Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: How to test if PCI 2.2?

2004-11-28 Thread Peter Svensson
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Lee wrote:

> So my question remains: Is PCI 2.2 a requirement to use the TDM400P
> card? If so, where is this specified? If not, is there a performance
> difference when using PCI 2.1?

PCI 2.2 is mostly a clerification on the 2.1 specification. One difference 
that may be important is that the 3.3V rail was made mandatory even in a 
5V slot. In PCI 2.1 it was optional.

Since the PCI 2.2 specification is tighter with a less ambigous language 
it is probably safer to require 2.2 as a manufacturer of PCI cards. There 
is less risk of implementational incompatibilites. Most likely the cards 
will work fine in a 2.1 slot.

Peter


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: How to test if PCI 2.2?

2004-11-28 Thread Kimble Young
Just adding my 2 cents..
I have used PCI cards before that say PCI 2.2 on them (not specifying 
whether it is a requirement) on machines that don't support it (old 
old). The cards functioned perfectly in all cases.

Note: These were not digium cards.
Regards,
Kimble Young
Lee wrote:
The Digium web site says that the card is "PCI 2.2 Compliant," which
to me says that the card *supports* that standard, not that PCI 2.2 is
*required*.
The data sheet states In "Hardware and Software Requirements":
"Available PCI Slot" Now, call me crazy, but that doesn't pretty much
means any PCI slot of any kind(!)
I would think if PCI 2.2 is required that such facts would be included
in the requirements section of the data sheet. If indeed PCI 2.2 *is*
required then Digium should carefully change their pre-sales
documentation.
So my question remains: Is PCI 2.2 a requirement to use the TDM400P
card? If so, where is this specified? If not, is there a performance
difference when using PCI 2.1?
Thanks and regards!
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: How to test if PCI 2.2?

2004-11-28 Thread Henry Devito


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Cook
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 8:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: How to test if PCI 2.2?
--snip--
>When I cat /var/log/dmesg | grep PCI, I get this:
>PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfc7ce, last bus=1


>Does this first line confirm that I am PCI 2.1.


I don't think that is what it means.  I am running FC3 on a board that is
2.2 compliant.  When I do the same command is says the same thing you are
seeing. 


 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: How to test if PCI 2.2?

2004-11-28 Thread Lee
The Digium web site says that the card is "PCI 2.2 Compliant," which
to me says that the card *supports* that standard, not that PCI 2.2 is
*required*.

The data sheet states In "Hardware and Software Requirements":
"Available PCI Slot" Now, call me crazy, but that doesn't pretty much
means any PCI slot of any kind(!)

I would think if PCI 2.2 is required that such facts would be included
in the requirements section of the data sheet. If indeed PCI 2.2 *is*
required then Digium should carefully change their pre-sales
documentation.

So my question remains: Is PCI 2.2 a requirement to use the TDM400P
card? If so, where is this specified? If not, is there a performance
difference when using PCI 2.1?

Thanks and regards!
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: How to test if PCI 2.2?

2004-11-28 Thread David Cook
When I cat /var/log/dmesg | grep PCI, I get this:
PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfc7ce, last bus=1
PCI: Using configuration type 1
PCI: Probing PCI hardware
PCI: Discovered primary peer bus 01 [IRQ]
PCI: Using IRQ router ServerWorks [1166/0200] at 00:0f.0
Serial driver version 5.05c (2001-07-08) with MANY_PORTS MULTIPORT
SHARE_IRQ SERIAL_PCI ISAPNP enabled
SvrWks OSB4: IDE controller at PCI slot 00:0f.1
PCI: Found IRQ 10 for device 01:02.0
PCI: Found IRQ 15 for device 01:02.1
scsi0 : Adaptec AIC7XXX EISA/VLB/PCI SCSI HBA DRIVER, Rev 6.2.36
scsi1 : Adaptec AIC7XXX EISA/VLB/PCI SCSI HBA DRIVER, Rev 6.2.36
PCI: Assigned IRQ 5 for device 00:0f.2


Does this first line confirm that I am PCI 2.1. I tried it on several
machines that I have access to and they all say 2.10. I recognize that
this means I'm out of luck for a TDM4xx card, but is this an accurate
enough test or might the OS be somehow fibbing?

dbc.

> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 08:31:47 +0800
> From: Ronald Wiplinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] How to test if PCI 2.2?
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
>   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>
> Is there a way to test if the motherboard is ready for a Digium card
> (PCI 2.2) ?
>
> I would like to know from a remote computer, where I have (root)
> access,
> if this computer is ready for a TDM22B.
>
> bye
>
> Ronald
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users