Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAXy reliability issues >> try an Ag-168 ?
The manufacturers are chinese, IP Trading is in Sydney Australia, they sell the units as a distributor (I believe) and thats where i have been getting mine. I've had unsolicited emails from different chinese manufacturers but they have yet follow up on my replies/questons. Gary On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:12:10 -, Helder Rogrio [MICROREDE] wrote: >Gary, > >IP trading is the vendor of this... Does it have any distributor in Europe? >Or website to check for informations? > >Thanks >Helder > >- Original Message - >From: "Gary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" > >Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004 3:28 AM >Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] IAXy reliability issues >> try an Ag-168 ? > > >> On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 10:01:17 +1100, Adam Goryachev wrote: >> >> >On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 08:00 +1000, Gary wrote: >> >> On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 14:34:24 -0500, Jim Van Meggelen wrote: >> >> >> >> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> >> Paul Fielding wrote: >> >> >>> Hmmm I could certainly see that being the issue. If it is the >> >> >>> issue, though, then I think it's something that needs to be >> >> >>> addressed. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> In my opinion, Digium needs to address it, as well as the whole >> >> >>> provisioning via cli thing. I know Asterisk itself is a CLI >oriented >> >> >>> piece of software, but the more one can do do decrease >configuration >> >> >>> timing and issues the better off one is. I think it would be a >> >> >>> benefit to allow the IAXy to be programmed via web interface. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> For that matter, from what I can tell via my own experimentation, >it >> >> >>> appears that you cannot use DNS to define the asterisk server to >it. >> >> >>> This is bad, since it means that if the IP of the asterisk server >> >> >>> changes, you need to directly reprovision *all* of your IAXy >> >> >>> devices >> >> >>> >> >> >>> For a new product, it has potential, hopefully these things will be >> >> >>> addressed >> >> >> >> >> >> The IAXy does not have the CPU, RAM, or Flash to be able to add any >> >> >> significant features. I think it has 4k or RAM and 4k of >> >> >> Flash. >> >> > >> >> >Well, that certainly limits it's useful future. A neat toy, with >limited >> >> >market potential. >> >> > >> >> >I'd certainly like to hear about it's successor, then, because any >kind >> >> >of IAX-based ATA is something that would seem to have a future with >> >> >Asterisk. >> >> >> >> Do a google fo an AG-168 device based on the PA1688 chipset. >> >> >> >> it available now. >> >> >> >> BTW, these ATA units are cheaper than an IAXy here in Australia as >> >> well. >> > >> >Can you point out any specific places that stock this item? I'd >> >certainly be interested in it... >> >> In Australia, IP Trading might have some left from the last batch >> >> One nice thing which people can use... >> >> These units suppport PPPoE and PTP. >> >> Think about it and you might realise how handy this can be. >> >> In our situation we have been using PPPoE extensively and it >> has made life easy for us, but ptp can be used the same way :-) >> >> >> Gary >> . >> >> >> ___ >> Asterisk-Users mailing list >> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com >> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >> > >___ >Asterisk-Users mailing list >Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users . ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAXy reliability issues >> try an Ag-168 ?
Gary, IP trading is the vendor of this... Does it have any distributor in Europe? Or website to check for informations? Thanks Helder - Original Message - From: "Gary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004 3:28 AM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] IAXy reliability issues >> try an Ag-168 ? > On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 10:01:17 +1100, Adam Goryachev wrote: > > >On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 08:00 +1000, Gary wrote: > >> On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 14:34:24 -0500, Jim Van Meggelen wrote: > >> > >> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> >> Paul Fielding wrote: > >> >>> Hmmm I could certainly see that being the issue. If it is the > >> >>> issue, though, then I think it's something that needs to be > >> >>> addressed. > >> >>> > >> >>> In my opinion, Digium needs to address it, as well as the whole > >> >>> provisioning via cli thing. I know Asterisk itself is a CLI oriented > >> >>> piece of software, but the more one can do do decrease configuration > >> >>> timing and issues the better off one is. I think it would be a > >> >>> benefit to allow the IAXy to be programmed via web interface. > >> >>> > >> >>> For that matter, from what I can tell via my own experimentation, it > >> >>> appears that you cannot use DNS to define the asterisk server to it. > >> >>> This is bad, since it means that if the IP of the asterisk server > >> >>> changes, you need to directly reprovision *all* of your IAXy > >> >>> devices > >> >>> > >> >>> For a new product, it has potential, hopefully these things will be > >> >>> addressed > >> >> > >> >> The IAXy does not have the CPU, RAM, or Flash to be able to add any > >> >> significant features. I think it has 4k or RAM and 4k of > >> >> Flash. > >> > > >> >Well, that certainly limits it's useful future. A neat toy, with limited > >> >market potential. > >> > > >> >I'd certainly like to hear about it's successor, then, because any kind > >> >of IAX-based ATA is something that would seem to have a future with > >> >Asterisk. > >> > >> Do a google fo an AG-168 device based on the PA1688 chipset. > >> > >> it available now. > >> > >> BTW, these ATA units are cheaper than an IAXy here in Australia as > >> well. > > > >Can you point out any specific places that stock this item? I'd > >certainly be interested in it... > > In Australia, IP Trading might have some left from the last batch > > One nice thing which people can use... > > These units suppport PPPoE and PTP. > > Think about it and you might realise how handy this can be. > > In our situation we have been using PPPoE extensively and it > has made life easy for us, but ptp can be used the same way :-) > > > Gary > . > > > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] IAXy reliability issues >> try an Ag-168 ?
