Reported Date in Incident

2014-09-04 Thread Brittain, Mark
HI All,

I find that in most cases the Reported Date is somewhat redundant and thought I 
could make it useful. On our monitoring system, the alert is either released by 
the engineer to create an Incident via the Incident Interface Create web 
service or it auto releases after 10 minutes after the alert becomes critical. 
I need the Critical Date/Time for reports and hate to add new fields if I don't 
need to do so . So I was thinking I could populate the Critical Date/Time into 
the Reported Date field. In testing the date time I sent got overwritten with 
the submit date timing.  I did the test from my desktop so maybe there were 
active links that would not come into play if submitted via a web service.

Is this doable and I'm missing something simple, or is this just a bad idea?

ITSM 7.6.04

Mark

Mark Brittain
Sr. OSD Systems Engineer
ITILv3 Foundation, Continual Service Improvement
NaviSite, Inc. - A Time Warner Cable Company
mbritt...@navisite.com<mailto:mbritt...@navisite.com>
Office: 315.634.9337
Mobile: 315.882.5360
[cid:image001.gif@01CFC86B.0B401A40]



This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable 
proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to 
copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for 
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any 
dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the 
contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be 
unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender 
immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and 
any printout.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"


Re: ITSM 7.6.04 - ARS 7.6.04.03 - Reported Date vs Submitted Date

2012-05-15 Thread patchsk
In the new ITSM, Reported Date gets populated when the agent enters the 
customer information on the incident create screen.
So the difference between Reported Date and Submit Date is really the 
amount of time the agent took to log the ticket.
Other than that we did not see much difference or use between Reported Date 
and Submitted Date.
We have different ways to create tks  like emails creating tks, other app 
integrations creating tkts etc..
For those tkts the Reported Date is blank since customer information is not 
entered manully.
So we have some tkts with Reported Date populated and some tkts Reported 
Date is blank. So it is not very consistent.
At the end for all practical purposes in our organization people are more 
concerned with submitted date than reported date, so we wrote a custom 
filter to set the Reported Date to Submitted Date when ever it is blank.
The out of the box dashboards and analytics reports and some SLAs use 
Reported Date so we decided to use the above procedure.


On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 11:22:57 AM UTC-5, Sanford, Claire wrote:
>
> ** 
>  
> In the old (I miss it so very much) Help Desk 6.0 you could tell the 
> system to “start the clock” on Submit.  I can’t seem to find this setting 
> in the new ITSM.  I have looked in the Incident Rules section and there 
> is no choice there.
>
>  
>
> The problem we are running into is that sometimes a ticket sits open on 
> the submitters desk for 5 or 10 minutes.  If it is a high severity 
> ticket, that 5 or 10 minutes has ticket away on the clock and the assignee 
> may have much less time to respond before it starts down the slippery slope 
> of escalation.
>
>  
>
> Should I create a piece of workflow that sets the Reported Date to the 
> Submitted Date?  We lose something there by doing that.  
>
> * *
>
> ITSM 7.6.04.02
> ARS  7.6.04.03
>
> Mid-Tier 7.6.04.03
>
>  
>
> Claire
>
>
>
>   _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ 


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"


Re: ITSM 7.6.04 - ARS 7.6.04.03 - Reported Date vs Submitted Date

2012-05-15 Thread Sanford, Claire
In the old (I miss it so very much) Help Desk 6.0 you could tell the system to 
"start the clock" on Submit.  I can't seem to find this setting in the new 
ITSM.  I have looked in the Incident Rules section and there is no choice there.

The problem we are running into is that sometimes a ticket sits open on the 
submitters desk for 5 or 10 minutes.  If it is a high severity ticket, that 5 
or 10 minutes has ticket away on the clock and the assignee may have much less 
time to respond before it starts down the slippery slope of escalation.

Should I create a piece of workflow that sets the Reported Date to the 
Submitted Date?  We lose something there by doing that.

ITSM 7.6.04.02
ARS  7.6.04.03
Mid-Tier 7.6.04.03

Claire



___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"


Changeable Reported Date Rule

2011-06-10 Thread Danaceau, Chris (CONTR)
And responded and resolution date.  From what I can tell the settings haven't 
changed the access these fields.   As an Incident Master I can change Responded 
Date and Last Resolved Date, but not Reported Date.  As a regular user I can 
only change Last Resolved Date.   Changing the Incident rules seems to have no 
effect on this access.



ITSM 7.1, patch 7.


-- 
Chris Danaceau
301-903-8741
Contractor to the Department Of Energy

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"


Re: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit date

2011-05-31 Thread Ramey, Anne
This is actually a setting you can change in the SLM set up.

Anne Ramey

***
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North 
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties only by an 
authorized State Official.

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Kailashnath A J
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2011 9:46 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit date

**

Reported Date -- the date and time at which the incident request was reported.

Submit Date -- automatically set to the date and time at which the incident 
request was registered/submitted.

The logic of calculating the response SLA counts the submitted date.


Thanks & Regards,
Kailashnath A J

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed)
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2011 3:34 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit date

**
Hi there,
Version 7.1
What is the difference between Reported date and Submit date in Incident 
Management and the clock for service targets starts from Reported Date or 
Submitted Date.



Thanks & Regards

Amanullah



DISCLAIMER:"This e-mail message including any of its attachments is intended 
solely for the addressee(s) and may contain privileged information. If you are 
not the addressee or you have received this email message in error, please 
notify the sender who will remove your details from its database. You are not 
authorized to read, copy, disseminate, distribute or use this e-mail message or 
any attachment to it in any manner and must delete the email and destroy any 
hard copies of it. This e-mail message does not contain financial instructions 
or commitments of any kind. Any views expressed in this message are those of 
the individual sender and do not necessarily reflect the views of Emirates NBD 
PJSC, or any other related subsidiaries, entities or persons."
_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary.

The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to 
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may 
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and 
any attachments.

WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should 
check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company 
accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this 
email.

www.wipro.com
_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"


Re: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit date

2011-05-30 Thread IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed)
Hi Moe
Thanks a lot. I have got the answer of my query.


Thanks & Regards

Amanullah

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Gmail
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 8:19 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit date

**
This is not customization. It's configuration. The system allows you to do 
that. From the SLM Data Source configuration setting, select HPD:Help Desk from 
the configure Service Target Data Source, then from the Start Time for 
Request-Based SVTs drop down, select "Reported Date+". You don't need to do 
anything other than that. All Service targets will be calculated based on 
Reported date+ going forward.

-Moe

From: Kailashnath A J [mailto:kailashnath.jeya...@wipro.com]
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 4:21 AM
Subject: Re: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit date

**
The time calculation of response SLA and resolution SLA counts on Submit Date 
only. This is a System-generated field that contains the date Incident was 
created. It might be customized in your application to count with Reported 
date, if I am not wrong.

