Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8
On 12/09/11 09:48 PM, Joseph wrote: Was NAT problem fixed in 1.8.7 ? I'm using 1.4 but I've tried 1.6 and 1.8.5 and in both cases connection is not working with my provider with SIP + NAT. The connection is showing up as registered but the call is not coming IN (congestion). Can you define NAT problem? I'm unaware of any issues with Asterisk (or end points) behind NAT. It is mostly likely a configuration issue rather than a bug. -- Leif Madsen http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/asterisk -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8
Hello i am not sure if this has been discussed before.. i have an asterisk 1.4 server that i managed to test it with 500+ concurrent calls and hit 800 concurrent calls with no problem CPU USAGE 90% i wanted to upgrade to 1.6 .. i did and when tested it .. the server crashed at 100 concurrent calls. my question is .. is there a different in resource consumption between all versions? how come 1.4 could handle over 500 calls while 1.6 crashed at 100? please advise? Tarek Sawah Information Technology Adviser Integrated Digital Systems CCNP, MCSE, RHCE, TELECOM USA: +1 386 492 9993 -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Tarek Sawah tareksa...@hotmail.com wrote: i wanted to upgrade to 1.6 .. i did and when tested it .. the server crashed at 100 concurrent calls. please advise? Nobody will know why your asterisk crashed unless you follow the instructions here: https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+a+Backtrace Please try that, and then rerun your call test. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8
I personally would not bother with 1.6 unless you needed some feature in that branch. 1.4 is the stable branch, but it seems that all of the resources are being channeled into 1.8 and 10.0, so 1.6 is a rabbit hole you really shouldn't be headed into. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tarek Sawah Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 10:19 AM To: Asterisk Users Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8 Hello i am not sure if this has been discussed before.. i have an asterisk 1.4 server that i managed to test it with 500+ concurrent calls and hit 800 concurrent calls with no problem CPU USAGE 90% i wanted to upgrade to 1.6 .. i did and when tested it .. the server crashed at 100 concurrent calls. my question is .. is there a different in resource consumption between all versions? how come 1.4 could handle over 500 calls while 1.6 crashed at 100? please advise? Tarek Sawah Information Technology Adviser Integrated Digital Systems CCNP, MCSE, RHCE, TELECOM USA: +1 386 492 9993 -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8
Actually i had to upgrade to 1.6 due to a provider problem with session-timers and RTP data .. then i downgraded again to 1.4. do you suggest that i test 1.8 instead of 1.6? Tarek Sawah Information Technology Adviser Integrated Digital Systems CCNP, MCSE, RHCE, TELECOM USA: +1 386 492 9993 From: da...@debsinc.com To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:54:35 -0500 Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8 I personally would not bother with 1.6 unless you needed some feature in that branch. 1.4 is the stable branch, but it seems that all of the resources are being channeled into 1.8 and 10.0, so 1.6 is a rabbit hole you really shouldn't be headed into. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tarek Sawah Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 10:19 AM To: Asterisk Users Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8 Hello i am not sure if this has been discussed before.. i have an asterisk 1.4 server that i managed to test it with 500+ concurrent calls and hit 800 concurrent calls with no problem CPU USAGE 90% i wanted to upgrade to 1.6 .. i did and when tested it .. the server crashed at 100 concurrent calls. my question is .. is there a different in resource consumption between all versions? how come 1.4 could handle over 500 calls while 1.6 crashed at 100? please advise? Tarek Sawah Information Technology Adviser Integrated Digital Systems CCNP, MCSE, RHCE, TELECOM USA: +1 386 492 9993 -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8
