[Asterisk-Users] Re: Re: Asterisk on SuSE 9.1?
Hi, On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 at 09:33, Rick Green wrote: (WHy is this?! I've noticed it with every sound card I've ever tried, and it infuriates me that I have to deal with feedback from the analog loopback in the sound card! Supposedly these soundards are full-duplex, so why are they looped by default, instead of keeping the inputs and outputs totally separated!) maybe because the sound cards are also being used for karaoke. ANybody know how to do an alsa.conf or set a mixer to fix this? Turn down the controller for the mic completely. It only controls how much from the mic's signal goes through the analog mixer directly to the speaker or line output, but has usually nothing to do with capturing. Then make sure that you have selected the mic as the input for capturing, and use the input gain controller to adjust the recording level. Depending on the sound card the mixer might have additional controls like a switch for a 2nd microphone or a mic boost switch that might need to be adjusted to get capturing from the mic working properly. cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] RE: Re: Voice in Asterisk with BRI ISDN Anyproperworking configurations yet?
Hi, On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 at 10:37, Christiaan Brink wrote: I have a HFC based ISDN BRI card in a Fedora Core 2 box (2.6.5 kernel). I was just wondering, is zaphfc the best way to interface this type of card with Asterisk? you might be able to interface these cards with mISDN as well (I don't know the current status of that), but zaphfc is certainly a better choice, because zaptel drivers have much less latency than CAPI. cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: Using AVM C4 with fewer than four lines?
Hi, On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 at 12:16, Louis van Dompselaar wrote: Does anyone know of a way to disable the ports on the C4 that are not connected? I think changing devices=4 to devices=2 in capi.conf should do the trick. Of course you have to make sure that your ISDN lines are connected to the two ports that haven't been disabled. cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: Re: Using AVM C4 with fewer than four lines?
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 at 14:08, Louis van Dompselaar wrote: It's already at devices=2 but that doesn't make a difference. Sorry, I was looking at the wrong place and drawing the wrong conclusions ... I think chan_capi sees the C4 as one single device with four controllers. A device corresponds to a B-chanel in capi.conf. See the capi.conf form chan_capi source tarball - it uses devices=2 for BRI lines, and devices=30 for PRI lines. So the C4 appears to chan_capi as 4 controllers with 2 devices each. You need to set up a separate interface section for each controller that is actually in use, and just skip the rest: [interfaces] ; The first controller msn=... ... controller=1 devices=2 ; The second controller msn=... ... controller=2 devices=2 Contr1: 2 B channels total, 2 B channels free. Contr2: 2 B channels total, 2 B channels free. Contr3: 2 B channels total, 2 B channels free. Contr4: 2 B channels total, 2 B channels free. capi info reports all the CAPI devices that exist in the system, but that doesn't mean it is really using them all. If you start Asterisk in verbose mode asterisk -vc , you should see a warning like this for every unused CAPI controller: Oct 28 15:41:04 WARNING[1076791936]: chan_capi.c:2786 load_module: Unused contr2 This is what I get on a system with a C2 card where only one of the two controllers is configured in capi.conf. cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: quadBRI ISDN telephone
Pedro, On Fri, 7 May 2004 at 10:51, Pedro Vela wrote: We have a quadBRI in NT mode with bri_cpe_ptmp signalling and when connect a ISDN telephone to this nothings happen. What can I do? - You have to use the right signalling (bri_net_ptmp) - The phone has to be connected to the card with a crossed cable - The phone needs power There are (at least) three ways to get power to the phone: - A power feeding module for the quadBRI cars. - A phone that has it's own power suply. - A NT1 (it could eveb be a broken one) that is being used as a power supply for the BRI link in question. See section 2.2 in http://www.pbx4linux.com/download/doc/PBX4Linux.htm for details on making a crossover cable for ISDN and using an old NT1 as a power supply. cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: Trouble compiling chan_capi on Suse 9.0
