Re: [ARR] For an Indian , SDM is ordinary.

2008-12-27 Thread Matthew Islam
Dear Vivek,
My intentions were never to advertise my inconsequential meets with AR bhai.
Most in the forum already knows of whatever little time I have spent with
him. He is like a brother to me, first and foremost, his being an MD or a
legend is now secondary to me. The point I was trying to make needed more
telling perhaps. See, I had at many instances told AR bhai about the success
of various movies and scripts and he would sometime agree and sometimes he
wouldn't. One such instance occurred with Dhoom 2. I told him that it would
bomb because of a weak script and he insisted that it wouldn't because of
marketing and cast no matter how bad the script was. He has told me that
these were the scales of movie making needed to be attempted so that the
bollywood grows in size. He has an acute sense of what worked and what
didn't. That was what I was trying to say. I worded it wrongly I think. But
if you look closely at his films in the past three or four years, you will
see, he has chosen scripts that were both challenging and different to what
both Tamil and hindi films are known to forward. His tenacity in accepting a
swades, RDB, JA, Guru... and many others of its like instead of many other
big films that he was offered is testament that he wants to achieve. He has
always stated that his musical contrubutions are wasted if a film fails and
he would like to do films which succeed or for that matter have at the least
an impact on the viewers minds. Ar Bhai is a team player. And no matter how
much you or anyone says that he's shoddy at choosing scripts, my first hand
experience is that atleast in the last half a decade he has tried to only do
movies/scripts that he knows will have an impact or that is entertaining.
Some movies have faltered because of the maker but the scripts had what you
call dum. Execution was bad perhaps, marketing also.

You know when someone makes choices that gets him so much recognition for
his work both abroad and in India.you would think its a given that
he knows something about what he is doing. You would think that since 95% of
his work are films and he is known for them that its a given that he knows
whats a good film and whats not. If not is it just luck then? There are many
composers out there.why not the same consistency in their work?
Tell me, do 90% of all the worlds critics know nothing about good scripts?
And even if they didn't...do western audiences not have the thinking
capacity that a mere viewer in India, Bangladesh or Pakistan have? Its not a
question of superiority, its a question of whether a huge number of people
are connecting to the product in question which is entertaining
them...worldwide.the answer to the question is an
emphatic yes! So how do you measure whats a good film or bad? How can you
tell me that a film's script success or failure lies in something else and
not the applause of the audience and the appreciation of the crowd who
watches it?  We can then get into a debate about GOOD SCRIPTS thats not
crowd pleasers and Bad scripts that are and how that is measured but this is
niether the time nor the place to do so and compared to the shit hollywood
produces day in and day out, SDM ranks above them for many reasons..the
storytelling is innovative, to me, personally that is. No one said its an
earth shattering story of new epic proportions. Everyone is saying its a
well made film with a simple story.

Another two cents from me!

Take Care.

Matthew

On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 5:18 AM, vivek iiivivekoberoi...@yahoo.com wrote:


 as much as you would want to advertise that you have watched movies
 along with thalaivar, it is a very well known fact that ARR is pretty
 bad in choosing script. We all know ARR in and out. Now, just because
 ARR had chosen to do SDM doesn't make it's script one in a million. I
 think it is a beaten-to-death run-off-the-mill script. Love makes you
 blind you see.

 Frankly, I can tell you, I believe ARR didnot do SDM because he was
 memerised by the script but because it provided new avenues and
 challenges to channel his creative blood and energy.

 --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com,
 Matthew Islam matthewis...@...
 wrote:
 
  I beg to differ on the ordinary bit. What sets it apart is the
 fact
  that it's a simple story but look at the treatment. What people
 are
  raving about is the tight script, music, acting and editing. The
  narrative has such force that the entire product over powers your
  senses. Successful films are ones which leaves you with an
 experience
  that you remember after you have left the theaters. I saw most
 people
  I know come out with a smile. Yes, it's not an extraordinary story.
 In
  todays age it's hard to tell one that we haven't heard before but
 what
  a beautiful execution of a story we have heard before.
  Our world is a dark one, as such when a character triumphs over
 such a
  dismal world armed with hope, perseverance, 

Re: [ARR] For an Indian , SDM is ordinary.

2008-12-27 Thread V S Rawat
On 12/27/2008 5:24 PM India Time, _Matthew Islam_ wrote:

 Dear Vivek,
 My intentions were never to advertise my inconsequential meets with AR 
 bhai. 

Meeting someone whom we are a fan of is a great experience, is fun, is a 
memory that gets etched in our mind and stays with us for life.

There is nothing wrong at all if someone tells about his meeting with ARR.

If someone finds that it is some kind of show-off, let it be. I think 
only a person who is frustrated in not being able to meet ARR till now 
would say so, and would feel hurt or unprivileged when someone else 
tells about his meeting with ARR.

I hope that Vivek also gets a chance to meet ARR and to talk with him. 
Then, Vivek will rise to the roof of the tallest building in his city 
and shout to everybody about his meeting with ARR. And that is perfectly 
  OK with me. :-)

So, dear Matthew and others who have met ARR, do tell us more about your 
meetings with him.

