Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Re: Fax and h323
On May 11, 2005, at 9:36 AM, Steve Underwood wrote: Mark told me it will go in as one of the pure GPL addons. It will not be disclaimed. I wanted to know if I could use its ASN.1 code in my T.38 implementation. Because of this I haven't. This seems to mean the new H.323 will have problems with things like G.729 Mark paid for the channel driver.. so that is fully Digium's (just not the ooh323c lib) /b ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
Re: [Asterisk-Dev] [Rant] [long] - code style and quality
I don't want to protract this debte, since it really is a matter for Mark (as bkw rightly points out), but this article seemed remarkably apropos: http://joelonsoftware.com/articles/Wrong.html -- David McNett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://slacker.com/~nugget/ ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Re: New h.323 channel driver
Hello, Michael Manousos wrote: > > The problems mostly relies on OpenH323 - there is deadlock condition, check > > #3967. Also, under high load single cleaner > > I have also notice them, but only with the Pandora or above versions. > That's the main reason that asterisk-oh323 has stuck with the Janus > version of OpenH323/Pwlib. I do about the same with chan_h323 about 1,5 years ago, and have the same troubles with pre-Pandora releases of OpenH323... WBR, Paul. ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
[Asterisk-Dev] Re: Fax and h323
I can confirm that any faxing over IP is hit and miss unless it uses T.38, and even then most implementations of that are buggy. Since both SIP and H.323 use RTP as the audio transport medium, the results should be precisely the same whichever you use. If not, you probably did something wrong. TRANSPORTS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH SPANDSP. I hate to shout, but people really do find it hard to get to grips with that. Regards, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Do you confirm whether spandsp can handle faxes in h323? I haven't manage to make it work apart from SIP/ IAX2 Selon Steve Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote: Will this code be disclaimed so it can be added to CVS-HEAD? Mark told me it will go in as one of the pure GPL addons. It will not be disclaimed. I wanted to know if I could use its ASN.1 code in my T.38 implementation. Because of this I haven't. This seems to mean the new H.323 will have problems with things like G.729. Regards, Steve ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
[Asterisk-Dev] Fax and h323
Hi, Do you confirm whether spandsp can handle faxes in h323? I haven't manage to make it work apart from SIP/ IAX2 Selon Steve Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote: > > > Will this code be disclaimed so it can be added to CVS-HEAD? > > > Mark told me it will go in as one of the pure GPL addons. It will not be > disclaimed. I wanted to know if I could use its ASN.1 code in my T.38 > implementation. Because of this I haven't. This seems to mean the new > H.323 will have problems with things like G.729. > > Regards, > Steve > > ___ > Asterisk-Dev mailing list > Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev > ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Re: New h.323 channel driver
Current code has nothing to do with it really. If you do follow the readme with the included chan_h323 that you wrote all you get is a nice segfault when the module loads. It works fine with something like redhat 9 or older slackware. I suspect that using gcc 3.4.3 has something to do with it. This channel driver from ObjSys compiles, loads and actually makes a call. Which is more than I could ever get your driver to do on the same box. So instead of filing a bug report you simply bitch about it? Go back to your hole. My my we are bitter today aren't we... I would file a report if we actually used your code. /b ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Re: New h.323 channel driver
Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote: Will this code be disclaimed so it can be added to CVS-HEAD? Mark told me it will go in as one of the pure GPL addons. It will not be disclaimed. I wanted to know if I could use its ASN.1 code in my T.38 implementation. Because of this I haven't. This seems to mean the new H.323 will have problems with things like G.729. Regards, Steve ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
Re: [Asterisk-Dev] chan_bluetooth
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 08:26 -0500, Brent Priddy wrote: > here is the output of asterisk -vvvcd on 2.6.7 and > 2.4.when making an outbound call from my motorola v600 cell phone, IAX > softphone is calling my T610 (if you keep scrolling you will see the > output from my Sony/Erricson T610) Hm, useful debugging -- thanks. It looks like the T610 is starting the SCO connection for itself, while the v600 expects us to open it. Try adding 'sco_start(dev, -1);' immediately after the send_atcmd(..."ATD%s;"...) in blt_call(). -- dwmw2 ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
