[Asterisk-Users] Stop this I'm trying to help you.(Fwd: Please confirm your message)
Why do ppl do this?
and no I will *not* follow the link.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ronald Wiplinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Apr 14, 2005 7:05 PM
Subject: Please confirm your message
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (TMDA).
Your message attached below is being held because the address
[EMAIL PROTECTED] has not been verified.
To release your message for delivery, please send an empty message
to the following address, or use your mailer's Reply feature.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This confirmation verifies that your message is legitimate and not
junk-mail. You should only have to confirm your address once.
If you do not respond to this confirmation request within 14 days,
your message will not be delivered.
-- Forwarded message --
From: C F [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ronald Wiplinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 19:05:25 -0400
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Setgroup Checkgroup
I will need more info in order to help you. Are you on IRC?
On 4/14/05, Ronald Wiplinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
C F wrote:
On 4/11/05, Damian Funnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would try setting the group name to something shorter and less likely
to conflict with any reserved system names (try something arbitrary like
'group1', 'group2', etc.
Our experience with SetGroup certainly doesn't indicate that using two
or more setgroups results in previous ones reverting to zero - we have a
total of four SetGroups and these are set and checked extensively
through our dial plan and they work fine.
You wont see it unless you run into problems or use noop in your dial
plan to show you what is being done.
But by design setgroup just sets a variable for the current channel,
it's the same as using SetVar(GROUP=whatever), as soon as issue
setgroup again the first group is gone, consider the following:
exten _.,1,SetGroup(test)
exten _.,2,SetGroup(test2)
exten _.,3,GetGroupCount(test)
exten _.,4,Noop(${GROUPCOUNT})
exten _.,5,GetGroupCount(test2)
exten _.,6,Noop(${GROUPCOUNT})
line 4 above will return 0, and line 6 will return 1. The reason is
because you have overwritten the variable ${GROUP} at line 2.
To Ronald, I think your problem has to do with the fact that you are
using local channels, which are then mapped to sip channels, but I
don't think you should have any operational problems, correct me if
I'm wrong.
The code should use one of the two lines (I jump there in with Random()
), and if this (first) one is already in use than use the other one.
However, it does not work.
I also need to make sure that an outgoing call will set this flag as well.
Can you help me to fix that?
bye
Ronald
Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
Damian Funnell wrote:
Hi Ronald,
We use SetGroup/CheckGroup and your syntax appears to be fine (either
that or ours is broken too, but it seems to work ok!)
One question - what lines do you have in priority 1 - 3? We found
that our dial plan would not work unless the first priority (for all
extensions) was 1 and unless the priorities increased an integer at a
time (not sure if this is by design or not, but was the only way it
would work regardless).
It starts correct with 1 (there are some NoOp and ENUM lookup, which
is not interesting for that case)
Also (and this is really grasping at straws), have you tried using
different group names in case 'sip-1x' has any special meaning?
These names can be anything that is meaningful and we use the format
'line28x' for our group names (which works fine).
The real group name is sip- (my phone number) I have
shorten it at the example.
I read somewhere, if you have TWO or more Setgroup than all previous
ones will be set to zero back!!! If that is the case than it makes not
much sense to use it that way I do. As you can see in the CLI outputs,
I copied, it uses a different name of the group variable.
bye
Ronald
Good luck!
Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
I have some troubles to use Setgroup / Checkgroup!!!
I setup a test (NoOP's are deleted): First caller should get first
line, second caller should get second line, third caller should get
busy and send an email. Note, that I used twice here to check the
first line!!!
[trunkint_A]
exten = _90N.,104,SetGroup(sip-13); increase Group counter
exten = _90N.,105,CheckGroup(1); check no more than
1 in this group
exten = _90N.,106,NoOp(Line 106)
exten = _90N.,107,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
exten = _90N.,108,hangup
;
exten = _90N.,206,SetGroup(sip-12)
exten = _90N.,207,CheckGroup(1)
exten = _90N.,208,NoOp(Line 208)
exten = _90N.,209,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
exten = _90N.,210,hangup
;
exten = _90N.,308,SetGroup(sip-13)
exten = _90N.,309,CheckGroup(1)
exten = _90N.,310,NoOp(Line 310)
exten =
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Stop this I'm trying to help you.(Fwd: Please confirm your message)
And the stupid thing is that it is trivial to set up a script
to autorespond to these things. So assuming it is a
valid MX (which is easy to check for without harrassing
anyone), a spammer has an easier time responding
than a nonspammer.
Jon.
On Thursday 14 April 2005 06:14 pm, C F wrote:
Why do ppl do this?
and no I will *not* follow the link.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ronald Wiplinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Apr 14, 2005 7:05 PM
Subject: Please confirm your message
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (TMDA).
Your message attached below is being held because the address
[EMAIL PROTECTED] has not been verified.
