Re: [aspectj-users] Server slowdown
Thanks Ryan, I found out it was because some code deeper down was creating a parser each time. I think you might be right as the parser created a hashmap each time. It's very frustrating this takes over 100 times longer on the server though, the specs are quite similar between my server and laptop. I'll just have to eliminate the parser from the code somehow. http://www.aplossystems.co.uk/ aplosLogoSmall A : Aplos Systems Ltd, 17 Carlton Place, Southampton, SO15 2DY. T : 0800 520 0690 Registered in England, 111 rattle Road, Westham, Pevensey, East Sussex, BN24 5DH; Registration number 6657177 From: aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Gardner Sent: 14 October 2014 02:22 To: aspectj-users@eclipse.org Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] Server slowdown Are those maps concurrent maps? If not, map resizing of a standard hashmap when being accessed via multi threads can cause CPU spikes like that. On Oct 13, 2014 5:22 PM, Anthony Mayfield i...@aplossystems.co.uk wrote: Hi, It's ok, it looks like the issue lies with the code inside the aspect that is getting called. I'm still not sure why it would take so long on the server and not on my laptop but it doesn't look related to the aspect coding directly, All the best, Anthony. http://www.aplossystems.co.uk/ aplosLogoSmall A : Aplos Systems Ltd, 17 Carlton Place, Southampton, SO15 2DY. T : 0800 520 0690 Registered in England, 111 rattle Road, Westham, Pevensey, East Sussex, BN24 5DH; Registration number 6657177 ___ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users ___ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
Re: [aspectj-users] Aspectj in weaving a jar file
I have one more doubt... I am adding aspects to hadoop source code and I imported one of the package and created aspect aj file but while running I have to choose main function but it seems no class of this package have main function...What I have to do?...Plz help me... -- View this message in context: http://aspectj.2085585.n4.nabble.com/Aspectj-in-weaving-a-jar-file-tp4651584p4651605.html Sent from the AspectJ - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
Re: [aspectj-users] Aspectj in weaving a jar file
can you share a link or any other on how to create a configuration manually...also is it mandatory to mention the main class in the configuration? -- View this message in context: http://aspectj.2085585.n4.nabble.com/Aspectj-in-weaving-a-jar-file-tp4651584p4651607.html Sent from the AspectJ - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
[aspectj-users] Stackmap frame errors when building the aspectj project with Java 1.7
Hi,
I have a project which is using aspectj and it is building fine with Java
1.6. When I update it to Java 1.7 I'm seeing following error.
[INFO] Molva the Destroyer Aspects ... FAILURE [2.324s]
[INFO] Molva The Destroyer Client SKIPPED
[INFO] Molva The Destroyer Parent SKIPPED
[INFO] Molva The Destroyer Distribution .. SKIPPED
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 2.424s
[INFO] Finished at: Tue Oct 14 11:16:19 PDT 2014
[INFO] Final Memory: 12M/310M
[INFO]
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.codehaus.mojo:exec-maven-plugin:1.1:java
(default) on project molva-the-destroyer-aspects: An exception occured
while executing the Java class. Expecting a stackmap frame at branch target
30
[ERROR] Exception Details:
[ERROR] Location:
[ERROR] com/concur/puma/molva/aspects/TestTarget.main([Ljava/lang/String;)V
@12: invokestatic
[ERROR] Reason:
[ERROR] Expected stackmap frame at this location.
[ERROR] Bytecode:
[ERROR] 000: 2a4d b200 5e01 012c b800 644e b800 c62d
[ERROR] 010: b600 ca2c 2db8 00bb 2db8 00bf 57b1 3a04
[ERROR] 020: b800 c62d 1904 b600 ce19 04bf
[ERROR] Exception Handler Table:
[ERROR] bci [12, 30] = handler: 30
[ERROR] - [Help 1]
[ERROR]
[ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e
switch.
[ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
[ERROR]
[ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
please read the following articles:
[ERROR] [Help 1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException
This is what my maven configuration looks like.
dependencies
dependency
groupIdjunit/groupId
artifactIdjunit/artifactId
version3.8.1/version
scopetest/scope
/dependency
dependency
groupIdorg.aspectj/groupId
artifactIdaspectjrt/artifactId
version1.6.5/version
/dependency
dependency
groupIdlog4j/groupId
artifactIdlog4j/artifactId
version1.2.17/version
/dependency
dependency
groupIdorg.perf4j/groupId
artifactIdperf4j/artifactId
version0.9.16/version
/dependency
/dependencies
build
plugins
plugin
groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId
artifactIdaspectj-maven-plugin/artifactId
version1.2/version
configuration
source1.7/source
target1.7/target
/configuration
executions
execution
goals
goalcompile/goal
/goals
/execution
/executions
/plugin
plugin
groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId
artifactIdexec-maven-plugin/artifactId
version1.1/version
executions
execution
phasepackage/phase
goals
goaljava/goal
/goals
/execution
/executions
configuration
mainClasscom.concur.puma.molva.aspects.TestTarget/mainClass
/configuration
/plugin
/plugins
/build
The TestTarget class is a simple class (Pasting it here for completeness.)