I think that is your best bet. 1.8.6 unless somebody has a good reason not to. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tarek Sawah Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 11:00 AM To: Asterisk Users Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8 Actually i had to upgrade to 1.6 due to a provider problem with session-timers and RTP data .. then i downgraded again to 1.4. do you suggest that i test 1.8 instead of 1.6? Tarek Sawah Information Technology Adviser Integrated Digital Systems CCNP, MCSE, RHCE, TELECOM USA: +1 386 492 9993 From: da...@debsinc.com To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:54:35 -0500 Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8 I personally would not bother with 1.6 unless you needed some feature in that branch. 1.4 is the stable branch, but it seems that all of the resources are being channeled into 1.8 and 10.0, so 1.6 is a rabbit hole you really shouldn't be headed into. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tarek Sawah Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 10:19 AM To: Asterisk Users Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8 Hello i am not sure if this has been discussed before.. i have an asterisk 1.4 server that i managed to test it with 500+ concurrent calls and hit 800 concurrent calls with no problem CPU USAGE 90% i wanted to upgrade to 1.6 .. i did and when tested it .. the server crashed at 100 concurrent calls. my question is .. is there a different in resource consumption between all versions? how come 1.4 could handle over 500 calls while 1.6 crashed at 100? please advise? Tarek Sawah Information Technology Adviser Integrated Digital Systems CCNP, MCSE, RHCE, TELECOM USA: +1 386 492 9993 -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8
On 11-09-12 12:07 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote: I think that is your best bet. 1.8.6 unless somebody has a good reason not to. You actually might want to test with 1.8.7.0-rc1, this will fix 2 big issue. A performance regressions and timerfd. -- Paul Belanger Digium, Inc. | Software Developer twitter: pabelanger | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode) Check us out at: http://digium.com http://asterisk.org -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8
On 09/12/11 14:08, Paul Belanger wrote: On 11-09-12 12:07 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote: I think that is your best bet. 1.8.6 unless somebody has a good reason not to. You actually might want to test with 1.8.7.0-rc1, this will fix 2 big issue. A performance regressions and timerfd. -- Paul Belanger Digium, Inc. | Software Developer twitter: pabelanger | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode) Check us out at: http://digium.com http://asterisk.org Was NAT problem fixed in 1.8.7 ? I'm using 1.4 but I've tried 1.6 and 1.8.5 and in both cases connection is not working with my provider with SIP + NAT. The connection is showing up as registered but the call is not coming IN (congestion). -- Joseph -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6 automated install script for CentOS 5.3 or 5.4
I suggest you install it from source, that way you can learn more about asterisk. 2010/1/16 William Stillwell (Lists) william.stillwell-li...@ablebody.net: Here is the 1.4.x version on centos 5 walk through. http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/CentOS+5+and+Asterisk+1.4.x+installation From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Bruce Nik Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 3:15 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6 automated install script for CentOS 5.3 or 5.4 Provided there is no comprehensive install guides (or is there?) yes I would like to see an easy install script which can install it all. On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Bruce Nik brucev...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Guys, Other than than yum repository (which fails when installing freepbx with it) are there any automated install scripts out there that would install Asterisk 1.6 or 1.4 onto a CentOS LAMP system? If the script install FreePBX that would be a BONUS. Thanks, Bruce -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Best regards, Sucan -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6 automated install script for CentOS 5.3 or 5.4
On 01/16/10 04:27, Bruce Nik wrote: Hi Guys, Other than than yum repository (which fails when installing freepbx with it) are there any automated install scripts out there that would install Asterisk 1.6 or 1.4 onto a CentOS LAMP system? If the script install FreePBX that would be a BONUS. Try PBX-in-a-Flash. Undoubtedly it won't do everything you want out of the box, but I suspect it will do /most/ of what you want out of the box. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6 automated install
Use kickstart to configure your default packages, and then set up a shell script to install the additional stuff you need. :) -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6 automated install script for CentOS 5.3 or 5.4