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 10:01:17 +1100, Adam Goryachev wrote: >On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 08:00 +1000, Gary wrote: >> On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 14:34:24 -0500, Jim Van Meggelen wrote: >> >> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> Paul Fielding wrote: >> >>> Hmmm I could certainly see that being the issue. If it is the >> >>> issue, though, then I think it's something that needs to be >> >>> addressed. >> >>> >> >>> In my opinion, Digium needs to address it, as well as the whole >> >>> provisioning via cli thing. I know Asterisk itself is a CLI oriented >> >>> piece of software, but the more one can do do decrease configuration >> >>> timing and issues the better off one is. I think it would be a >> >>> benefit to allow the IAXy to be programmed via web interface. >> >>> >> >>> For that matter, from what I can tell via my own experimentation, it >> >>> appears that you cannot use DNS to define the asterisk server to it. >> >>> This is bad, since it means that if the IP of the asterisk server >> >>> changes, you need to directly reprovision *all* of your IAXy >> >>> devices >> >>> >> >>> For a new product, it has potential, hopefully these things will be >> >>> addressed >> >> >> >> The IAXy does not have the CPU, RAM, or Flash to be able to add any >> >> significant features. I think it has 4k or RAM and 4k of >> >> Flash. >> > >> >Well, that certainly limits it's useful future. A neat toy, with limited >> >market potential. >> > >> >I'd certainly like to hear about it's successor, then, because any kind >> >of IAX-based ATA is something that would seem to have a future with >> >Asterisk. >> >> Do a google fo an AG-168 device based on the PA1688 chipset. >> >> it available now. >> >> BTW, these ATA units are cheaper than an IAXy here in Australia as >> well. > >Can you point out any specific places that stock this item? I'd >certainly be interested in it... In Australia, IP Trading might have some left from the last batch One nice thing which people can use... These units suppport PPPoE and PTP. Think about it and you might realise how handy this can be. In our situation we have been using PPPoE extensively and it has made life easy for us, but ptp can be used the same way :-) Gary . ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] IAXy reliability issues
On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 08:00 +1000, Gary wrote: > On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 14:34:24 -0500, Jim Van Meggelen wrote: > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Paul Fielding wrote: > >>> Hmmm I could certainly see that being the issue. If it is the > >>> issue, though, then I think it's something that needs to be > >>> addressed. > >>> > >>> In my opinion, Digium needs to address it, as well as the whole > >>> provisioning via cli thing. I know Asterisk itself is a CLI oriented > >>> piece of software, but the more one can do do decrease configuration > >>> timing and issues the better off one is. I think it would be a > >>> benefit to allow the IAXy to be programmed via web interface. > >>> > >>> For that matter, from what I can tell via my own experimentation, it > >>> appears that you cannot use DNS to define the asterisk server to it. > >>> This is bad, since it means that if the IP of the asterisk server > >>> changes, you need to directly reprovision *all* of your IAXy > >>> devices > >>> > >>> For a new product, it has potential, hopefully these things will be > >>> addressed > >> > >> The IAXy does not have the CPU, RAM, or Flash to be able to add any > >> significant features. I think it has 4k or RAM and 4k of > >> Flash. > > > >Well, that certainly limits it's useful future. A neat toy, with limited > >market potential. > > > >I'd certainly like to hear about it's successor, then, because any kind > >of IAX-based ATA is something that would seem to have a future with > >Asterisk. > > Do a google fo an AG-168 device based on the PA1688 chipset. > > it available now. > > BTW, these ATA units are cheaper than an IAXy here in Australia as > well. Can you point out any specific places that stock this item? I'd certainly be interested in it... Regards, Adam -- -- Adam Goryachev Website Managers Ph: +61 2 8304 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: +61 2 9345 4396www.websitemanagers.com.au ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] IAXy reliability issues
