RE: [Asterisk-Users] Digium hardware

2006-01-26 Thread Bogdan Moldovan
Hello,
 
The 5 exchange lines I assume they are analogic. For them you will need 5
FXO ports. You can buy a TDM04B and a TDM01B (this will get you to the 5
FXO). Make sure you have 2 PCI slots available.
 
Now for the extensions you need 
- IP Phones 
or
- ATAs (if you want to reuse your analog phones)
 
IP Phones you can buy from different companies. I like Aastra, Polycom...
 
For ATAs I like Linksys PAP2.
 
Bogdan Moldovan
VoIP SIP: sip://[EMAIL PROTECTED]
VoIP IAX: iax://obelisk.modulo.ro/101
MODULO Consulting
The Future Is Not What It Used To Be
http://www.modulo.ro 




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cisco - Kameko
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 9:17 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Digium hardware


Hello,
 
I want to setup an asterisk pabx. I want to understand more on what hardware
(PCI cards) i will need to do this. I have 5 xchange lines and 30
extensions within our offices. I have just finished installing Fedora Core
and downloaded asterisk-1.2.3.tar.gz
http://ftp.digium.com/pub/asterisk/asterisk-1.2.3.tar.gz  and
zaptel-1.2.2.tar.gz http://ftp.digium.com/pub/zaptel/zaptel-1.2.2.tar.gz
which i want to install.
 
In need or your advise ASAP
 
Regards,
 
SOUL

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] How to set features.conf to change thehangup key.

2006-01-08 Thread Bogdan Moldovan
If you are on 1.2.1, do:

In features.conf

[featuremap]
automon = *1  ; One Touch Record
atxfer = *2
disconnect = *97  ; this is the line you should add or edit

Bogdan Moldovan
MODULO Consulting
The Future Is Not What It Used To Be
http://www.modulo.ro 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Obelix
Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 10:37 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] How to set features.conf to change thehangup
key.

Quoting Bogdan Moldovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

I have upgraded to Asterisk 1.2.1 and haven't gotten it to work yet.

Does it depend on some options in the Dial command?

I have also got the source now, and would like to know how it can be
modified.

There is no documentation on what the structures do, how which parameters
contain the right settings.

This appears to be the relevant line. What changes does it require to change
the setting?

  { AST_FEATURE_DISCONNECT, Disconnect Call, disconnect, 
  *, *, builtin_disconnect, AST_FEATURE_FLAG_NEEDSDTMF }, };
 

/Obelix


 Hello,

 The idea is the following:

 For the 1.2.1 installation just set the parameter disconnect = *97 In 
 your features.conf

 For the 1.0.7 installation you either upgrade or patch the code. The 
 patch the code would require you a lot of knowledge of c 
 programming. It would consist of extracting from the 1.2.1 code the 
 disconnect functionality and add it to the 1.0.7 code base. But that is
not straight forward...

 If you need it badly we can do it for you as consulting. But I 
 strongly advise you to upgrade.

 Upgrade,now, is not an easy task either, but it might be easier that 
 the code patch. Mainly because you would have to migrate the 
 configuration or test it... Do you have a test bed?

 BR

 Bogdan Moldovan
 MODULO Consulting
 The Future Is Not What It Used To Be
 http://www.modulo.ro

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Obelix
 Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 2:01 PM
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] How to set features.conf to change 
 thehangup key.

 Quoting Bogdan Moldovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 I don't have this in my main installation, which is 1.0.7.
 In the case of 1.0.7 where else can I effect that change?

 I also have a 1.2.1 setup, what would I have to change in the code below?

 What is the general idea?