Hi, On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 at 19:49, asterisk wrote: [...] chan_capi.c: In function `pipe_frame': chan_capi.c:1187: error: too many arguments to function `ast_dsp_process' make: *** [chan_capi.o] Error 1 This looks like you are trying to compile chan_capi against a version of Asterisk (or installed Asterisk headers), that is either too old or too new, i.e. the two are expecting a different number of arguments to the ast_dsp_process function. cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: Convert ISDN Card in NT Mode
Hi, On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 at 09:35, Ignace CARIA wrote: My question is: is it possible to convert the second ISDN card into NT-Mode? yes. If yes, which card must I use? One that is based on the HFC-S chipset. They are available from various manufacturers and priced around 30 Euro here in Germany. How should I configure it? You need the zaphfc driver which is part of the bri-stuff package that can be found here: http://www.junghanns.net/asterisk/downloads The most recent version is 0.0.2rc12, but the author told me he soon will upload a much improved 0.0.2rc13. cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: SoftFAX/spandsp: installing and results on Gentoo/SuSE
Hi, On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 at 15:36, Diego Ercolani wrote: I've found the same unresolved issue with libtiff. I use SuSE 9.0 SuSE Linux 9.0 comes with libtiff-3.5.7 which allows to compile and run Steve's fax applications just fine with the additional headers provided by him. So which unresolved issue do you have with it? cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: Error compiling zaptel
Hi, On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 at 11:29, Hans-Henrik Andresen wrote: But when compiling zaptel I got this error [...] zaptel.c:5892: error: parse error before unsigned make: *** [zaptel.o] Error 1 Any help on this ? you left out the important part of the error log. I guess the compiler complains about a header file it doesn't find before throwing all those parse errors. cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: Zaptel BRI and HFC-S cards
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 at 21:07, Armand A. Verstappen wrote: Note that when using more than one card, the module will segfault when unloading: I also get this with a single HFC-S card when I try to unload the zaphfc module once it has been used by Asterisk. cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: HFC-S cards?
Hi, On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 at 17:22, FastJack wrote: anyone knows where to get one of theses cards (or any other based on the HFC-S chipset) in germany? I bought a Longshine LCS-8051 Card recently. http://www.longshine.de/produkt-ger/modem/8051.htm It works with i4l and zaphfc. K+K Computer sells them for EUR 28.59 + shipping. http://www.kkcomputer.de cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: Need to interface to BRIs
Hi, On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 at 04:10, Jim Archer wrote: I would like to interface 4 BRI lines to Asterisk. I looked at Digium's hardware list and, although they have solutions for PRI and T1, I didn't see anything for BRI. I would like to avoid ISDN4Linux if possible. Does anyone know of any hardware suppoted by Asterisk I can use for this? http://www.junghanns.net/asterisk/page17.html cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Mailing list lag again
Hi, today's BRI thread showed, that the mailing list has a delay of about an hour again. Is this still due to the Digium relocation, or is something else going on with the list server? cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: USB headset recommendations
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 at 23:36, Ken Alker wrote: I'd like to get some feedback from users of USB headsets as to what they like/dislike about the unit they own (manufacturer/model number). I've got a Labtec Axis 712 stereo USB headset. They also produced it in a mono version (Axis 711). Both devices have disappeared from the Labtec homepage, but retailers still seem to have them on stock, e.g.: http://www.thinkgeek.com/computing/speakers/headsets/5de1 It is supported by ALSA, and by the kernel's native USB audio driver. Sound quality is great, but the box with the volume and mute buttons on it is a bit clunky for my taste. I've had some problems getting it to work on various USB ports based on VIA chipsets (Intel worked fine), but that