ADM:timing test please ignore

2014-04-30 Thread Daniel
Just received a bunch at 12:12 and I did nothing to cause it. sigh.

 

1:10pm est


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


ADM:timing test please ignore

2014-03-31 Thread arslist
4:18a.m. EST [yes you can guess I am not in that time zone at the moment]


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years


ADM:Timing Test Please Ignore

2012-07-02 Thread Daniel Bloom
7:21am EST


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are


ADM:Timing Test please ignore

2012-06-17 Thread Daniel Bloom
9:27pm EST


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are


ADM:Timing test please ignore

2012-04-15 Thread Daniel Bloom
6:49am est


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are


ADM:Timing Test please ignore

2011-11-16 Thread Daniel Bloom
8:28pm EST


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are


ADM:Timing Test please ignore

2011-08-24 Thread Daniel Bloom
13:37 EST


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are


ADM:Timing Test please ignore

2011-08-04 Thread Daniel Bloom
2:27p.m. EST


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are


ADM:Timing Test please ignore

2011-06-28 Thread Daniel Bloom
15:00:00 EST


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are


ADM:Timing Test Please Ignore

2011-05-08 Thread Daniel Bloom
9:50a.m. EST

We seem to be stabalizing


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are


ADM:timing test please ignore

2011-02-24 Thread daniel on squirrel
test 8:01a.m.EST


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are


ADM:Timing Test please ignore

2011-01-12 Thread Daniel Bloom
7:01a.m. EST

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are


ADM:Timing Test please ignore

2010-12-26 Thread Daniel Bloom
I think the Server drank too much christmas cheer. 9:34am EST

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are


ADM:Timing Test please ignore

2010-11-06 Thread Daniel Bloom
3:17pm EST

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are


ADM:Timing Test please ignore

2010-09-13 Thread Daniel Bloom
Monday 14:58 EST

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Adm:Timing Test please ignore

2009-12-30 Thread Daniel Bloom
8:12am EST

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Adm:Timing Test please ignore

2009-12-27 Thread Daniel Bloom
9:11pm EST

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


ADM:Timing Test please ignore

2009-11-04 Thread Daniel Bloom
5:40am EST

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


ADM:Timing Test please ignore

2009-10-26 Thread Daniel Bloom
6:34a.m. EST

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


ADM:Timing Test please ignore

2009-10-08 Thread Daniel Bloom
15:37 EST

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


ADM:Timing Test Please Ignore

2009-09-30 Thread Daniel Bloom
3:09pm EST  slow day or a problem?

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


ADM:Timing Test please ignore

2009-09-28 Thread Daniel Bloom
4:50p.m. EST

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


ADM:Timing test Please ignore

2009-08-10 Thread Daniel Bloom
8:12am EST

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


ADM:Timing Test please ignore

2009-08-01 Thread Daniel Bloom
18:43 EST


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


ADM:Timing test please ignore

2007-12-29 Thread Daniel Bloom
12:06pm EST

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore, ITSM7

2007-02-20 Thread Rick Cook
I suppose that quality vs. timeliness is a trade-off of sorts - as Matt's
sig line says Good, Fast, Cheap - pick any two.  Right now, especially
when it comes to patches, I'd be happy with getting two, and at times, one.
 
Rick 
  _  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lucero, Michelle - IST contractor
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 7:05 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore, ITSM7


** 
Hi, Rick:
 
In all fairness and in light of recent patch releases (eh hem DST P20), I
would much rather them take as long as necessary to properly test and QA
this combination before releasing it to the masses.  I'm hoping that it's
not a low priority for them and they're simply trying to get it right this
time.  I'm sure they are aware that their reputation among some of their
customers might be at stake.  
 
On the more obvious point, I believe you're making...
If you've been given an Estimated Time of Release for a product and months
have passed, I would say that they might need to work on setting and meeting
expectations.  I almost wish they would say, sometime in 2007 and be done
with it.
 
I agree with your last point that, BMC sales would try to sell it [ITSM 6]
as an alternative  This is what some companies on their own are
electing to do.  That is installing ARS 7.0 with ITSM 6.0 as a solution.
 
My two cents,
Michelle

  _  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 9:16 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore, ITSM7


** 
As soon as ITSM 6 will work with CMDB 2.0?  That was supposed to happen in
November, then December, then January, and now it's February.  I keep being
told it's in process, but geez, it's been so long since it was promised that
I have to think it's a pretty low priority for them.  I do wish we had the
option of keeping some people on ITSM 6 until their organizations were ready
for ITIL, and that BMC sales would try to sell it as an alternative when it
was the better alternative for a particular customer.
 