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 08:48:27PM +1100, Rob Hillis wrote: On 01/16/10 04:27, Bruce Nik wrote: Hi Guys, Other than than yum repository (which fails when installing freepbx with it) are there any automated install scripts out there that would install Asterisk 1.6 or 1.4 onto a CentOS LAMP system? If the script install FreePBX that would be a BONUS. Try PBX-in-a-Flash. Undoubtedly it won't do everything you want out of the box, but I suspect it will do /most/ of what you want out of the box. But will not let you debug that install script. I tend to distrust running such a hidden script. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com +972-50-7952406 mailto:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com http://www.xorcom.com iax:gu...@local.xorcom.com/tzafrir -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6 automated install script for CentOS 5.3 or 5.4
On 01/17/10 01:15, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: Try PBX-in-a-Flash. Undoubtedly it won't do everything you want out of the box, but I suspect it will do /most/ of what you want out of the box. But will not let you debug that install script. I tend to distrust running such a hidden script What hidden script are you referring to? -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6 automated install script for CentOS 5.3 or 5.4
Hi Guys, Other than than yum repository (which fails when installing freepbx with it) are there any automated install scripts out there that would install Asterisk 1.6 or 1.4 onto a CentOS LAMP system? If the script install FreePBX that would be a BONUS. Thanks, Bruce -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6 automated install script for CentOS 5.3 or 5.4
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Bruce Nik brucev...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Guys, Other than than yum repository (which fails when installing freepbx with it) are there any automated install scripts out there that would install Asterisk 1.6 or 1.4 onto a CentOS LAMP system? If the script install FreePBX that would be a BONUS. Thanks, Bruce Do you like 'kitchen sink' installs? I can't think of any way to decide on an asterisk configuration that out-of-the-box would be right for everybody... as in, fax support? g729 licenses? whether or not to build against DAHDI? You get the idea. The only way I can think to do it would to be to build in a lot of stuff that most people would never want in their asterisk, which would then result in having to restart asterisk because you need a software update to a package that is a dependency for a part of asterisk you don't use anyway. Anybody who was using asterisk in a serious production environment would probably prefer the control of having most of what they don't want compiled out. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6 automated install script for CentOS 5.3 or 5.4
Provided there is no comprehensive install guides (or is there?) yes I would like to see an easy install script which can install it all. On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Bruce Nik brucev...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Guys, Other than than yum repository (which fails when installing freepbx with it) are there any automated install scripts out there that would install Asterisk 1.6 or 1.4 onto a CentOS LAMP system? If the script install FreePBX that would be a BONUS. Thanks, Bruce -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6 automated install script for CentOS 5.3 or 5.4
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Bruce Nik brucev...@gmail.com wrote: Provided there is no comprehensive install guides (or is there?) yes I would like to see an easy install script which can install it all. tar xvzf ./configure make (optional, do a 'make menuconfig') make install But the problem is that there are steps before the configure you need if you want support for more than barebones asterisk. Nobody knows what you personally need except you. Maybe I'm the only one who doesn't think it's so bad to build from source. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6 automated install script for CentOS 5.3 or 5.4
