Re: [arch-general] Missing sys_siglist declaration
On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 15:30:44 -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > Indeed it does, you can report a documentation bug here: > https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html Done. Cheerio, Hauke -- The ASCII Ribbon CampaignHauke Fath () No HTML/RTF in emailInstitut für Nachrichtentechnik /\ No Word docs in email TU Darmstadt Respect for open standards Ruf +49-6151-16-21344
Re: [arch-general] Missing sys_siglist declaration
On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 13:57:09 -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > From the glibc 2.32 release notes: > > Deprecated and removed features, and other changes affecting compatibility: > [...] > * The deprecated arrays sys_siglist, _sys_siglist, and sys_sigabbrev > are no longer available to newly linked binaries, and their declarations > have been removed from . They are exported solely as > compatibility symbols to support old binaries. All programs should use > strsignal instead. > > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=b1ccfc061feee9ce616444ded8e1cd5acf9fa97f Thanks! I'll look into that. As I said, the strsignal(3) man page still refers to sys_siglist, so that would need updating. Cheerio, Hauke -- The ASCII Ribbon CampaignHauke Fath () No HTML/RTF in emailInstitut für Nachrichtentechnik /\ No Word docs in email TU Darmstadt Respect for open standards Ruf +49-6151-16-21344
Re: [arch-general] Missing sys_siglist declaration
On 10/1/20 3:28 PM, Hauke Fath wrote: > On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 13:57:09 -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: >> From the glibc 2.32 release notes: >> >> Deprecated and removed features, and other changes affecting compatibility: >> [...] >> * The deprecated arrays sys_siglist, _sys_siglist, and sys_sigabbrev >> are no longer available to newly linked binaries, and their declarations >> have been removed from . They are exported solely as >> compatibility symbols to support old binaries. All programs should use >> strsignal instead. >> >> > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=b1ccfc061feee9ce616444ded8e1cd5acf9fa97f > > Thanks! I'll look into that. As I said, the strsignal(3) man page still > refers to sys_siglist, so that would need updating. Indeed it does, you can report a documentation bug here: https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html Thanks! -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] Missing sys_siglist declaration
On 10/1/20 11:45 AM, Hauke Fath wrote: > Hi, > > on an arch machine updated yesterday, my XEmacs does not build because > the 'sys_siglist' declaration is gone from , where the > strsignal(3) man page says it should be. > > Searching the usual suspects didn't bring up anything. What did I miss? From the glibc 2.32 release notes: Deprecated and removed features, and other changes affecting compatibility: [...] * The deprecated arrays sys_siglist, _sys_siglist, and sys_sigabbrev are no longer available to newly linked binaries, and their declarations have been removed from . They are exported solely as compatibility symbols to support old binaries. All programs should use strsignal instead. https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=b1ccfc061feee9ce616444ded8e1cd5acf9fa97f -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-general] Missing sys_siglist declaration
A bit of Googling would suggest that sys_siglist is only available on BSD.
[arch-general] Missing sys_siglist declaration
Hi, on an arch machine updated yesterday, my XEmacs does not build because the 'sys_siglist' declaration is gone from , where the strsignal(3) man page says it should be. Searching the usual suspects didn't bring up anything. What did I miss? Cheerio, Hauke -- The ASCII Ribbon CampaignHauke Fath () No HTML/RTF in email Institut für Nachrichtentechnik /\ No Word docs in email TU Darmstadt Respect for open standards Ruf +49-6151-16-21344
