Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier cache)
So for one of our more complicated forms, I'd probably keep exports down to < 500 objects by exporting active links & filters separately. Maybe that should do it. Thanks, David From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Goodall, Andrew C Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 10:24 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier cache) ** Good point :) Regards, Andrew C. Goodall Software Engineer Development Services ago...@jcpenney.com<mailto:ago...@jcpenney.com> jcpenney 6501 Legacy Drive Plano, TX 75024 jcp.com From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@arslist.org]<mailto:[mailto:arslist@arslist.org]> On Behalf Of Rick Cook Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 9:23 AM To: arslist@arslist.org<mailto:arslist@arslist.org> Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier cache) ** True, Andrew, but it will still be tying up the Admin thread. Rick On Jun 5, 2012 10:21 AM, "Goodall, Andrew C" mailto:ago...@jcp.com>> wrote: Exporting - no, not to my knowledge. Ideally your admin ARS server should not be forward facing to end users anyway. Regards, Andrew C. Goodall Software Engineer Development Services ago...@jcpenney.com<mailto:ago...@jcpenney.com> jcpenney 6501 Legacy Drive Plano, TX 75024 jcp.com<http://jcp.com> -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@arslist.org<mailto:arslist@arslist.org>] On Behalf Of David Durling Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 9:18 AM To: arslist@arslist.org<mailto:arslist@arslist.org> Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier cache) Hi, a follow-up question on this old thread: Would you all consider exporting a def file from a production system something that should be done in a change window? Are there risks or possible performance issues associated with this? Thanks, David Durling University of Georgia ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier cache)
Good point J Regards, Andrew C. Goodall Software Engineer Development Services ago...@jcpenney.com jcpenney 6501 Legacy Drive Plano, TX 75024 jcp.com From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Rick Cook Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 9:23 AM To: arslist@arslist.org Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier cache) ** True, Andrew, but it will still be tying up the Admin thread. Rick On Jun 5, 2012 10:21 AM, "Goodall, Andrew C" wrote: Exporting - no, not to my knowledge. Ideally your admin ARS server should not be forward facing to end users anyway. Regards, Andrew C. Goodall Software Engineer Development Services ago...@jcpenney.com jcpenney 6501 Legacy Drive Plano, TX 75024 jcp.com -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@arslist.org] On Behalf Of David Durling Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 9:18 AM To: arslist@arslist.org Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier cache) Hi, a follow-up question on this old thread: Would you all consider exporting a def file from a production system something that should be done in a change window? Are there risks or possible performance issues associated with this? Thanks, David Durling University of Georgia > -Original Message- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of LJ LongWing > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 1:23 PM > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier > cache) > > I'm not intimately familiar with what adding groups, regardless of the usage > of the group, doesbut it's my understanding that it causes some sort of re- > caching to happen at the server level > > -Original Message- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of David Durling > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 10:57 AM > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier > cache) > > LJ, > > Thanks for your response. How about adding groups that aren't used for > permissions (except dynamically in field 112 or dynamic group fields)? Even > adding a notification group should be considered an off-hours change? > > Thanks, > > David > > David Durling > University of Georgia > > > -Original Message- > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of LJ LongWing > > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 12:54 PM > > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > > Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing > midtier > > cache) > > > > David, > > In general, I have always considered making changes in production to > > be either a scheduled situation, or an emergency thing. Any change > > going to production needs to first be developed in Dev, moved to Test > > via standard procedures, tested in test to ensure the functionality is > > working properlythen moved to Prod in the same manner it was moved > > to Testso this essentially means that you are never using Dev > > Studio in Test/Prod with exception of importing already developed > > stuff. Adding users is standard operating proceduresbut adding > > groups should not be > as > > that causes re-caching of stuff on the server as well...it's almost > analogous to > > doing code changes (but not 100% the same). > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of David Durling > > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 2:58 PM > > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > > Subject: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing > > midtier > > cache) > > > > Joe brought up an issue I already had questions relating to, being: > > what workflow IS okay to change on a production AR server during > > production hours? > > > > For instance, if I have an app on a production box that is being > > tested by users and is not itself "production", am I endangering other > > things on production by making changes to it during production hours? > > (Besides flushing the mid tier cache, that is.) > > > > Or do people have categories of changes - like rewording text in an > > email filter or on a form, or adding an item to a character menu - > > that they > consider > > have an acceptable level of risk to do during normal hours? Or is it > standard > > to just not to
Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier cache)