--
Rawat

 Most in the forum already knows of whatever little time I have 
 spent with him. He is like a brother to me, first and foremost, his 
 being an MD or a legend is now secondary to me. The point I was trying 
 to make needed more telling perhaps. See, I had at many instances told 
 AR bhai about the success of various movies and scripts and he would 
 sometime agree and sometimes he wouldn't. One such instance occurred 
 with Dhoom 2. I told him that it would bomb because of a weak script and 
 he insisted that it wouldn't because of marketing and cast no matter how 
 bad the script was. He has told me that these were the scales of movie 
 making needed to be attempted so that the bollywood grows in size. He 
 has an acute sense of what worked and what didn't. That was what I was 
 trying to say. I worded it wrongly I think. But if you look closely at 
 his films in the past three or four years, you will see, he has chosen 
 scripts that were both challenging and different to what both Tamil and 
 hindi films are known to forward. His tenacity in accepting a swades, 
 RDB, JA, Guru... and many others of its like instead of many other big 
 films that he was offered is testament that he wants to achieve. He has 
 always stated that his musical contrubutions are wasted if a film fails 
 and he would like to do films which succeed or for that matter have at 
 the least an impact on the viewers minds. Ar Bhai is a team player. And 
 no matter how much you or anyone says that he's shoddy at choosing 
 scripts, my first hand experience is that atleast in the last half a 
 decade he has tried to only do movies/scripts that he knows will have an 
 impact or that is entertaining. Some movies have faltered because of the 
 maker but the scripts had what you call dum. Execution was bad 
 perhaps, marketing also.
 
 You know when someone makes choices that gets him so much recognition 
 for his work both abroad and in India.you would think its a 
 given that he knows something about what he is doing. You would think 
 that since 95% of his work are films and he is known for them that its a 
 given that he knows whats a good film and whats not. If not is it just 
 luck then? There are many composers out there.why not the same 
 consistency in their work?
 Tell me, do 90% of all the worlds critics know nothing about good 
 scripts? And even if they didn't...do western audiences not have the 
 thinking capacity that a mere viewer in India, Bangladesh or Pakistan 
 have? Its not a question of superiority, its a question of whether a 
 huge number of people are connecting to the product in question which is 
 entertaining them...worldwide.the answer to the 
 question is an emphatic yes! So how do you measure whats a good film 
 or bad? How can you tell me that a film's script success or failure lies 
 in something else and not the applause of the audience and the 
 appreciation of the crowd who watches it?  We can then get into a debate 
 about GOOD SCRIPTS thats not crowd pleasers and Bad scripts that are and 
 how that is measured but this is niether the time nor the place to do so 
 and compared to the shit hollywood produces day in and day out, SDM 
 ranks above them for many reasons..the storytelling is innovative, 
 to me, personally that is. No one said its an earth shattering story of 
 new epic proportions. Everyone is saying its a well made film with a 
 simple story.
 
 Another two cents from me!
 
 Take Care.
 
 Matthew




Are you searching for a reason, to be kind?
b
Explore, Experience, Enjoy A.R.Rahman - The Man, The Music, The Magic.
Only at arrahmanfans.com - The definitive A.R.Rahman e-community.

Homepage: http://www.arrahmanfans.com
Admin: ad...@arrahmanfans.com
To Subscribe: arrahmanfans-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
To Unsubscribe: arrahmanfans-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.comyahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arrahmanfans/

* Your email 

Re: [ARR] For an Indian , SDM is ordinary.

2008-12-27 Thread vivek
 Then, Vivek will rise to the roof of the tallest building in his 
city 
 and shout to everybody about his meeting with ARR. And that is 

That goes without saying

the context here is different. and, I do remember once mathew 
interviewing ARR on his visit to london quite some time back. 


--- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, V S Rawat vsra...@... wrote:

 On 12/27/2008 5:24 PM India Time, _Matthew Islam_ wrote:
 
  Dear Vivek,
  My intentions were never to advertise my inconsequential meets 
with AR 
  bhai. 
 
 Meeting someone whom we are a fan of is a great experience, is fun, 
is a 
 memory that gets etched in our mind and stays with us for life.
 
 There is nothing wrong at all if someone tells about his meeting 
with ARR.
 
 If someone finds that it is some kind of show-off, let it be. I 
think 
 only a person who is frustrated in not being able to meet ARR till 
now 
 would say so, and would feel hurt or unprivileged when someone else 
 tells about his meeting with ARR.
 
 I hope that Vivek also gets a chance to meet ARR and to talk with 
him. 
 Then, Vivek will rise to the roof of the tallest building in his 
city 
 and shout to everybody about his meeting with ARR. And that is 
perfectly 
   OK with me. :-)
 
 So, dear Matthew and others who have met ARR, do tell us more about 
your 
 meetings with him.
 
