Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
FYI: FWD shows a different inbound prefix:
**164 e164.org8781039311
Yes that works as well, and was issued by another company, the contact
at FWD asked if we could route that to them as well, I prefer the other
range because it's shorter and we've always routed it like that so it's
easier for me to remember...
Is there enough spare numbering space there for you to assign e164.org
dialable numbers to people in the asterisk community too?
Technically no, but we do it anyways despite how much the ITU loves us
for doing it :) In the telephone world there is no equivalent to private
LAN IP ranges, we're hoping if we get enough support for what we're
doing to be allocated the +88299 range, (highly unlikely to funnier
things have been known to happen)
While it might be nice for asterisk home users to have their single
DID listed, it strikes me that the real utility would be to have a
blocks of 100 or 1000 numbers assigned to folks, so they could have
each of their voip phones directly dialable from anyone that queries
your db.
We have always offered blocks of 100 numbers in the +88299 range for
anyone that wants them, catch being that they're not really allocated by
anyone/body except our DNS zone... Any number ranges in our zone are
also accessible from FWD etc etc etc...
--
Best regards,
Duane
http://www.cacert.org - Free Security Certificates
http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally
http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom
http://happysnapper.com.au - Sell your photos over the net!
http://e164.org - Using Enum.164 to interconnect asterisk servers
In the long run the pessimist may be proved right,
but the optimist has a better time on the trip.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