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 14:34:24 -0500, Jim Van Meggelen wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Paul Fielding wrote: >>> Hmmm I could certainly see that being the issue. If it is the >>> issue, though, then I think it's something that needs to be >>> addressed. >>> >>> In my opinion, Digium needs to address it, as well as the whole >>> provisioning via cli thing. I know Asterisk itself is a CLI oriented >>> piece of software, but the more one can do do decrease configuration >>> timing and issues the better off one is. I think it would be a >>> benefit to allow the IAXy to be programmed via web interface. >>> >>> For that matter, from what I can tell via my own experimentation, it >>> appears that you cannot use DNS to define the asterisk server to it. >>> This is bad, since it means that if the IP of the asterisk server >>> changes, you need to directly reprovision *all* of your IAXy >>> devices >>> >>> For a new product, it has potential, hopefully these things will be >>> addressed >> >> The IAXy does not have the CPU, RAM, or Flash to be able to add any >> significant features. I think it has 4k or RAM and 4k of >> Flash. > >Well, that certainly limits it's useful future. A neat toy, with limited >market potential. > >I'd certainly like to hear about it's successor, then, because any kind >of IAX-based ATA is something that would seem to have a future with >Asterisk. Do a google fo an AG-168 device based on the PA1688 chipset. it available now. BTW, these ATA units are cheaper than an IAXy here in Australia as well. . ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAXy reliability issues
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 13:11:06 -0600, Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote: >Paul Fielding wrote: >> Hmmm I could certainly see that being the issue. If it is the >> issue, though, then I think it's something that needs to be addressed. >> >> In my opinion, Digium needs to address it, as well as the whole >> provisioning via cli thing. I know Asterisk itself is a CLI oriented >> piece of software, but the more one can do do decrease configuration >> timing and issues the better off one is. I think it would be a benefit >> to allow the IAXy to be programmed via web interface. >> >> For that matter, from what I can tell via my own experimentation, it >> appears that you cannot use DNS to define the asterisk server to it. >> This is bad, since it means that if the IP of the asterisk server >> changes, you need to directly reprovision *all* of your IAXy devices >> >> For a new product, it has potential, hopefully these things will be >> addressed > >The IAXy does not have the CPU, RAM, or Flash to be able to add any >significant features. I think it has 4k or RAM and 4k of Flash. I wonder if a slightly different approach to provision of the IAXy could be taken, (prob still not enough ram/flash. a bootp type protocol to a dns, with not only code, but dialplan (based on MAC address) as well, maybe just extra ram ? I haven't looked but it might be only a few chip change. . ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] IAXy reliability issues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Paul Fielding wrote: >> Hmmm I could certainly see that being the issue. If it is the >> issue, though, then I think it's something that needs to be >> addressed. >> >> In my opinion, Digium needs to address it, as well as the whole >> provisioning via cli thing. I know Asterisk itself is a CLI oriented >> piece of software, but the more one can do do decrease configuration >> timing and issues the better off one is. I think it would be a >> benefit to allow the IAXy to be programmed via web interface. >> >> For that matter, from what I can tell via my own experimentation, it >> appears that you cannot use DNS to define the asterisk server to it. >> This is bad, since it means that if the IP of the asterisk server >> changes, you need to directly reprovision *all* of your IAXy >> devices >> >> For a new product, it has potential, hopefully these things will be >> addressed > > The IAXy does not have the CPU, RAM, or Flash to be able to add any > significant features. I think it has 4k or RAM and 4k of > Flash. Well, that certainly limits it's useful future. A neat toy, with limited market potential. I'd certainly like to hear about it's successor, then, because any kind of IAX-based ATA is something that would seem to have a future with Asterisk. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.6.6 - Release Date: 28/12/2004 ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAXy reliability issues
Paul Fielding wrote: Hmmm I could certainly see that being the issue. If it is the issue, though, then I think it's something that needs to be addressed. In my opinion, Digium needs to address it, as well as the whole provisioning via cli thing. I know Asterisk itself is a CLI oriented piece of software, but the more one can do do decrease configuration timing and issues the better off one is. I think it would be a benefit to allow the IAXy to be programmed via web interface. For that matter, from what I can tell via my own experimentation, it appears that you cannot use DNS to define the asterisk server to it. This is bad, since it means that if the IP of the asterisk server changes, you need to directly reprovision *all* of your IAXy devices For a new product, it has potential, hopefully these things will be addressed The IAXy does not have the CPU, RAM, or Flash to be able to add any significant features. I think it has 4k or RAM and 4k of Flash. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAXy reliability issues