 --
 Rawat
 
  Most in the forum already knows of whatever little time I have 
  spent with him. He is like a brother to me, first and foremost, 
his 
  being an MD or a legend is now secondary to me. The point I was 
trying 
  to make needed more telling perhaps. See, I had at many instances 
told 
  AR bhai about the success of various movies and scripts and he 
would 
  sometime agree and sometimes he wouldn't. One such instance 
occurred 
  with Dhoom 2. I told him that it would bomb because of a weak 
script and 
  he insisted that it wouldn't because of marketing and cast no 
matter how 
  bad the script was. He has told me that these were the scales of 
movie 
  making needed to be attempted so that the bollywood grows in 
size. He 
  has an acute sense of what worked and what didn't. That was what 
I was 
  trying to say. I worded it wrongly I think. But if you look 
closely at 
  his films in the past three or four years, you will see, he has 
chosen 
  scripts that were both challenging and different to what both 
Tamil and 
  hindi films are known to forward. His tenacity in accepting a 
swades, 
  RDB, JA, Guru... and many others of its like instead of many 
other big 
  films that he was offered is testament that he wants to achieve. 
He has 
  always stated that his musical contrubutions are wasted if a film 
fails 
  and he would like to do films which succeed or for that matter 
have at 
  the least an impact on the viewers minds. Ar Bhai is a team 
player. And 
  no matter how much you or anyone says that he's shoddy at 
choosing 
  scripts, my first hand experience is that atleast in the last 
half a 
  decade he has tried to only do movies/scripts that he knows will 
have an 
  impact or that is entertaining. Some movies have faltered because 
of the 
  maker but the scripts had what you call dum. Execution was bad 
  perhaps, marketing also.
  
  You know when someone makes choices that gets him so much 
recognition 
  for his work both abroad and in India.you would think its 
a 
  given that he knows something about what he is doing. You would 
think 
  that since 95% of his work are films and he is known for them 
that its a 
  given that he knows whats a good film and whats not. If not is it 
just 
  luck then? There are many composers out there.why not the 
same 
  consistency in their work?
  Tell me, do 90% of all the worlds critics know nothing about good 
  scripts? And even if they didn't...do western audiences not 
have the 
  thinking capacity that a mere viewer in India, Bangladesh or 
Pakistan 
  have? Its not a question of superiority, its a question of 
whether a 
  huge number of people are connecting to the product in question 
which is 
  entertaining them...worldwide.the answer to 
the 
  question is an emphatic yes! So how do you measure whats a good 
film 
  or bad? How can you tell me that a film's script success or 
failure lies 
  in something else and not the applause of the audience and the 
  appreciation of the crowd who watches it?  We can then get into a 
debate 
  about GOOD SCRIPTS thats not crowd pleasers and Bad scripts that 
are and 
  how that is measured but this is niether the time nor the place 
to do so 
  and compared to the shit hollywood produces day in and day out, 
SDM 
  ranks above them for many reasons..the storytelling is 
innovative, 
  to me, personally that is. No one said its an earth shattering 
story of 
  new epic proportions. Everyone is saying its a well made film 
with a 
  simple story.
  
  Another two cents from me!
  
  Take Care.
  
  Matthew





Re: [ARR] For an Indian , SDM is ordinary.

2008-12-26 Thread Matthew Islam
I beg to differ on the ordinary bit. What sets it apart is the fact  
that it's a simple story but look at the treatment. What people are  
raving about is the tight script, music, acting and editing. The  
narrative has such force that the entire product over powers your  
senses. Successful films are ones which leaves you with an experience  
that you remember after you have left the theaters. I saw most people  
I know come out with a smile. Yes, it's not an extraordinary story. In  
todays age it's hard to tell one that we haven't heard before but what  
a beautiful execution of a story we have heard before.
Our world is a dark one, as such when a character triumphs over such a  
dismal world armed with hope, perseverance, love, charm and faith. It  
displays a kind of tale that's considered extraordinary and your inner  
human nature falls in love with it. My friends in Bangladesh to ones  
in Mexico report unanimously that they haven't connected with a movie  
from their hearts, in a long while, like they have with SDM. The  
fuss therefore is about a movie which tells us what we know already,  
especially westerners (to think otherwise in a blanket bracketing is  
ignorant) in a way that's cinematically engaging is a victory for the  
makers of the film. So when a film as fresh and well made like this  
shows up in the western world they appreciate in hoards the brilliance  
of the work on display that is so different than the formula films or  
negative toned films that the west tends to make or stories of that  
natures they they seem to tell when you can get the effect from  
stories that are a little more close to reality.



My two cents.
Btw, AR Bhai displays his great knowledge of scripts that he composes  
for by choosing to do SDM or of being able to discern a bad movie from  
a good one when he sees it. From having seen movies with him, I know  
he has a great instinct about films.


Regards,
Matthew Islam

Sent from my iPhone

On 26 Dec 2008, at 11:25, rivjot riv...@yahoo.com wrote:


Very true, it was ordinary for Indian audience, but for western
countries it was never before told experience/story.

me too, loved kid Jamal the most!