doesn't seem to be the fault of the headset, as other USB devices were having problems on theese VIA chipsets as well. Any advantages/disadvantages to using a USB headset over a regular headset slaved off the internal sound card? And advantage of having the headset separate from the internal sound card is, that you can use the latter for playing the phone ring sound which would be too silent if only played on the speakers of the headset. Are you using yours in a call center environment? No, only for testing so far, but I think it would be OK for a call center env. As an aside, do all USB headphones have built-in sounds cards? I think so. If so, are the built-in cards always full duplex? I would assume so, as most applications of a hadset require it to support full duplex. Also, I don't think anybody is still making sound cards that aren't full duplex these days. cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: Compiling problems with SuSE
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 at 06:26, Franz Edler wrote: From: Dustin Knuttgen on Sunday, January 18, 2004 11:47 PM We tried to use SuSE initially and had no luck compiling zaptel on either 8.2 or 9.0. We even had Digium take a look. After working on it for days we finally switched to Red Hat 9. Is there anyone who succeeded in compiling Asterisk with SuSE 8.2 or 9.0? I have no problems compiling Asterisk on SuSE, but I've never tried zaptel. cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: compiling problems
Hi Franz, On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 at 21:47, Franz Edler wrote: Now I learned, that I have to provide also the kernel-sources for compiling zaptel. I have done that, have you also copied the running kernel's configuration to the kernel sources zcat /proc/config.gz /usr/src/linux/.config and executed make oldconfig make dep in /usr/src/linux ? These steps might be needed for compiling external kernel modules like zaptel. but at the end of make install of zaptel I get the following errors on unresolved symbols: /sbin/depmod -a If the above doesn't help please run 'depmod -ae' to see the names of the symbols it can't resolve. Maybe the names can give a hint where to look next. cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] RE: Fax
Hi, On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 at 21:06, Jason Penton wrote: (I have successfully managed to receive faxes thru my isdn card so I don't see why I shouldn't be able to send them). that's interesting, as in my tests it was just the other way around. I can send faxes through my AVM ISDN card (chan_capi), but when I try to receive a fax, app_rxfax fails after reporting some carrier training errors. I've posted the detailed error logs to this list some weeks ago. Jason, are you using chan_capi, or chan_modem_i4l to access your ISDN card? cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: newbie ISDN question
Hi, On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 at 12:15, Klaus-Peter Junghanns wrote: The quadBRI card is EUR 600, excluding VAT. this looks like a great piece of hardware, but I think it's too expensive for home users like me who wouldn't really need more than one or two BRI ports. So do you have any plans for a singleBRI or doubleBRI version of this card, or maybe even a variant that comes with a single port preinstalled and three more ports can be added as needed via daughterboards like on the TDM400P? cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: newbie ISDN question
Hi, On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 at 15:11, Klaus-Peter Junghanns wrote: Currently i am polishing the driver for the hfc-s pci a chipset, which i used in numerous el-cheapo ISDN cards (street price around 30 EUR). ah - that's much closer to the home user's typical budget :) Is there a list of cards that use this chipset somewhere on the 'net? I've googled for it, but most pages only talk about cards based on the HFC-S chipset without listing brand and model names. This will bring zaptel BRI (and even NT mode) to the home user. :) Cool, NT mode is exactly what I am looking for :) Thanks for the great work you are doing to bring Asterisk to the ISDN world! cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: tunnel iax via gnophone with ssh?
Hi, On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 at 08:44, Chris Hirsch wrote: Anybody have any ideas? Asterisk uses UDP, but ssh can only forward TCP ports. cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: Soft fax (rxfax) 8 byte output problem resolved?