Hmmm I could certainly see that being the issue. If it is the issue, though, then I think it's something that needs to be addressed. In my opinion, Digium needs to address it, as well as the whole provisioning via cli thing. I know Asterisk itself is a CLI oriented piece of software, but the more one can do do decrease configuration timing and issues the better off one is. I think it would be a benefit to allow the IAXy to be programmed via web interface. For that matter, from what I can tell via my own experimentation, it appears that you cannot use DNS to define the asterisk server to it. This is bad, since it means that if the IP of the asterisk server changes, you need to directly reprovision *all* of your IAXy devices For a new product, it has potential, hopefully these things will be addressed regards Paul - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 6:14 AM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAXy reliability issues On Thu, 30 Dec 2004, Gary wrote: On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 00:12:51 -0700, Paul Fielding wrote: >I've just picked up a pair of IAXy devices. They work fine except that >they >keep going offline. As in, I plug it in, it connects to Asterisk, I can >dial and phone and all is dandy. Then, maybe 12h later, maybe 24, maybe >36, >maybe 48, I'll either try to phone the device and not get through or >I'll >pick it up and the dialtone is gone. it's simply lost it's connection >to >Asterisk. If I unplug and plug back in, it reconnects and all is well. > >I'm running firmware v. 22. > >Anyone else experiencing this? > >Paul DHCP timeouts ?? Didn't somebody say that the IAXy doesn't renew its DHCP lease (ie its a BOOTP client). In which case, your DHCP server needs to give it an infinite lease. Steve ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAXy reliability issues
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004, Gary wrote: > On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 00:12:51 -0700, Paul Fielding wrote: > > >I've just picked up a pair of IAXy devices. They work fine except that they > >keep going offline. As in, I plug it in, it connects to Asterisk, I can > >dial and phone and all is dandy. Then, maybe 12h later, maybe 24, maybe 36, > >maybe 48, I'll either try to phone the device and not get through or I'll > >pick it up and the dialtone is gone. it's simply lost it's connection to > >Asterisk. If I unplug and plug back in, it reconnects and all is well. > > > >I'm running firmware v. 22. > > > >Anyone else experiencing this? > > > >Paul > > > DHCP timeouts ?? Didn't somebody say that the IAXy doesn't renew its DHCP lease (ie its a BOOTP client). In which case, your DHCP server needs to give it an infinite lease. Steve ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAXy reliability issues
Paul Fielding wrote: I've just picked up a pair of IAXy devices. They work fine except that they keep going offline. As in, I plug it in, it connects to Asterisk, I can dial and phone and all is dandy. Then, maybe 12h later, maybe 24, maybe 36, maybe 48, I'll either try to phone the device and not get through or I'll pick it up and the dialtone is gone. it's simply lost it's connection to Asterisk. If I unplug and plug back in, it reconnects and all is well. I'm running firmware v. 22. Anyone else experiencing this? Paul Paul, I have 30 of them sitting in a box that I can sell until these problems get resolved! Want mine? Your best bet is to get SER runing with the NAT proxy and use SIP ATA endpoints. Best, Todd ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAXy reliability issues
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 00:12:51 -0700, Paul Fielding wrote: >I've just picked up a pair of IAXy devices. They work fine except that they >keep going offline. As in, I plug it in, it connects to Asterisk, I can >dial and phone and all is dandy. Then, maybe 12h later, maybe 24, maybe 36, >maybe 48, I'll either try to phone the device and not get through or I'll >pick it up and the dialtone is gone. it's simply lost it's connection to >Asterisk. If I unplug and plug back in, it reconnects and all is well. > >I'm running firmware v. 22. > >Anyone else experiencing this? > >Paul DHCP timeouts ?? . ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
