Re: [asterisk-users] Stun Server

2011-07-27 Thread Robert Huddleston
I like Xen. It's free and rock solid. VMWare is great but their money
greedy.

 

From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Bryant
Zimmerman
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 9:30 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Stun Server

 

We have been running a windows stun server for 5 years now and I would like
to change to either a linux of freebsd based unit to phase out the old XP
box in our datacenter.   What should I look at that would be a good
replacement.  The windows box has worked but the hardware is at end of life
and I want to move it to a vm and I don't want Windows. 

Any advise is apperciated. 

Thanks
zktech

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Stun Server

2011-07-27 Thread Bryant Zimmerman
We have been running a windows stun server for 5 years now and I would like 
to change to either a linux of freebsd based unit to phase out the old XP 
box in our datacenter.   What should I look at that would be a good 
replacement.  The windows box has worked but the hardware is at end of life 
and I want to move it to a vm and I don't want Windows. 


Any advise is apperciated. 


Thanks

zktech
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] stun server [SOLVED]

2006-05-11 Thread Serghei Amelian
On Thursday 11 May 2006 21:10, Moises Silva wrote:
> Thanks for the fix :)

no problem

> About DNS, I think only the primary stun address should be registered.
> Try using as stun server grievous.ivsol.net, is our stun server and is
> installed with the ebuild I sent you. That will give us more hints
> about where the problem might be.
>
> Try using the stunclient application from inside the network where the
> phone is, it will help you to debug.

When i've seen that you stun works, I've got an ideea: the stun and asterisk 
cannot share the same ip. I swapped the primary ip with secondary ip, and 
voila :-)

Thanks a lot for help.

-- 
Serghei.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] stun server

2006-05-11 Thread Moises Silva

Thanks for the fix :)

About DNS, I think only the primary stun address should be registered.
Try using as stun server grievous.ivsol.net, is our stun server and is
installed with the ebuild I sent you. That will give us more hints
about where the problem might be.

Try using the stunclient application from inside the network where the
phone is, it will help you to debug.



On 5/11/06, Serghei Amelian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Thursday 11 May 2006 18:32, Moises Silva wrote:
> I was thinking in sending you an attachment, but I have decided to put
> it on the web, you can get it in
>
> http://phpmexic.u33.0web-hosting.com/wordpress/ebuilds/vovida-stun-0.96-ebu
>ild.tar.bz2
>
> Let me know if you it have bugs

I'm not lucky, my voip phone do not want to work with vovida-stun. The phone
is Perfectone IP-300.

The command is:

/usr/sbin/stunserver -h xxx.96.148.138 -a xxx.96.148.139 -p 3478 -o 3479

In attachment is tcpdump runned stun server.

It's very strange, with stun.fwdnet.net it works perfectly.

Question: in dns both ip's must be registered? In this moment only
xxx.96.148.138 is registered as stun.blabla

[...]

Thanks

--
Serghei.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users







--
"Su nombre es GNU/Linux, no solamente Linux, mas info en http://www.gnu.org";
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] stun server

2006-05-11 Thread Serghei Amelian
On Thursday 11 May 2006 18:32, Moises Silva wrote:
> I was thinking in sending you an attachment, but I have decided to put
> it on the web, you can get it in
>
> http://phpmexic.u33.0web-hosting.com/wordpress/ebuilds/vovida-stun-0.96-ebu
>ild.tar.bz2
>
> Let me know if you it have bugs

I'm not lucky, my voip phone do not want to work with vovida-stun. The phone 
is Perfectone IP-300.

The command is:

/usr/sbin/stunserver -h xxx.96.148.138 -a xxx.96.148.139 -p 3478 -o 3479

In attachment is tcpdump runned stun server.

It's very strange, with stun.fwdnet.net it works perfectly.

Question: in dns both ip's must be registered? In this moment only 
xxx.96.148.138 is registered as stun.blabla

[...]

