and there's no function key for it. I think it is activated through infrared light sensor or something similar to that. And thank you guys for replying. I think I'd better consider sell this HP and buy a new laptop instead. :P Regards, Tony
Re: [arch-general] /var/run should not be contained in the package file list.
Op 23-02-12 23:45, Tom Gundersen schreef: On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Damjangdam...@gmail.com wrote: g: * /var/run is a symlink (created on boot) to /run. This should be changed in the future so the symlink is shipped with the filesystem package, but we have not figured out the transtion yet. How would that work with systemd where /run is bind mounted on /var/run (so it requires a /var/run directory) ? That's not a problem. systemd checks if /var/run is a symlink, and if so leaves it alone (this is the preferred way of doing it). Only if /var/run is a directory, it will by bind-mounted, giving more or less the same result as the symlink. Deleting /var/run and replacing it with a symlink is a bit of a hassle, so even if you are using systemd it might be worth-while to reboot once with initscripts so this will be done for you. -t This message may be double in the list, but I'm not sure if my previous copy was sent correctly Hi, I'm running systemd. What exactly is bind-mounted? Current mount information shows: /run on /var/run type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,mode=755) I presume this is a bind-mount? So what you're saying is that I should boot with SysV once to convert it into a symlink? Thanks, Christian.
Re: [arch-general] Howto prevent LDFLAGS --sort-common, --as-needed, snip, --hash-style=gnu
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:46 AM, David C. Rankin drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote: I'm working on building kwin-style-crystal and I have patched acinclude.m4, aclocal.m4 and configure to remove references to --as-needed, but when I run configure, I still get the three unwanted LDFLAGS put back in the makefile somehow? Example: Makefile:LDFLAGS = -Wl,-O1,--sort-common,--as-needed,-z,relro,--hash-style=gnu I just want it to read: Makefile:LDFLAGS = -Wl,-O1,-z,relro [...] What's the trick? Thanks. # grep LDFLAGS /etc/makepkg.conf ;-) -- C Anthony
Re: [arch-general] Howto prevent LDFLAGS --sort-common, --as-needed, snip, --hash-style=gnu
On Tuesday 28 of February 2012 09:46:29 David C. Rankin wrote: What magic autotool does this and how do I fix it? The flags show up in the Makefiles and the config.status file. I have completely searched the source code with grep -r and after patching none of the unwanted flags are present before starting the build. When the build craters, I check the Makefiles and config.status and the unwanted flags are back. This results in the build failing with: Hi, the 'evil' LDFLAGS are probably being set in /etc/makepkg.conf Check my rpm PKGBUILD[1] for working solution. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rp/rpm/PKGBUILD
Re: [arch-general] /var/run should not be contained in the package file list.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Christian Stadegaart e-m...@bewust-leven.nl wrote: What exactly is bind-mounted? Current mount information shows: /run on /var/run type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,mode=755) I presume this is a bind-mount? Correct. So what you're saying is that I should boot with SysV once to convert it into a symlink? should might be a bit strong ;-) You can do it, and at least I find the result somewhat tidier. It can be argued that it does not matter at all... -t