In SLM Data source configuration settings under Request based tab we have to 
select the option as "Assignment Date" from Start time for Request base SVT's 
drop down field.
Also while creating the service target under Goal and Cost tab we have to 
select the option "Use start time defined as Application form", then as per the 
Submit Date SLA calculation will be counted.


Thanks & Regards,
Kailashnath A J

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed)
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 8:49 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit date

**
I raised an incident, Reported date:  25/5/2011 3:31:56 PM, Submit date:  
25/5/2011 3:39:31 PM
The calculation of response SLA counts the Reported date not submit date. Can 
anybody tell that SLA calculates value on bases of Reported date or submit date.

Thanks & Regards

Amanullah
IT Enterprise Applications
Group Applications
Emirates NBD, Al-Barsha Office Mezz floor
Dubai, UAE
Desk: +971 4 3726602
Mobile: +971 50 2182455

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Gmail
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 9:02 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit date

**
We use the reported date in my organization. In most cases, there's no 
difference in time between submit date and reported date.

From: Kailashnath A J [mailto:kailashnath.jeya...@wipro.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2011 9:46 AM
Subject: Re: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit date

**

Reported Date -- the date and time at which the incident request was reported.

Submit Date -- automatically set to the date and time at which the incident 
request was registered/submitted.

The logic of calculating the response SLA counts the submitted date.


Thanks & Regards,
Kailashnath A J

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed)
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2011 3:34 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit date

**
Hi there,
Version 7.1
What is the difference between Reported date and Submit date in Incident 
Management and the clock for service targets starts from Reported Date or 
Submitted Date.



Thanks & Regards

Amanullah



DISCLAIMER:"This e-mail message including any of its attachments is intended 
solely for the addressee(s) and may contain privileged information. If you are 
not the addressee or you have received this email message in error, please 
notify the sender who will remove your details from its database. You are not 
authorized to read, copy, disseminate, distribute or use this e-mail message or 
any attachment to it in any manner and must delete the email and destroy any 
hard copies of it. This e-mail message does not contain financial instructions 
or commitments of any kind. Any views expressed in this message are those of 
the individual sender and do not necessarily reflect the views of Emirates NBD 
PJSC, or any other related subsidiaries, entities or persons."
_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary.

The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to 
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may 
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message an

Re: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit date

2011-05-30 Thread Gmail
This is not customization. It's configuration. The system allows you to do
that. From the SLM Data Source configuration setting, select HPD:Help Desk
from the configure Service Target Data Source, then from the Start Time for
Request-Based SVTs drop down, select "Reported Date+". You don't need to do
anything other than that. All Service targets will be calculated based on
Reported date+ going forward. 

 

-Moe

 

From: Kailashnath A J [mailto:kailashnath.jeya...@wipro.com] 
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 4:21 AM
Subject: Re: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit date

 

** 

The time calculation of response SLA and resolution SLA counts on Submit
Date only. This is a System-generated field that contains the date Incident
was created. It might be customized in your application to count with
Reported date, if I am not wrong.

 

In SLM Data source configuration settings under Request based tab we have to
select the option as "Assignment Date" from Start time for Request base
SVT's drop down field.

Also while creating the service target under Goal and Cost tab we have to
select the option "Use start time defined as Application form", then as per
the Submit Date SLA calculation will be counted.

 

 

Thanks & Regards,

Kailashnath A J

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed)
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 8:49 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit date

 

** 

I raised an incident, Reported date:  25/5/2011 3:31:56 PM, Submit date:
25/5/2011 3:39:31 PM

The calculation of response SLA counts the Reported date not submit date.
Can anybody tell that SLA calculates value on bases of Reported date or
submit date.

 

Thanks & Regards

 

Amanullah

IT Enterprise Applications

Group Applications

Emirates NBD, Al-Barsha Office Mezz floor

Dubai, UAE

Desk: +971 4 3726602

Mobile: +971 50 2182455

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Gmail
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 9:02 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit date

 

** 

We use the reported date in my organization. In most cases, there's no
difference in time between submit date and reported date. 

 

From: Kailashnath A J [mailto:kailashnath.jeya...@wipro.com] 
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2011 9:46 AM
Subject: Re: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit date

 

** 

Reported Date -- the date and time at which the incident request was
reported.

Submit Date -- automatically set to the date and time at which the incident
request was registered/submitted.

The logic of calculating the response SLA counts the submitted date.

 

 

Thanks & Regards,

Kailashnath A J

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed)
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2011 3:34 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit date

 

** 

Hi there,

Version 7.1

What is the difference between Reported date and Submit date in Incident
Management and the clock for service targets starts from Reported Date or
Submitted Date.

 

 

 

Thanks & Regards

 

Amanullah

 



DISCLAIMER:"This e-mail message including any of its attachments is intended
solely for the addressee(s) and may contain privileged information. If you
are not the addressee or you have received this email message in error,
please notify the sender who will remove your details from its database. You
are not authorized to read, copy, disseminate, distribute or use this e-mail
message or any attachment to it in any manner and must delete the email and
destroy any hard copies of it. This e-mail message does not contain
financial instructions or commitments of any kind. Any views expressed in
this message are those of the individual sender and do not necessarily
reflect the views of Emirates NBD PJSC, or any other related subsidiaries,
entities or persons." 

_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ 

Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. 

The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not
the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this
e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this
message and any attachments. 

WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should
check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The
company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted
by this email. 

www.wipro.com 

Re: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit date

2011-05-30 Thread Kailashnath A J
The time calculation of response SLA and resolution SLA counts on Submit
Date only. This is a System-generated field that contains the date
Incident was created. It might be customized in your application to
count with Reported date, if I am not wrong.



In SLM Data source configuration settings under Request based tab we
have to select the option as "Assignment Date" from Start time for
Request base SVT's drop down field.

Also while creating the service target under Goal and Cost tab we have
to select the option "Use start time defined as Application form", then
as per the Submit Date SLA calculation will be counted.





Thanks & Regards,

Kailashnath A J



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed)
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 8:49 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit
date



**

I raised an incident, Reported date:  25/5/2011 3:31:56 PM, Submit date:
25/5/2011 3:39:31 PM

The calculation of response SLA counts the Reported date not submit
date. Can anybody tell that SLA calculates value on bases of Reported
date or submit date.



Thanks & Regards



Amanullah

IT Enterprise Applications

Group Applications

Emirates NBD, Al-Barsha Office Mezz floor

Dubai, UAE

Desk: +971 4 3726602

Mobile: +971 50 2182455



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Gmail
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 9:02 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit
date



**

We use the reported date in my organization. In most cases, there's no
difference in time between submit date and reported date.