Rick 
  _  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Bloom
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 5:52 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore, ITSM7


** 

Robert,

 

Hmm, could it be more difficult than a change to ITSM7?

You know, I could get into a lot of trouble for this.

 

On the one hand, I love the look and feel of ITSM7.

Most certainly it feels more ITIL aligned than ITSM6,

and has some neat stuff in it.

 

On the other, gosh I hate converting people from ITSM6 to it,

and really, waiting for ITSM6 on CMDB2.0 makes a lot of sense for a lot of
people.

 

A number of folks I know and respect have commented on ITSM6 being a very
good option,

and as soon as the upgrade to CMDB2.0 is available I think that answers that
issue.

 

[anybody want a really heated discussion of the field ids in ITSM7? 

Ed, got your breakdown  spreadsheet of how many are outside the prescribed
range done yet?]

 

thanks for the kudos .. Daniel

 

 

  _  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Molenda
Sent: February 19, 2007 8:01 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore

 

Thanks Daniel;

We DO appreciate your efforts :-)

 

Hopefully your upgrade goes better than ITSM7.

 

Oh wait those are in side the head words. darn those just keep leaking out
these days.

 

Thanks-n-advance; 

HDT Platform Incident / Problem Manager  Architect 
Robert Molenda 
IT OS PA 
Tel: +1 408 503 2701 
Fax: +1 408 503 2912 
Mobile: +1 408 472 8097 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Quality begins with your actions.

 

 

__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ __20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML
in it___ __20060125___This posting was submitted with
HTML in it___ __20060125___This posting was submitted
with HTML in it___ __20060125___This posting was
submitted with HTML in it___ __20060125___This posting
was submitted with HTML in it___ 

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:Where the 
Answers Are


Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore

2007-02-19 Thread Robert Molenda
All I know is that on Saturday / Sunday I received my has been
distributed messages for the last week(s) postings / replies...

 

Unfortunately I do not know where the Queuing point was since email is
a non-trusted-delivery-mechanism...

 

Thanks-n-advance; 

HDT Platform Incident / Problem Manager  Architect 
Robert Molenda 
IT OS PA 
Tel: +1 408 503 2701 
Fax: +1 408 503 2912 
Mobile: +1 408 472 8097 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Quality begins with your actions.

 



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 2:07 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore

 

** 

Gmail sometimes decides that random entries from the list are Spam, and
puts them in that folder, which means that if you have it directed at
Outlook, you won't see those entries.  Log into the gmail web interface
to track that. 

 

Rick
 

On 2/16/07, Daniel Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

** 

There was a bunching for around 2 hours today, fixed.

The list other than that has been busy at a usual volume.

I have also heard this week of a group in Australia/NZ that were

not receiving the list, but one of them did.

I have seen people post from gmail so it is not all gmail recipients.

There is definitely a current issue of if you post from the Web
interface it does not get emailed out, 

as mentioned in a previous post by me.

Reports of not receiving the arslist at all,  

over the past decade or so,

off the top of my head stats of course,

I would say 95% have been problems local to the end user 

either due to firewall or ISP issues.

thanks ... Daniel



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Scott
Sent: February 16, 2007 4:38 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG 
Subject: Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore

It seems to be working ok for me.  I notice that I seem to get them in
batches every 10 - 15 minutes, though.  That may just be coincidence,
however. 

Bruce 



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Stoddard
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 2:33 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore

** Am I the only one who is having problems receiving the emails from
the list?  This was the 4th message that I've received today, and
probably the 20th that I've received this week.  I've got two different
accounts signed up, one work and one personal for archive purposes, and
both have become very spotty since about the first of the month. 


Charles

On 2/16/07, Daniel Bloom  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote: 

** 

VIA email, 3:47pm Friday

__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ 


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:Where the 
Answers Are


Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore

2007-02-19 Thread Daniel Bloom
Can't say as I can figure this one out either.

 

13 hours after the reboot all the posts from the web for the last while

suddenly appeared. Why, I don't know ,and quite frankly it isn't worth the
time to figure out.

 

I do know that It looks like time for the next upgrade and hope that fixes
this bug.

 

. Daniel

 

  _  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Molenda
Sent: February 19, 2007 12:32 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore

 

All I know is that on Saturday / Sunday I received my has been distributed
messages for the last week(s) postings / replies.

 

Unfortunately I do not know where the Queuing point was since email is a
non-trusted-delivery-mechanism.