True, Andrew, but it will still be tying up the Admin thread. Rick On Jun 5, 2012 10:21 AM, "Goodall, Andrew C" wrote: > Exporting - no, not to my knowledge. Ideally your admin ARS server should > not be forward facing to end users anyway. > > Regards, > > Andrew C. Goodall > Software Engineer > Development Services > ago...@jcpenney.com > jcpenney > 6501 Legacy Drive > Plano, TX 75024 > jcp.com > > > -Original Message- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: > arslist@arslist.org] On Behalf Of David Durling > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 9:18 AM > To: arslist@arslist.org > Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing > midtier cache) > > Hi, a follow-up question on this old thread: > > Would you all consider exporting a def file from a production system > something that should be done in a change window? Are there risks or > possible performance issues associated with this? > > Thanks, > > David Durling > University of Georgia > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of LJ LongWing > > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 1:23 PM > > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > > Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing > midtier > > cache) > > > > I'm not intimately familiar with what adding groups, regardless of the > usage > > of the group, doesbut it's my understanding that it causes some sort > of re- > > caching to happen at the server level > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of David Durling > > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 10:57 AM > > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > > Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing > midtier > > cache) > > > > LJ, > > > > Thanks for your response. How about adding groups that aren't used for > > permissions (except dynamically in field 112 or dynamic group fields)? > Even > > adding a notification group should be considered an off-hours change? > > > > Thanks, > > > > David > > > > David Durling > > University of Georgia > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > > > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of LJ LongWing > > > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 12:54 PM > > > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > > > Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing > > midtier > > > cache) > > > > > > David, > > > In general, I have always considered making changes in production to > > > be either a scheduled situation, or an emergency thing. Any change > > > going to production needs to first be developed in Dev, moved to Test > > > via standard procedures, tested in test to ensure the functionality is > > > working properlythen moved to Prod in the same manner it was moved > > > to Testso this essentially means that you are never using Dev > > > Studio in Test/Prod with exception of importing already developed > > > stuff. Adding users is standard operating proceduresbut adding > > > groups should not be > > as > > > that causes re-caching of stuff on the server as well...it's almost > > analogous to > > > doing code changes (but not 100% the same). > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > > > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of David Durling > > > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 2:58 PM > > > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > > > Subject: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing > > > midtier > > > cache) > > > > > > Joe brought up an issue I already had questions relating to, being: > > > what workflow IS okay to change on a production AR server during > > > production hours? > > > > > > For instance, if I have an app on a production box that is being > > > tested by users and is not itself "production", am I endangering other > > > things on production by making changes to it during production hours? > > > (Besides flushing the mid tier cache, that is.) > > > > > > Or do people have categories of changes - like rewording text in an > > > email filter or on a form, or adding an item to a character menu - >
Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier cache)
I think that it is safe to do an export without a change window. You are not actually changing anything and the impact is tiny. That is as long as you are not exporting a huge application. The activity will still take some I/O so the larger the file the more impactful it may be depending up on your system. -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of David Durling Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 9:18 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier cache) Hi, a follow-up question on this old thread: Would you all consider exporting a def file from a production system something that should be done in a change window? Are there risks or possible performance issues associated with this? Thanks, David Durling University of Georgia > -Original Message- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of LJ LongWing > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 1:23 PM > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing > midtier > cache) > > I'm not intimately familiar with what adding groups, regardless of the > usage of the group, doesbut it's my understanding that it causes > some sort of re- caching to happen at the server level > > -Original Message- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of David Durling > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 10:57 AM > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing > midtier > cache) > > LJ, > > Thanks for your response. How about adding groups that aren't used > for permissions (except dynamically in field 112 or dynamic group > fields)? Even adding a notification group should be considered an off-hours > change? > > Thanks, > > David > > David Durling > University of Georgia > > > -Original Message- > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of LJ LongWing > > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 12:54 PM > > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > > Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing > midtier > > cache) > > > > David, > > In general, I have always considered making changes in production to > > be either a scheduled situation, or an emergency thing. Any change > > going to production needs to first be developed in Dev, moved to > > Test via standard procedures, tested in test to ensure the > > functionality is working properlythen moved to Prod in the same > > manner it was moved to Testso this essentially means that you > > are never using Dev Studio in Test/Prod with exception of importing > > already developed stuff. Adding users is standard operating > > proceduresbut adding groups should not be > as > > that causes re-caching of stuff on the server as well...it's almost > analogous to > > doing code changes (but not 100% the same). > > > > -----Original Message- > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of David Durling > > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 2:58 PM > > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > > Subject: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing > > midtier > > cache) > > > > Joe brought up an issue I already had questions relating to, being: > > what workflow IS okay to change on a production AR server during > > production hours? > > > > For instance, if I have an app on a production box that is being > > tested by users and is not itself "production", am I endangering > > other things on production by making changes to it during production hours? > > (Besides flushing the mid tier cache, that is.) > > > > Or do people have categories of changes - like rewording text in an > > email filter or on a form, or adding an item to a character menu - > > that they > consider > > have an acceptable level of risk to do during normal hours? Or is > > it > standard > > to just not touch anything with Developer Studio unless it's an > > emergency > or > > a change window? > > > > Related question: Are updating groups or using the Data Import tool > > (on a reasonable, limited basis) considered normal production procedures? > > > > Thanks for any insights on this, > > > > David > > > > David Durling > > University of Georgia > > >
Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier cache)
Depends on the size of the export and your system. I would say that if it is more than a few forms and its few hundred associated objects, a performance hit could be noticeable. Rick On Jun 5, 2012 10:19 AM, "David Durling" wrote: > Hi, a follow-up question on this old thread: > > Would you all consider exporting a def file from a production system > something that should be done in a change window? Are there risks or > possible performance issues associated with this? > > Thanks, > > David Durling > University of Georgia > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of LJ LongWing > > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 1:23 PM > > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > > Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing > midtier > > cache) > > > > I'm not intimately familiar with what adding groups, regardless of the > usage > > of the group, doesbut it's my understanding that it causes some sort > of re- > > caching to happen at the server level > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of David Durling > > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 10:57 AM > > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > > Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing > midtier > > cache) > > > > LJ, > > > > Thanks for your response. How about adding groups that aren't used for > > permissions (except dynamically in field 112 or dynamic group fields)? > Even > > adding a notification group should be considered an off-hours change? > > > > Thanks, > > > > David > > > > David Durling > > University of Georgia > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > > > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of LJ LongWing > > > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 12:54 PM > > > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > > > Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing > > midtier > > > cache) > > > > > > David, > > > In general, I have always considered making changes in production to > > > be either a scheduled situation, or an emergency thing. Any change > > > going to production needs to first be developed in Dev, moved to Test > > > via standard procedures, tested in test to ensure the functionality is > > > working properlythen moved to Prod in the same manner it was moved > > > to Testso this essentially means that you are never using Dev > > > Studio in Test/Prod with exception of importing already developed > > > stuff. Adding users is standard operating proceduresbut adding > > > groups should not be > > as > > > that causes re-caching of stuff on the server as well...it's almost > > analogous to > > > doing code changes (but not 100% the same). > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > > > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of David Durling > > > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 2:58 PM > > > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > > > Subject: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing > > > midtier > > > cache) > > > > > > Joe brought up an issue I already had questions relating to, being: > > > what workflow IS okay to change on a production AR server during > > > production hours? > > > > > > For instance, if I have an app on a production box that is being > > > tested by users and is not itself "production", am I endangering other > > > things on production by making changes to it during production hours? > > > (Besides flushing the mid tier cache, that is.) > > > > > > Or do people have categories of changes - like rewording text in an > > > email filter or on a form, or adding an item to a character menu - > > > that they > > consider > > > have an acceptable level of risk to do during normal hours? Or is it > > standard > > > to just not touch anything with Developer Studio unless it's an > > > emergency > > or > > > a change window? > > > > > > Related question: Are updating groups or using the Data Import tool > > > (on a reasonable, limited basis) considered normal production > procedures? > > > > > > Thanks for any insig
Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier cache)
Exporting - no, not to my knowledge. Ideally your admin ARS server should not be forward facing to end users anyway. Regards, Andrew C. Goodall Software Engineer Development Services ago...@jcpenney.com jcpenney 6501 Legacy Drive Plano, TX 75024 jcp.com -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@arslist.org] On Behalf Of David Durling Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 9:18 AM To: arslist@arslist.org Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier cache) Hi, a follow-up question on this old thread: Would you all consider exporting a def file from a production system something that should be done in a change window? Are there risks or possible performance issues associated with this? Thanks, David Durling University of Georgia > -Original Message- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of LJ LongWing > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 1:23 PM > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier > cache) > > I'm not intimately familiar with what adding groups, regardless of the usage > of the group, doesbut it's my understanding that it causes some sort of > re- > caching to happen at the server level > > -Original Message- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of David Durling > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 10:57 AM > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier > cache) > > LJ, > > Thanks for your response. How about adding groups that aren't used for > permissions (except dynamically in field 112 or dynamic group fields)? Even > adding a notification group should be considered an off-hours change? > > Thanks, > > David > > David Durling > University of Georgia > > > -Original Message- > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of LJ LongWing > > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 12:54 PM > > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > > Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing > midtier > > cache) > > > > David, > > In general, I have always considered making changes in production to > > be either a scheduled situation, or an emergency thing. Any change > > going to production needs to first be developed in Dev, moved to Test > > via standard procedures, tested in test to ensure the functionality is > > working properlythen moved to Prod in the same manner it was moved > > to Testso this essentially means that you are