There was kinda unplugged version of O Saya at the end of end credits,
loved that as well :D

--- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Gomzy™ gomtesh.upad...@...  
wrote:


 Got to watch Slumdog Millionaire. I was wondering what all the fuss
is about
 :)
 But since we have been used to so much cliche in our movies that we
find a
 heart touching, soul stirring
 movie to be silly.

 But SDM isnt bad.Infact you will love it as the movie unfolds. Go
watch it
 for the excellent performances, the music and for the youngest
Jamal. The
 small kid is so adorable ( especially when he tries to get an
autograph of
 AB ).





Re: [ARR] For an Indian , SDM is ordinary.

2008-12-26 Thread Kalimuthu
Agree with Gomzy here.
Movie is OKAY. I loved Jamal's (Kid artist) performance - oh, you have
mentioned this too. :)


On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Gomzy™ gomtesh.upad...@gmail.com wrote:

   Got to watch Slumdog Millionaire. I was wondering what all the fuss is
 about :)
 But since we have been used to so much cliche in our movies that we find a
 heart touching, soul stirring
 movie to be silly.

 But SDM isnt bad.Infact you will love it as the movie unfolds. Go watch it
 for the excellent performances, the music and for the youngest Jamal. The
 small kid is so adorable ( especially when he tries to get an autograph of
 AB ).


  




-- 
Sent from my very old 386 machine.


Re: [ARR] For an Indian , SDM is ordinary.

2008-12-26 Thread Gomzy™
Like i said, for us Indians, its really an ordinary movie. I know why the
westeners
are raving about it. But we have had such gripping stories told before and I
as an
Indian did not feel and could not connect with the movie at certain points.

Sample this: The two kids speak polished english and hindi with a british
accent.How can
i as an Indian make any connection with that? I hope you get what i tried to
say. My two cents :)

On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Matthew Islam matthewis...@gmail.comwrote:

   I beg to differ on the ordinary bit. What sets it apart is the fact that
 it's a simple story but look at the treatment. What people are raving about
 is the tight script, music, acting and editing. The narrative has such force
 that the entire product over powers your senses. Successful films are ones
 which leaves you with an experience that you remember after you have left
 the theaters. I saw most people I know come out with a smile. Yes, it's not
 an extraordinary story. In todays age it's hard to tell one that we haven't
 heard before but what a beautiful execution of a story we have heard before.
 Our world is a dark one, as such when a character triumphs over such a
 dismal world armed with hope, perseverance, love, charm and faith. It
 displays a kind of tale that's considered extraordinary and your inner human
 nature falls in love with it. My friends in Bangladesh to ones in Mexico
 report unanimously that they haven't connected with a movie from their
 hearts, in a long while, like they have with SDM. The fuss therefore is
 about a movie which tells us what we know already, especially westerners (to
 think otherwise in a blanket bracketing is ignorant) in a way that's
 cinematically engaging is a victory for the makers of the film. So when a
 film as fresh and well made like this shows up in the western world they
 appreciate in hoards the brilliance of the work on display that is so
 different than the formula films or negative toned films that the west tends
 to make or stories of that natures they they seem to tell when you can get
 the effect from stories that are a little more close to reality.


 My two cents.
 Btw, AR Bhai displays his great knowledge of scripts that he composes for
 by choosing to do SDM or of being able to discern a bad movie from a good
 one when he sees it. From having seen movies with him, I know he has a great
 instinct about films.

 Regards,
 Matthew Islam

 Sent from my iPhone

 On 26 Dec 2008, at 11:25, rivjot riv...@yahoo.com wrote:

  Very true, it was ordinary for Indian audience, but for western
 countries it was never before told experience/story.

 me too, loved kid Jamal the most!

 There was kinda unplugged version of O Saya at the end of end credits,
 loved that as well :D

 --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com,
 Gomzy™ gomtesh.upad...@... wrote:
 
  Got to watch Slumdog Millionaire. I was wondering what all the fuss
 is about
  :)
  But since we have been used to so much cliche in our movies that we
 find a
  heart touching, soul stirring
  movie to be silly.
 
  But SDM isnt bad.Infact you will love it as the movie unfolds. Go
 watch it
  for the excellent performances, the music and for the youngest
 Jamal. The
  small kid is so adorable ( especially when he tries to get an
 autograph of
  AB ).
 

   



Re: [ARR] For an Indian , SDM is ordinary.

2008-12-26 Thread Matthew Islam
Hmm. That is a fair point. Hadn't thought of it that way. My friends and I
were so gripped by the film that it didn't cross our mind. Thats pretty
clever. Use some hindi and a lot of english.and  some people would
not notice...like us. Fair point. I get it. I assumed otherwise because
I saw it with a few Bangladeshi's and Indians and they were gripped and we
didn't question this. I hope it does well in India though when it comes out
in January. Its got a LAagan type energy to it that makes me think, it will
do well.

Time will tell...

Matthew

On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Gomzy™ gomtesh.upad...@gmail.com wrote:

   Like i said, for us Indians, its really an ordinary movie. I know why
 the westeners
 are raving about it. But we have had such gripping stories told before and
 I as an
 Indian did not feel and could not connect with the movie at certain points.