To release your message for delivery, please send an empty message
to the following address, or use your mailer's Reply feature.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This confirmation verifies that your message is legitimate and not
junk-mail. You should only have to confirm your address once.
If you do not respond to this confirmation request within 14 days,
your message will not be delivered.
-- Forwarded message --
From: C F [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ronald Wiplinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 19:05:25 -0400
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Setgroup Checkgroup
I will need more info in order to help you. Are you on IRC?
On 4/14/05, Ronald Wiplinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
C F wrote:
On 4/11/05, Damian Funnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would try setting the group name to something shorter and less likely
to conflict with any reserved system names (try something arbitrary
like 'group1', 'group2', etc.
Our experience with SetGroup certainly doesn't indicate that using two
or more setgroups results in previous ones reverting to zero - we have
a total of four SetGroups and these are set and checked extensively
through our dial plan and they work fine.
You wont see it unless you run into problems or use noop in your dial
plan to show you what is being done.
But by design setgroup just sets a variable for the current channel,
it's the same as using SetVar(GROUP=whatever), as soon as issue
setgroup again the first group is gone, consider the following:
exten _.,1,SetGroup(test)
exten _.,2,SetGroup(test2)
exten _.,3,GetGroupCount(test)
exten _.,4,Noop(${GROUPCOUNT})
exten _.,5,GetGroupCount(test2)
exten _.,6,Noop(${GROUPCOUNT})
line 4 above will return 0, and line 6 will return 1. The reason is
because you have overwritten the variable ${GROUP} at line 2.
To Ronald, I think your problem has to do with the fact that you are
using local channels, which are then mapped to sip channels, but I
don't think you should have any operational problems, correct me if
I'm wrong.
The code should use one of the two lines (I jump there in with Random()
), and if this (first) one is already in use than use the other one.
However, it does not work.
I also need to make sure that an outgoing call will set this flag as
well.
Can you help me to fix that?
bye
Ronald
Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
Damian Funnell wrote:
Hi Ronald,
We use SetGroup/CheckGroup and your syntax appears to be fine (either
that or ours is broken too, but it seems to work ok!)
One question - what lines do you have in priority 1 - 3? We found
that our dial plan would not work unless the first priority (for all
extensions) was 1 and unless the priorities increased an integer at a
time (not sure if this is by design or not, but was the only way it
would work regardless).
It starts correct with 1 (there are some NoOp and ENUM lookup, which
is not interesting for that case)
Also (and this is really grasping at straws), have you tried using
different group names in case 'sip-1x' has any special meaning?
These names can be anything that is meaningful and we use the format
'line28x' for our group names (which works fine).
The real group name is sip- (my phone number) I have
shorten it at the example.
I read somewhere, if you have TWO or more Setgroup than all previous
ones will be set to zero back!!! If that is the case than it makes not
much sense to use it that way I do. As you can see in the CLI outputs,
I copied, it uses a different name of the group variable.
bye
Ronald
Good luck!
Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
I have some troubles to use Setgroup / Checkgroup!!!
I setup a test (NoOP's are deleted): First caller should get first
line, second caller should get second line, third caller should get
busy and send an email. Note, that I used twice here to check the
first line!!!
[trunkint_A]
exten = _90N.,104,SetGroup(sip-13); increase Group
counter exten = _90N.,105,CheckGroup(1); check no
more than 1 in this group
exten = _90N.,106,NoOp(Line 106)
exten = _90N.,107,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN:[EMAIL
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Stop this I'm trying to help you.(Fwd: Please confirm your message)
Jon Gabrielson wrote:
And the stupid thing is that it is trivial to set up a script
to autorespond to these things. So assuming it is a
valid MX (which is easy to check for without harrassing
anyone), a spammer has an easier time responding
than a nonspammer.
Jon.
Jon,
you miss the point.
I have setup the white listing system that I get rid of the spam, and it
works very good.
The message says it very clear what to do, if you cannot / do not want
to read, it is your thing.
Second and more important question is, why you sent me a message to me
at all. I subscribe to the list, and there should be the answer anyway.
bye
Ronald
On Thursday 14 April 2005 06:14 pm, C F wrote:
Why do ppl do this?
and no I will *not* follow the link.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ronald Wiplinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Apr 14, 2005 7:05 PM
Subject: Please confirm your message
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (TMDA).
Your message attached below is being held because the address
[EMAIL PROTECTED] has not been verified.
To release your message for delivery, please send an empty message
to the following address, or use your mailer's Reply feature.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This confirmation verifies that your message is legitimate and not
junk-mail. You should only have to confirm your address once.
If you do not respond to this confirmation request within 14 days,
your message will not be delivered.
-- Forwarded message --
From: C F [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ronald Wiplinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 19:05:25 -0400
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Setgroup Checkgroup
I will need more info in order to help you. Are you on IRC?