 

Thanks-n-advance; 

HDT Platform Incident / Problem Manager  Architect 
Robert Molenda 
IT OS PA 
Tel: +1 408 503 2701 
Fax: +1 408 503 2912 
Mobile: +1 408 472 8097 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Quality begins with your actions.

 

  _  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 2:07 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore

 

** 

Gmail sometimes decides that random entries from the list are Spam, and puts
them in that folder, which means that if you have it directed at Outlook,
you won't see those entries.  Log into the gmail web interface to track
that. 

 

Rick
 

On 2/16/07, Daniel Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

** 

There was a bunching for around 2 hours today, fixed.

The list other than that has been busy at a usual volume.

I have also heard this week of a group in Australia/NZ that were

not receiving the list, but one of them did.

I have seen people post from gmail so it is not all gmail recipients.

There is definitely a current issue of if you post from the Web interface it
does not get emailed out, 

as mentioned in a previous post by me.

Reports of not receiving the arslist at all,  

over the past decade or so,

off the top of my head stats of course,

I would say 95% have been problems local to the end user 

either due to firewall or ISP issues.

thanks . Daniel

  _  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Scott
Sent: February 16, 2007 4:38 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG  mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG 
Subject: Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore

It seems to be working ok for me.  I notice that I seem to get them in
batches every 10 - 15 minutes, though.  That may just be coincidence,
however. 

Bruce 

  _  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Stoddard
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 2:33 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore

** Am I the only one who is having problems receiving the emails from the
list?  This was the 4th message that I've received today, and probably the
20th that I've received this week.  I've got two different accounts signed
up, one work and one personal for archive purposes, and both have become
very spotty since about the first of the month. 


Charles

On 2/16/07, Daniel Bloom  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote: 

** 

VIA email, 3:47pm Friday

__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ 

__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:Where the 
Answers Are


Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore

2007-02-19 Thread Robert Molenda
Thanks Daniel;

We DO appreciate your efforts :-)

 

Hopefully your upgrade goes better than ITSM7...

 

Oh wait those are in side the head words... darn those just keep
leaking out these days...

 

Thanks-n-advance; 

HDT Platform Incident / Problem Manager  Architect 
Robert Molenda 
IT OS PA 
Tel: +1 408 503 2701 
Fax: +1 408 503 2912 
Mobile: +1 408 472 8097 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Quality begins with your actions.

 



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Bloom
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 11:20 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore

 

Can't say as I can figure this one out either.

 

13 hours after the reboot all the posts from the web for the last while

suddenly appeared. Why, I don't know ,and quite frankly it isn't worth
the time to figure out.

 

I do know that It looks like time for the next upgrade and hope that
fixes this bug.

 

... Daniel

 



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Molenda
Sent: February 19, 2007 12:32 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore

 

All I know is that on Saturday / Sunday I received my has been
distributed messages for the last week(s) postings / replies...

 

Unfortunately I do not know where the Queuing point was since email is
a non-trusted-delivery-mechanism...

 

Thanks-n-advance; 

HDT Platform Incident / Problem Manager  Architect 
Robert Molenda 
IT OS PA 
Tel: +1 408 503 2701 
Fax: +1 408 503 2912 
Mobile: +1 408 472 8097 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Quality begins with your actions.

 



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 2:07 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore

 

** 

Gmail sometimes decides that random entries from the list are Spam, and
puts them in that folder, which means that if you have it directed at
Outlook, you won't see those entries.  Log into the gmail web interface
to track that. 

 

Rick
 

On 2/16/07, Daniel Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

** 

There was a bunching for around 2 hours today, fixed.

The list other than that has been busy at a usual volume.

I have also heard this week of a group in Australia/NZ that were

not receiving the list, but one of them did.

I have seen people post from gmail so it is not all gmail recipients.

There is definitely a current issue of if you post from the Web
interface it does not get emailed out, 

as mentioned in a previous post by me.

Reports of not receiving the arslist at all,  

over the past decade or so,

off the top of my head stats of course,

I would say 95% have been problems local to the end user 

either due to firewall or ISP issues.

thanks ... Daniel



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Scott
Sent: February 16, 2007 4:38 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG 
Subject: Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore

It seems to be working ok for me.  I notice that I seem to get them in
batches every 10 - 15 minutes, though.  That may just be coincidence,
however. 

Bruce 



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Stoddard
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 2:33 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore

** Am I the only one who is having problems receiving the emails from
the list?  This was the 4th message that I've received today, and
probably the 20th that I've received this week.  I've got two different
accounts signed up, one work and one personal for archive purposes, and
both have become very spotty since about the first of the month. 