Hi, On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 at 13:53, David Carr wrote: I have read all the mailing list posts regarding rxfax receiving a fax and outputing an 8 byte tif file (tif header only). This is the problem I can't seem to get past. I think this is not necessarily a single problem. As I understood Steve the 8 byte tiff file just means, that there was no fax received, which can have various reasons. Has anyone out there also had this problem and found some workaround for it? I don't have a workaround so far, but I'll try to give as much detail as possible of what's happening on my installation, in the hope that it helps Steve to find out what's going wrong. The Asterisk machine is a K6/333 (too slow?), connected to the internal ISDN line of a small ISDN PBX (chan_capi). I've tried to receive faxes from a real fax machine and from a fax modem with no success. Both devices are connected to analog lines of the PBX. I run Asterisk in verbose mode, and try sending a Fax from the modem with sendfax (http://alpha.greenie.net/mgetty). After some time sendfax prints out the following message and exits: sendfax: FAILED to transmit 'f1.g3'. Transmission error: +FHNG:20 (Unspecified Transmit Phase B error) Asterisk's log looks like this: -- Executing RxFAX(CAPI[contr1/98]/0, /tmp/fax.tif) in new stack Changed from phase 0 to 1 Start receiving document Changed from phase 1 to 4 Sending ident CSI: 40 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 DIS: Store and forward Internet fax: no Real-time Internet fax: no Preferred octets: 256 Can receive fax Data signalling rate: V.29 R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK 2D coding OK Scan line length: 215mm Recording length: A4 (297mm) Receiver's minimum scan line time: 0ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85 R8x15.4lines/mm OK Inch-based resolution preferred: no Metric-based resolution preferred: no Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7 DIS: 80 00 c6 f0 80 80 01 HDLC underflow in state 9 Changed from phase 4 to 3 TSI: 43 20 20 20 20 20 37 39 36 39 36 33 32 20 31 31 39 20 39 34 2b TSI without final frame tag Remote fax gave TSI as: +49 911 2369697 DCS: 83 00 46 f0 00 DCS with final frame tag In state 9 DCS: Store and forward Internet fax: no Real-time Internet fax: no Can receive fax Data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK Scan line length: 215mm Recording length: A4 (297mm) Minimum scan line time: 0ms Get at V.29 Changed from phase 3 to 5 Fast carrier up Fast carrier down Changed from phase 5 to 4 0 bad bits in trainability test Start rx document - compression 1 Start rx page CFR: 84 HDLC underflow in state 5 Post trainability Changed from phase 4 to 5 Fast carrier up Fast carrier down Fast carrier up Fast carrier down Fast carrier up Equalizer state: -7 (0.0, 0.0) - 0.0 -6 (0.0, 0.0) - 0.0 -5 (0.0, 0.0) - 0.0 -4 (0.0, 0.0) - 0.0 -3 (0.0, 0.0) - 0.0 -2 ( -0.08332,-0.68161) - 0.47154 -1 (0.66136, 0.74688) - 0.99522 0 (0.83336, 2.86588) - 8.90777 1 (0.66136, 0.74688) - 0.99522 2 ( -0.08332,-0.68161) - 0.47154 3 (0.0, 0.0) - 0.0 4 (0.0, 0.0) - 0.0 5 (0.0, 0.0) - 0.0 6 (0.0, 0.0) - 0.0 7 (0.0, 0.0) - 0.0 Equalizer state: -7 (0.24872,-0.01973) - 0.06225 -6 (0.06295,-0.59891) - 0.36265 -5 (0.04198,-0.41768) - 0.17622 -4 (0.12922, 0.34088) - 0.13290 -3 (0.29121, 0.41776) - 0.25932 -2 (0.05779,-1.18501) - 1.40758 -1 (0.67094,-0.35069) - 0.57314 0 (0.60670, 2.23125) - 5.34655 1 (0.34490, 1.36992) - 1.99564 2 ( -0.31233, 0.09159) - 0.10594 3 ( -0.00825, 0.00787) - 0.00013 4 (0.02226,-0.47177) - 0.22306 5 ( -0.17953, 0.14528) - 0.05334 6 ( -0.25318, 0.57800) - 0.39819 7 ( -0.10465, 0.05659) - 0.01415 Equalizer state: -7 (0.10674, 0.25606) - 0.07696 -6 ( -0.05000,-0.10084) - 0.01267 -5 ( -0.04246,-0.24755) - 0.06308 -4 (0.01990, 0.30283) - 0.09210 -3 ( -0.04673, 0.31177) - 0.09939 -2 ( -0.20575,-0.84531) - 0.75687 -1 (0.53295, 0.18096) - 0.31678 0 (0.84089,
[Asterisk-Users] Re: OT : For the SQL gurus..
