Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ + AJDT + AspectJ Maven development versions for Java 16 available
The gap would be some of the more advanced intertype declaration usage. All the advice language constructs and basic declare parents is possible with annotation style today. Andy On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 at 05:12, Timothy Spear wrote: > Andy, Alexander, > > What is the gap between the custom language and the annotations? > Has anyone proposed a tool to convert AsspectJ to annotations? > > Tim > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 7:52 AM Alexander Kriegisch < > alexan...@kriegisch.name> wrote: > >> Thanks all for your encouragement. >> >> Concerning "AspectK", I think that it is not going to happen anytime >> soon or at all, given the developer resource situation and my currently >> modest level of knowledge, especially concerning parsing, AST, >> compilation. >> >> What makes it so hard to keep AspectJ up to date is the native syntax >> support. AJC is an ECJ fork. Imagine a parallel Kotlinc fork on top of >> that. Getting rid of native syntax altogether, only supporting >> annotation-style AOP, would be the easiest to maintain according to >> Andy. This is not even considering keeping IDE support up to date. For >> Eclipse this is done in AJDT, which is a nightmare to maintain, and for >> IntelliJ JetBrains implemented it themselves, but never really finished >> the job IMO. But then we would lose both the elegant, expressive syntax >> and several features which just do not work in @AspectJ style. Anyway, >> focusing on the present situation, you do have options to apply aspects >> to Kotlin code, using LTW or binary weaving. If Andy ever gets around to >> supporting invokedynamic (think: intercepting lambdas), I think that it >> would be a step forward for all of CTW, LTW and binary weaving. >> >> Bottom line: We need to prioritise. I am doing this for fun, so I am >> going to do whatever strikes me as interesting and is within the range >> of my current capabilities. I might be able to do more in the future, if >> by some miracle Andy ever gets bored of his awesome daytime job and has >> time to mentor me. ;-) >> >> Anyway, we sent a message that AspectJ is far from dead, even though not >> exactly running like a race horse. >> >> Cheers >> -- >> Alexander Kriegisch >> https://scrum-master.de >> >> >> Matthew Adams schrieb am 28.04.2021 21:06 (GMT +07:00): >> >> > Awesome. I'm also a long-time AspectJ user and occasional supporter >> (I'm a >> > former SpringSource consultant from way back 2007-2008 and founding >> > co-committer of Spring Data Cassandra). >> > >> > I've been working primarily in the Node.js space for the last 7+ years, >> but >> > have been keeping a little bit of an eye on developments in the Java >> ecosystem. >> > Kotlin has really caught my eye, and, after having been spoiled in Java >> for so >> > many years with AspectJ, I was hoping that I'd see first-class support >> for AOP >> > in Kotlin via "AspectK" or something, since, by the time we ceased Java >> > development, ajc was our only compiler, if you can believe it. >> > >> > I know this is a lot to ask because I've felt Andy's been way >> underresourced >> > over the years and have truly feared the day Andy decides to hang it >> up, but >> > I'd really like to see a new compiler akc, similar to ajc, only for >> Kotlin. >> > >> > Honestly, I don't understand why SpringSource/Pivotal/... doesn't >> allocate more >> > resources to such a crucial and awesome technology as AspectJ. >> Further, given >> > Spring's substantial adoption of Kotlin, why more effort hasn't gone >> into a >> > sister/twin effort for AOP in Kotlin (what I call "AspectK"). >> > >> > What will it take for AspectK to be recognized as necessary and >> resources >> > allocated to it? >> > >> >> On Apr 28, 2021, at 2:43 AM, Alexander Kriegisch < >> alexan...