Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Dialplan 'i' and DIALSTATUS bugs
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: ast-one dial(IAX2/)'s ast-two. Both are CVS HEAD within a week of today. ast-two's context for ast-one's type=user is somecontext. [somecontext] exten = 100,1,NoOp(One) exten = 100,2,Hangup exten = 200,1,NoOp(Two) exten = 200,2,Hangup exten = i,1,Wait(1) exten = i,2,Playback(tt-somethingwrong) exten = i,3,Hangup Now, when ast-one Dial(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/300) I get an immediate failure with DIALSTATUS set to NOANSWER. This is bad. Why? Because I cannot tell the difference between dialing a valid extension that does not answer, and dialing an invalid extension, and thus it is impossible to provide a failover scenario. Further, extension 'i' is not being triggered even though it should. Similarly, I have a PRI and DIDs from 555-0001 thorugh 555-0030 inclusive. My 23 Zap channels dump into the pri context: [pri] exten = 555-0001,1,NoOp(0001) exten = 555-0001,2,Hangup exten = 555-0002,1,NoOp(0002) exten = 555-0002,2,Hangup exten = i,1,Wait(1) exten = i,2,Playback(tt-somethingwrong) exten = i,3,Hangup Now when someone calls 555-0003 the call gets routed to be. However, the 'i' extension again does not get triggered, Asterisk refuses the call and the Telco sends back a number not in service message. If I did NOT have 'i' in there I would agree with this behaviour. However, since the extension is invalid, I should be triggering 'i'. Can anyone refute this logic? I want to get everyone's opinion before I start an attempt to fix this. Next time try to use ACTUAL stuff from your dialplan. 555-1212 is NOT correct unless your telco is REALLY REALLY WEIRD. The telco will send 5551212 Telephone numbers do not contain non-numbers. -- Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest. Mark Twain ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Dialplan 'i' and DIALSTATUS bugs
ast-one dial(IAX2/)'s ast-two. Both are CVS HEAD within a week of today. ast-two's context for ast-one's type=user is somecontext. [somecontext] exten = 100,1,NoOp(One) exten = 100,2,Hangup exten = 200,1,NoOp(Two) exten = 200,2,Hangup exten = i,1,Wait(1) exten = i,2,Playback(tt-somethingwrong) exten = i,3,Hangup Now, when ast-one Dial(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/300) I get an immediate failure with DIALSTATUS set to NOANSWER. This is bad. Why? Because I cannot tell the difference between dialing a valid extension that does not answer, and dialing an invalid extension, and thus it is impossible to provide a failover scenario. Further, extension 'i' is not being triggered even though it should. Similarly, I have a PRI and DIDs from 555-0001 thorugh 555-0030 inclusive. My 23 Zap channels dump into the pri context: [pri] exten = 555-0001,1,NoOp(0001) exten = 555-0001,2,Hangup exten = 555-0002,1,NoOp(0002) exten = 555-0002,2,Hangup exten = i,1,Wait(1) exten = i,2,Playback(tt-somethingwrong) exten = i,3,Hangup Now when someone calls 555-0003 the call gets routed to be. However, the 'i' extension again does not get triggered, Asterisk refuses the call and the Telco sends back a number not in service message. If I did NOT have 'i' in there I would agree with this behaviour. However, since the extension is invalid, I should be triggering 'i'. Can anyone refute this logic? I want to get everyone's opinion before I start an attempt to fix this. Next time try to use ACTUAL stuff from your dialplan. 555-1212 is NOT correct unless your telco is REALLY REALLY WEIRD. The telco will send 5551212 Telephone numbers do not contain non-numbers. Look a little closer... he didn't say a thing about 555-1212. (more coffee?) ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Dialplan 'i' and DIALSTATUS bugs
On Friday 15 April 2005 10:37, Eric Wieling wrote: Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: [pri] exten = 555-0001,1,NoOp(0001) exten = 555-0001,2,Hangup exten = 555-0002,1,NoOp(0002) exten = 555-0002,2,Hangup Next time try to use ACTUAL stuff from your dialplan. 555-1212 is NOT correct unless your telco is REALLY REALLY WEIRD. The telco will send 5551212 Telephone numbers do not contain non-numbers. Actually, either will work. Try it in your own dialplan. Also, note that you can do a Goto(5-5-5-0-0-0-1,1), as the - is completely ignored when dealing with dialplan extensions. -- Tilghman ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Dialplan 'i' and DIALSTATUS bugs
On April 15, 2005 11:37 am, Eric Wieling wrote: exten = 555-0001,1,NoOp(0001) exten = 555-0001,2,Hangup Next time try to use ACTUAL stuff from your dialplan. 555-1212 is NOT correct unless your telco is REALLY REALLY WEIRD. The telco will send 5551212 Telephone numbers do not contain non-numbers. This was an example; of course there's no dashes in the real thing... Please try to see beyond the obvious bugs... I've been using Asterisk for well over a year now and push many tens of thousands of calls through it. :-) -A. ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