From: Kailashnath A J [mailto:kailashnath.jeya...@wipro.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2011 9:46 AM
Subject: Re: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit
date



**

Reported Date -- the date and time at which the incident request was
reported.

Submit Date -- automatically set to the date and time at which the
incident request was registered/submitted.

The logic of calculating the response SLA counts the submitted date.





Thanks & Regards,

Kailashnath A J



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed)
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2011 3:34 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit date



**

Hi there,

Version 7.1

What is the difference between Reported date and Submit date in Incident
Management and the clock for service targets starts from Reported Date
or Submitted Date.







Thanks & Regards



Amanullah





DISCLAIMER:"This e-mail message including any of its attachments is
intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain privileged
information. If you are not the addressee or you have received this
email message in error, please notify the sender who will remove your
details from its database. You are not authorized to read, copy,
disseminate, distribute or use this e-mail message or any attachment to
it in any manner and must delete the email and destroy any hard copies
of it. This e-mail message does not contain financial instructions or
commitments of any kind. Any views expressed in this message are those
of the individual sender and do not necessarily reflect the views of
Emirates NBD PJSC, or any other related subsidiaries, entities or
persons."

_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary.

The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments
to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s)
and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate,
distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and
destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.

WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient
should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses.
The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus
transmitted by this email.

www.wipro.com

_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_



Click here
<https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/pcTyBZdARofTndxI!oX7UpuxbmA1KaZkpShC+tlG
hooGFLF2HoJUMn6EhwSzBCjYN2m5q7dK97mh35PDdlVduQ==>  to report this email
as spam.

_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_


Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. 

The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to 
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may 
contain proprietary, conf

Re: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit date

2011-05-29 Thread IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed)
I raised an incident, Reported date:  25/5/2011 3:31:56 PM, Submit date:  
25/5/2011 3:39:31 PM
The calculation of response SLA counts the Reported date not submit date. Can 
anybody tell that SLA calculates value on bases of Reported date or submit date.

Thanks & Regards

Amanullah
IT Enterprise Applications
Group Applications
Emirates NBD, Al-Barsha Office Mezz floor
Dubai, UAE
Desk: +971 4 3726602
Mobile: +971 50 2182455

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Gmail
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 9:02 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit date

**
We use the reported date in my organization. In most cases, there's no 
difference in time between submit date and reported date.

From: Kailashnath A J [mailto:kailashnath.jeya...@wipro.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2011 9:46 AM
Subject: Re: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit date

**

Reported Date -- the date and time at which the incident request was reported.

Submit Date -- automatically set to the date and time at which the incident 
request was registered/submitted.

The logic of calculating the response SLA counts the submitted date.


Thanks & Regards,
Kailashnath A J

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed)
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2011 3:34 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit date

**
Hi there,
Version 7.1
What is the difference between Reported date and Submit date in Incident 
Management and the clock for service targets starts from Reported Date or 
Submitted Date.



Thanks & Regards

Amanullah



DISCLAIMER:"This e-mail message including any of its attachments is intended 
solely for the addressee(s) and may contain privileged information. If you are 
not the addressee or you have received this email message in error, please 
notify the sender who will remove your details from its database. You are not 
authorized to read, copy, disseminate, distribute or use this e-mail message or 
any attachment to it in any manner and must delete the email and destroy any 
hard copies of it. This e-mail message does not contain financial instructions 
or commitments of any kind. Any views expressed in this message are those of 
the individual sender and do not necessarily reflect the views of Emirates NBD 
PJSC, or any other related subsidiaries, entities or persons."
_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary.

The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to 
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may 
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and 
any attachments.

WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should 
check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company 
accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this 
email.

www.wipro.com
_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_


Click 
here<https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/pcTyBZdARofTndxI!oX7UpuxbmA1KaZkpShC+tlGhooGFLF2HoJUMn6EhwSzBCjYN2m5q7dK97mh35PDdlVduQ==>
 to report this email as spam.
_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"


Re: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit date

2011-05-29 Thread Gmail
We use the reported date in my organization. In most cases, there's no
difference in time between submit date and reported date. 

 

From: Kailashnath A J [mailto:kailashnath.jeya...@wipro.com] 
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2011 9:46 AM
Subject: Re: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit date

 

** 

Reported Date -- the date and time at which the incident request was
reported.

Submit Date -- automatically set to the date and time at which the incident
request was registered/submitted.

The logic of calculating the response SLA counts the submitted date.

 

 

Thanks & Regards,

Kailashnath A J

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed)
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2011 3:34 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit date

 

** 

Hi there,

Version 7.1

What is the difference between Reported date and Submit date in Incident
Management and the clock for service targets starts from Reported Date or
Submitted Date.

 

 

 

Thanks & Regards

 

Amanullah

 



DISCLAIMER:"This e-mail message including any of its attachments is intended
solely for the addressee(s) and may contain privileged information. If you
are not the addressee or you have received this email message in error,
please notify the sender who will remove your details from its database. You
are not authorized to read, copy, disseminate, distribute or use this e-mail
message or any attachment to it in any manner and must delete the email and
destroy any hard copies of it. This e-mail message does not contain
financial instructions or commitments of any kind. Any views expressed in
this message are those of the individual sender and do not necessarily
reflect the views of Emirates NBD PJSC, or any other related subsidiaries,
entities or persons." 

_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ 

Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. 

The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not
the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this
e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this
message and any attachments. 

WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should
check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The
company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted
by this email. 

www.wipro.com 

_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"


Re: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit date

2011-05-29 Thread Kailashnath A J
Reported Date -- the date and time at which the incident request was
reported.

Submit Date -- automatically set to the date and time at which the
incident request was registered/submitted.

The logic of calculating the response SLA counts the submitted date.





Thanks & Regards,

Kailashnath A J



From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed)
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2011 3:34 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit date



**

Hi there,

Version 7.1

What is the difference between Reported date and Submit date in Incident
Management and the clock for service targets starts from Reported Date
or Submitted Date.







Thanks & Regards



Amanullah





DISCLAIMER:"This e-mail message including any of its attachments is
intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain privileged
information. If you are not the addressee or you have received this
email message in error, please notify the sender who will remove your
details from its database. You are not authorized to read, copy,
disseminate, distribute or use this e-mail message or any attachment to
it in any manner and must delete the email and destroy any hard copies
of it. This e-mail message does not contain financial instructions or
commitments of any kind. Any views expressed in this message are those
of the individual sender and do not necessarily reflect the views of
Emirates NBD PJSC, or any other related subsidiaries, entities or
persons."

_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_


Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. 

The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to 
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may 
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and 
any attachments. 

WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should 
check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company 
accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this 
email. 

www.wipro.com

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"


Service target time starts from Reported date or Submit date

2011-05-29 Thread IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed)
Hi there,
Version 7.1
What is the difference between Reported date and Submit date in Incident 
Management and the clock for service targets starts from Reported Date or 
Submitted Date.



Thanks & Regards

Amanullah



DISCLAIMER:
"This e-mail message including any of its attachments is intended solely for 
the addressee(s) and may contain privileged information. If you are not the 
addressee or you have received this email message in error, please notify the 
sender who will remove your details from its database. You are not authorized 
to read, copy, disseminate, distribute or use this e-mail message or any 
attachment to it in any manner and must delete the email and destroy any hard 
copies of it. 
This e-mail message does not contain financial instructions or commitments of 
any kind. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual 
sender and do not necessarily reflect the views of Emirates NBD PJSC, or any 
other related subsidiaries, entities or persons."

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"


Re: Missing Reported Date in Incident

2010-01-14 Thread Lyle Taylor
By default, the Reported Date is simply the date/time that the ticket was 
submitted (the Submit Date) and gets set when an Incident is submitted.  Have 
you customized any of the workflow around ticket submission, or are these 
tickets getting created in some way other than via the GUI (e.g., are they 
automated tickets, or were they manually entered in by support personnel on the 
Help Desk form, etc.)?

Lyle

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Ex Soundgarden
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 11:16 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Missing Reported Date in Incident

**
Hi All,

HAving an issue where the Reported Date from the INcident form doesn't contain 
any values. Any idea why is this happening? And also, does BMC have docos for 
Reported Date field?

Thanks!
gabud


_Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_


 NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) 
and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized 
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all 
copies of the original message.



___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"


Missing Reported Date in Incident

2010-01-13 Thread Ex Soundgarden
Hi All,

HAving an issue where the Reported Date from the INcident form doesn't contain 
any values. Any idea why is this happening? And also, does BMC have docos for 
Reported Date field?

Thanks!
gabud




___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
  

Re: Reported date

2009-10-19 Thread ARSmarts Support

Hi,

In order to see the whole list of filters or active links or  
escalations that set the Reported Date or the z1D Ticket Start Time,  
you should have a look at ARSmarts, which will give you all XRefs to  
those fields.


Best regards,
Jean-Louis Halleux
www.arsmarts.com


On 19 Oct 2009, at 20:34, Ramey, Anne wrote:

It doesn't appear to be that way in ITSM 7.x...The only filter that  
sets it that I can find is HPD:INC:SetReportedDate_010, which sets  
it if ('Reported Date' = $NULL$) OR (('Reported Date' != $NULL$) AND  
('Reported Date' > 'z1D Ticket Start Time')).  Then it sets it to  
'z1D Ticket Start Time'...but I can't find a filter or escalation  
that sets 'z1D Ticket Start Time'.


Anne Ramey

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG 
] On Behalf Of Charles Baldi

Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 4:00 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Reported date

I think that ReportedDate has workflow that sets it based on Reported
Source. I don't know if that gets called via the interface create form
or not but it is a place to look.

Regards,
Chuck Baldi

On 10/16/09, Ramey, Anne  wrote:
I'm seeing an issue where sometimes, when a ticket is created  
through the
HPD:IncidentInterface_Create, the Reported Date is not getting  
set.  It's
not on every ticket created this way, just some of them.  Has  
anyone else

seen this?

Anne Ramey




E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to  
the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties  
by an

authorized state official.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the  
Answers Are"




--
Sent from my mobile device

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the  
Answers Are"


E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the  
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third  
parties by an authorized state official.


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the  
Answers Are"


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"


Re: Reported date

2009-10-19 Thread Ramey, Anne
It doesn't appear to be that way in ITSM 7.x...The only filter that sets it 
that I can find is HPD:INC:SetReportedDate_010, which sets it if ('Reported 
Date' = $NULL$) OR (('Reported Date' != $NULL$) AND ('Reported Date' > 'z1D 
Ticket Start Time')).  Then it sets it to 'z1D Ticket Start Time'...but I can't 
find a filter or escalation that sets 'z1D Ticket Start Time'.

Anne Ramey

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Charles Baldi
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 4:00 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Reported date

I think that ReportedDate has workflow that sets it based on Reported
Source. I don't know if that gets called via the interface create form
or not but it is a place to look.

Regards,
Chuck Baldi

On 10/16/09, Ramey, Anne  wrote:
> I'm seeing an issue where sometimes, when a ticket is created through the
> HPD:IncidentInterface_Create, the Reported Date is not getting set.  It's
> not on every ticket created this way, just some of them.  Has anyone else
> seen this?
>
> Anne Ramey
>
>
>
> 
> E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
> Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an
> authorized state official.
>
> ___
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
>

--
Sent from my mobile device

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North 
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an 
authorized state official.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"


Re: Reported date

2009-10-16 Thread Charles Baldi
I think that ReportedDate has workflow that sets it based on Reported
Source. I don't know if that gets called via the interface create form
or not but it is a place to look.

Regards,
Chuck Baldi

On 10/16/09, Ramey, Anne  wrote:
> I'm seeing an issue where sometimes, when a ticket is created through the
> HPD:IncidentInterface_Create, the Reported Date is not getting set.  It's
> not on every ticket created this way, just some of them.  Has anyone else
> seen this?
>
> Anne Ramey
>
>
>
> 
> E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
> Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an
> authorized state official.
>
> ___
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile device

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"


Reported date

2009-10-16 Thread Ramey, Anne
I'm seeing an issue where sometimes, when a ticket is created through the 
HPD:IncidentInterface_Create, the Reported Date is not getting set.  It's not 
on every ticket created this way, just some of them.  Has anyone else seen this?

Anne Ramey




E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North 
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an 
authorized state official.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"


Re: Reported Date is greater than Submitted Date

2009-01-12 Thread Joe DeSouza
Manoj,

Thats possibly the way the time is captured - one Reported date could be a 
custom field that is set using an Active link so is the Client time, while 
Submitted date could be the system field (ID 3) so is set from the server. Or 
even if it is a custom field you must be setting it from a Filter.

If you do not have a time server on your network that doesn't keep time on the 
clients and servers in sync, do not be too surprised seeing a decrepancy in the 
time between what an AL captures from a Filter..

Cheers

Joe





From: manoj jain 
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 11:27:18 AM
Subject: Reported Date is greater than Submitted Date

** 
Hi All,


Usally Reported Date should be less than Submitted Date but in my case for some 
tickets Reported Date is greater than Submitted Date that's why i am getting 
negative value for time and its giving error.

So if you have any suggession regarding this please mail me.