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 at 10:17, brez wrote: SELECT *, length(code) FROM a WHERE code = '00442085673456' OR code = '0044208567345' OR code = '004420856734' OR code = '00442085673' OR code = '0044208567' OR code = '004420856' OR code = '00442085' OR code = '0044208' OR code = '004420' OR code = '00442' OR code = '0044' ORDER BY length(code) DESC; Again, the first row in the result set is the one you are after. can be reduced to: SELECT TOP 1 *, length(code) FROM a WHERE code LIKE '0044%' ORDER BY length(code) DESC; No it can't, because that would bring up everything that starts with 0044 (e.g. 00445678), but we are looking for the longest prefix that matches a given number. cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: [Users] OT : For the SQL gurus..
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 at 09:56, WipeOut wrote: If I have a MySQL table with dialing codes and a corresponding description (see below) and I want to lookup the best match for a phone number.. What would the SQL look like to do it? I don't know MySQL very well, but maybe you also get an idea of how it can be done if I describe it in terms of PostgreSQL: SELECT DISTINCT *,length(code) FROM a WHERE '00442085673456' LIKE (code || '%') ORDER length(code) DESC; Now, the first row in the result set contains the longest matching prefix of the given number that exists in the table, if there is any. or would it take more than just SQL to get to the best result? If MySQL doesn't support using a column as a pattern for the LIKE operator you might have to make multiple queries and allways strip one more digit from the end of the number until you find a match. cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: [Users] Re: [Users] OT : For the SQL gurus..
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 at 12:33, Reinhard Max wrote: SELECT DISTINCT *,length(code) FROM a WHERE '00442085673456' LIKE (code || '%') ORDER length(code) DESC; ^ BY Oops, that one got lost when I re-formatted the query. cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: OT : For the SQL gurus..
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 at 14:55, Michael Bielicki wrote: Just as a tip you could do that with regex functions as well, omitting the quite costly length functions .. Well, regular expressions can be costly as well, and it depends on the DBMS implementation how costly length() is. If the actual length of a text or varchar field is being stored anyways, length() can be implemented in a rather cheap way. cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] RE: [Users] Is the X100P a WinModem?
Hi, On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 at 15:44, Chris Albertson wrote: Also do remember that PCI card's config registrs are little endian and you will have to mantally byteswap when you read the hex dump. ... or simply use lspci -nv to get the IDs instead of the textual translations. cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: [Users] ISDN BRI active adapters with NT mode - any alternatives ?
Hi, On 15 Sep 2003 at 11:52, Klaus-Peter Junghanns wrote: We are working on an alternative, a passive multiport ISDN card that supports TE and NT mode with zaptel drivers for asterisk. this sounds very interesting. Are there any details available yet? cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: [Users] Linux-IAX-Client
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 at 17:04, Holger Schildt wrote: is there another IAX-CLient for Linux beside Gnophone? There is tkPhone, but it is still beta. You can download version 0.1 from http://tel.sf.net. There is no pop-up-window or any sound that caughts my attention. This feature doesn't currently exist in tkPhone either, but it should be only a matter of minutes and 5-10 lines of Tcl code to add it. cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: [Users] chan_capi with avm c2 only uses one BRI
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 at 17:09, Michael Labuschke wrote: wasn't the capi driver for the avm only for one card per pc ? That only applies to their passive cards. The c2 is an active card with two ISDN ports, so it should be able to handle them both at once. cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: [Users] Proposed IAX2 Name
On 13 Mar 2003 at 13:00, Howard White wrote: To our multi-lingual listers - do IAX or TASTE have any non-English complications? In German, Taste means key like in keyboard, not lock and key. But the word is pronounced differently than the English taste. cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
