[arch-general] netcfg - virtual network on a loopback interface

2012-06-30 Thread Sudaraka Wijesinghe
Hi Everyone,

I was using a virtual network within my computer to run a web server for
development work. Following is the way it setup:

/etc/network.d/vlan
CONNECTION='ethernet'
DESCRIPTION='Virtual LAN'
INTERFACE='lo:1'
IP='static'
ADDR='192.168.123.1'
GATEWAY='192.168.123.1'
NETMASK='255.255.255.0'

Then I have valn in the NETWORKS array in /etc/conf.d/netcfg and,
net-profiles in the DAEMONS array in /etc/rc.conf

Everything was working fine until the netcfg package update yesterday,
and since then it fails to find/create the loopback interface. I get the
followin error at boot and when I run netcfg manually.

/usr/lib/network/network: line 364: /sys/class/net/lo:1/flags: No such
file or directory (x6)
/usr/lib/network/globals: line 104: /sys/class/net/lo:1/carrier: No
such file or directory (x6)

** (x6) means I get 6 of the same message

Can anyone please give me a pointer how to solve this?

Thanks.

-- 

Sudaraka Wijesinghe

identica/twitter | im/email  | text/voice
@sudaraka| sudaraka.wijesin...@gmail.com | +94777221779




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [arch-general] Help with pm-suspend

2012-06-30 Thread Marius T.

Am 30.06.2012 06:28, schrieb Randy:

Hello All,


I'm seeing a strange issue when I suspend my system. If I suspend 
using either the command:


dbus-send --system --print-reply --dest=org.freedesktop.UPower 
/org/freedesktop/UPower org.freedesktop.UPower.Suspend


or running pm-suspend as root, the system will shutdown and go into 
suspend mode like it should.


But if I execute either of these commands again, it doesn't suspend. 
What I found is that after suspending the first time I can see that 
/usr/sbin/pm-suspend is still active. After killing this process I 
am then able to suspend again.


Any ideas on what's going on here? Why would the suspend process still 
be running after resuming from suspend?


Thanks,

Randy

hi,

do you have any custom hooks in /etc/pm/sleep.d/ ?
I had a similiar problem once when I created a custom hook and didn't 
fork the process I was starting inside the hook, so pm-suspend would 
wait forever for the hook to exit.
/var/log/pm-suspend.log should be able to show you at what hook it is 
hanging.




Re: [arch-general] skype - problem with audio playback when initiating call

2012-06-30 Thread Mauro Santos
On 30-06-2012 06:49, David C. Rankin wrote:
 On 06/29/2012 04:46 PM, Mauro Santos wrote:
 Most probably something else is grabbing either the playback or the
 capture device, at least I have only seen that error when that's the
 case. If you don't want pulse to manage your sound devices you should
 look into setting up an asound.conf with explicit entries for dmix and
 dsnoop to avoid one program hogging the sound device.

 That said, the latest skype has been working just fine here with xfce+pulse.

 
 I suspect there is a soundcard fight going on. Incoming calls work with:
 
 Speakers: Intel ICH6, Intel ICH6 - IEC958 (hw:0,4)
 Ringing: Intel ICH6, Intel ICH6 - IEC958 (hw:0,4)
 
 It's just the dialout that is messed up. I have also noticed that with
 pulse/Intel configs I get a delay when testing skype sound (push test button 
 and
 10 seconds later the audio file plays).
 
 To test, I fired up gnome (stuck in fallback with my Nvidia 8800 - sigh), but
 skype sound worked fine.
 
 I have no beef with pulse, alsa, whatever as long as it works. Since this is 
 my
 first time messing with skype -- I'm just happy to identify the issue.
 
 Kudos to the folks who put the skype wiki together. Setting up a separate user
 to run skype with and preventing it from snooping is just plain smart. Simple
 solution, well written up.
 
 Thanks for your help and explanation!
 

I'd say that you should try to use what you are using for everything
else, and you should make that explicit.

You mention running skype with another user, as a start I would run it
as your user, if I'm not wrong these days access to the sound devices is
granted dynamically by consolekit (or whatever *kit) based on the
current active session. The alternate user for skype might not register
as having an active session thus causing some problem.

You should also state which DE you are planning to use as some other
users may have stumbled upon similar a problem. My experience is with
XFCE and mostly with pulse, I have also done a short stint with only
alsa so I don't have as much experience with that.

-- 
Mauro Santos




Re: [arch-general] cpufreq stopped working

2012-06-30 Thread Jesse Juhani Jaara
la, 2012-06-30 kello 01:14 -0400, Martin Zecher kirjoitti:
 I'm not really sure when cpufreq stopped working, maybe 2 or 3 months ago.
 It was working fine before and I don't really remember making any change in
 configuration.