Thanks & Regards,
Manoj Jain




___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: RMI Solutions ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reported Date is greater than Submitted Date

2009-01-12 Thread manoj jain
Hi All,


Usally Reported Date should be less than Submitted Date but in my case for
some tickets Reported Date is greater than Submitted Date that's why i am
getting negative value for time and its giving error.

So if you have any suggession regarding this please mail me.

Thanks & Regards,
Manoj Jain

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: RMI Solutions ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"


Re: Null Reported Date ARS7

2008-08-19 Thread Tony Worthington
I'm with ya.  I looked and looked at log files for that field until I was 
blue in the face.  Couldn't figure out what the heck was happening.  (I 
was trying to use the field on the Date/Time tab in a notification -- it 
was always null.)  :-D


-- 
Tony Worthington
Sr. Technical Analyst
Kohl's Department Stores
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
262-703-5911



Carey Matthew Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: "Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)" 

08/19/2008 09:56 AM
Please respond to
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG


To
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
cc

Subject
Re: Null Reported Date ARS7






Tony,

Thanks for the followup and clarification.

As a general design practice I despise showing the same data in more
than one place on a form. And in this specific case
Where would I put the field that actually holds the data?
  On the 'Classification' tab or on the 'Date/System' tab? Hum... let me 
see...

I stopped looking after I found the field on the 'Date/System' field.
It just did not occur to me that it might be in a field on that form
somewhere else. I was guessing that it might be on some other form
somewhere. Not that that idea makes any more sense to me. And given
that my sync DB has not been synced I did not feel like digging
through the 1152 Active links on the form to see if I could find where
the data was coming from or going to.

Again, thanks for the pointer to the real field/field ID.

-- 
Carey Matthew Black
Remedy Skilled Professional (RSP)
ARS = Action Request System(Remedy)

Love, then teach
Solution = People + Process + Tools
Fast, Accurate, Cheap Pick two.


On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Tony Worthington
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> **
> There are two Reported Date fields on HPD:Help Desk.
>
> One is on the  Date/System tab (a d/o field) -- 100719 z1D Reported 
Date
>
> The "real" db field is actually on the Classification tab -- 100560
> Reported Date.
>
> --
> Tony Worthington
> Sr. Technical Analyst
> Kohl's Department Stores
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 262-703-5911
>
>
> Carey Matthew Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent by: "Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)"
> 
>
> 08/16/2008 04:53 PM
>
> Please respond to
> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> To
> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> cc
> Subject
> Re: Null Reported Date ARS7
>



> But there is a twist I was not expecting
> Reported Date = field ID 100719, but it is a display only field (
> What the [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] )
>   So that means that MAYBE if you import the data into that field
> there will be workflow on Merge that puts it where it needs to go to
> actually keep the value. The general approrach of using the import
> tool to backfill the data should work if you can figure out where it
> needs to be kept. Maybe the display only field already has workflow no
> merge that will work. I think it is worth a shot at least. I doubt it
> can hurt anything. (If you do your field map correctly.)



> HTH.
>
> --
> Carey Matthew Black

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: 
This is a transmission from Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
and may contain information which is confidential and proprietary.
If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, copying or distribution or use of 
the contents of this message is expressly prohibited.
If you have received this transmission in error, please destroy it and notify 
us immediately at 262-703-7000.

CAUTION:
Internet and e-mail communications are Kohl's property and Kohl's reserves the 
right to retrieve and read any message created, sent and received.  Kohl's 
reserves the right to monitor messages by authorized Kohl's Associates at any 
time
without any further consent.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"


Re: Null Reported Date ARS7

2008-08-19 Thread Carey Matthew Black
Tony,

Thanks for the followup and clarification.

As a general design practice I despise showing the same data in more
than one place on a form. And in this specific case
Where would I put the field that actually holds the data?
  On the 'Classification' tab or on the 'Date/System' tab? Hum... let me see...

I stopped looking after I found the field on the 'Date/System' field.
It just did not occur to me that it might be in a field on that form
somewhere else. I was guessing that it might be on some other form
somewhere. Not that that idea makes any more sense to me. And given
that my sync DB has not been synced I did not feel like digging
through the 1152 Active links on the form to see if I could find where
the data was coming from or going to.

Again, thanks for the pointer to the real field/field ID.

-- 
Carey Matthew Black
Remedy Skilled Professional (RSP)
ARS = Action Request System(Remedy)

Love, then teach
Solution = People + Process + Tools
Fast, Accurate, Cheap Pick two.


On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Tony Worthington
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> **
> There are two Reported Date fields on HPD:Help Desk.
>
> One is on the  Date/System tab (a d/o field) -- 100719 z1D Reported Date
>
> The "real" db field is actually on the Classification tab -- 100560
> Reported Date.
>
> --
> Tony Worthington
> Sr. Technical Analyst
> Kohl's Department Stores
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 262-703-5911
>
>
> Carey Matthew Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent by: "Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)"
> 
>
> 08/16/2008 04:53 PM
>
> Please respond to
> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> To
> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> cc
> Subject
> Re: Null Reported Date ARS7
>



> But there is a twist I was not expecting
> Reported Date = field ID 100719, but it is a display only field (
> What the [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] )
>   So that means that MAYBE if you import the data into that field
> there will be workflow on Merge that puts it where it needs to go to
> actually keep the value. The general approrach of using the import
> tool to backfill the data should work if you can figure out where it
> needs to be kept. Maybe the display only field already has workflow no
> merge that will work. I think it is worth a shot at least. I doubt it
> can hurt anything. (If you do your field map correctly.)



> HTH.
>
> --
> Carey Matthew Black

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"


Re: Null Reported Date ARS7

2008-08-19 Thread Tony Worthington
There are two Reported Date fields on HPD:Help Desk.

One is on the  Date/System tab (a d/o field) -- 100719 z1D Reported 
Date

The "real" db field is actually on the Classification tab -- 100560 
Reported Date.

-- 
Tony Worthington
Sr. Technical Analyst
Kohl's Department Stores
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
262-703-5911



Carey Matthew Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: "Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)" 

08/16/2008 04:53 PM
Please respond to
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG


To
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
cc

Subject
Re: Null Reported Date ARS7






M.B.

Sorry for the incomplete answer. I hit the send button to soon. :(

Yes you need to cross map the value for the field that you want to set
to the field (in the file) that you want it to be set to.
So after you "Add All"
You need to set 'reported date' = $3$ (or whaterver field ID/field
name you are going to use to backfill the data with) before you do the
import.


BTW: If you look at the 4th line of an ARX file you will see a line like 
this...
"
FLD-ID 4 1 3
"

This is a space separated list of field ID's that were exported in the
arx file. In the example above fields: 4 , 1,  and 3 were exported. I
would bet that your ARX file does not have a "1" as a field ID in the
file.