Here is the 1.4.x version on centos 5 walk through. http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/CentOS+5+and+Asterisk+1.4.x+installation From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Bruce Nik Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 3:15 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6 automated install script for CentOS 5.3 or 5.4 Provided there is no comprehensive install guides (or is there?) yes I would like to see an easy install script which can install it all. On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Bruce Nik brucev...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Guys, Other than than yum repository (which fails when installing freepbx with it) are there any automated install scripts out there that would install Asterisk 1.6 or 1.4 onto a CentOS LAMP system? If the script install FreePBX that would be a BONUS. Thanks, Bruce -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 vs 1.6
Hi, I was wondering whether there are any problems with v1.6 which means I should avoid it. What are the advantages of upgrading? And finally, why both versions are available? Why not just scrap 1.4? Many thanks Dan Journo ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 vs 1.6
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Dan Journo d...@keshercommunications.com wrote: I was wondering whether there are any problems with v1.6 which means I should avoid it. Try searching the list for the many times this has been answered. Since this is your choice, you need to set up a parallel instance of your environment and vet your particular usage. At the very least you will need to update your dialplan to the new syntax, and upgrade to DAHDI if you're using hardware phone cards. What are the advantages of upgrading? Features, both to the individual applications and new applications not previously available. Scalability, especially for large dialplans, and a much better SIP stack. More eyes on the code as it's the current track. Try searching the list for the many times this has been answered. And finally, why both versions are available? Why not just scrap 1.4? 1.2 is still available too. Because the choice is yours. Many people are still using 1.2, much less 1.4. Some people call old code 'stable' code, as in the bugs are known or worked around. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 to 1.6 extensions.conf
Michael mich...@networkstuff.co.nz writes: pbx.c:3143 pbx_extension_helper: No such label 'outgoing|PHONE NUMBER|1' in extension 'PHONE NUMBER' in context 'phones' [Apr 20 15:43:15] WARNING[11793]: pbx.c:8650 pbx_parseable_goto: Priority 'outgoing|PHONE NUMBER' must be a number 0, or valid label You want , instead of | /Benny ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 to 1.6 extensions.conf
Benny Amorsen wrote: Michael mich...@networkstuff.co.nz writes: pbx.c:3143 pbx_extension_helper: No such label 'outgoing|PHONE NUMBER|1' in extension 'PHONE NUMBER' in context 'phones' [Apr 20 15:43:15] WARNING[11793]: pbx.c:8650 pbx_parseable_goto: Priority 'outgoing|PHONE NUMBER' must be a number 0, or valid label You want , instead of | Asterisk always shows parameters separated by a pipe symbol in the log. He may very well have parameters separated by a comma in the dialplan. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 to 1.6 extensions.conf
On Monday 20 April 2009 05:46:17 Rob Hillis wrote: Benny Amorsen wrote: Michael mich...@networkstuff.co.nz writes: pbx.c:3143 pbx_extension_helper: No such label 'outgoing|PHONE NUMBER|1' in extension 'PHONE NUMBER' in context 'phones' [Apr 20 15:43:15] WARNING[11793]: pbx.c:8650 pbx_parseable_goto: Priority 'outgoing|PHONE NUMBER' must be a number 0, or valid label You want , instead of | Asterisk always shows parameters separated by a pipe symbol in the log. Only in versions 1.4 and previous. He may very well have parameters separated by a comma in the dialplan. If he did, he would not be getting this error. -- Tilghman ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 to 1.6 extensions.conf
pbx.c:3143 pbx_extension_helper: No such label 'outgoing|PHONE NUMBER|1' in extension 'PHONE NUMBER' in context 'phones' [Apr 20 15:43:15] WARNING[11793]: pbx.c:8650 pbx_parseable_goto: Priority 'outgoing|PHONE NUMBER' must be a number 0, or valid label PHONE NUMBER = the number I called. This dialplan worked fine in version 1.4. Michael ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 to 1.6 extensions.conf
Michael wrote: pbx.c:3143 pbx_extension_helper: No such label 'outgoing|PHONE NUMBER|1' in extension 'PHONE NUMBER' in context 'phones' [Apr 20 15:43:15] WARNING[11793]: pbx.c:8650 pbx_parseable_goto: Priority 'outgoing|PHONE NUMBER' must be a number 0, or valid label PHONE NUMBER = the number I called. This dialplan worked fine in version 1.4. It's normal for dialplans to have to be rewritten slightly between major releases of Asterisk. It would help if you could post the parts of the dialplan that are giving you trouble. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6 ???
