Re: [asterisk-users] Building an RPM from Asterisk 1.4

2007-09-20 Thread Marcus Franke
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 12:22:43AM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
 
  Why is it looking for files that obviously
  don't exist?
 
 That spec uses quite a few discourged methods for rpm packages. There
 are a number of well-maintained RPM packages of Asterisk. Use one of
 them or modify one of them.
 

Do you have any examples for these spec files? 

I found a repository for installing Asterisk on Centos, but it
took a while before I discovered it. Ok, just checked the link
its for RHEL, but as Centos is just recompiled this won't matter.

Same situation for Ubuntu using the debian package format, but
I have not found a repository so far and Ubuntu delivers just 
the old 1.2 release. :)



Marcus

___

Sign up now for AstriCon 2007!  September 25-28th.  http://www.astricon.net/ 

--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Best wifi IP phone for asterisk

2007-06-25 Thread Marcus Franke
Benny Amorsen schrieb:
 MM Siemens GigaSet SL75

 The SL75 is DECT, not Wifi.

 Apart from that, was it really necessary to quote 20 lines and add a
 ridiculous 15 line disclaimer telling me that I'm not allowed to read
 the message?
There is a GigaSet SL75 WLAN.

http://gigaset.siemens.com/shc/0,1935,hq_en_0_122755_rArNrNrNrN,00.html


Hmm, I did not see any DECT SL75..



Marcus

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Recordings.

2006-11-22 Thread Marcus Franke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Does anyone have experience with recording multiple calls 
 simultaneously on a single system with or without performance trouble? 
 What kind of system do I need?
 

Well, isnt this just a simple calculation?

Do a record of one of your lines for about a minute.

Look at the size of the created file and divide the kb by 60 and
multiply by 20 and you have an first overview about how much data will
get written down to harddisk per second.

But I think you should be fairly well if you use state-of-the-art
server disks. They should be fast enough for this.



Marcus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFZFjMqwWWw48OFWoRAvhtAKC58l2WXpK/RmzWB2FtRDbHFxsJWQCgp3OI
o9zojHnurfaMtAOjLytHFUs=
=upqP
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Recordings.

2006-11-22 Thread Marcus Franke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Vicky wrote:
 Yeh even a
 simple UDMA 5 enabled hard drive can handle 30 calls recording easily .
 Sata hard drives are even better .
 

Hehe, UDMA sounds like EIDE drives.. nice to see they are fast enough,
but I do not recommend those as server hardware. ;-)

But, if John is going to buy a extra new server, he could use two drives
in a mirror setup extra for recordings of these files. As it is not only
the frequency of reading/writing these files but other accesses of the
media like starting programs or reading/writing of logfiles that slowes
down the access to the recorded audio files.


Marcus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFZGUUqwWWw48OFWoRAvidAJwPSpTSuY6nwxKTDKI8fZDmshmbUgCgtWAp
27akzsEDv03q5CmlGMObo50=
=2jAI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Recordings.

2006-11-22 Thread Marcus Franke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Michael Welter wrote:
 Has anyone tried recording to a ramdisk?  To an NFS mount?  Was there a
 benefit?
 

RAM disk? Interesting idea, but what to do in case of a server crash
loosing these recorded files?

You will get very angry customers if you have to explain them, that your
server, where you did record their complaints, crashed and lost their
problems :)

Id recommend this as a cache drive where you would move the files away
from, when the call is finished. But thats extra cpu cycles and it would
be kind of an effort to trigger the move the files after call is finished..



Marcus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFZGnpqwWWw48OFWoRAoxqAJ0WIynm41jcxh3WT2GM1C/8bMj1KACg8vZJ
gkKQtIlykyJO6ZQwmvggUm4=
=JC+B
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users