Charles

On 2/16/07, Daniel Bloom  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote: 

** 

VIA email, 3:47pm Friday

__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ 

__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ __20060125___This posting was submitted with
HTML in it___

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:Where the 
Answers Are


Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore, ITSM7

2007-02-19 Thread Daniel Bloom
Robert,

 

Hmm, could it be more difficult than a change to ITSM7?

You know, I could get into a lot of trouble for this.

 

On the one hand, I love the look and feel of ITSM7.

Most certainly it feels more ITIL aligned than ITSM6,

and has some neat stuff in it.

 

On the other, gosh I hate converting people from ITSM6 to it,

and really, waiting for ITSM6 on CMDB2.0 makes a lot of sense for a lot of
people.

 

A number of folks I know and respect have commented on ITSM6 being a very
good option,

and as soon as the upgrade to CMDB2.0 is available I think that answers that
issue.

 

[anybody want a really heated discussion of the field ids in ITSM7? 

Ed, got your breakdown  spreadsheet of how many are outside the prescribed
range done yet?]

 

thanks for the kudos .. Daniel

 

 

  _  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Molenda
Sent: February 19, 2007 8:01 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore

 

Thanks Daniel;

We DO appreciate your efforts :-)

 

Hopefully your upgrade goes better than ITSM7.

 

Oh wait those are in side the head words. darn those just keep leaking out
these days.

 

Thanks-n-advance; 

HDT Platform Incident / Problem Manager  Architect 
Robert Molenda 
IT OS PA 
Tel: +1 408 503 2701 
Fax: +1 408 503 2912 
Mobile: +1 408 472 8097 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Quality begins with your actions.

 

 

__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ __20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML
in it___ __20060125___This posting was submitted with
HTML in it___

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:Where the 
Answers Are


Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore, ITSM7

2007-02-19 Thread Rick Cook
As soon as ITSM 6 will work with CMDB 2.0?  That was supposed to happen in
November, then December, then January, and now it's February.  I keep being
told it's in process, but geez, it's been so long since it was promised that
I have to think it's a pretty low priority for them.  I do wish we had the
option of keeping some people on ITSM 6 until their organizations were ready
for ITIL, and that BMC sales would try to sell it as an alternative when it
was the better alternative for a particular customer.
 
Rick 
  _  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Bloom
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 5:52 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore, ITSM7


** 

Robert,

 

Hmm, could it be more difficult than a change to ITSM7?

You know, I could get into a lot of trouble for this.

 

On the one hand, I love the look and feel of ITSM7.

Most certainly it feels more ITIL aligned than ITSM6,

and has some neat stuff in it.

 

On the other, gosh I hate converting people from ITSM6 to it,

and really, waiting for ITSM6 on CMDB2.0 makes a lot of sense for a lot of
people.

 

A number of folks I know and respect have commented on ITSM6 being a very
good option,

and as soon as the upgrade to CMDB2.0 is available I think that answers that
issue.

 

[anybody want a really heated discussion of the field ids in ITSM7? 

Ed, got your breakdown  spreadsheet of how many are outside the prescribed
range done yet?]

 

thanks for the kudos .. Daniel

 

 

  _  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Molenda
Sent: February 19, 2007 8:01 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore

 

Thanks Daniel;

We DO appreciate your efforts :-)

 

Hopefully your upgrade goes better than ITSM7.

 

Oh wait those are in side the head words. darn those just keep leaking out
these days.

 

Thanks-n-advance; 

HDT Platform Incident / Problem Manager  Architect 
Robert Molenda 
IT OS PA 
Tel: +1 408 503 2701 
Fax: +1 408 503 2912 
Mobile: +1 408 472 8097 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Quality begins with your actions.

 

 

__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ __20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML
in it___ __20060125___This posting was submitted with
HTML in it___ __20060125___This posting was submitted
with HTML in it___

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:Where the 
Answers Are


Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore

2007-02-16 Thread Charles Stoddard

Am I the only one who is having problems receiving the emails from the
list?  This was the 4th message that I've received today, and probably the
20th that I've received this week.  I've got two different accounts signed
up, one work and one personal for archive purposes, and both have become
very spotty since about the first of the month.


Charles

On 2/16/07, Daniel Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


**

VIA email, 3:47pm Friday
 __20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:Where the Answers 
Are


Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore

2007-02-16 Thread Bruce Scott
It seems to be working ok for me.  I notice that I seem to get them in
batches every 10 - 15 minutes, though.  That may just be coincidence,
however.
 