public class TestTarget {
static Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(TestTarget.class);
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
// Test case 01
new TestTarget().test1();
// Test case 02
for(int i=0;i10;i++) {
testCountFast(1000);
}
// Test case 03
for(int i=0;i5;i++) {
testCountSlow(1000);
}
// Test case 04
//new TestTarget().test2();
}
public static void testCountSlow(int value) {
count(value,5);
System.out.println(slow count executed!);
//logger.info(Slow count complete!);
}
public static void testCountFast(int value) {
count(value,0);
System.out.println(fast count executed!);
//logger.info(Fast count complete!);
}
private static void count(int value, int delay) {
for (int i=0;ivalue;i++) {
try {
Thread.sleep(delay);
} catch (Exception e) {
logger.error(Error occurred while sleeping the thread
count, e);
}
}
}
public void test1() {
//logger.info(TestTarget.test());
}
public void
Re: [aspectj-users] Stackmap frame errors when building the aspectj project with Java 1.7
2014-10-14 21:28 GMT+02:00 Andy Clement andrew.clem...@gmail.com: I’d recommend updating to a more recent AspectJ. Older AspectJs did have issues with making mistakes generating stack map frames. The option to use split verifier was only possible with JDK1.6 I think, with 1.7 they removed that capability so the stack map frames needed to be correct. For the record, -XX:-UseSplitVerifier is available in the Hotspot JVM 7 to disable the new verifier which needs correct stack map frames. It's not available in the Hotspot JVM 8 anymore. Frank ___ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
Re: [aspectj-users] Stackmap frame errors when building the aspectj project with Java 1.7
Yes, the default compliance level is 1.4 according to http://mojo.codehaus.org/aspectj-maven-plugin/compile-mojo.html#complianceLevel, even in the current plugin version 1.7 (you still use 1.5, I recommend an update there as well, not just in the AspectJ runtime). -- Alexander Kriegisch http://scrum-master.de Am 14.10.2014 um 23:08 schrieb Heshan Suriyaarachchi heshan.suriyaarach...@gmail.com: Thank you for the quick feedback guys. I tried updating to the latest aspectj jars too. Still I saw the same error. Then I found out the error. I was missing the complianceLevel tag in my plugin configuration. Pasting the updated aspectj-maven-plugin configuration in case someone runs into the same issue that I ran into. plugin groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId artifactIdaspectj-maven-plugin/artifactId version1.5/version configuration complianceLevel1.7/complianceLevel source1.7/source target1.7/target /configuration executions execution !--phaseprocess-sources/phase-- goals goalcompile/goal goaltest-compile/goal /goals /execution /executions /plugin Thanks, Heshan. On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Frank Pavageau frank.pavag...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-10-14 21:28 GMT+02:00 Andy Clement andrew.clem...@gmail.com: I’d recommend updating to a more recent AspectJ. Older AspectJs did have issues with making mistakes generating stack map frames. The option to use split verifier was only possible with JDK1.6 I think, with 1.7 they removed that capability so the stack map frames needed to be correct. For the record, -XX:-UseSplitVerifier is available in the Hotspot JVM 7 to disable the new verifier which needs correct stack map frames. It's not available in the Hotspot JVM 8 anymore. Frank ___ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users -- Regards, Heshan Suriyaarachchi http://heshans.blogspot.com/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/heshan ___ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users ___ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
Re: [aspectj-users] Stackmap frame errors when building the aspectj project with Java 1.7
I forgot to mention that AspectJ Maven Plugin 1.7 automatically uses aspectjtools 1.8.2 by default, see http://mojo.codehaus.org/aspectj-maven-plugin/dependencies.html Am 14.10.2014 um 23:19 schrieb Alexander Kriegisch alexan...@kriegisch.name: Yes, the default compliance level is 1.4 according to http://mojo.codehaus.org/aspectj-maven-plugin/compile-mojo.html#complianceLevel, even in the current plugin version 1.7 (you still use 1.5, I recommend an update there as well, not just in the AspectJ runtime). -- Alexander Kriegisch http://scrum-master.de Am 14.10.2014 um 23:08 schrieb Heshan Suriyaarachchi heshan.suriyaarach...@gmail.com: Thank you for the quick feedback guys. I tried updating to the latest aspectj jars too. Still I saw the same error. Then I found out the error. I was missing the complianceLevel tag in my plugin configuration. Pasting the updated aspectj-maven-plugin configuration in case someone runs into the same issue that I ran into. plugin groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId artifactIdaspectj-maven-plugin/artifactId version1.5/version configuration complianceLevel1.7/complianceLevel source1.7/source target1.7/target /configuration executions execution !--phaseprocess-sources/phase-- goals goalcompile/goal goaltest-compile/goal /goals /execution /executions /plugin Thanks, Heshan. On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Frank Pavageau frank.pavag...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-10-14 21:28 GMT+02:00 Andy Clement andrew.clem...@gmail.com: I’d recommend updating to a more recent AspectJ. Older AspectJs did have issues with making mistakes generating stack map frames. The option to use split verifier was only possible with JDK1.6 I think, with 1.7 they removed that capability so the stack map frames needed to be correct. For the record, -XX:-UseSplitVerifier is available in the Hotspot JVM 7 to disable the new verifier which needs correct stack map frames. It's not available in the Hotspot JVM 8 anymore. Frank ___ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users -- Regards, Heshan Suriyaarachchi http://heshans.blogspot.com/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/heshan ___ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users ___ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users ___ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