never using Dev > > Studio in Test/Prod with exception of importing already developed > > stuff. Adding users is standard operating proceduresbut adding > > groups should not be > as > > that causes re-caching of stuff on the server as well...it's almost > analogous to > > doing code changes (but not 100% the same). > > > > -Original Message----- > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of David Durling > > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 2:58 PM > > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > > Subject: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing > > midtier > > cache) > > > > Joe brought up an issue I already had questions relating to, being: > > what workflow IS okay to change on a production AR server during > > production hours? > > > > For instance, if I have an app on a production box that is being > > tested by users and is not itself "production", am I endangering other > > things on production by making changes to it during production hours? > > (Besides flushing the mid tier cache, that is.) > > > > Or do people have categories of changes - like rewording text in an > > email filter or on a form, or adding an item to a character menu - > > that they > consider > > have an acceptable level of risk to do during normal hours? Or is it > standard > > to just not touch anything with Developer Studio unless it's an > > emergency > or > > a change window? > > > > Related question: Are updating groups or using the Data Import tool > > (on a reasonable, limited basis) considered normal production procedures? > > > > Thanks for any insights on this, > > > > David > > > > David Durling > > University of Georgia > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARS
Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier cache)
Hi, a follow-up question on this old thread: Would you all consider exporting a def file from a production system something that should be done in a change window? Are there risks or possible performance issues associated with this? Thanks, David Durling University of Georgia > -Original Message- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of LJ LongWing > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 1:23 PM > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier > cache) > > I'm not intimately familiar with what adding groups, regardless of the usage > of the group, doesbut it's my understanding that it causes some sort of > re- > caching to happen at the server level > > -Original Message- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of David Durling > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 10:57 AM > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier > cache) > > LJ, > > Thanks for your response. How about adding groups that aren't used for > permissions (except dynamically in field 112 or dynamic group fields)? Even > adding a notification group should be considered an off-hours change? > > Thanks, > > David > > David Durling > University of Georgia > > > -Original Message- > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of LJ LongWing > > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 12:54 PM > > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > > Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing > midtier > > cache) > > > > David, > > In general, I have always considered making changes in production to > > be either a scheduled situation, or an emergency thing. Any change > > going to production needs to first be developed in Dev, moved to Test > > via standard procedures, tested in test to ensure the functionality is > > working properlythen moved to Prod in the same manner it was moved > > to Testso this essentially means that you are never using Dev > > Studio in Test/Prod with exception of importing already developed > > stuff. Adding users is standard operating proceduresbut adding > > groups should not be > as > > that causes re-caching of stuff on the server as well...it's almost > analogous to > > doing code changes (but not 100% the same). > > > > -Original Message----- > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of David Durling > > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 2:58 PM > > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > > Subject: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing > > midtier > > cache) > > > > Joe brought up an issue I already had questions relating to, being: > > what workflow IS okay to change on a production AR server during > > production hours? > > > > For instance, if I have an app on a production box that is being > > tested by users and is not itself "production", am I endangering other > > things on production by making changes to it during production hours? > > (Besides flushing the mid tier cache, that is.) > > > > Or do people have categories of changes - like rewording text in an > > email filter or on a form, or adding an item to a character menu - > > that they > consider > > have an acceptable level of risk to do during normal hours? Or is it > standard > > to just not touch anything with Developer Studio unless it's an > > emergency > or > > a change window? > > > > Related question: Are updating groups or using the Data Import tool > > (on a reasonable, limited basis) considered normal production procedures? > > > > Thanks for any insights on this, > > > > David > > > > David Durling > > University of Georgia > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > > > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Joe Martin D'Souza > > > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 4:19 PM > > > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > > > Subject: Re: Effects of flushing midtier cache > > > > > > When would you need to flush cache? The obvious answer is when there > > > is a workflow change on production.. Changes to workflow are done > > > whenever there is need for code change for enhancement or bug fixes.. > > > The general industry practic
Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier cache)