Cpufreq utils are deprecated and replaced with cpupower utils. Try
installing cpupower and see if it works ^_^



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[arch-general] Documentation about pambase

2012-06-30 Thread Damjan
It's nice that Arch introduced the pambase package, so that there's some 
referent point of pam configuration.


But currently it lacks any documentation and recommendations how those 
files should be used (for people that it's not so obvious).


Especially something we can point to people making packages on AUR.

For ex. what should lightdm use?
just include /etc/pam.d/system-login or /etc/pam.d/system-local-login?


--
дамјан



Re: [arch-general] Help with pm-suspend

2012-06-30 Thread Randy

On 06/30/2012 06:16 AM, Marius T. wrote:

Am 30.06.2012 06:28, schrieb Randy:

Hello All,


I'm seeing a strange issue when I suspend my system. If I suspend 
using either the command:


dbus-send --system --print-reply --dest=org.freedesktop.UPower 
/org/freedesktop/UPower org.freedesktop.UPower.Suspend


or running pm-suspend as root, the system will shutdown and go into 
suspend mode like it should.


But if I execute either of these commands again, it doesn't suspend. 
What I found is that after suspending the first time I can see that 
/usr/sbin/pm-suspend is still active. After killing this process I 
am then able to suspend again.


Any ideas on what's going on here? Why would the suspend process 
still be running after resuming from suspend?


Thanks,

Randy

hi,

do you have any custom hooks in /etc/pm/sleep.d/ ?
I had a similiar problem once when I created a custom hook and didn't 
fork the process I was starting inside the hook, so pm-suspend would 
wait forever for the hook to exit.
/var/log/pm-suspend.log should be able to show you at what hook it is 
hanging.





The only thing that I have in sleep.d is 90alsa, but I didn't place this 
file there. It must have been done when a package was installed. If I rm 
this file, then it works ok.


Do you think that it's ok to not have this file there? I'll have to 
check if removing it prevents my sound from working after a resume.








Re: [arch-general] cpufreq stopped working

2012-06-30 Thread Leonid Isaev
On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 10:05:29 -0400
Martin Zecher mzec...@gmail.com wrote:

 Thanks for answering.
 
 I already installed cpupower with no luck. I think that the problem is
 related with the module acpi_cpufreq, which loads but does nothing at all.

For basic (automatic) scaling you don't need either cpupower nor cpufreq nor
MODULES=(acpi_cpufreq) with linux 3.4.x. From your previous email, it follows
that your kernel oopses. Please show the complete relevant piece from
kernel.log (or whatever place systemd logs to, not grepped). Also, you could
try booting w/o nvidia to not taint kernel.

 
 
 On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Jesse Juhani Jaara
 jesse.ja...@gmail.comwrote:
 
  la, 2012-06-30 kello 01:14 -0400, Martin Zecher kirjoitti:
   I'm not really sure when cpufreq stopped working, maybe 2 or 3 months
  ago.
   It was working fine before and I don't really remember making any change
  in
   configuration.
 
  Cpufreq utils are deprecated and replaced with cpupower utils. Try
  installing cpupower and see if it works ^_^
 
 
 
 



-- 
Leonid Isaev
GnuPG key: 0x164B5A6D
Fingerprint: C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE  775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [arch-general] Help with pm-suspend

2012-06-30 Thread Marius T.

Am 30.06.2012 16:01, schrieb Randy:


The only thing that I have in sleep.d is 90alsa, but I didn't place 
this file there. It must have been done when a package was installed. 
If I rm this file, then it works ok.


Do you think that it's ok to not have this file there? I'll have to 
check if removing it prevents my sound from working after a resume.


this file is part of alsa-utils and as far as I understand this was 
added as a workaround for some buggy application behaviour:

https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17239

I'm not sure what the hook actually does, but it doesn't seem to be 
neccessary - at least on my systems (I use systemd to suspend, so these 
hooks are not even run on my systems).


Anyway, if this hook indeed causes the problem I think you should file a 
bug report. Maybe whatever this hook fixes has been fixed upstream and 
it isn't even needed anymore...


Re: [arch-general] cpufreq stopped working

2012-06-30 Thread Leonidas Spyropoulos
On Jun 30, 2012 4:01 PM, Leonid Isaev lis...@umail.iu.edu wrote:

 On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 10:05:29 -0400
 Martin Zecher mzec...@gmail.com wrote:

  Thanks for answering.
 
  I already installed cpupower with no luck. I think that the problem is
  related with the module acpi_cpufreq, which loads but does nothing at
all.

 For basic (automatic) scaling you don't need either cpupower nor cpufreq
nor
 MODULES=(acpi_cpufreq) with linux 3.4.x.

Can you elaborate in that a bit more? Does the kernel handle that? What
does the cpupower  or cpufreq offer more?

From your previous email, it follows
 that your kernel oopses. Please show the complete relevant piece from
 kernel.log (or whatever place systemd logs to, not grepped). Also, you
could
 try booting w/o nvidia to not taint kernel.