Also .. I just looked on our ITSM v7 HPD:Helpdesk form and the field 1
name is 'Entry ID' and it has a prefix of "INC". ( The 'Incident ID'
field is actually field ID 100161 and has a Field DB name of
"Incident Number". This field can not be used to update a record via
the import tool. Unless they finally fixed the idea of doing the
matching on other columns than field 1 when I was not looking. :) )

Submit Date = field ID 3

Which is why you were getting the errors you were getting. Without a
Field 1 value the Import tool assumes that your trying to create a new
record (like a Submit operation) instead of trying to update an
existing record ( like a Modify) operation. ( Keep in mind the filters
that are triggered are neither Submit, nor Modify. Only Merge filters
are triggered directly by the Import tool. Workflow can the trigger
Submit/Modify filters as a result of Push actions, and even Get Entry
filters too (SetField) but those are other topics for other days. So I
hope that does not confuse the issue any.)


But there is a twist I was not expecting
Reported Date = field ID 100719, but it is a display only field (
What the [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] )
   So that means that MAYBE if you import the data into that field
there will be workflow on Merge that puts it where it needs to go to
actually keep the value. The general approrach of using the import
tool to backfill the data should work if you can figure out where it
needs to be kept. Maybe the display only field already has workflow no
merge that will work. I think it is worth a shot at least. I doubt it
can hurt anything. (If you do your field map correctly.)

If the Merge to the display only field fails to get you what your
after then you may need to turn on Filter tracing, do a Submit or a
Modify of a record where you manually set 'Reported Date' to a value
to be able to find where the value is kept in the application. (Sorry
for the confusion, but apparently the field you are likely seeing on
the form is not actually where that data is stored. GRRR.)

HTH.

-- 
Carey Matthew Black
Remedy Skilled Professional (RSP)
ARS = Action Request System(Remedy)

Love, then teach
Solution = People + Process + Tools
Fast, Accurate, Cheap Pick two.


P.S. Your first initial would not happen to be a "C" would it? :)

On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 5:12 PM, MCrawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you clarify step one?  I am exporting the following from
> HPD:Helpdesk to an ARX file.
>
> 1 Incident ID
> 2 Reported Date
> 3 Submit Date
>
> I open the import tool, and load the form and data.  I click 'Add
> all'.  From here I would think I would have to change the mappings so
> that Reported Date = Submit Date, but following your steps I just
> change the preference settings to update records and click the start
> import button.  It gives me the following errors:
>
> AR System Import Tool  Fri Aug 15 17:05:59 2008
>
>
>
>  Did not find any matching fields to add as new mappings (ARWARN
> 4013)
>
>  Import of d:\documents and settings\matthew.crawford\desktop
> \report.arx started. (ARNOTE 4001)
>
>  Record 1 : The value(s) for this entry violate a unique index
> that has been defined for this form -- HPD:Help Desk
> entry:INC00042965 fields: 100161 100079 100018
> 100019 100080 4 100427 100063 100064 100065
> 20003 20004 20005 240001002 100869 100875 179 7
> 301735100 301734000  (ARERR 382)
>
&

Re: Null Reported Date ARS7

2008-08-18 Thread LJ Longwing
Yes you canbut it's not supported by anyone...and you need to know the
Epoch/Julian (depending on the type of field) that Remedy actually stores in
the DB (which you can lookup from the other field, if they are the same data
type) 

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MCrawford
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 9:04 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Null Reported Date ARS7

Out of curiosity, would it be possible to just open the actual ARSystem DB
and manually enter the dates?

I will give the import another shot with the updated advice.  Thank you for
the assistance!

M.B.

On Aug 16, 5:53 pm, Carey Matthew Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> M.B.
>
> Sorry for the incomplete answer. I hit the send button to soon. :(
>
> Yes you need to cross map the value for the field that you want to set 
> to the field (in the file) that you want it to be set to.
> So after you "Add All"
> You need to set 'reported date' = $3$ (or whaterver field ID/field 
> name you are going to use to backfill the data with) before you do the 
> import.
>
> BTW: If you look at the 4th line of an ARX file you will see a line like
this...
> "
> FLD-ID 4 1 3
> "
>
> This is a space separated list of field ID's that were exported in the 
> arx file. In the example above fields: 4 , 1,  and 3 were exported. I 
> would bet that your ARX file does not have a "1" as a field ID in the 
> file.
>
> Also .. I just looked on our ITSM v7 HPD:Helpdesk form and the field 1 
> name is 'Entry ID' and it has a prefix of "INC". ( The 'Incident ID'
> field is actually field ID 100161 and has a Field DB name of 
> "Incident Number". This field can not be used to update a record via 
> the import tool. Unless they finally fixed the idea of doing the 
> matching on other columns than field 1 when I was not looking. :) )
>
> Submit Date = field ID 3
>
> Which is why you were getting the errors you were getting. Without a 
> Field 1 value the Import tool assumes that your trying to create a new 
> record (like a Submit operation) instead of trying to update an 
> existing record ( like a Modify) operation. ( Keep in mind the filters 
> that are triggered are neither Submit, nor Modify. Only Merge filters 
> are triggered directly by the Import tool. Workflow can the trigger 
> Submit/Modify filters as a result of Push actions, and even Get Entry 
> filters too (SetField) but those are other topics for other days. So I 
> hope that does not confuse the issue any.)
>
> But there is a twist I was not expecting
> Reported Date = field ID 100719, but it is a display only field ( 
> What the [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] )
>    So that means that MAYBE if you import the data into that field 
> there will be workflow on Merge that puts it where it needs to go to 
> actually keep the value. The general approrach of using the import 
> tool to backfill the data should work if you can figure out where it 
> needs to be kept. Maybe the display only field already has workflow no 
> merge that will work. I think it is worth a shot at least. I doubt it 
> can hurt anything. (If you do your field map correctly.)
>
> If the Merge to the display only field fails to get you what your 
> after then you may need to turn on Filter tracing, do a Submit or a 
> Modify of a record where you manually set 'Reported Date' to a value 
> to be able to find where the value is kept in the application. (Sorry 
> for the confusion, but apparently the field you are likely seeing on 
> the form is not actually where that data is stored. GRRR.)
>
> HTH.
>
> --
> Carey Matthew Black
> Remedy Skilled Professional (RSP)
> ARS = Action Request System(Remedy)
>
> Love, then teach
> Solution = People + Process + Tools
> Fast, Accurate, Cheap Pick two.
>
> P.S. Your first initial would not happen to be a "C" would it? :)
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 5:12 PM, MCrawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can you clarify step one?  I am exporting the following from 
> > HPD:Helpdesk to an ARX file.
>
> > 1 Incident ID
> > 2 Reported Date
> > 3 Submit Date
>
> > I open the import tool, and load the form and data.  I click 'Add 
> > all'.  From here I would think I would have to change the mappings 
> > so that Reported Date = Submit Date, but following your steps I just 
> > change the preference settings to update records and click the start 
> > import button.  It gives me the following errors:
>
> > AR System Import Tool  Fri Aug 15 17:05:59 2008
>

Re: Null Reported Date ARS7

2008-08-18 Thread MCrawford
Out of curiosity, would it be possible to just open the actual
ARSystem DB and manually enter the dates?