Hi, I agree with Gordon. We are still using Asterisk 1.2 because we are waiting for Asterisk 1.4 features to work as for Asterisk 1.2 (it seems to us that parking and queues have some problems... so not good enough for production). Giorgio Incantalupo Gordon Henderson wrote: On Mon, 6 Oct 2008, Alejandro Facultad wrote: Dear all, I know there are two actual versions of Asterisk: 1.4 and 1.6. There is also 1.2. It may not be supported but there are 1000's of people out there (myself included) who are still using it. My scenario is: SIP server with 100-150 SIP users, voice mail and maybe IVR. I will use GSM audio codec. Maybe in the future I'll connect a E1 line to the PSTN. What Asterisk version is better to me and why ??? The answer you are looking for is that you should be using a supported, stable version, and right now, 1.4 is the only one that fits. If I were starting today, I'd go with 1.4. But I have to ask: Why GSM? If everything is in-house on the same LAN, then why not G711a? E1 is G711a, so you'd have to get the box to transcode to G711, which depending on the number of calls and CPU, might be an issue... Gordon ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6 ???
Brendan Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Oct 6, 2008, at 3:52 PM, Gordon Henderson wrote: The answer you are looking for is that you should be using a supported, stable version, and right now, 1.4 is the only one that fits. If I were starting today, I'd go with 1.4. 1.6.0 has just been released. Personally I'd start with that because then you don't stuck with generation old features, and as you are just starting you aren't locked into any feature sets or syntax issues, etc. I completely agree with Brendan here. 1.6 is new and undoubtedly buggy (although we haven't been hit by anything serious yet...), but the code quality is higher overall. Also, the code is fresh in the minds of the developers, so they can fix bugs faster. 1.4 isn't new, but it still has its share of bugs -- look at Mantis. The advantage of 1.4 and especially 1.2 is that you can look the bugs up in Mantis before you hit them. For your first deployment you will probably end up spending several months in testing. During those months 1.6 will stabilize a lot. If you hit a really bad bug, you can switch to 1.4 reasonably quickly -- they aren't THAT different. /Benny ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6 ???
Dear all, I know there are two actual versions of Asterisk: 1.4 and 1.6. My scenario is: SIP server with 100-150 SIP users, voice mail and maybe IVR. I will use GSM audio codec. Maybe in the future I'll connect a E1 line to the PSTN. What Asterisk version is better to me and why ??? Thank you. A.F. Yahoo! Cocina Recetas prácticas y comida saludable http://ar.mujer.yahoo.com/cocina/___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6 ???
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008, Alejandro Facultad wrote: Dear all, I know there are two actual versions of Asterisk: 1.4 and 1.6. There is also 1.2. It may not be supported but there are 1000's of people out there (myself included) who are still using it. My scenario is: SIP server with 100-150 SIP users, voice mail and maybe IVR. I will use GSM audio codec. Maybe in the future I'll connect a E1 line to the PSTN. What Asterisk version is better to me and why ??? The answer you are looking for is that you should be using a supported, stable version, and right now, 1.4 is the only one that fits. If I were starting today, I'd go with 1.4. But I have to ask: Why GSM? If everything is in-house on the same LAN, then why not G711a? E1 is G711a, so you'd have to get the box to transcode to G711, which depending on the number of calls and CPU, might be an issue... Gordon ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6 ???
On Oct 6, 2008, at 3:52 PM, Gordon Henderson wrote: The answer you are looking for is that you should be using a supported, stable version, and right now, 1.4 is the only one that fits. If I were starting today, I'd go with 1.4. 1.6.0 has just been released. Personally I'd start with that because then you don't stuck with generation old features, and as you are just starting you aren't locked into any feature sets or syntax issues, etc. Of course as it has just been released there are undoubtedly some bugs yet to be discovered, 1.4 has been around a while and will probably be easier to find support/documentation for. Brendan ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6 ???