@kriegisch.name> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hello AspectJ users community! >> >> >> >> You might know me as a fellow user who over the years asked or answered >> >> questions, raised bugs or commented here. I also answer questions about >> >> AspectJ and Spring AOP on StackOverflow, in order to unburden Andy >> >> Clement as a maintainer from user support a little bit. >> >> >> >> Somewhat new is my role as an active contributor to the code bases of >> >> ** AspectJ, >> >> ** AJDT (AspectJ Development Tools) for Eclipse IDE, >> >> ** AspectJ Maven Plugin. >> >> >> >> It all started with reading source code because I did not understand >> >> something or wanted to know how to fix a tiny issue, then baby step by >> >> step it somehow escalated into adding Java 15+16 support to AspectJ, >> >> Java 13-16 support to AspectJ Maven and making AJDT work with the new >> >> AspectJ version in its belly on Eclipse IDE 4.19 (2021-03). All of this >> >> stuff is available for you to test, feedback is welcome. As I do not >> >> have commit and deploy rights on Eclipse projects (yet), I just set up >> a >> >> little Maven repository on my domain aspectj.dev. >> >> >> >> More details in this comment I posted on a recently merged Gi
Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ + AJDT + AspectJ Maven development versions for Java 16 available
Andy, Alexander, What is the gap between the custom language and the annotations? Has anyone proposed a tool to convert AsspectJ to annotations? Tim On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 7:52 AM Alexander Kriegisch < alexan...@kriegisch.name> wrote: > Thanks all for your encouragement. > > Concerning "AspectK", I think that it is not going to happen anytime > soon or at all, given the developer resource situation and my currently > modest level of knowledge, especially concerning parsing, AST, > compilation. > > What makes it so hard to keep AspectJ up to date is the native syntax > support. AJC is an ECJ fork. Imagine a parallel Kotlinc fork on top of > that. Getting rid of native syntax altogether, only supporting > annotation-style AOP, would be the easiest to maintain according to > Andy. This is not even considering keeping IDE support up to date. For > Eclipse this is done in AJDT, which is a nightmare to maintain, and for > IntelliJ JetBrains implemented it themselves, but never really finished > the job IMO. But then we would lose both the elegant, expressive syntax > and several features which just do not work in @AspectJ style. Anyway, > focusing on the present situation, you do have options to apply aspects > to Kotlin code, using LTW or binary weaving. If Andy ever gets around to > supporting invokedynamic (think: intercepting lambdas), I think that it > would be a step forward for all of CTW, LTW and binary weaving. > > Bottom line: We need to prioritise. I am doing this for fun, so I am > going to do whatever strikes me as interesting and is within the range > of my current capabilities. I might be able to do more in the future, if > by some miracle Andy ever gets bored of his awesome daytime job and has > time to mentor me. ;-) > > Anyway, we sent a message that AspectJ is far from dead, even though not > exactly running like a race horse. > > Cheers > -- > Alexander Kriegisch > https://scrum-master.de > > > Matthew Adams schrieb am 28.04.2021 21:06 (GMT +07:00): > > > Awesome. I'm also a long-time AspectJ user and occasional supporter > (I'm a > > former SpringSource consultant from way back 2007-2008 and founding > > co-committer of Spring Data Cassandra). > > > > I've been working primarily in the Node.js space for the last 7+ years, > but > > have been keeping a little bit of an eye on developments in the Java > ecosystem. > > Kotlin has really caught my eye, and, after having been spoiled in Java > for so > > many years with AspectJ, I was hoping that I'd see first-class support > for AOP > > in Kotlin via "AspectK" or something, since, by the time we ceased Java > > development, ajc was our only compiler, if you can believe it. > > > > I know this is a lot to ask because I've felt Andy's been way > underresourced > > over the years and have truly feared the day Andy decides to hang it up, > but > > I'd really like to see a new compiler akc, similar to ajc, only for > Kotlin. > > > > Honestly, I don't understand why SpringSource/Pivotal/... doesn't > allocate more > > resources to such a crucial and awesome technology as AspectJ. Further, > given > > Spring's substantial adoption of Kotlin, why more effort hasn't gone > into a > > sister/twin effort for AOP in Kotlin (what I call "AspectK"). > > > > What will it take for AspectK to be recognized as necessary and resources > > allocated to it? > > > >> On Apr 28, 2021, at 2:43 AM, Alexander Kriegisch < > alexan...