 Sample this: The two kids speak polished english and hindi with a british
 accent.How can
 i as an Indian make any connection with that? I hope you get what i tried
 to say. My two cents :)

 On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Matthew Islam matthewis...@gmail.comwrote:

   I beg to differ on the ordinary bit. What sets it apart is the fact
 that it's a simple story but look at the treatment. What people are raving
 about is the tight script, music, acting and editing. The narrative has such
 force that the entire product over powers your senses. Successful films are
 ones which leaves you with an experience that you remember after you have
 left the theaters. I saw most people I know come out with a smile. Yes, it's
 not an extraordinary story. In todays age it's hard to tell one that we
 haven't heard before but what a beautiful execution of a story we have heard
 before.
 Our world is a dark one, as such when a character triumphs over such a
 dismal world armed with hope, perseverance, love, charm and faith. It
 displays a kind of tale that's considered extraordinary and your inner human
 nature falls in love with it. My friends in Bangladesh to ones in Mexico
 report unanimously that they haven't connected with a movie from their
 hearts, in a long while, like they have with SDM. The fuss therefore is
 about a movie which tells us what we know already, especially westerners (to
 think otherwise in a blanket bracketing is ignorant) in a way that's
 cinematically engaging is a victory for the makers of the film. So when a
 film as fresh and well made like this shows up in the western world they
 appreciate in hoards the brilliance of the work on display that is so
 different than the formula films or negative toned films that the west tends
 to make or stories of that natures they they seem to tell when you can get
 the effect from stories that are a little more close to reality.


 My two cents.
 Btw, AR Bhai displays his great knowledge of scripts that he composes for
 by choosing to do SDM or of being able to discern a bad movie from a good
 one when he sees it. From having seen movies with him, I know he has a great
 instinct about films.

 Regards,
 Matthew Islam

 Sent from my iPhone

 On 26 Dec 2008, at 11:25, rivjot riv...@yahoo.com wrote:

  Very true, it was ordinary for Indian audience, but for western
 countries it was never before told experience/story.

 me too, loved kid Jamal the most!

 There was kinda unplugged version of O Saya at the end of end credits,
 loved that as well :D

 --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com,
 Gomzy™ gomtesh.upad...@... wrote:
 
  Got to watch Slumdog Millionaire. I was wondering what all the fuss
 is about
  :)
  But since we have been used to so much cliche in our movies that we
 find a
  heart touching, soul stirring
  movie to be silly.
 
  But SDM isnt bad.Infact you will love it as the movie unfolds. Go
 watch it
  for the excellent performances, the music and for the youngest
 Jamal. The
  small kid is so adorable ( especially when he tries to get an
 autograph of
  AB ).
 


  



Re: [ARR] For an Indian , SDM is ordinary.

2008-12-26 Thread brijesh.anantharam
Guys, moving further, I thought Mumbai was amazingly captured by
Anthony Dod Mantle with 3 different kinds of camera(including a SLR) I
hope ARR and Mantle get the nod for oscar nominations.

About BGM, Rahman has tweaked a lot especially on O saya and Mausam
and escape which actually sounds amazing, different from the
soundtrack on CD. Now I want the rip of DVD version when it gets released


--- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Islam
matthewis...@... wrote:

 Hmm. That is a fair point. Hadn't thought of it that way. My friends
and I
 were so gripped by the film that it didn't cross our mind. Thats pretty
 clever. Use some hindi and a lot of english.and  some people
would
 not notice...like us. Fair point. I get it. I assumed otherwise
because
 I saw it with a few Bangladeshi's and Indians and they were gripped
and we
 didn't question this. I hope it does well in India though when it
comes out
 in January. Its got a LAagan type energy to it that makes me think,
it will
 do well.
 
 Time will tell...
 
 Matthew
 
 On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Gomzy™ gomtesh.upad...@... wrote:
 
Like i said, for us Indians, its really an ordinary movie. I
know why
  the westeners
  are raving about it. But we have had such gripping stories told
before and
  I as an
  Indian did not feel and could not connect with the movie at
certain points.
 
  Sample this: The two kids speak polished english and hindi with a
british
  accent.How can
  i as an Indian make any connection with that? I hope you get what
i tried
  to say. My two cents :)
 
  On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Matthew Islam
matthewis...@...wrote:
 
I beg to differ on the ordinary bit. What sets it apart is the fact
  that it's a simple story but look at the treatment. What people
are raving
  about is the tight script, music, acting and editing. The
narrative has such
  force that the entire product over powers your senses. Successful
films are
  ones which leaves you with an experience that you remember after
you have
  left the theaters. I saw most people I know come out with a
smile. Yes, it's
  not an extraordinary story. In todays age it's hard to tell one
that we
  haven't heard before but what a beautiful execution of a story we
have heard
  before.
  Our world is a dark one, as such when a character triumphs over
such a
  dismal world armed with hope, perseverance, love, charm and faith. It
  displays a kind of tale that's considered extraordinary and your
inner human
  nature falls in love with it. My friends in Bangladesh to ones in
Mexico
  report unanimously that they haven't connected with a movie from
their
  hearts, in a long while, like they have with SDM. The fuss
therefore is
  about a movie which tells us what we know already, especially
westerners (to
  think otherwise in a blanket bracketing is ignorant) in a way that's
  cinematically engaging is a victory for the makers of the film.
So when a
  film as fresh and well made like this shows up in the western
world they
  appreciate in hoards the brilliance of the work on display that is so
  different than the formula films or negative toned films that the
west tends
  to make or stories of that natures they they seem to tell when
you can get
  the effect from stories that are a little more close to reality.
 