I'm not intimately familiar with what adding groups, regardless of the usage of the group, doesbut it's my understanding that it causes some sort of re-caching to happen at the server level -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of David Durling Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 10:57 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier cache) LJ, Thanks for your response. How about adding groups that aren't used for permissions (except dynamically in field 112 or dynamic group fields)? Even adding a notification group should be considered an off-hours change? Thanks, David David Durling University of Georgia > -Original Message- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of LJ LongWing > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 12:54 PM > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier > cache) > > David, > In general, I have always considered making changes in production to be > either a scheduled situation, or an emergency thing. Any change going to > production needs to first be developed in Dev, moved to Test via standard > procedures, tested in test to ensure the functionality is working > properlythen moved to Prod in the same manner it was moved to > Testso this essentially means that you are never using Dev Studio in > Test/Prod with exception of importing already developed stuff. Adding > users is standard operating proceduresbut adding groups should not be as > that causes re-caching of stuff on the server as well...it's almost analogous to > doing code changes (but not 100% the same). > > -Original Message- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of David Durling > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 2:58 PM > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier > cache) > > Joe brought up an issue I already had questions relating to, being: what > workflow IS okay to change on a production AR server during production > hours? > > For instance, if I have an app on a production box that is being tested by > users and is not itself "production", am I endangering other things on > production by making changes to it during production hours? (Besides > flushing the mid tier cache, that is.) > > Or do people have categories of changes - like rewording text in an email > filter or on a form, or adding an item to a character menu - that they consider > have an acceptable level of risk to do during normal hours? Or is it standard > to just not touch anything with Developer Studio unless it's an emergency or > a change window? > > Related question: Are updating groups or using the Data Import tool (on a > reasonable, limited basis) considered normal production procedures? > > Thanks for any insights on this, > > David > > David Durling > University of Georgia > > > -Original Message- > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Joe Martin D'Souza > > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 4:19 PM > > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > > Subject: Re: Effects of flushing midtier cache > > > > When would you need to flush cache? The obvious answer is when there > > is a workflow change on production.. Changes to workflow are done > > whenever there is need for code change for enhancement or bug fixes.. > > The general industry practice is to manage these changes in a change > > window, where there is a scheduled outage, which is typically > > scheduled on weekends or > the > > least productive hours of an organization. So cache should be flushed > during > > these changes. > > > > That being said, there may be emergency changes that were a result of > > a > part > > or whole system being rendered unusable pending that change. On such > > an event it would be ok to flush your cache after fixing whatever the > > problem/bug/enhancement was. > > > > Yes flushing cache during production hours may cause a brief negative > impact > > on users using the system at the time of the change. > > > > Joe > > > > -Original Message- > > From: David Durling > > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 3:48 PM Newsgroups: > > public.remedy.arsystem.general > > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > > Subject: Effects of flushing midtier cache > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm one of those that has fou
Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier cache)
LJ, Thanks for your response. How about adding groups that aren't used for permissions (except dynamically in field 112 or dynamic group fields)? Even adding a notification group should be considered an off-hours change? Thanks, David David Durling University of Georgia > -Original Message- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of LJ LongWing > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 12:54 PM > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier > cache) > > David, > In general, I have always considered making changes in production to be > either a scheduled situation, or an emergency thing. Any change going to > production needs to first be developed in Dev, moved to Test via standard > procedures, tested in test to ensure the functionality is working > properlythen moved to Prod in the same manner it was moved to > Testso this essentially means that you are never using Dev Studio in > Test/Prod with exception of importing already developed stuff. Adding > users is standard operating proceduresbut adding groups should not be as > that causes re-caching of stuff on the server as well...it's almost analogous > to > doing code changes (but not 100% the same). > > -Original Message- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of David Durling > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 2:58 PM > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier > cache) > > Joe brought up an issue I already had questions relating to, being: what > workflow IS okay to change on a production AR server during production > hours? > > For instance, if I have an app on a production box that is being tested by > users and is not itself "production", am I endangering other things on > production by making changes to it during production hours? (Besides > flushing the mid tier cache, that is.) > > Or do people have categories of changes - like rewording text in an email > filter or on a form, or adding an item to a character menu - that they > consider > have an acceptable level of risk to do during normal hours? Or is it standard > to just not touch anything with Developer Studio unless it's an emergency or > a change window? > > Related question: Are updating groups or using the Data Import tool (on a > reasonable, limited basis) considered normal production procedures? > > Thanks for any insights on this, > > David > > David Durling > University of Georgia > > > -Original Message- > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Joe Martin D'Souza > > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 4:19 PM > > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > > Subject: Re: Effects of flushing midtier cache > > > > When would you need to flush cache? The obvious answer is when there > > is a workflow change on production.. Changes to workflow are done > > whenever there is need for code change for enhancement or bug fixes.. > > The general industry practice is to manage these changes in a change > > window, where there is a scheduled outage, which is typically > > scheduled on weekends or > the > > least productive hours of an organization. So cache should be flushed > during > > these changes. > > > > That being said, there may be emergency changes that were a result of > > a > part > > or whole system being rendered unusable pending that change. On such > > an event it would be ok to flush your cache after fixing whatever the > > problem/bug/enhancement was. > > > > Yes flushing cache during production hours may cause a brief negative > impact > > on users using the system at the time of the change. > > > > Joe > > > > -Original Message- > > From: David Durling > > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 3:48 PM Newsgroups: > > public.remedy.arsystem.general > > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > > Subject: Effects of flushing midtier cache > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm one of those that has found it necessary to use the "flush cache" > button > > in the mid tier config when sometimes certain changes aren't picked up > > at the regular cache check interval. > > > > Do you all consider a flush of the mid tier cache to be unintrusive - > something > > that can be done during production hours? Or is it something that > > should > be > > done off-hours? > >
Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier cache)
David, In general, I have always considered making changes in production to be either a scheduled situation, or an emergency thing. Any change going to production needs to first be developed in Dev, moved to Test via standard procedures, tested in test to ensure the functionality is working properlythen moved to Prod in the same manner it was moved to Testso this essentially means that you are never using Dev Studio in Test/Prod with exception of importing already developed stuff. Adding users is standard operating proceduresbut adding groups should not be as that causes re-caching of stuff on the server as well...it's almost analogous to doing code changes (but not 100% the same). -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of David Durling Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 2:58 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier cache) Joe brought up an issue I already had questions relating to, being: what workflow IS okay to change on a production AR server during production hours? For instance, if I have an app on a production box that is being tested by users and is not itself "production", am I endangering other things on production by making changes to it during production hours? (Besides flushing the mid tier cache, that is.) Or do people have categories of changes - like rewording text in an email filter or on a form, or adding an item to a character menu - that they consider have an acceptable level of risk to do during normal hours? Or is it standard to just not touch anything with Developer Studio unless it's an emergency or a change window? Related question: Are updating groups or using the Data Import tool (on a reasonable, limited basis) considered normal production procedures? Thanks for any insights on this, David David Durling University of Georgia > -Original Message- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Joe Martin D'Souza > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 4:19 PM > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Re: Effects of flushing midtier cache > > When would you need to flush cache? The obvious answer is when there is a > workflow change on production.. Changes to workflow are done whenever > there is need for code change for enhancement or bug fixes.. The general > industry practice is to manage these changes in a change window, where > there is a scheduled outage, which is typically scheduled on weekends or the > least productive hours of an organization. So cache should be flushed during > these changes. > > That being said, there may be emergency changes that were a result of a part > or whole system being rendered unusable pending that change. On such an > event it would be ok to flush your cache after fixing whatever the > problem/bug/enhancement was. > > Yes flushing cache during production hours may cause a brief negative impact > on users using the system at the time of the change. > > Joe > > -Original Message- > From: David Durling > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 3:48 PM Newsgroups: > public.remedy.arsystem.general > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Effects of flushing midtier cache > > Hi, > > I'm one of those that has found it necessary to use the "flush cache" button > in the mid tier config when sometimes certain changes aren't picked up at > the regular cache check interval. > > Do you all consider a flush of the mid tier cache to be unintrusive - something > that can be done during production hours? Or is it something that should be > done off-hours? > > On our server I don't notice performance issues in using it, and in what little > testing I've done, user sessions seem to be uninterrupted. (I'm not sure > about floating users on the web, though - if there's anything to consider > there.) > > I'm on ARS 7.5 patch 007 with mid tier 7.5 patch 007 with apache/tomcat. > > Thanks, > > David > --- David Durling durl...@uga.edu Enterprise IT Services 706-542-0223 University of Georgia ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are" ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier cache)
Thanks, Joe & Chris & Andrew (& others) - Except for the mid-tier flush - which I'm not sure about in all my users' cases, I'm pretty sure my users don't experience outages from these changes in general. We are well under 100 logged-in users at any given time. In addition to performance issues during changes, I was also thinking in terms of what could go wrong. Years ago, for instance, on ARS 4.x, I remember some operation wrecked access to one of our major Remedy forms where a fellow had to go into sqlplus or something and rename a T-table in order to recover the form. And of course a change could be implemented that simply doesn't work properly because of not being tested first. That's the kind of thing I'm most concerned with - something unexpected that actually breaks functionality or disrupts user sessions, not so much things that seem to cause a (in my case small) slowness in performance. I do appreciate the comments on standard practices. Thanks! David > -Original Message- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Joe Martin D'Souza > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 5:20 PM > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier > cache) > > I hit the send button too early.. > > Changes to Filters & Filter Guides, Escalations would not impact the mid-tier > server in any way.. They would however impact the caching of the AR Server > itself.. which could again have an impact on the usability of the AR Server > which the mid tier is connected to... Think of it like a train with two > cars.. if > the first one is moving smoothly but the second hits its brakes, it could > impact the first car too although it has not hit any brakes.. > > Changes to Forms, Active Links, Menus, Active Link Guides, Web Services, > Flashboard objects, adding new Permission Groups or changing their existing > type would impact both the AR Server and the Mid-Tier. (Both cars having > their brakes pressed..) > > Data loads to group form should be avoided if you can. Group caching can > impact both the AR Server and the Mid-Tier as it would need to be cached if > the group added is a permission group. > > So yes it is standard not to promote anything to production from the dev or > test environment to production during production hours. > > Again - the bottom-line is, you are the best judge to know if