@kriegisch.name> > >> wrote: > >> > >> Hello AspectJ users community! > >> > >> You might know me as a fellow user who over the years asked or answered > >> questions, raised bugs or commented here. I also answer questions about > >> AspectJ and Spring AOP on StackOverflow, in order to unburden Andy > >> Clement as a maintainer from user support a little bit. > >> > >> Somewhat new is my role as an active contributor to the code bases of > >> ** AspectJ, > >> ** AJDT (AspectJ Development Tools) for Eclipse IDE, > >> ** AspectJ Maven Plugin. > >> > >> It all started with reading source code because I did not understand > >> something or wanted to know how to fix a tiny issue, then baby step by > >> step it somehow escalated into adding Java 15+16 support to AspectJ, > >> Java 13-16 support to AspectJ Maven and making AJDT work with the new > >> AspectJ version in its belly on Eclipse IDE 4.19 (2021-03). All of this > >> stuff is available for you to test, feedback is welcome. As I do not > >> have commit and deploy rights on Eclipse projects (yet), I just set up a > >> little Maven repository on my domain aspectj.dev. > >> > >> More details in this comment I posted on a recently merged GitHub pull > >> request: > >> > >> https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/pull/41#issuecomment-826066012 > >> > >> Best regards > >> -- > >> Alexander Kriegisch > >> https://scrum-master.de > >> ___ > >> aspectj-users mailing list > >> aspectj-users@eclipse.org > >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit > >> h
Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ + AJDT + AspectJ Maven development versions for Java 16 available
Thanks all for your encouragement. Concerning "AspectK", I think that it is not going to happen anytime soon or at all, given the developer resource situation and my currently modest level of knowledge, especially concerning parsing, AST, compilation. What makes it so hard to keep AspectJ up to date is the native syntax support. AJC is an ECJ fork. Imagine a parallel Kotlinc fork on top of that. Getting rid of native syntax altogether, only supporting annotation-style AOP, would be the easiest to maintain according to Andy. This is not even considering keeping IDE support up to date. For Eclipse this is done in AJDT, which is a nightmare to maintain, and for IntelliJ JetBrains implemented it themselves, but never really finished the job IMO. But then we would lose both the elegant, expressive syntax and several features which just do not work in @AspectJ style. Anyway, focusing on the present situation, you do have options to apply aspects to Kotlin code, using LTW or binary weaving. If Andy ever gets around to supporting invokedynamic (think: intercepting lambdas), I think that it would be a step forward for all of CTW, LTW and binary weaving. Bottom line: We need to prioritise. I am doing this for fun, so I am going to do whatever strikes me as interesting and is within the range of my current capabilities. I might be able to do more in the future, if by some miracle Andy ever gets bored of his awesome daytime job and has time to mentor me. ;-) Anyway, we sent a message that AspectJ is far from dead, even though not exactly running like a race horse. Cheers -- Alexander Kriegisch https://scrum-master.de Matthew Adams schrieb am 28.04.2021 21:06 (GMT +07:00): > Awesome. I'm also a long-time AspectJ user and occasional supporter (I'm a > former SpringSource consultant from way back 2007-2008 and founding > co-committer of Spring Data Cassandra). > > I've been working primarily in the Node.js space for the last 7+ years, but > have been keeping a little bit of an eye on developments in the Java > ecosystem. > Kotlin has really caught my eye, and, after having been spoiled in Java for so > many years with AspectJ, I was hoping that I'd see first-class support for AOP > in Kotlin via "AspectK" or something, since, by the time we ceased Java > development, ajc was our only compiler, if you can believe it. > > I know this is a lot to ask because I've felt Andy's been way underresourced > over the years and have truly feared the day Andy decides to hang it up, but > I'd really like to see a new compiler akc, similar to ajc, only for Kotlin. > > Honestly, I don't understand why SpringSource/Pivotal/... doesn't allocate > more > resources to such a crucial and awesome technology as AspectJ. Further, given > Spring's substantial adoption of Kotlin, why more effort hasn't gone into a > sister/twin effort for AOP in Kotlin (what I call "AspectK"). > > What will it take for AspectK to be recognized as necessary and resources > allocated to it? > >> On Apr 28, 2021, at 2:43 AM, Alexander