Bruce
 

  _  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Stoddard
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 2:33 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore


** Am I the only one who is having problems receiving the emails from
the list?  This was the 4th message that I've received today, and
probably the 20th that I've received this week.  I've got two different
accounts signed up, one work and one personal for archive purposes, and
both have become very spotty since about the first of the month. 


Charles


On 2/16/07, Daniel Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

** 

VIA email, 3:47pm Friday

__20060125___This posting was submitted with
HTML in it___ 


__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ 

#
The information contained in this electronic mail message, including 
attachments, if any, is PetSmart confidential information.  It is intended only 
for the use of the person(s) named above.  If the reader of this message is not 
the intended recipient, or has received this message in error, you are hereby 
notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
communication is strictly prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient or 
have received this message in error, please notify the sender via e-mail and 
promptly delete the original message.
#

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:Where the 
Answers Are


Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore

2007-02-16 Thread Daniel Bloom
There was a bunching for around 2 hours today, fixed.

 

The list other than that has been busy at a usual volume.

 

I have also heard this week of a group in Australia/NZ that were

not receiving the list, but one of them did.

 

I have seen people post from gmail so it is not all gmail recipients.

 

There is definitely a current issue of if you post from the Web interface it
does not get emailed out,

as mentioned in a previous post by me.

 

Reports of not receiving the arslist at all,  

over the past decade or so,

off the top of my head stats of course,

I would say 95% have been problems local to the end user 

either due to firewall or ISP issues.

 

thanks . Daniel

 

  _  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Scott
Sent: February 16, 2007 4:38 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore

 

It seems to be working ok for me.  I notice that I seem to get them in
batches every 10 - 15 minutes, though.  That may just be coincidence,
however.

 

Bruce

 

 

  _  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Stoddard
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 2:33 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore

** Am I the only one who is having problems receiving the emails from the
list?  This was the 4th message that I've received today, and probably the
20th that I've received this week.  I've got two different accounts signed
up, one work and one personal for archive purposes, and both have become
very spotty since about the first of the month. 


Charles

On 2/16/07, Daniel Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

** 

VIA email, 3:47pm Friday

__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ 


__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ 

  _  

The information contained in this electronic mail message, including
attachments, if any, is PetSmart confidential information.  It is intended
only for the use of the person(s) named above.  If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, or has received this message in
error, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution
or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you are not the
intended recipient or have received this message in error, please notify the
sender via e-mail and promptly delete the original message.

  _  

__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:Where the 
Answers Are


Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore

2007-02-16 Thread Rick Cook

Gmail sometimes decides that random entries from the list are Spam, and puts
them in that folder, which means that if you have it directed at Outlook,
you won't see those entries.  Log into the gmail web interface to track
that.

Rick

On 2/16/07, Daniel Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


**

There was a bunching for around 2 hours today, fixed.

The list other than that has been busy at a usual volume.

I have also heard this week of a group in Australia/NZ that were

not receiving the list, but one of them did.

I have seen people post from gmail so it is not all gmail recipients.

There is definitely a current issue of if you post from the Web interface
it does not get emailed out,

as mentioned in a previous post by me.

Reports of not receiving the arslist at all,

over the past decade or so,

off the top of my head stats of course,

I would say 95% have been problems local to the end user

either due to firewall or ISP issues.

thanks … Daniel

 --

*From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Bruce Scott
*Sent:* February 16, 2007 4:38 PM
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
*Subject:* Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore

It seems to be working ok for me.  I notice that I seem to get them in
batches every 10 - 15 minutes, though.  That may just be coincidence,
however.

Bruce
 --

*From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Charles Stoddard
*Sent:* Friday, February 16, 2007 2:33 PM
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
*Subject:* Re: ADM:Timing Test, please ignore

** Am I the only one who is having problems receiving the emails from the
list?  This was the 4th message that I've received today, and probably the
20th that I've received this week.  I've got two different accounts signed
up, one work and one personal for archive purposes, and both have become
very spotty since about the first of the month.


Charles

On 2/16/07, *Daniel Bloom* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

**

VIA email, 3:47pm Friday



___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:Where the Answers 
Are


ADM:Timing test, please ignore

2006-12-17 Thread Daniel Bloom
testing


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:Where the 
Answers Are


ADM:timing test please ignore

2006-10-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
weekly test

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org


ADM:timing test, please ignore

2006-08-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
weekly timing test

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org