 
  My two cents.
  Btw, AR Bhai displays his great knowledge of scripts that he
composes for
  by choosing to do SDM or of being able to discern a bad movie
from a good
  one when he sees it. From having seen movies with him, I know he
has a great
  instinct about films.
 
  Regards,
  Matthew Islam
 
  Sent from my iPhone
 
  On 26 Dec 2008, at 11:25, rivjot riv...@... wrote:
 
   Very true, it was ordinary for Indian audience, but for western
  countries it was never before told experience/story.
 
  me too, loved kid Jamal the most!
 
  There was kinda unplugged version of O Saya at the end of end
credits,
  loved that as well :D
 
  --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com,
  Gomzy™ gomtesh.upadhye@ wrote:
  
   Got to watch Slumdog Millionaire. I was wondering what all the fuss
  is about
   :)
   But since we have been used to so much cliche in our movies that we
  find a
   heart touching, soul stirring
   movie to be silly.
  
   But SDM isnt bad.Infact you will love it as the movie unfolds. Go
  watch it
   for the excellent performances, the music and for the youngest
  Jamal. The
   small kid is so adorable ( especially when he tries to get an
  autograph of
   AB ).
  
 
 
   
 





Re: [ARR] For an Indian , SDM is ordinary.

2008-12-26 Thread vivek

as much as you would want to advertise that you have watched movies 
along with thalaivar, it is a very well known fact that ARR is pretty 
bad in choosing script. We all know ARR in and out. Now, just because 
ARR had chosen to do SDM doesn't make it's script one in a million. I 
think it is a beaten-to-death run-off-the-mill script. Love makes you 
blind you see. 

Frankly, I can tell you, I believe ARR didnot do SDM because he was 
memerised by the script but because it provided new avenues and 
challenges to channel his creative blood and energy.



--- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Islam matthewis...@... 
wrote:

 I beg to differ on the ordinary bit. What sets it apart is the 
fact  
 that it's a simple story but look at the treatment. What people 
are  
 raving about is the tight script, music, acting and editing. The  
 narrative has such force that the entire product over powers your  
 senses. Successful films are ones which leaves you with an 
experience  
 that you remember after you have left the theaters. I saw most 
people  
 I know come out with a smile. Yes, it's not an extraordinary story. 
In  
 todays age it's hard to tell one that we haven't heard before but 
what  
 a beautiful execution of a story we have heard before.
 Our world is a dark one, as such when a character triumphs over 
such a  
 dismal world armed with hope, perseverance, love, charm and faith. 
It  
 displays a kind of tale that's considered extraordinary and your 
inner  
 human nature falls in love with it. My friends in Bangladesh to 
ones  
 in Mexico report unanimously that they haven't connected with a 
movie  
 from their hearts, in a long while, like they have with SDM. The  
 fuss therefore is about a movie which tells us what we know 
already,  
 especially westerners (to think otherwise in a blanket bracketing 
is  
 ignorant) in a way that's cinematically engaging is a victory for 
the  
 makers of the film. So when a film as fresh and well made like 
this  
 shows up in the western world they appreciate in hoards the 
brilliance  
 of the work on display that is so different than the formula films 
or  
 negative toned films that the west tends to make or stories of 
that  
 natures they they seem to tell when you can get the effect from  
 stories that are a little more close to reality.
 
 
 My two cents.
 Btw, AR Bhai displays his great knowledge of scripts that he 
composes  
 for by choosing to do SDM or of being able to discern a bad movie 
from  
 a good one when he sees it. From having seen movies with him, I 
know  
 he has a great instinct about films.
 
 Regards,
 Matthew Islam
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On 26 Dec 2008, at 11:25, rivjot riv...@... wrote:
 
  Very true, it was ordinary for Indian audience, but for western
  countries it was never before told experience/story.
 
  me too, loved kid Jamal the most!
 
  There was kinda unplugged version of O Saya at the end of end 
credits,
  loved that as well :D
 
  --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Gomzy™ 
gomtesh.upadhye@  
  wrote:
  
   Got to watch Slumdog Millionaire. I was wondering what all the 
fuss
  is about
   :)
   But since we have been used to so much cliche in our movies 
that we
  find a
   heart touching, soul stirring
   movie to be silly.
  
   But SDM isnt bad.Infact you will love it as the movie unfolds. 
Go
  watch it
   for the excellent performances, the music and for the youngest
  Jamal. The
   small kid is so adorable ( especially when he tries to get an
  autograph of
   AB ).
  