I will give the import another shot with the updated advice.  Thank
you for the assistance!

M.B.

On Aug 16, 5:53 pm, Carey Matthew Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> M.B.
>
> Sorry for the incomplete answer. I hit the send button to soon. :(
>
> Yes you need to cross map the value for the field that you want to set
> to the field (in the file) that you want it to be set to.
> So after you "Add All"
> You need to set 'reported date' = $3$ (or whaterver field ID/field
> name you are going to use to backfill the data with) before you do the
> import.
>
> BTW: If you look at the 4th line of an ARX file you will see a line like 
> this...
> "
> FLD-ID 4 1 3
> "
>
> This is a space separated list of field ID's that were exported in the
> arx file. In the example above fields: 4 , 1,  and 3 were exported. I
> would bet that your ARX file does not have a "1" as a field ID in the
> file.
>
> Also .. I just looked on our ITSM v7 HPD:Helpdesk form and the field 1
> name is 'Entry ID' and it has a prefix of "INC". ( The 'Incident ID'
> field is actually field ID 100161 and has a Field DB name of
> "Incident Number". This field can not be used to update a record via
> the import tool. Unless they finally fixed the idea of doing the
> matching on other columns than field 1 when I was not looking. :) )
>
> Submit Date = field ID 3
>
> Which is why you were getting the errors you were getting. Without a
> Field 1 value the Import tool assumes that your trying to create a new
> record (like a Submit operation) instead of trying to update an
> existing record ( like a Modify) operation. ( Keep in mind the filters
> that are triggered are neither Submit, nor Modify. Only Merge filters
> are triggered directly by the Import tool. Workflow can the trigger
> Submit/Modify filters as a result of Push actions, and even Get Entry
> filters too (SetField) but those are other topics for other days. So I
> hope that does not confuse the issue any.)
>
> But there is a twist I was not expecting
> Reported Date = field ID 100719, but it is a display only field (
> What the [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] )
>    So that means that MAYBE if you import the data into that field
> there will be workflow on Merge that puts it where it needs to go to
> actually keep the value. The general approrach of using the import
> tool to backfill the data should work if you can figure out where it
> needs to be kept. Maybe the display only field already has workflow no
> merge that will work. I think it is worth a shot at least. I doubt it
> can hurt anything. (If you do your field map correctly.)
>
> If the Merge to the display only field fails to get you what your
> after then you may need to turn on Filter tracing, do a Submit or a
> Modify of a record where you manually set 'Reported Date' to a value
> to be able to find where the value is kept in the application. (Sorry
> for the confusion, but apparently the field you are likely seeing on
> the form is not actually where that data is stored. GRRR.)
>
> HTH.
>
> --
> Carey Matthew Black
> Remedy Skilled Professional (RSP)
> ARS = Action Request System(Remedy)
>
> Love, then teach
> Solution = People + Process + Tools
> Fast, Accurate, Cheap Pick two.
>
> P.S. Your first initial would not happen to be a "C" would it? :)
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 5:12 PM, MCrawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can you clarify step one?  I am exporting the following from
> > HPD:Helpdesk to an ARX file.
>
> > 1 Incident ID
> > 2 Reported Date
> > 3 Submit Date
>
> > I open the import tool, and load the form and data.  I click 'Add
> > all'.  From here I would think I would have to change the mappings so
> > that Reported Date = Submit Date, but following your steps I just
> > change the preference settings to update records and click the start
> > import button.  It gives me the following errors:
>
> > AR System Import Tool  Fri Aug 15 17:05:59 2008
>
> >  Did not find any matching fields to add as new mappings (ARWARN
> > 4013)
>
> >  Import of d:\documents and settings\matthew.crawford\desktop
> > \report.arx started. (ARNOTE 4001)
>
> >  Record 1 : The value(s) for this entry violate a unique index
> > that has been defined for this form -- HPD:Help Desk
> > entry:INC00042965 fields: 100161 100079 100018
> > 100019 100080 4 100427 100

Re: Null Reported Date ARS7

2008-08-16 Thread Carey Matthew Black
M.B.

Sorry for the incomplete answer. I hit the send button to soon. :(

Yes you need to cross map the value for the field that you want to set
to the field (in the file) that you want it to be set to.
So after you "Add All"
You need to set 'reported date' = $3$ (or whaterver field ID/field
name you are going to use to backfill the data with) before you do the
import.


BTW: If you look at the 4th line of an ARX file you will see a line like this...
"
FLD-ID 4 1 3
"

This is a space separated list of field ID's that were exported in the
arx file. In the example above fields: 4 , 1,  and 3 were exported. I
would bet that your ARX file does not have a "1" as a field ID in the
file.

Also .. I just looked on our ITSM v7 HPD:Helpdesk form and the field 1
name is 'Entry ID' and it has a prefix of "INC". ( The 'Incident ID'
field is actually field ID 100161 and has a Field DB name of
"Incident Number". This field can not be used to update a record via
the import tool. Unless they finally fixed the idea of doing the
matching on other columns than field 1 when I was not looking. :) )

Submit Date = field ID 3

Which is why you were getting the errors you were getting. Without a
Field 1 value the Import tool assumes that your trying to create a new
record (like a Submit operation) instead of trying to update an
existing record ( like a Modify) operation. ( Keep in mind the filters
that are triggered are neither Submit, nor Modify. Only Merge filters
are triggered directly by the Import tool. Workflow can the trigger
Submit/Modify filters as a result of Push actions, and even Get Entry
filters too (SetField) but those are other topics for other days. So I
hope that does not confuse the issue any.)


But there is a twist I was not expecting
Reported Date = field ID 100719, but it is a display only field (
What the [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] )
   So that means that MAYBE if you import the data into that field
there will be workflow on Merge that puts it where it needs to go to
actually keep the value. The general approrach of using the import
tool to backfill the data should work if you can figure out where it
needs to be kept. Maybe the display only field already has workflow no
merge that will work. I think it is worth a shot at least. I doubt it
can hurt anything. (If you do your field map correctly.)