Kriegisch >> wrote: >> >> Hello AspectJ users community! >> >> You might know me as a fellow user who over the years asked or answered >> questions, raised bugs or commented here. I also answer questions about >> AspectJ and Spring AOP on StackOverflow, in order to unburden Andy >> Clement as a maintainer from user support a little bit. >> >> Somewhat new is my role as an active contributor to the code bases of >> ** AspectJ, >> ** AJDT (AspectJ Development Tools) for Eclipse IDE, >> ** AspectJ Maven Plugin. >> >> It all started with reading source code because I did not understand >> something or wanted to know how to fix a tiny issue, then baby step by >> step it somehow escalated into adding Java 15+16 support to AspectJ, >> Java 13-16 support to AspectJ Maven and making AJDT work with the new >> AspectJ version in its belly on Eclipse IDE 4.19 (2021-03). All of this >> stuff is available for you to test, feedback is welcome. As I do not >> have commit and deploy rights on Eclipse projects (yet), I just set up a >> little Maven repository on my domain aspectj.dev. >> >> More details in this comment I posted on a recently merged GitHub pull >> request: >> >> https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/pull/41#issuecomment-826066012 >> >> Best regards >> -- >> Alexander Kriegisch >> https://scrum-master.de >> ___ >> aspectj-users mailing list >> aspectj-users@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > > ___ > aspectj-users mailing list > aspectj-users@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > > ___ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ + AJDT + AspectJ Maven development versions for Java 16 available
I'll jump on the thread. Alexander has been doing some awesome (overdue) work here, particularly around making it easier to keep pace with Java - this has become even more urgent as the release cadence for Java has accelerated. I don't see aspectj.dev as some rogue location, it is Alexander working with me (well not really supported enough by me, but we are communicating!) to get AspectJ to a better place for the future. I can see aspectj.dev replace repo.spring.io as the place for snapshot builds going forward. With releases going into central as usual. Alexanders work means a Java 15/16 release is very close, when my plan was to just support them all at the next LTS (17). thanks Alexander! cheers, Andy On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 at 07:06, Matthew Adams wrote: > Awesome. I'm also a long-time AspectJ user and occasional supporter (I'm > a former SpringSource consultant from way back 2007-2008 and founding > co-committer of Spring Data Cassandra). > > I've been working primarily in the Node.js space for the last 7+ years, > but have been keeping a little bit of an eye on developments in the Java > ecosystem. Kotlin has really caught my eye, and, after having been spoiled > in Java for so many years with AspectJ, I was hoping that I'd see > first-class support for AOP in Kotlin via "AspectK" or something, since, by > the time we ceased Java development, ajc was our only compiler, if you can > believe it. > > I know this is a lot to ask because I've felt Andy's been way > underresourced over the years and have truly feared the day Andy decides to > hang it up, but I'd really like to see a new compiler akc, similar to ajc, > only for Kotlin. > > Honestly, I don't understand why SpringSource/Pivotal/... doesn't allocate > more resources to such a crucial and awesome technology as AspectJ. > Further, given Spring's substantial adoption of Kotlin, why more effort > hasn't gone into a sister/twin effort for AOP in Kotlin (what I call > "AspectK"). > > What will it take for AspectK to be recognized as necessary and resources > allocated to it? > > > On Apr 28, 2021, at 2:43 AM, Alexander Kriegisch < > alexan...