 
 





Re: [ARR] For an Indian , SDM is ordinary.

2008-12-26 Thread Gomzy™
Please treat seniors with some respect. Now its come to this huh

On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 4:48 AM, vivek iiivivekoberoi...@yahoo.com wrote:


 as much as you would want to advertise that you have watched movies
 along with thalaivar, it is a very well known fact that ARR is pretty
 bad in choosing script. We all know ARR in and out. Now, just because
 ARR had chosen to do SDM doesn't make it's script one in a million. I
 think it is a beaten-to-death run-off-the-mill script. Love makes you
 blind you see.

 Frankly, I can tell you, I believe ARR didnot do SDM because he was
 memerised by the script but because it provided new avenues and
 challenges to channel his creative blood and energy.


 --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com,
 Matthew Islam matthewis...@...
 wrote:
 
  I beg to differ on the ordinary bit. What sets it apart is the
 fact
  that it's a simple story but look at the treatment. What people
 are
  raving about is the tight script, music, acting and editing. The
  narrative has such force that the entire product over powers your
  senses. Successful films are ones which leaves you with an
 experience
  that you remember after you have left the theaters. I saw most
 people
  I know come out with a smile. Yes, it's not an extraordinary story.
 In
  todays age it's hard to tell one that we haven't heard before but
 what
  a beautiful execution of a story we have heard before.
  Our world is a dark one, as such when a character triumphs over
 such a
  dismal world armed with hope, perseverance, love, charm and faith.
 It
  displays a kind of tale that's considered extraordinary and your
 inner
  human nature falls in love with it. My friends in Bangladesh to
 ones
  in Mexico report unanimously that they haven't connected with a
 movie
  from their hearts, in a long while, like they have with SDM. The
  fuss therefore is about a movie which tells us what we know
 already,
  especially westerners (to think otherwise in a blanket bracketing
 is
  ignorant) in a way that's cinematically engaging is a victory for
 the
  makers of the film. So when a film as fresh and well made like
 this
  shows up in the western world they appreciate in hoards the
 brilliance
  of the work on display that is so different than the formula films
 or
  negative toned films that the west tends to make or stories of
 that
  natures they they seem to tell when you can get the effect from
  stories that are a little more close to reality.
 
 
  My two cents.
  Btw, AR Bhai displays his great knowledge of scripts that he
 composes
  for by choosing to do SDM or of being able to discern a bad movie
 from
  a good one when he sees it. From having seen movies with him, I
 know
  he has a great instinct about films.
 
  Regards,
  Matthew Islam
 
  Sent from my iPhone
 
  On 26 Dec 2008, at 11:25, rivjot riv...@... wrote:
 
   Very true, it was ordinary for Indian audience, but for western
   countries it was never before told experience/story.
  
   me too, loved kid Jamal the most!
  
   There was kinda unplugged version of O Saya at the end of end
 credits,
   loved that as well :D
  
   --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com,
 Gomzyâ„¢
 gomtesh.upadhye@
   wrote:
   
Got to watch Slumdog Millionaire. I was wondering what all the
 fuss
   is about
:)
But since we have been used to so much cliche in our movies
 that we
   find a
heart touching, soul stirring
movie to be silly.
   
But SDM isnt bad.Infact you will love it as the movie unfolds.
 Go
   watch it
for the excellent performances, the music and for the youngest
   Jamal. The
small kid is so adorable ( especially when he tries to get an
   autograph of
AB ).
   
  
  
 

  



Re: [ARR] For an Indian , SDM is ordinary.

2008-12-26 Thread Gomzy™
Can you tell me any composer who has been great in choosing scripts?

On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 4:48 AM, vivek iiivivekoberoi...@yahoo.com wrote:


 as much as you would want to advertise that you have watched movies
 along with thalaivar, it is a very well known fact that ARR is pretty
 bad in choosing script. We all know ARR in and out. Now, just because
 ARR had chosen to do SDM doesn't make it's script one in a million. I
 think it is a beaten-to-death run-off-the-mill script. Love makes you
 blind you see.

 Frankly, I can tell you, I believe ARR didnot do SDM because he was
 memerised by the script but because it provided new avenues and
 challenges to channel his creative blood and energy.


 --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com,
 Matthew Islam matthewis...@...
 wrote:
 
  I beg to differ on the ordinary bit. What sets it apart is the
 fact
  that it's a simple story but look at the treatment. What people
 are
  raving about is the tight script, music, acting and editing. The
  narrative has such force that the entire product over powers your
  senses. Successful films are ones which leaves you with an
 experience
  that you remember after you have left the theaters. I saw most
 people
  I know come out with a smile. Yes, it's not an extraordinary story.
 In
  todays age it's hard to tell one that we haven't heard before but
 what
  a beautiful execution of a story we have heard before.
  Our world is a dark one, as such when a character triumphs over
 such a
  dismal world armed with hope, perseverance, love, charm and faith.
 It
  displays a kind of tale that's considered extraordinary and your
 inner
  human nature falls in love with it. My friends in Bangladesh to
 ones
  in Mexico report unanimously that they haven't connected with a
 movie
  from their hearts, in a long while, like they have with SDM. The
  fuss therefore is about a movie which tells us what we know
 already,
  especially westerners (to think otherwise in a blanket bracketing
 is
  ignorant) in a way that's cinematically engaging is a victory for
 the
  makers of the film. So when a film as fresh and well made like
 this
  shows up in the western world they appreciate in hoards the
 brilliance
  of the work on display that is so different than the formula films
 or
  negative toned films that the west tends to make or stories of
 that
  natures they they seem to tell when you can get the effect from
  stories that are a little more close to reality.
 