it would be OK > for your users to face a little outage.. > > -Original Message----- > From: David Durling > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 4:58 PM Newsgroups: > public.remedy.arsystem.general > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier > cache) > > Joe brought up an issue I already had questions relating to, being: what > workflow IS okay to change on a production AR server during production > hours? > > For instance, if I have an app on a production box that is being tested by > users and is not itself "production", am I endangering other things on > production by making changes to it during production hours? (Besides > flushing the mid tier cache, that is.) > > Or do people have categories of changes - like rewording text in an email > filter or on a form, or adding an item to a character menu - that they > consider > have an acceptable level of risk to do during normal hours? Or is it standard > to just not touch anything with Developer Studio unless it's an emergency or > a change window? > > Related question: Are updating groups or using the Data Import tool (on a > reasonable, limited basis) considered normal production procedures? > > Thanks for any insights on this, > > David > > David Durling > University of Georgia > > > -Original Message- > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Joe Martin D'Souza > > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 4:19 PM > > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > > Subject: Re: Effects of flushing midtier cache > > > > When would you need to flush cache? The obvious answer is when there > > is a workflow change on production.. Changes to workflow are done > > whenever there is need for code change for enhancement or bug fixes.. > > The general industry practice is to manage these changes in a change > > window, where there is a scheduled outage, which is typically > > scheduled on weekends or the least productive hours of an > > organization. So cache should be flushed during these changes. > > > > That being said, there may be emergency changes that were a result
Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier cache)
I hit the send button too early.. Changes to Filters & Filter Guides, Escalations would not impact the mid-tier server in any way.. They would however impact the caching of the AR Server itself.. which could again have an impact on the usability of the AR Server which the mid tier is connected to... Think of it like a train with two cars.. if the first one is moving smoothly but the second hits its brakes, it could impact the first car too although it has not hit any brakes.. Changes to Forms, Active Links, Menus, Active Link Guides, Web Services, Flashboard objects, adding new Permission Groups or changing their existing type would impact both the AR Server and the Mid-Tier. (Both cars having their brakes pressed..) Data loads to group form should be avoided if you can. Group caching can impact both the AR Server and the Mid-Tier as it would need to be cached if the group added is a permission group. So yes it is standard not to promote anything to production from the dev or test environment to production during production hours. Again - the bottom-line is, you are the best judge to know if it would be OK for your users to face a little outage.. -Original Message- From: David Durling Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 4:58 PM Newsgroups: public.remedy.arsystem.general To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier cache) Joe brought up an issue I already had questions relating to, being: what workflow IS okay to change on a production AR server during production hours? For instance, if I have an app on a production box that is being tested by users and is not itself "production", am I endangering other things on production by making changes to it during production hours? (Besides flushing the mid tier cache, that is.) Or do people have categories of changes - like rewording text in an email filter or on a form, or adding an item to a character menu - that they consider have an acceptable level of risk to do during normal hours? Or is it standard to just not touch anything with Developer Studio unless it's an emergency or a change window? Related question: Are updating groups or using the Data Import tool (on a reasonable, limited basis) considered normal production procedures? Thanks for any insights on this, David David Durling University of Georgia -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Joe Martin D'Souza Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 4:19 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Effects of flushing midtier cache When would you need to flush cache? The obvious answer is when there is a workflow change on production.. Changes to workflow are done whenever there is need for code change for enhancement or bug fixes.. The general industry practice is to manage these changes in a change window, where there is a scheduled outage, which is typically scheduled on weekends or the least productive hours of an organization. So cache should be flushed during these changes. That being said, there may be emergency changes that were a result of a part or whole system being rendered unusable pending that change. On such an event it would be ok to flush your cache after fixing whatever the problem/bug/enhancement was. Yes flushing cache during production hours may cause a brief negative impact on users using the system at the time of the change. Joe -Original Message- From: David Durling Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 3:48 PM Newsgroups: public.remedy.arsystem.general To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Effects of flushing midtier cache Hi, I'm one of those that has found it necessary to use the "flush cache" button in the mid tier config when sometimes certain changes aren't picked up at the regular cache check interval. Do you all consider a flush of the mid tier cache to be unintrusive - something that can be done during production hours? Or is it something that should be done off-hours? On our server I don't notice performance issues in using it, and in what little testing I've done, user sessions seem to be uninterrupted. (I'm not sure about floating users on the web, though - if there's anything to consider there.) I'm on ARS 7.5 patch 007 with mid tier 7.5 patch 007 with apache/tomcat. Thanks, David --- David Durling durl...@uga.edu Enterprise IT Services 706-542-0223 University of Georgia ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
Re: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier cache)