On 4/14/05, Ronald Wiplinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
C F wrote:
On 4/11/05, Damian Funnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would try setting the group name to something shorter and less likely
to conflict with any reserved system names (try something arbitrary
like 'group1', 'group2', etc.
Our experience with SetGroup certainly doesn't indicate that using two
or more setgroups results in previous ones reverting to zero - we have
a total of four SetGroups and these are set and checked extensively
through our dial plan and they work fine.
You wont see it unless you run into problems or use noop in your dial
plan to show you what is being done.
But by design setgroup just sets a variable for the current channel,
it's the same as using SetVar(GROUP=whatever), as soon as issue
setgroup again the first group is gone, consider the following:
exten _.,1,SetGroup(test)
exten _.,2,SetGroup(test2)
exten _.,3,GetGroupCount(test)
exten _.,4,Noop(${GROUPCOUNT})
exten _.,5,GetGroupCount(test2)
exten _.,6,Noop(${GROUPCOUNT})
line 4 above will return 0, and line 6 will return 1. The reason is
because you have overwritten the variable ${GROUP} at line 2.
To Ronald, I think your problem has to do with the fact that you are
using local channels, which are then mapped to sip channels, but I
don't think you should have any operational problems, correct me if
I'm wrong.
The code should use one of the two lines (I jump there in with Random()
), and if this (first) one is already in use than use the other one.
However, it does not work.
I also need to make sure that an outgoing call will set this flag as
well.
Can you help me to fix that?
bye
Ronald
Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
Damian Funnell wrote:
Hi Ronald,
We use SetGroup/CheckGroup and your syntax appears to be fine (either
that or ours is broken too, but it seems to work ok!)
One question - what lines do you have in priority 1 - 3? We found
that our dial plan would not work unless the first priority (for all
extensions) was 1 and unless the priorities increased an integer at a
time (not sure if this is by design or not, but was the only way it
would work regardless).
It starts correct with 1 (there are some NoOp and ENUM lookup, which
is not interesting for that case)
Also (and this is really grasping at straws), have you tried using
different group names in case 'sip-1x' has any special meaning?
These names can be anything that is meaningful and we use the format
'line28x' for our group names (which works fine).
The real group name is sip- (my phone number) I have
shorten it at the example.
I read somewhere, if you have TWO or more Setgroup than all previous
ones will be set to zero back!!! If that is the case than it makes not
much sense to use it that way I do. As you can see in the CLI outputs,
I copied, it uses a different name of the group variable.
bye
Ronald
Good luck!
Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
I have some troubles to use Setgroup / Checkgroup!!!
I setup a test (NoOP's are deleted): First caller should get first
line, second caller should get second line, third caller should get
busy and send an email. Note, that I used twice
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Stop this I'm trying to help you.(Fwd: Please confirm your message)
C F wrote:
Why do ppl do this?
and no I will *not* follow the link.
Good,
can we come to the subject, please?
How can I set it up?
I guess more people would like to know how to get Setgroup / Checkgroup
to work. Obviously it is not doing as I expected it.
bye
Ronald
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ronald Wiplinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Apr 14, 2005 7:05 PM
Subject: Please confirm your message
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (TMDA).
Your message attached below is being held because the address
[EMAIL PROTECTED] has not been verified.
To release your message for delivery, please send an empty message
to the following address, or use your mailer's Reply feature.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This confirmation verifies that your message is legitimate and not
junk-mail. You should only have to confirm your address once.
If you do not respond to this confirmation request within 14 days,
your message will not be delivered.
-- Forwarded message --
From: C F [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ronald Wiplinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 19:05:25 -0400
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Setgroup Checkgroup
I will need more info in order to help you. Are you on IRC?
On 4/14/05, Ronald Wiplinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
C F wrote:
On 4/11/05, Damian Funnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would try setting the group name to something shorter and less likely
to conflict with any reserved system names (try something arbitrary like
'group1', 'group2', etc.
Our experience with SetGroup certainly doesn't indicate that using two
or more setgroups results in previous ones reverting to zero - we have a
total of four SetGroups and these are set and checked extensively
through our dial plan and they work fine.
You wont see it unless you run into problems or use noop in your dial
plan to show you what is being done.
But by design setgroup just sets a variable for the current channel,
it's the same as using SetVar(GROUP=whatever), as soon as issue
setgroup again the first group is gone, consider the following:
exten _.,1,SetGroup(test)
exten _.,2,SetGroup(test2)
exten _.,3,GetGroupCount(test)
exten _.,4,Noop(${GROUPCOUNT})
exten _.,5,GetGroupCount(test2)
exten _.,6,Noop(${GROUPCOUNT})
line 4 above will return 0, and line 6 will return 1. The reason is
because you have overwritten the variable ${GROUP} at line 2.