  Indeed, this is 1.2.1
 
  But do the following:
 
  Go to the source tree, do a
  vi res/res_features.c
 
  Search for a :
  struct ast_call_feature builtin_features[]
 
  And you should see the builtin features:
 
  In 1.2.1 I have:
 
  #define FEATURES_COUNT (sizeof(builtin_features) /
  sizeof(builtin_features[0]))
  struct ast_call_feature builtin_features[] =  {
  { AST_FEATURE_REDIRECT, Blind Transfer, blindxfer, #, 
  #, builtin_blindtransfer, AST_FEATURE_FLAG_NEEDSDTMF },
  { AST_FEATURE_REDIRECT, Attended Transfer, atxfer, , 
  , builtin_atxfer, AST_FEATURE_FLAG_NEEDSDTMF },
  { AST_FEATURE_AUTOMON, One Touch Monitor, automon, , 
  , builtin_automonitor, AST_FEATURE_FLAG_NEEDSDTMF },
  { AST_FEATURE_DISCONNECT, Disconnect Call, disconnect, 
  *, *, builtin_disconnect, AST_FEATURE_FLAG_NEEDSDTMF }, };
 
  In case you do not have this, good changes are that, in case you 
  need badly this feature, you will upgrade or tweak the sources...
 
  Bogdan
 
 

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users






This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Dial(Console/dsp) and option g doesnt appear towork

2006-01-04 Thread Bogdan Moldovan



Have you tried?

exten = 309,1,System(echo  /tmp/file)exten = 
309,2,Dial(Console/dsp,,g)exten = 309,103,System(rm -f /tmp/file)
exten = 309,104,Hangup()exten = 309,3,System(rm -f 
/tmp/file)exten = 309,4,Hangup()


Bogdan MoldovanMODULO Consulting"The Future Is Not What 
It Used To Be"http://www.modulo.ro 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry 
GeisSent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 8:25 PMTo: 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.comSubject: [Asterisk-Users] 
Dial(Console/dsp) and option g doesnt appear towork
I have a case where I need the option g to continue 
execute after the hangup (I'm using 1.2.1)and I have the following in my 
extensions:exten = 309,1,System(echo  /tmp/file)exten = 
309,2,Dial(Console/dsp,,g)exten = 309,3,System(rm -f /tmp/file)exten 
= 309,4,HangupHowever, after the hangup priority 3 is not 
executed.Does 'g' not work with console/dsp or do I have something 
wrong.THanks,Jerry
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] How to set features.conf to change thehangup key.

2006-01-03 Thread Bogdan Moldovan
Hello,

The idea is the following:

For the 1.2.1 installation just set the parameter 
disconnect = *97
In your features.conf

For the 1.0.7 installation you either upgrade or patch the code. The patch
the code would require you a lot of knowledge of c programming. It would
consist of extracting from the 1.2.1 code the disconnect functionality and
add it to the 1.0.7 code base. But that is not straight forward...

If you need it badly we can do it for you as consulting. But I strongly
advise you to upgrade.

Upgrade,now, is not an easy task either, but it might be easier that the
code patch. Mainly because you would have to migrate the configuration or
test it... Do you have a test bed?

BR

Bogdan Moldovan
MODULO Consulting
The Future Is Not What It Used To Be
http://www.modulo.ro 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Obelix
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 2:01 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] How to set features.conf to change thehangup
key.

Quoting Bogdan Moldovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

I don't have this in my main installation, which is 1.0.7.
In the case of 1.0.7 where else can I effect that change?

I also have a 1.2.1 setup, what would I have to change in the code below?

What is the general idea?

 Indeed, this is 1.2.1

 But do the following:

 Go to the source tree, do a
 vi res/res_features.c

 Search for a :
 struct ast_call_feature builtin_features[]

 And you should see the builtin features:

 In 1.2.1 I have:

 #define FEATURES_COUNT (sizeof(builtin_features) /
 sizeof(builtin_features[0]))
 struct ast_call_feature builtin_features[] =  {
 { AST_FEATURE_REDIRECT, Blind Transfer, blindxfer, #, 
 #, builtin_blindtransfer, AST_FEATURE_FLAG_NEEDSDTMF },
 { AST_FEATURE_REDIRECT, Attended Transfer, atxfer, , , 
 builtin_atxfer, AST_FEATURE_FLAG_NEEDSDTMF },
 { AST_FEATURE_AUTOMON, One Touch Monitor, automon, , , 
 builtin_automonitor, AST_FEATURE_FLAG_NEEDSDTMF },
 { AST_FEATURE_DISCONNECT, Disconnect Call, disconnect, 
 *, *, builtin_disconnect, AST_FEATURE_FLAG_NEEDSDTMF }, };

 In case you do not have this, good changes are that, in case you need 
 badly this feature, you will upgrade or tweak the sources...