If the Merge to the display only field fails to get you what your
after then you may need to turn on Filter tracing, do a Submit or a
Modify of a record where you manually set 'Reported Date' to a value
to be able to find where the value is kept in the application. (Sorry
for the confusion, but apparently the field you are likely seeing on
the form is not actually where that data is stored. GRRR.)

HTH.

-- 
Carey Matthew Black
Remedy Skilled Professional (RSP)
ARS = Action Request System(Remedy)

Love, then teach
Solution = People + Process + Tools
Fast, Accurate, Cheap Pick two.


P.S. Your first initial would not happen to be a "C" would it? :)

On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 5:12 PM, MCrawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you clarify step one?  I am exporting the following from
> HPD:Helpdesk to an ARX file.
>
> 1 Incident ID
> 2 Reported Date
> 3 Submit Date
>
> I open the import tool, and load the form and data.  I click 'Add
> all'.  From here I would think I would have to change the mappings so
> that Reported Date = Submit Date, but following your steps I just
> change the preference settings to update records and click the start
> import button.  It gives me the following errors:
>
> AR System Import Tool  Fri Aug 15 17:05:59 2008
>
>
>
>  Did not find any matching fields to add as new mappings (ARWARN
> 4013)
>
>  Import of d:\documents and settings\matthew.crawford\desktop
> \report.arx started. (ARNOTE 4001)
>
>  Record 1 : The value(s) for this entry violate a unique index
> that has been defined for this form -- HPD:Help Desk
> entry:INC00042965 fields: 100161 100079 100018
> 100019 100080 4 100427 100063 100064 100065
> 20003 20004 20005 240001002 100869 100875 179 7
> 301735100 301734000  (ARERR 382)
>
>  DATA "INC00045876" "" 1218122557
>
>
>
> On Aug 15, 2:13 pm, Carey Matthew Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> M.B.
>>
>> I am sure there is a way to fix these records. And I would guess that
>> one way would be to do something like this:
>>
>> 1) Export three columns of data from the effected records to an ARX or CSV 
>> file.
>> Field 1 (maybe called 'Request ID', 'Entry ID', 'Call ID' or some
>> other name)
>> 'reported d

Re: Null Reported Date ARS7

2008-08-15 Thread MCrawford
Can you clarify step one?  I am exporting the following from
HPD:Helpdesk to an ARX file.

1 Incident ID
2 Reported Date
3 Submit Date

I open the import tool, and load the form and data.  I click 'Add
all'.  From here I would think I would have to change the mappings so
that Reported Date = Submit Date, but following your steps I just
change the preference settings to update records and click the start
import button.  It gives me the following errors:

AR System Import Tool  Fri Aug 15 17:05:59 2008



 Did not find any matching fields to add as new mappings (ARWARN
4013)

 Import of d:\documents and settings\matthew.crawford\desktop
\report.arx started. (ARNOTE 4001)

 Record 1 : The value(s) for this entry violate a unique index
that has been defined for this form -- HPD:Help Desk
entry:INC00042965 fields: 100161 100079 100018
100019 100080 4 100427 100063 100064 100065
20003 20004 20005 240001002 100869 100875 179 7
301735100 301734000  (ARERR 382)

 DATA "INC00045876" "" 1218122557



On Aug 15, 2:13 pm, Carey Matthew Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> M.B.
>
> I am sure there is a way to fix these records. And I would guess that
> one way would be to do something like this:
>
> 1) Export three columns of data from the effected records to an ARX or CSV 
> file.
>     Field 1 (maybe called 'Request ID', 'Entry ID', 'Call ID' or some
> other name)
>     'reported date'
>     Field 3 (maybe called 'Create Date', 'Create-date', or some other name)
>
> * Note if you do not want to set 'reported date' = 'Create Date' then
> pick any other field you want from the existing record and export that
> data instead of Field 3.
>
> 2) Use the Import tool to *update* the existing records.
>     Select the form, select the file that you exported above, and "Map all"
>     * Note: Configuring the Import tool to update existing records is
> found in File(menu) --> Preferences (menu item) --> Duplicate Request
> ID (tab) menu of the import tool.
>
> Barring any strange Merge filters on the form then that simple process
> should work.
>
> --
> Carey Matthew Black
> Remedy Skilled Professional (RSP)
> ARS = Action Request System(Remedy)
>
> Love, then teach
> Solution = People + Process + Tools
> Fast, Accurate, Cheap Pick two.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 1:16 PM, MCrawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Greetings,
>
> > About 100 tickets have been created with blank/null reported dates.
> > This is causing issues with reporting.  Most of the tickets were
> > associated with a single user.  I have removed and re-created his
> > account, and the error appears to be resolved.  However, I need to
> > know if there is a way to fix the erroneous tickets?
>
> > Thanks,
>
> > M.B.
>
> > ___
> > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives atwww.arslist.org
> > Platinum Sponsor:www.rmsportal.comARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
>
> ___
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives atwww.arslist.org
> Platinum Sponsor:www.rmsportal.comARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"


Re: Null Reported Date ARS7

2008-08-15 Thread Carey Matthew Black
M.B.

I am sure there is a way to fix these records. And I would guess that
one way would be to do something like this:

1) Export three columns of data from the effected records to an ARX or CSV file.
Field 1 (maybe called 'Request ID', 'Entry ID', 'Call ID' or some
other name)
'reported date'
Field 3 (maybe called 'Create Date', 'Create-date', or some other name)

* Note if you do not want to set 'reported date' = 'Create Date' then
pick any other field you want from the existing record and export that
data instead of Field 3.

2) Use the Import tool to *update* the existing records.
Select the form, select the file that you exported above, and "Map all"
* Note: Configuring the Import tool to update existing records is
found in File(menu) --> Preferences (menu item) --> Duplicate Request
ID (tab) menu of the import tool.


Barring any strange Merge filters on the form then that simple process
should work.

-- 
Carey Matthew Black
Remedy Skilled Professional (RSP)
ARS = Action Request System(Remedy)

Love, then teach
Solution = People + Process + Tools
Fast, Accurate, Cheap Pick two.




On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 1:16 PM, MCrawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> About 100 tickets have been created with blank/null reported dates.
> This is causing issues with reporting.  Most of the tickets were
> associated with a single user.  I have removed and re-created his
> account, and the error appears to be resolved.  However, I need to
> know if there is a way to fix the erroneous tickets?
>
> Thanks,
>
> M.B.
>
> ___
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
>

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"


Null Reported Date ARS7

2008-08-15 Thread MCrawford
Greetings,

About 100 tickets have been created with blank/null reported dates.
This is causing issues with reporting.  Most of the tickets were
associated with a single user.  I have removed and re-created his
account, and the error appears to be resolved.  However, I need to
know if there is a way to fix the erroneous tickets?

Thanks,

M.B.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"