I would stick with 1.4 in production, how mad would you be if I gave you a cell phone with new code and it didn’t work? Would you throw your cell phone at me if it cut us off during phone calls from a bug? Some people are ok with trying new stuff, others it costs money when they lose business due to their phone system not working. I’ve noticed you can mess up computers, but phones get people mad when they don’t work. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alejandro Facultad Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 3:02 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6 ??? Dear all, I know there are two actual versions of Asterisk: 1.4 and 1.6. My scenario is: SIP server with 100-150 SIP users, voice mail and maybe IVR. I will use GSM audio codec. Maybe in the future I'll connect a E1 line to the PSTN. What Asterisk version is better to me and why ??? Thank you. A.F. Yahoo! Cocina Recetas prácticas y comida saludable Visitá http://ar.mujer.yahoo.com/cocina/ - Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6 ???
Brendan Martens wrote: On Oct 6, 2008, at 3:52 PM, Gordon Henderson wrote: The answer you are looking for is that you should be using a supported, stable version, and right now, 1.4 is the only one that fits. If I were starting today, I'd go with 1.4. 1.6.0 has just been released. Personally I'd start with that because then you don't stuck with generation old features, and as you are just starting you aren't locked into any feature sets or syntax issues, etc. Of course as it has just been released there are undoubtedly some bugs yet to be discovered, 1.4 has been around a while and will probably be easier to find support/documentation for. Quote are undoubtedly some bugs yet to be discovered Good laugh, look at the BUG reporting site. 1.4 had how many HUNDREDS of bugs reported ? How many more continue to flow in ? and you think someone should go to 1.6 ? May want to reconsider that. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6
Yes, that is what I did, I used overlay but I had a hard time to unmak it. The 1.4 is not even in the portage unstable and it was masked in: /usr/portage/profile/package.mask True. The asterisk packages in the voip overlay aren't particularly up-to-date. If I had more knowledge of Portage and how it works, I'd help out, but alas, I don't, and don't really have time to learn. For some of the packages you need to edit the ebuild file and add ~amd64 ~x86 (depending on your architecture) to the ARCH= line, then rebuild the digests on the ebuilds. Regards, Chris ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6
Hi, On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 01:05:17PM -0600, Joseph wrote: I need to upgrade my Asterisk, currently I'm using 1.2.27 from Gentoo portage but I think this version has a problem with RFC2833 DTMF signaling and I don't think there will be any newer version available anytime soon on portage. I need stable version, I'm using Asterisk mostly with ATA adapter (Linksys and Sipura); should I go to 1.6 or 1.4? You can use the gentoo voip overlay. Asterisk 1.4.21.2 is included in the overlay. # emerge layman # layman -a voip Regards, Artem ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6
You can use the gentoo voip overlay. Asterisk 1.4.21.2 is included in the overlay. # emerge layman # layman -a voip You may need to modify some of the .ebuild files, or your /etc/portage/packages.unmask depending on your asterisk build. Regards, Chris ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6
On 09/24/08 14:12, Chris Bagnall wrote: You can use the gentoo voip overlay. Asterisk 1.4.21.2 is included in the overlay. # emerge layman # layman -a voip You may need to modify some of the .ebuild files, or your /etc/portage/packages.unmask depending on your asterisk build. Regards, Chris Yes, that is what I did, I used overlay but I had a hard time to unmak it. The 1.4 is not even in the portage unstable and it was masked in: /usr/portage/profile/package.mask It looks like somebody is trying very hard for Gentoo user not to use 1.4-version. -- #Joseph ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6
1.6 = Windows Vista :-P On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need to upgrade my Asterisk, currently I'm using 1.2.27 from Gentoo portage but I think this version has a problem with RFC2833 DTMF signaling and I don't think there will be any newer version available anytime soon on portage. I need stable version, I'm using Asterisk mostly with ATA adapter (Linksys and Sipura); should I go to 1.6 or 1.4? -- #Joseph ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6
I would think 1.6 = Windows Vista :) PaulH Steve Totaro wrote: 1.6 = Windows Vista :-P On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need to upgrade my Asterisk, currently I'm using 1.2.27 from Gentoo portage but I think this version has a problem with RFC2833 DTMF signaling and I don't think there will be any newer version available anytime soon on portage. I need stable version, I'm using Asterisk mostly with ATA adapter (Linksys and Sipura); should I go to 1.6 or 1.4? -- #Joseph ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6