 Bogdan



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] IAXTEL??

2006-01-03 Thread Bogdan Moldovan
From:
http://www.iaxtel.com/

The IAXTel Server is currently under maintenance. Some technical
difficulties, such as connection timeouts, registration timeouts, and the
inability to make phone calls may be experienced. Thank you for your
patience.




:(

b

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kerry Garrison
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 5:55 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] IAXTEL??

Is IAXTEL still around? I needed to call Digium and figured I would set it
up to save some miinutes when talking to them but I can't get it to
register.

-Kerry


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] IAXTEL??

2006-01-03 Thread Bogdan Moldovan
I know, this is the sad part :(
b 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Vile
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 6:08 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAXTEL??

That message has been there for months.

On 1/3/06, Bogdan Moldovan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 From:
 http://www.iaxtel.com/

 The IAXTel Server is currently under maintenance. Some technical 
 difficulties, such as connection timeouts, registration timeouts, and 
 the inability to make phone calls may be experienced. Thank you for 
 your patience.

 


 :(

 b

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kerry 
 Garrison
 Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 5:55 PM
 To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] IAXTEL??

 Is IAXTEL still around? I needed to call Digium and figured I would 
 set it up to save some miinutes when talking to them but I can't get 
 it to register.

 -Kerry


 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



--
Tom Vile
Baldwin Technology Solutions, Inc
Consulting - Web Design - VoIP Telephony www.baldwintechsolutions.com
Phone: 518-631-2855 x205
Fax: 518-631-2856
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] FC3 or FC1 (or something else?)

2006-01-03 Thread Bogdan Moldovan
IMHO use FC4.

Also after the install of the OS and all the required packages do a 'yum
update'.

Bogdan Moldovan
MODULO Consulting
The Future Is Not What It Used To Be
http://www.modulo.ro 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett, Gary
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 6:34 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FC3 or FC1 (or something else?)

Hi

I wish to install asterisk 1.2 (the latest tar.gz from the site not the
CVS version) on an HP box with a TE110P (single port E1/T1)

My question is which OS would be preferred in this configuration Fedora Core
1 or Fedora Core 3, and are there any install guides out there that are
recent enough for asterisk 1.2

I am also open to suggestions for other Operating Systems if any of you feel
that FC1/3 are not the best for the job, my only definates are that I use
the latest tar.gz from the asterisk.org website not the CVS and also that I
will be using the TE110p

Any help would be greatly appreciated
Gary
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] offline g.729 transcoding

2006-01-02 Thread Bogdan Moldovan



Hello Kevin,

Matt Ridell also replied to a another message with this 
link (10x both)...

But is there a way to do that using a command line like 
sox? Can sox enc/decode from/to g.729? WIth an external/builtin library? Or 
something similar to sox?

Thanks,

Bogdan MoldovanMODULO Consulting"The Future Is Not What 
It Used To Be"http://www.modulo.ro 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of kevin 
lingSent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 5:31 AMTo: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial 
Discussion'Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] offline g.729 
transcoding

try this:
http://www.asteriskguru.com/audio_conversion.php



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim 
HarrisonSent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 10:52 AMTo: 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.comSubject: [Asterisk-Users] offline 
g.729 transcoding
I'm trying to get some of the sample asterisk gsm files into a 
g.729 encoding. Is there an offline way of doing this (without a 
specialized card?) Can someone point me in the right 
direction?Thanks,-Tim
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] offline g.729 transcoding

2006-01-02 Thread Bogdan Moldovan



Thanks Kevin,

Bogdan


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of kevin 
lingSent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 8:28 AMTo: 'Asterisk 
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'Subject: RE: 
[Asterisk-Users] offline g.729 transcoding

FYI:

http://redice.krisk.org/

g729:
http://www.readytechnology.co.uk/open/ipp-codecs/ 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bogdan 
MoldovanSent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 1:46 PMTo: 
'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'Subject: RE: 
[Asterisk-Users] offline g.729 transcoding

Hello Kevin,

Matt Ridell also replied to a another message with this 
link (10x both)...