The short answer is none.. Anything that may cause the server to re-cache its definitions, should not be promoted to the production server during peak hours of usage. But then there you might have other things to consider.. 1) Have portions of the system been rendered unusable as a result of a bug or enhancement request?? Is it preventing majority of the users to not be able to perform business critical functions? 2) Will not performing the change ASAP lead you to a point where you would be saying yes to 1) soon enough so you want to take a preventive action?? 3) How strong really is your user-base? If you have a user base of less than maybe 500, there may not be that much impact. So the impact this action would make is really a combination of various factors which you would be a better judge than any of us here.. But if you can afford it, it’s a change best kept for the least productive hour of the week, and done after informing the users of potential outage during that window so that the few who would be on, would be aware.. Joe -Original Message- From: David Durling Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 4:58 PM Newsgroups: public.remedy.arsystem.general To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier cache) Joe brought up an issue I already had questions relating to, being: what workflow IS okay to change on a production AR server during production hours? For instance, if I have an app on a production box that is being tested by users and is not itself "production", am I endangering other things on production by making changes to it during production hours? (Besides flushing the mid tier cache, that is.) Or do people have categories of changes - like rewording text in an email filter or on a form, or adding an item to a character menu - that they consider have an acceptable level of risk to do during normal hours? Or is it standard to just not touch anything with Developer Studio unless it's an emergency or a change window? Related question: Are updating groups or using the Data Import tool (on a reasonable, limited basis) considered normal production procedures? Thanks for any insights on this, David David Durling University of Georgia -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Joe Martin D'Souza Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 4:19 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Effects of flushing midtier cache When would you need to flush cache? The obvious answer is when there is a workflow change on production.. Changes to workflow are done whenever there is need for code change for enhancement or bug fixes.. The general industry practice is to manage these changes in a change window, where there is a scheduled outage, which is typically scheduled on weekends or the least productive hours of an organization. So cache should be flushed during these changes. That being said, there may be emergency changes that were a result of a part or whole system being rendered unusable pending that change. On such an event it would be ok to flush your cache after fixing whatever the problem/bug/enhancement was. Yes flushing cache during production hours may cause a brief negative impact on users using the system at the time of the change. Joe -Original Message- From: David Durling Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 3:48 PM Newsgroups: public.remedy.arsystem.general To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Effects of flushing midtier cache Hi, I'm one of those that has found it necessary to use the "flush cache" button in the mid tier config when sometimes certain changes aren't picked up at the regular cache check interval. Do you all consider a flush of the mid tier cache to be unintrusive - something that can be done during production hours? Or is it something that should be done off-hours? On our server I don't notice performance issues in using it, and in what little testing I've done, user sessions seem to be uninterrupted. (I'm not sure about floating users on the web, though - if there's anything to consider there.) I'm on ARS 7.5 patch 007 with mid tier 7.5 patch 007 with apache/tomcat. Thanks, David --- David Durling durl...@uga.edu Enterprise IT Services 706-542-0223 University of Georgia ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
Production changes (spin-off of RE: Effects of flushing midtier cache)
Joe brought up an issue I already had questions relating to, being: what workflow IS okay to change on a production AR server during production hours? For instance, if I have an app on a production box that is being tested by users and is not itself "production", am I endangering other things on production by making changes to it during production hours? (Besides flushing the mid tier cache, that is.) Or do people have categories of changes - like rewording text in an email filter or on a form, or adding an item to a character menu - that they consider have an acceptable level of risk to do during normal hours? Or is it standard to just not touch anything with Developer Studio unless it's an emergency or a change window? Related question: Are updating groups or using the Data Import tool (on a reasonable, limited basis) considered normal production procedures? Thanks for any insights on this, David David Durling University of Georgia > -Original Message- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Joe Martin D'Souza > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 4:19 PM > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Re: Effects of flushing midtier cache > > When would you need to flush cache? The obvious answer is when there is a > workflow change on production.. Changes to workflow are done whenever > there is need for code change for enhancement or bug fixes.. The general > industry practice is to manage these changes in a change window, where > there is a scheduled outage, which is typically scheduled on weekends or the > least productive hours of an organization. So cache should be flushed during > these changes. > > That being said, there may be emergency changes that were a result of a part > or whole system being rendered unusable pending that change. On such an > event it would be ok to flush your cache after fixing whatever the > problem/bug/enhancement was. > > Yes flushing cache during production hours may cause a brief negative impact > on users using the system at the time of the change. > > Joe > > -Original Message- > From: David Durling > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 3:48 PM Newsgroups: > public.remedy.arsystem.general > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Effects of flushing midtier cache > > Hi, > > I'm one of those that has found it necessary to use the "flush cache" button > in the mid tier config when sometimes certain changes aren't picked up at > the regular cache check interval. > > Do you all consider a flush of the mid tier cache to be unintrusive - > something > that can be done during production hours? Or is it something that should be > done off-hours? > > On our server I don't notice performance issues in using it, and in what > little > testing I've done, user sessions seem to be uninterrupted. (I'm not sure > about floating users on the web, though - if there's anything to consider > there.) > > I'm on ARS 7.5 patch 007 with mid tier 7.5 patch 007 with apache/tomcat. > > Thanks, > > David > --- David Durling durl...@uga.edu Enterprise IT Services 706-542-0223 University of Georgia ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