RE: [Asterisk-Dev] Re: New h.323 channel driver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Chih-Wei Huang wrote: > >> Sounds like you don't understand very well what you talked about... >> > > He just wants free support so he can make money without spending any, > yet doesn't want to learn anything on his own. I am not after free support. As for spending less money, yes any business wishes to get more out every dollar spent. We have spent time and time to configure H323 for quite few clients and we have learnt what was needed and successfully deployed H323. I just wish other people on this list do not have to go thru same pain. That is all :) Senad ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Re: New h.323 channel driver
Senad J wrote: Just compare it to SIP, and you will see HUGE differences :) Because SIP is the new H.323. Jeremy McNamara ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
RE: [Asterisk-Dev] Re: New h.323 channel driver
> Documentation? > I think Openh323 much more rich documenations than ooh323c. > Check > > http://www.voxgratia.org/ cool.. now we are getting somewhere... :) > Even the old unmaintained www.openh323.org > contains enough information for a beginner to > study and programming. You are missing my point... Documentation, hints etc.. for the usage of H323 in asterisk not GENERAL knowledge. >> Wiki has got very litle information... > Do you mean www.voip-info.org? > Yeah... voip-info contains few information about Openh323. > But that just means there are lesser intersections between > community of Openh323 and voip-info. >> Googling does not help... there are more mailing list "fights" >> between OH323 and open_h323 then useful information :) > Fights between what? I'm confused... > Openh323 is an H.323 protocol stack, what OH323 means? > Do you mean ooh323c, another H.323 stack in C by Objective Systems? > Or chan_oh323, another Asterisk H.323 channel driver by > inAccessNetwork? Well.. above you are answering your own question with correct answers... I wonder why did you ask it in first place? > Sounds like you don't understand very well what you talked about... Yes... exactly the point and that is correct.. I have NOT a clue about asterisk H323... and do you know why? Answer: Because there is not enough asterisk H323 related docs, hints, examples etc... Just compare it to SIP, and you will see HUGE differences :) Senad ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Re: New h.323 channel driver
Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote: Will this code be disclaimed so it can be added to CVS-HEAD? Digium BOUGHT it. I would hope it would get added to cvs -head. Jeremy McNamara ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Re: New h.323 channel driver
Brian West wrote: Current code has nothing to do with it really. If you do follow the readme with the included chan_h323 that you wrote all you get is a nice segfault when the module loads. It works fine with something like redhat 9 or older slackware. I suspect that using gcc 3.4.3 has something to do with it. This channel driver from ObjSys compiles, loads and actually makes a call. Which is more than I could ever get your driver to do on the same box. So instead of filing a bug report you simply bitch about it? Go back to your hole. Jeremy McNamara ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Re: New h.323 channel driver
Let me remind all you people, Digium PAID for this newest H.323 driver to be developed. For whatever reason is beyond me. I have always had very good luck using reasonable volumes of traffic on my H.323 driver when using the proper versions of Open H.323 as defined in the README. If you don't actually read the documentation, you will not make it work. To have something they knew would work with some sort of reliability. The channel driver in CVS and ooh323 both have issues and do not work for everyone. If I take your chan_h323 compile and install it to the letter in the README it will segfault on load. I compile and install this new driver which isn't even complete yet and I can at least make a phone call with it. I do not mean any disrespect to you or your code ... this is just one more option that people will have. /b ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Re: New h.323 channel driver
Will this code be disclaimed so it can be added to CVS-HEAD? -- Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-210-3699 x2120 ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Re: New h.323 channel driver
If you would run even semi-current code chan_h323 performs wonderfully against As5300s - both inbound and outbound. Think before you type. Jeremy McNamara Current code has nothing to do with it really. If you do follow the readme with the included chan_h323 that you wrote all you get is a nice segfault when the module loads. It works fine with something like redhat 9 or older slackware. I suspect that using gcc 3.4.3 has something to do with it. This channel driver from ObjSys compiles, loads and actually makes a call. Which is more than I could ever get your driver to do on the same box. /b ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
Re: [Asterisk-Dev] [Rant] [long] - code style and quality
On May 10, 2005 09:56 pm, Brian West wrote: > Lets clarify.. the "power" that be is Mark Spencer... I doubt he seen > this thread. Nonsense. You read it. I read it. many people who contribute to asterisk read it, and many people who may want to start their patching foray will read it. It really is a shame that Mark doesn't, but he's unbelievably busy and he gets his news through the grapevine, of which anyone who talks to him is part, and it's THOSE people who are reading this. -A. ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