But is there a way to do that using a command line like 
sox? Can sox enc/decode from/to g.729? WIth an external/builtin library? Or 
something similar to sox?

Thanks,

Bogdan MoldovanMODULO Consulting"The Future Is Not What 
It Used To Be"http://www.modulo.ro 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of kevin 
lingSent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 5:31 AMTo: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial 
Discussion'Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] offline g.729 
transcoding

try this:
http://www.asteriskguru.com/audio_conversion.php



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim 
HarrisonSent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 10:52 AMTo: 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.comSubject: [Asterisk-Users] offline 
g.729 transcoding
I'm trying to get some of the sample asterisk gsm files into a 
g.729 encoding. Is there an offline way of doing this (without a 
specialized card?) Can someone point me in the right 
direction?Thanks,-Tim
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] How to set features.conf to change the hangup key.

2005-12-31 Thread Bogdan Moldovan
In features.conf

[featuremap]
automon = *1  ; One Touch Record
atxfer = *2
disconnect = *97  ; this is just an example

Bogdan

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Obelix
Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 4:52 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] How to set features.conf to change the hangup key.



I want to modify features.conf to set a different key to hang up call.
Rather than the usual * key. I gather it involves some application map
settings etc.

Does anyone have a clue? I have read the docs but can hardly find any
examples.

Regards

Obelix


This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] How to set features.conf to change thehangup key.

2005-12-31 Thread Bogdan Moldovan
Indeed, this is 1.2.1

But do the following:

Go to the source tree, do a 
vi res/res_features.c

Search for a :
struct ast_call_feature builtin_features[]

And you should see the builtin features:

In 1.2.1 I have:

#define FEATURES_COUNT (sizeof(builtin_features) /
sizeof(builtin_features[0]))
struct ast_call_feature builtin_features[] =
 {
{ AST_FEATURE_REDIRECT, Blind Transfer, blindxfer, #, #,
builtin_blindtransfer, AST_FEATURE_FLAG_NEEDSDTMF },
{ AST_FEATURE_REDIRECT, Attended Transfer, atxfer, , ,
builtin_atxfer, AST_FEATURE_FLAG_NEEDSDTMF },
{ AST_FEATURE_AUTOMON, One Touch Monitor, automon, , ,
builtin_automonitor, AST_FEATURE_FLAG_NEEDSDTMF },
{ AST_FEATURE_DISCONNECT, Disconnect Call, disconnect, *, *,
builtin_disconnect, AST_FEATURE_FLAG_NEEDSDTMF },
};

In case you do not have this, good changes are that, in case you need badly
this feature, you will upgrade or tweak the sources...

Bogdan
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Obelix
Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 6:07 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] How to set features.conf to change thehangup
key.

Quoting Bogdan Moldovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Does this option work with Asterisk 1.07? I tried it and it didn't work

 In features.conf

 [featuremap]
 automon = *1  ; One Touch Record
 atxfer = *2
 disconnect = *97  ; this is just an example

 Bogdan

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Obelix
 Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 4:52 PM
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] How to set features.conf to change the hangup
key.



 I want to modify features.conf to set a different key to hang up call.
 Rather than the usual * key. I gather it involves some application map 
 settings etc.

 Does anyone have a clue? I have read the docs but can hardly find any 
 examples.

 Regards

 Obelix

 
 This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users






This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] How to set features.conf to change thehangup key.

2005-12-31 Thread Bogdan Moldovan
Of course,
This is what res_features.c does...
B

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Obelix
Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 6:32 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] How to set features.conf to change thehangup
key.

Quoting Bogdan Moldovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Is there a means of monitoring the call for that sequence of keys then
hanging up the call if they are detected?