To Ronald, I think your problem has to do with the fact that you are
using local channels, which are then mapped to sip channels, but I
don't think you should have any operational problems, correct me if
I'm wrong.
The code should use one of the two lines (I jump there in with Random()
), and if this (first) one is already in use than use the other one.
However, it does not work.
I also need to make sure that an outgoing call will set this flag as well.
Can you help me to fix that?
bye
Ronald
Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
Damian Funnell wrote:
Hi Ronald,
We use SetGroup/CheckGroup and your syntax appears to be fine (either
that or ours is broken too, but it seems to work ok!)
One question - what lines do you have in priority 1 - 3? We found
that our dial plan would not work unless the first priority (for all
extensions) was 1 and unless the priorities increased an integer at a
time (not sure if this is by design or not, but was the only way it
would work regardless).
It starts correct with 1 (there are some NoOp and ENUM lookup, which
is not interesting for that case)
Also (and this is really grasping at straws), have you tried using
different group names in case 'sip-1x' has any special meaning?
These names can be anything that is meaningful and we use the format
'line28x' for our group names (which works fine).
The real group name is sip- (my phone number) I have
shorten it at the example.
I read somewhere, if you have TWO or more Setgroup than all previous
ones will be set to zero back!!! If that is the case than it makes not
much sense to use it that way I do. As you can see in the CLI outputs,
I copied, it uses a different name of the group variable.
bye
Ronald
Good luck!
Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
I have some troubles to use Setgroup / Checkgroup!!!
I setup a test (NoOP's are deleted): First caller should get first
line, second caller should get second line, third caller should get
busy and send an email. Note, that I used twice here to check the
first line!!!
[trunkint_A]
exten = _90N.,104,SetGroup(sip-13); increase Group counter
exten = _90N.,105,CheckGroup(1); check no more than
1 in this group
exten = _90N.,106,NoOp(Line 106)
exten = _90N.,107,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
exten = _90N.,108,hangup
;
exten = _90N.,206,SetGroup(sip-12)
exten = _90N.,207,CheckGroup(1)
exten = _90N.,208,NoOp(Line 208)
exten = _90N.,209,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Stop this I'm trying to help you.(Fwd: Please confirm your message)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 14 April 2005 19:25, Ronald Wiplinger wrote: you miss the point. I have setup the white listing system that I get rid of the spam, and it works very good. The message says it very clear what to do, if you cannot / do not want to read, it is your thing. Second and more important question is, why you sent me a message to me at all. I subscribe to the list, and there should be the answer anyway. It doesn't matter whether you send directly to you, or to the list, I'm guessing. A lot of the time when I receive a message like yours, it's because I've posted to the list, and because of the way the list headers are written, I get vacation autoresponders, autoresponders similar to yours, and so on. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCXy0mgYKvkeyp3F4RAgCuAKCcRNpiKU+ZkL/5YXuRY6T3S4HweQCdEKSk nl2j/YUcqnYZzOQCV4/9wbg= =gTro -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Stop this I'm trying to help you.(Fwd: Please confirm your message)
Daniel Bruce Lynes wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 14 April 2005 19:25, Ronald Wiplinger wrote: you miss the point. I have setup the white listing system that I get rid of the spam, and it works very good. The message says it very clear what to do, if you cannot / do not want to read, it is your thing. Second and more important question is, why you sent me a message to me at all. I subscribe to the list, and there should be the answer anyway. It doesn't matter whether you send directly to you, or to the list, I'm guessing. A lot of the time when I receive a message like yours, it's because I've posted to the list, and because of the way the list headers are written, I get vacation autoresponders, autoresponders similar to yours, and so on. Just delete it, ... thats what I made my system with people who send an email to me and do not want to whitelist themselves, .. simple and it works!!! bye Ronald -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCXy0mgYKvkeyp3F4RAgCuAKCcRNpiKU+ZkL/5YXuRY6T3S4HweQCdEKSk nl2j/YUcqnYZzOQCV4/9wbg= =gTro -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Ronald Wiplinger (CEO of ELMIT) http://www.elmit.com+886 (0) 939--77-55-16 or FWD 511208 - I'm a SpamCon Foundation Member, #694, Verify it at http://www.spamcon.org PS: Spam prevention! Our system is protected with a spam prevention program. If you send us an e-mail, our system will send you a confirmation message back. Just reply to this confirmation message please. After receiving this confirmation message, our system will send the hold message (one) and all future messages (after the received confirmation message) to me without asking you again. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Stop this I'm trying to help you.(Fwd: Please confirm your message)
Many of these scripts are based on the from which for the most part on this list is whoever posts a reply. When you reply it goes to the list address but the from is infact that of the author of the current message which causes vacation/spam/.. filters to go crazy. For example I just got a mail box full from a member of this list. Odds are this and each new post until they fix it will also cause the same issue. -- William ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