 
 
  On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Jesse Juhani Jaara
  jesse.ja...@gmail.comwrote:
 
   la, 2012-06-30 kello 01:14 -0400, Martin Zecher kirjoitti:
I'm not really sure when cpufreq stopped working, maybe 2 or 3
months
   ago.
It was working fine before and I don't really remember making any
change
   in
configuration.
  
   Cpufreq utils are deprecated and replaced with cpupower utils. Try
   installing cpupower and see if it works ^_^
  
  
 
 



 --
 Leonid Isaev
 GnuPG key: 0x164B5A6D
 Fingerprint: C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE  775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D


Re: [arch-general] cpufreq stopped working

2012-06-30 Thread Leonid Isaev
On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 21:37:39 +0100
Leonidas Spyropoulos artafi...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Jun 30, 2012 4:01 PM, Leonid Isaev lis...@umail.iu.edu wrote:
 
  On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 10:05:29 -0400
  Martin Zecher mzec...@gmail.com wrote:
 
   Thanks for answering.
  
   I already installed cpupower with no luck. I think that the problem is
   related with the module acpi_cpufreq, which loads but does nothing at
 all.
 
  For basic (automatic) scaling you don't need either cpupower nor cpufreq
 nor
  MODULES=(acpi_cpufreq) with linux 3.4.x.
 
 Can you elaborate in that a bit more? Does the kernel handle that? What
 does the cpupower  or cpufreq offer more?

Yes, it's what they call CPU driver autoprobing:
http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_3.4#head-9df4e508cb97f4e138c590b9ccff3e0eda6cc7fc.

Basically, if your CPU supports scaling, the corresponding driver will be
loaded automatically. This and the fact that arch kernel now defaults to
ONDEMAND governor (CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_ONDEMAND=y, FS#28778),
eliminates the need for userspace tools and explicit module loading.

If you want just default scaling (within hw defaults), you don't have to do
anything beyond enabling speedstep/coolnquiet in BIOS. But if you want to see
various info, control frequency range (to downclock, for instance) or change
the governor from the userspace, you'll have to install either cpupower or
cpufrequtils. Of course, you could achive some of it functionality by simply
echoing parameters to corresponding files in /sys/devices/system/cpu/*.

If you need to control frequency based on acpi events, you'll probably need
cpupower: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/CPU_Frequency_Scaling.

 
 From your previous email, it follows
  that your kernel oopses. Please show the complete relevant piece from
  kernel.log (or whatever place systemd logs to, not grepped). Also, you
 could
  try booting w/o nvidia to not taint kernel.
 
  
  
   On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Jesse Juhani Jaara
   jesse.ja...@gmail.comwrote:
  
la, 2012-06-30 kello 01:14 -0400, Martin Zecher kirjoitti:
 I'm not really sure when cpufreq stopped working, maybe 2 or 3
 months
ago.
 It was working fine before and I don't really remember making any
 change
in
 configuration.
   
Cpufreq utils are deprecated and replaced with cpupower utils. Try
installing cpupower and see if it works ^_^
   
   
  
  
 
 
 
  --
  Leonid Isaev
  GnuPG key: 0x164B5A6D
  Fingerprint: C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE  775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D

-- 
Leonid Isaev
GnuPG key: 0x164B5A6D
Fingerprint: C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE  775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [arch-general] Help with pm-suspend

2012-06-30 Thread Randy

On 06/30/2012 11:11 AM, Marius T. wrote:

Am 30.06.2012 16:01, schrieb Randy:


The only thing that I have in sleep.d is 90alsa, but I didn't place 
this file there. It must have been done when a package was installed. 
If I rm this file, then it works ok.


Do you think that it's ok to not have this file there? I'll have to 
check if removing it prevents my sound from working after a resume.


this file is part of alsa-utils and as far as I understand this was 
added as a workaround for some buggy application behaviour:

https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17239

I'm not sure what the hook actually does, but it doesn't seem to be 
neccessary - at least on my systems (I use systemd to suspend, so 
these hooks are not even run on my systems).


Anyway, if this hook indeed causes the problem I think you should file 
a bug report. Maybe whatever this hook fixes has been fixed upstream 
and it isn't even needed anymore...



Ok. Thanks for the help!



Re: [arch-general] Nvidia/vesafb/GRUB2

2012-06-30 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Jun 29, 2012 2:12 AM, arnaud gaboury arnaud.gabo...@gmail.com wrote:

 Switching to Nouveau would be best indeed, but not at its current stage.

Why?  Do you have problems running it?  I [unfortunately] have several
systems with nvidia cards, of varying age/caliber, all running nouveau with
3D-ness enabled in X ... no significant issues for probably 1-2 yrs or so
(and just gave a successful presentation on vpython 3 days ago).

Not to suggest it's without issue, but its worth trying periodically.

-- 

C Anthony [mobile]