 Indeed, this is 1.2.1

 But do the following:

 Go to the source tree, do a
 vi res/res_features.c

 Search for a :
 struct ast_call_feature builtin_features[]

 And you should see the builtin features:

 In 1.2.1 I have:

 #define FEATURES_COUNT (sizeof(builtin_features) /
 sizeof(builtin_features[0]))
 struct ast_call_feature builtin_features[] =  {
 { AST_FEATURE_REDIRECT, Blind Transfer, blindxfer, #, 
 #, builtin_blindtransfer, AST_FEATURE_FLAG_NEEDSDTMF },
 { AST_FEATURE_REDIRECT, Attended Transfer, atxfer, , , 
 builtin_atxfer, AST_FEATURE_FLAG_NEEDSDTMF },
 { AST_FEATURE_AUTOMON, One Touch Monitor, automon, , , 
 builtin_automonitor, AST_FEATURE_FLAG_NEEDSDTMF },
 { AST_FEATURE_DISCONNECT, Disconnect Call, disconnect, 
 *, *, builtin_disconnect, AST_FEATURE_FLAG_NEEDSDTMF }, };

 In case you do not have this, good changes are that, in case you need 
 badly this feature, you will upgrade or tweak the sources...

 Bogdan


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Obelix
 Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 6:07 PM
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] How to set features.conf to change 
 thehangup key.

 Quoting Bogdan Moldovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Does this option work with Asterisk 1.07? I tried it and it didn't 
 work

  In features.conf
 
  [featuremap]
  automon = *1  ; One Touch Record
  atxfer = *2
  disconnect = *97  ; this is just an example
 
  Bogdan
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Obelix
  Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 4:52 PM
  To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
  Subject: [Asterisk-Users] How to set features.conf to change the 
  hangup
 key.
 
 
 
  I want to modify features.conf to set a different key to hang up call.
  Rather than the usual * key. I gather it involves some application 
  map settings etc.
 
  Does anyone have a clue? I have read the docs but can hardly find 
  any examples.
 
  Regards
 
  Obelix
 
  
  This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 




 
 This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users






This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Semi-OT: porting numbers away

2005-12-30 Thread Bogdan Moldovan
Depending on the forward type. You could put conditional or un-conditional
forwarding. As far as I know some telcos are placing restrictions on
conditional forwarding (and that depends on a case by case basis) but for
un-conditional forwarding I don't see why there could be a limitation.

Bogdan

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ross C
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 9:34 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Semi-OT: porting numbers away

Thanks Matt.
Are there limitations with call forwarding?  For example, with Teliax's pay
as you go plan you can have a whole bunch of simultaneous calls (we had 12
going the other day).  So say we get 10 or 12 calls on our telco number that
forwards to Teliax, is there a limit to the number of forwarded calls going
on at once?  Or does the telco hand-off the call to Teliax, then the telco
is no longer involved in that call?  I just don't want call forwarding to
defeat the purpose of going with an ITSN or limit my capabilities.

Also, do I need to have an actual physical analog line to use call
forwarding?  I have two numbers that I would like to forward, but I really
only need one POTS line that would be used by outgoing stuff (911, credit
card machines, etc).  So could I have 123-4567 forward to Teliax#987-6543
and 123-4568 forward to Teliax#987-6542, but only have one actual POTS line?
Or is this heavily dependent on the telco doing the forwarding?

Thanks!

-ross

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Riddell
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 1:16 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Semi-OT: porting numbers away

Ross C wrote:
 Thanks, but I'm looking for information on porting numbers when the
current
 provider holding the numbers goes out of business and is unreachable.  
 Can
I
 get the numbers?  The business has had the same phone number for 
 almost 30 years and definitely can't lose the number due to some 
 provider's instability.
 As most VoIP companies are relatively new and small, I'm a bit 
 skittish about porting these numbers to an ITSN, then that company 
 going out of business and not being able to get my numbers back.  How
would that work?

So use call forwarding from the Telco, forward it to a VoIP DID, if you lose
the VoIP DID, change the forwarding to another number.

That way you can also keep the PSTN line for emergency calls (despite 911
services being offered by various ITSPs, you are relying on the Internet on
site being in top shape).

For example, I have seen more companies do something strange (or even
participate unknowingly in DDOS attacks) rendering their internet connection
useless.

While there are workarounds (maintain a good security policy, use QOS, dual
networks with router-based traffic control), it never pays to have a
customer unhappy (or dead in the case of a missed 911 call).