I need to upgrade my Asterisk, currently I'm using 1.2.27 from Gentoo portage but I think this version has a problem with RFC2833 DTMF signaling and I don't think there will be any newer version available anytime soon on portage. I need stable version, I'm using Asterisk mostly with ATA adapter (Linksys and Sipura); should I go to 1.6 or 1.4? -- #Joseph ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Joseph wrote: I need to upgrade my Asterisk, currently I'm using 1.2.27 from Gentoo portage but I think this version has a problem with RFC2833 DTMF signaling and I don't think there will be any newer version available anytime soon on portage. I need stable version, I'm using Asterisk mostly with ATA adapter (Linksys and Sipura); should I go to 1.6 or 1.4? Compile up 1.2.30 yourself :) Gordon ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 or 1.6
Joseph wrote: I need to upgrade my Asterisk, currently I'm using 1.2.27 from Gentoo portage but I think this version has a problem with RFC2833 DTMF signaling and I don't think there will be any newer version available anytime soon on portage. I need stable version, I'm using Asterisk mostly with ATA adapter (Linksys and Sipura); should I go to 1.6 or 1.4? By saying you need a stable version, you've answered your own question. 1.6 has not yet been released and therefore should not be considered to be production ready yet. Upgrade to version 1.6 at your own risk only. Some people have reported 1.6 to be very stable, others (such as myself) are still having occasional problems with it. For me, these issues aren't a great concern since it's a home system, but at least for the moment, I wouldn't consider running 1.6 in a production environment. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 vs 1.6
Alex Balashov [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Seysan wrote: Hello, What is the Differences between Asterisk 1.4 and Asterisk 1.6 ? Also I mean what has made it to be in a separate Branch ? There are release notes that speak to this. Where? And is there a release history anywhere? Kind regards P.N. -- Alex Balashov Evariste Systems Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel: (+1) (678) 954-0670 Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671 Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599 ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 vs 1.6
At 06:49 2/19/2008, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: Alex Balashov [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Seysan wrote: Hello, What is the Differences between Asterisk 1.4 and Asterisk 1.6 ? Also I mean what has made it to be in a separate Branch ? There are release notes that speak to this. Where? And is there a release history anywhere? http://ftp.digium.com/pub/asterisk/releases/ ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 vs 1.6
On 13:49, Tue 19 Feb 08, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: Alex Balashov [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Seysan wrote: Hello, What is the Differences between Asterisk 1.4 and Asterisk 1.6 ? Also I mean what has made it to be in a separate Branch ? There are release notes that speak to this. Where? And is there a release history anywhere? http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk/tags/1.6.0-beta3/CHANGES?view=markup -- Michiel van Baak [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://michiel.vanbaak.eu GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x71C946BD Why is it drug addicts and computer aficionados are both called users? ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 vs 1.6
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 01:49:58PM +0100, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: Alex Balashov [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Seysan wrote: Hello, What is the Differences between Asterisk 1.4 and Asterisk 1.6 ? Also I mean what has made it to be in a separate Branch ? There are release notes that speak to this. Where? And is there a release history anywhere? Read the UPGRADE.txt file in the source distribution of Asterisk. -- Ulexus [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpX6qBT52NKf.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 vs 1.6
Hello, What is the Differences between Asterisk 1.4 and Asterisk 1.6 ? Also I mean what has made it to be in a separate Branch ? thanks ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 vs 1.6
Seysan wrote: Hello, What is the Differences between Asterisk 1.4 and Asterisk 1.6 ? Also I mean what has made it to be in a separate Branch ? There are release notes that speak to this. -- Alex Balashov Evariste Systems Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel: (+1) (678) 954-0670 Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671 Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599 ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