@kriegisch.name> wrote: > > > > Hello AspectJ users community! > > > > You might know me as a fellow user who over the years asked or answered > > questions, raised bugs or commented here. I also answer questions about > > AspectJ and Spring AOP on StackOverflow, in order to unburden Andy > > Clement as a maintainer from user support a little bit. > > > > Somewhat new is my role as an active contributor to the code bases of > > ** AspectJ, > > ** AJDT (AspectJ Development Tools) for Eclipse IDE, > > ** AspectJ Maven Plugin. > > > > It all started with reading source code because I did not understand > > something or wanted to know how to fix a tiny issue, then baby step by > > step it somehow escalated into adding Java 15+16 support to AspectJ, > > Java 13-16 support to AspectJ Maven and making AJDT work with the new > > AspectJ version in its belly on Eclipse IDE 4.19 (2021-03). All of this > > stuff is available for you to test, feedback is welcome. As I do not > > have commit and deploy rights on Eclipse projects (yet), I just set up a > > little Maven repository on my domain aspectj.dev. > > > > More details in this comment I posted on a recently merged GitHub pull > > request: > > > > https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/pull/41#issuecomment-826066012 > > > > Best regards > > -- > > Alexander Kriegisch > > https://scrum-master.de > > ___ > > aspectj-users mailing list > > aspectj-users@eclipse.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > > ___ > aspectj-users mailing list > aspectj-users@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > ___ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ + AJDT + AspectJ Maven development versions for Java 16 available
Awesome. I'm also a long-time AspectJ user and occasional supporter (I'm a former SpringSource consultant from way back 2007-2008 and founding co-committer of Spring Data Cassandra). I've been working primarily in the Node.js space for the last 7+ years, but have been keeping a little bit of an eye on developments in the Java ecosystem. Kotlin has really caught my eye, and, after having been spoiled in Java for so many years with AspectJ, I was hoping that I'd see first-class support for AOP in Kotlin via "AspectK" or something, since, by the time we ceased Java development, ajc was our only compiler, if you can believe it. I know this is a lot to ask because I've felt Andy's been way underresourced over the years and have truly feared the day Andy decides to hang it up, but I'd really like to see a new compiler akc, similar to ajc, only for Kotlin. Honestly, I don't understand why SpringSource/Pivotal/... doesn't allocate more resources to such a crucial and awesome technology as AspectJ. Further, given Spring's substantial adoption of Kotlin, why more effort hasn't gone into a sister/twin effort for AOP in Kotlin (what I call "AspectK"). What will it take for AspectK to be recognized as necessary and resources allocated to it? > On Apr 28, 2021, at 2:43 AM, Alexander Kriegisch > wrote: > > Hello AspectJ users community! > > You might know me as a fellow user who over the years asked or answered > questions, raised bugs or commented here. I also answer questions about > AspectJ and Spring AOP on StackOverflow, in order to unburden Andy > Clement as a maintainer from user support a little bit. > > Somewhat new is my role as an active contributor to the code bases of > ** AspectJ, > ** AJDT (AspectJ Development Tools) for Eclipse IDE, > ** AspectJ Maven Plugin. > > It all started with reading source code because I did not understand > something or wanted to know how to fix a tiny issue, then baby step by > step it somehow escalated into adding Java 15+16 support to AspectJ, > Java 13-16 support to AspectJ Maven and making AJDT work with the new > AspectJ version in its belly on Eclipse IDE 4.19 (2021-03). All of this > stuff is available for you to test, feedback is welcome. As I do not > have commit and deploy rights on Eclipse projects (yet), I just set up a > little Maven repository on my domain aspectj.dev. > > More details in this comment I posted on a recently merged GitHub pull > request: > > https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/pull/41#issuecomment-826066012 > > Best regards > -- > Alexander Kriegisch > https://scrum-master.de > ___ > aspectj-users mailing list > aspectj-users@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users ___ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ + AJDT + AspectJ Maven development versions for Java 16 available