Typically most ITSPs rely on SLAs (Service Level Agreements) from upstream
providers which will effectively indemnify them in case of upstream failure,
a court case is not really useful in the prevention of the situation.

Is one POTS line really so much in the end?

We normally route outbound calls first via ourselves, and in the case of
network failures, fall back to the customer's PSTN/BRI line.  (BRI being
quite popular here in Italy).

This way they have unlimited outgoing lines and a set number of incoming
lines (we typically offer per channel on inbound DIDs).

If there is ever any problem with the DID, you can forward the PSTN number
back to a cellphone etc.

In fact, if I remember correctly NuFone (https://www.nufone.net/) in the USA
provides a service whereby they will try to route your number via voip and
fallback to an alternate number (ideal if available).

Furthermore, NuFone is one of the oldest (if not _the_ oldest) IAX provider
and has proven to be one of our most stable providers.

If you know what you're doing, NuFone would be my recommendation, if however
you need quite a bit of hand holding, I'd either recommend another provider,
or exhaustive use of the various Asterisk documentation resources.  :)

You can never guarantee a company is not going to go under, but when a
company provides a good service for an extended period of time, you can feel
a little safer.

--
Cheers,

Matt Riddell
___

http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
http://freevoip.gedameurope.com (Free Asterisk Voip Community)
http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and 

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Semi-OT: porting numbers away

2005-12-30 Thread Bogdan Moldovan
This is a possible scenario indeed. But this scenario should be handled by
the switches of the telco...
bogdan

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of trixter aka
Bret McDanel
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 9:55 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Semi-OT: porting numbers away

On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 21:38 +0200, Bogdan Moldovan wrote:
 Depending on the forward type. You could put conditional or 
 un-conditional forwarding. As far as I know some telcos are placing 
 restrictions on conditional forwarding (and that depends on a case by 
 case basis) but for un-conditional forwarding I don't see why there could
be a limitation.

Well they generally like limitations because people sometimes show
questionable judgement.  A forwards to B, B forwards to A.  Call comes in on
either and you rapidly exhaust capacity.  Sometimes its just lack of
knowledge that leads people to do this sometimes they just dont think
beforehand.  

For reasons like these they like to put caps on it, but you can generally
get the caps high enough that if you are forwarding from an analog line it
shouldnt matter (ie if you need 1000 forwards you need to reevaluate how you
are doing this).


-- 
Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel
UK +44 870 340 4605   Germany +49 801 777 555 3402
US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200
FreeWorldDialup: 635378
http://www.sacaug.org/ Sacramento Asterisk Users Group

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Conditional CODEC translation

2005-12-29 Thread Bogdan Moldovan



Hello Leandro,

Indeed, your problem is a nice one.

I do not think this is possible to do this with *. If I 
am wrong, the list, please correct me...

There are two ways of doing that:
1/. would be to have the IP phone have a logic that 
advertises the preferred codec based on B-number. I do not know of any IP Phones 
that are able to do that...
2/. would be to have * perform allow/disallow 
parameters based on the number you have dialed.

Both would be interesting... Maybe we will implement 
this in LoudHush (for the softphone side).

Could such a conditional codec be implemented on 
asterisk in a future version?

Bogdan Moldovan
MODULO Consulting
"The Future Is Not What It Used To 
Be"
http://www.modulo.ro


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leandro 
RzezakSent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 6:03 AMTo: 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.comSubject: [Asterisk-Users] Conditional 
CODEC translation
We have a VoIP termination provider that allows g729.We would 
that internal calls (between our own IP phones) be handled using alaw, and 
outgoing calls using native forwarded g729 without translation (ie, not using 
asterisk g729 licenses). We need to avoid translations.WHAT WE HAVE 
NOW:IP Phone --alaw-- IP PhoneIP Phone --alaw-- Asterisk 
--g729-- VoIP provider(Phones are configured only to allow alaw 
and g729, provider is configured only to allow g729; however phones are never 
using g729)WHAT WE NEED:IP Phone --alaw-- IP 
PhoneIP Phone --g729-- VoIP providerPlease help me 
accomplish that.Thank you-- Leandro 
Rzezak[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users