 
  My two cents.
  Btw, AR Bhai displays his great knowledge of scripts that he
 composes
  for by choosing to do SDM or of being able to discern a bad movie
 from
  a good one when he sees it. From having seen movies with him, I
 know
  he has a great instinct about films.
 
  Regards,
  Matthew Islam
 
  Sent from my iPhone
 
  On 26 Dec 2008, at 11:25, rivjot riv...@... wrote:
 
   Very true, it was ordinary for Indian audience, but for western
   countries it was never before told experience/story.
  
   me too, loved kid Jamal the most!
  
   There was kinda unplugged version of O Saya at the end of end
 credits,
   loved that as well :D
  
   --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com,
 Gomzyâ„¢
 gomtesh.upadhye@
   wrote:
   
Got to watch Slumdog Millionaire. I was wondering what all the
 fuss
   is about
:)
But since we have been used to so much cliche in our movies
 that we
   find a
heart touching, soul stirring
movie to be silly.
   
But SDM isnt bad.Infact you will love it as the movie unfolds.
 Go
   watch it
for the excellent performances, the music and for the youngest
   Jamal. The
small kid is so adorable ( especially when he tries to get an
   autograph of
AB ).
   
  
  
 

  



Re: [ARR] For an Indian , SDM is ordinary.

2008-12-26 Thread V S Rawat
On 12/27/2008 9:33 AM India Time, _Gomzy™_ wrote:

 Can you tell me any composer who has been great in choosing scripts?
 

But, what is the drawback in ARR choosing SDM?

When I had first heard that ARR has done something called SDM, I thought 
it would be another of those Deepa Mehta type of movies that ARR did 
because he doesn't know how to say no, but, see what all publicity, what 
all nomination, what all international focus SDM has got to ARR and to 
India.

So, now I feel that ARR was absolutely correct in doing SDM. No other 
movie has got this much publicity out of India.

-- 
Rawat



Are you searching for a reason, to be kind?
b
Explore, Experience, Enjoy A.R.Rahman - The Man, The Music, The Magic.
Only at arrahmanfans.com - The definitive A.R.Rahman e-community.

Homepage: http://www.arrahmanfans.com
Admin: ad...@arrahmanfans.com
To Subscribe: arrahmanfans-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
To Unsubscribe: arrahmanfans-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.comyahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arrahmanfans/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arrahmanfans/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:arrahmanfans-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:arrahmanfans-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
arrahmanfans-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



[ARR] For an Indian , SDM is ordinary.

2008-12-25 Thread Gomzy™
Got to watch Slumdog Millionaire. I was wondering what all the fuss is about
:)
But since we have been used to so much cliche in our movies that we find a
heart touching, soul stirring
movie to be silly.

But SDM isnt bad.Infact you will love it as the movie unfolds. Go watch it
for the excellent performances, the music and for the youngest Jamal. The
small kid is so adorable ( especially when he tries to get an autograph of
AB ).


Re: [ARR] For an Indian , SDM is ordinary.

2008-12-25 Thread just an another girl
Most of my Indian friends shared shades of the same opinion 

But for me , it was movie back to its basics ... a simple love story with a
happy ending , set in an totally charming , rude , visually stunning city
...

On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Gomzy™ gomtesh.upad...@gmail.com wrote:

   Got to watch Slumdog Millionaire. I was wondering what all the fuss is
 about :)
 But since we have been used to so much cliche in our movies that we find a
 heart touching, soul stirring
 movie to be silly.

 But SDM isnt bad.Infact you will love it as the movie unfolds. Go watch it
 for the excellent performances, the music and for the youngest Jamal. The
 small kid is so adorable ( especially when he tries to get an autograph of
 AB ).


  



Re: [ARR] For an Indian , SDM is ordinary.

2008-12-25 Thread rivjot
Very true, it was ordinary for Indian audience, but for western
countries it was never before told experience/story. 

me too, loved kid Jamal the most!

There was kinda unplugged version of O Saya at the end of end credits,
loved that as well :D

--- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Gomzy™ gomtesh.upad...@... wrote:

 Got to watch Slumdog Millionaire. I was wondering what all the fuss
is about
 :)
 But since we have been used to so much cliche in our movies that we
find a
 heart touching, soul stirring
 movie to be silly.
 
 But SDM isnt bad.Infact you will love it as the movie unfolds. Go
watch it
 for the excellent performances, the music and for the youngest
Jamal. The
 small kid is so adorable ( especially when he tries to get an
autograph of
 AB ).