Congrats. I have read your replies on a few issues which solved the problem i was facing at the time. Tim On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 7:44 AM Saad Fch wrote: > awesome career, good luck for the future > > Le mer. 28 avr. 2021 à 09:43, Alexander Kriegisch < > alexan...@kriegisch.name> a écrit : > >> Hello AspectJ users community! >> >> You might know me as a fellow user who over the years asked or answered >> questions, raised bugs or commented here. I also answer questions about >> AspectJ and Spring AOP on StackOverflow, in order to unburden Andy >> Clement as a maintainer from user support a little bit. >> >> Somewhat new is my role as an active contributor to the code bases of >> ** AspectJ, >> ** AJDT (AspectJ Development Tools) for Eclipse IDE, >> ** AspectJ Maven Plugin. >> >> It all started with reading source code because I did not understand >> something or wanted to know how to fix a tiny issue, then baby step by >> step it somehow escalated into adding Java 15+16 support to AspectJ, >> Java 13-16 support to AspectJ Maven and making AJDT work with the new >> AspectJ version in its belly on Eclipse IDE 4.19 (2021-03). All of this >> stuff is available for you to test, feedback is welcome. As I do not >> have commit and deploy rights on Eclipse projects (yet), I just set up a >> little Maven repository on my domain aspectj.dev. >> >> More details in this comment I posted on a recently merged GitHub pull >> request: >> >> https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/pull/41#issuecomment-826066012 >> >> Best regards >> -- >> Alexander Kriegisch >> https://scrum-master.de >> ___ >> aspectj-users mailing list >> aspectj-users@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >> > -- > *Best regards* > > Saad EL FCHTALI > > *Phone : * > * (+33) 6 19 48 32 13* > ___ > aspectj-users mailing list > aspectj-users@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > ___ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ + AJDT + AspectJ Maven development versions for Java 16 available
awesome career, good luck for the future Le mer. 28 avr. 2021 à 09:43, Alexander Kriegisch a écrit : > Hello AspectJ users community! > > You might know me as a fellow user who over the years asked or answered > questions, raised bugs or commented here. I also answer questions about > AspectJ and Spring AOP on StackOverflow, in order to unburden Andy > Clement as a maintainer from user support a little bit. > > Somewhat new is my role as an active contributor to the code bases of > ** AspectJ, > ** AJDT (AspectJ Development Tools) for Eclipse IDE, > ** AspectJ Maven Plugin. > > It all started with reading source code because I did not understand > something or wanted to know how to fix a tiny issue, then baby step by > step it somehow escalated into adding Java 15+16 support to AspectJ, > Java 13-16 support to AspectJ Maven and making AJDT work with the new > AspectJ version in its belly on Eclipse IDE 4.19 (2021-03). All of this > stuff is available for you to test, feedback is welcome. As I do not > have commit and deploy rights on Eclipse projects (yet), I just set up a > little Maven repository on my domain aspectj.dev. > > More details in this comment I posted on a recently merged GitHub pull > request: > > https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/pull/41#issuecomment-826066012 > > Best regards > -- > Alexander Kriegisch > https://scrum-master.de > ___ > aspectj-users mailing list > aspectj-users@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > -- *Best regards* Saad EL FCHTALI *Phone : * * (+33) 6 19 48 32 13* ___ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
[aspectj-users] AspectJ + AJDT + AspectJ Maven development versions for Java 16 available
Hello AspectJ users community! You might know me as a fellow user who over the years asked or answered questions, raised bugs or commented here. I also answer questions about AspectJ and Spring AOP on StackOverflow, in order to unburden Andy Clement as a maintainer from user support a little bit. Somewhat new is my role as an active contributor to the code bases of ** AspectJ, ** AJDT (AspectJ Development Tools) for Eclipse IDE, ** AspectJ Maven Plugin. It all started with reading source code because I did not understand something or wanted to know how to fix a tiny issue, then baby step by step it somehow escalated into adding Java 15+16 support to AspectJ, Java 13-16 support to AspectJ Maven and making AJDT work with the new AspectJ version in its belly on Eclipse IDE 4.19 (2021-03). All of this stuff is available for you to test, feedback is welcome. As I do not have commit and deploy rights on Eclipse projects (yet), I just set up a little Maven repository on my domain aspectj.dev. More details in this comment I posted on a recently merged GitHub pull request: https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/pull/41#issuecomment-826066012 Best regards -- Alexander Kriegisch https://scrum-master.de ___ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