Thanks

-- 
Serghei.
20:19:56.711700 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 122, id 4, offset 0, flags [none], proto: UDP 
(17), length: 56) xxx.186.145.226.5060 > xxx.96.148.138.3478: SIP, length: 28
\000\001\000\010*\323q\307.\244~S\012 
\015\035\014'Ev\000\003\000\004\000\000\000\000
20:19:56.711746 IP (tos 0x0, ttl  64, id 8, offset 0, flags [DF], proto: UDP 
(17), length: 116) xxx.96.148.138.3478 > xxx.186.145.226.5060: SIP, length: 88
\001\001\000D*\323q\307.\244~S\012 
\015\035\014'Ev\000\001\000\010\000\001\000\000\010\236\353\267!\000\000\000udp 
and host 
devel.thel.ro\000\267\021\000\000\0003478\000H\352\267host\021\000\000\0005060
20:19:56.756315 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 122, id 5, offset 0, flags [none], proto: UDP 
(17), length: 411) xxx.186.145.226.5060 > xxx.96.148.138.5060: SIP, length: 383
REGISTER sip:sip.datadrill\000\000\010\236\353\267!\000\000\000udp and 
host 
devel.thel.ro\000\267\021\000\000\0003478\000H\352\267host\021\000\000\0005060\000H\352\267\020\000\000\000)\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\001\000\000\000PV\027\010(V\027\010dns\0001\000\000\000\200F\027\010\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000files\000\000\000\000\000\000\000)\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000dns\000\031\000\000\000\030G\027\010\300F\027\010services\000\000\000\000)\000\000\000\350F\027\010\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000db\000\0001\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000files\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\031\000\000\000xA\027\0100G\027\010protocols\000\000\000)\000\000\000\330V\027\010\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\001\000\000
20:19:56.756474 IP (tos 0x0, ttl  64, id 18140, offset 0, flags [DF], proto: 
UDP (17), length: 453) xxx.96.148.138.5060 > xxx.186.145.226.5060: SIP, length: 
425
SIP/2.0 100 Trying
Via: S\000\000\010\236\353\267!\000\000\000udp and host 
devel.thel.ro\000\267\021\000\000\0003478\000H\352\267host\021\000\000\0005060\000H\352\267\020\000\000\000)\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\001\000\000\000PV\027\010(V\027\010dns\0001\000\000\000\200F\027\010\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000files\000\000\000\000\000\000\000)\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000dns\000\031\000\000\000\030G\027\010\300F\027\010services\000\000\000\000)\000\000\000\350F\027\010\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000db\000\0001\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000files\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\031\000\000\000xA\027\0100G\027\010protocols\000\000\000)\000\000\000\330V\027\010\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000db\000\006!\000\000\000\270W\027\010`W\027\010ethers\\000\000\000\000\000
20:19:56.756515 IP (tos 0x0, ttl  64, id 18141, offset 0, flags [DF], proto: 
UDP (17), length: 535) xxx.96.148.138.5060 > xxx.186.145.226.5060: SIP, length: 
507
SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized
\000\000\010\236\353\267!\000\000\000udp and host 
devel.thel.ro\000\267\021\000\000\0003478\000H\352\267host\021\000\000\0005060\000H\352\267\020\000\000\000)\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\001\000\000\000PV\027\010(V\027\010dns\0001\000\000\000\200F\027\010\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000files\000\000\000\000\000\000\000)\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000dns\000\031\000\00

Re: [Asterisk-Users] stun server

2006-05-11 Thread Moises Silva

I was thinking in sending you an attachment, but I have decided to put
it on the web, you can get it in

http://phpmexic.u33.0web-hosting.com/wordpress/ebuilds/vovida-stun-0.96-ebuild.tar.bz2

Let me know if you it have bugs

Regards

On 5/11/06, Serghei Amelian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Thursday 11 May 2006 16:51, Moises Silva wrote:
>I seriously doubt that message has something to do with the stun
> server. Have you read what the STUN server does? The message you are

I known what do a stun server.

> getting is most likely to be because of wrong registration user name
> or password in your voip phone.
>Any way, if you are still interested in having the stun properly
> installed and you have Gentoo Linux, I have made an ebuild that will
> install it right with a configuration file. Just let me know.

I'm interested, I use gentoo on my asterisk/stun server. Thanks a lot.

--
Serghei.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




--
"Su nombre es GNU/Linux, no solamente Linux, mas info en http://www.gnu.org";
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] stun server

2006-05-11 Thread Serghei Amelian
On Thursday 11 May 2006 16:51, Moises Silva wrote:
>I seriously doubt that message has something to do with the stun
> server. Have you read what the STUN server does? The message you are

I known what do a stun server.

> getting is most likely to be because of wrong registration user name
> or password in your voip phone.
>Any way, if you are still interested in having the stun properly
> installed and you have Gentoo Linux, I have made an ebuild that will
> install it right with a configuration file. Just let me know.

I'm interested, I use gentoo on my asterisk/stun server. Thanks a lot.

-- 
Serghei.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] stun server

2006-05-11 Thread Moises Silva

  I seriously doubt that message has something to do with the stun
server. Have you read what the STUN server does? The message you are
getting is most likely to be because of wrong registration user name
or password in your voip phone.
  Any way, if you are still interested in having the stun properly
installed and you have Gentoo Linux, I have made an ebuild that will
install it right with a configuration file. Just let me know.

Regards

On 5/11/06, Serghei Amelian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi list,

I want to setup a stun server. I tried stun server from vovida and mystun, but
my voip phone said that "logon failed". When I use stun.xten.com works fine.

This is vovida stun in verbose mode:

***received on A1:P1
Got a request (len=28) from xxx.186.145.226:5060
Received stun message: 28 bytes
ChangeRequest = 0
Request parsed ok
BindRequest does not contain MessageIntegrity
Request is valid:
 flags=0
 changeIp=0
 changePort=0
 from = xxx.186.145.226:5060
 respond to = xxx.186.145.226:5060
 mapped = xxx.186.145.226:5060
Encoding stun message:
Encoding MappedAddress: xxx.186.145.226:5060
Encoding SourceAddress: xxx.96.148.138:3478
Encoding ChangedAddress: xxx.96.148.139:3479
Encoding XorMappedAddress: xxx.101.192.77:16411
Encoding ServerName: Vovida.org 0.96

Thanks

--
Serghei.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




--
"Su nombre es GNU/Linux, no solamente Linux, mas info en http://www.gnu.org";
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] STUN Server

2005-03-17 Thread Madhawa
Hi!
Asterisk supports NAT!
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+Avoid+SIP+NAT+Traversal
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+sip+nat+solutions

/Madhawa


On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:17:14 -0500, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Does asterisk have in itself an STUN server built in?  Or do I need to
> set one up seperately?  And if that is the case, what is recommended
> for use with asterisk (to allow VOIP users behind nats to connect to
> my VOIP servers)
> 
> Matt
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 


-- 
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you are not the intended addressee, or the person
responsible for delivering it to them, you may not copy, forward
disclose or otherwise use it or any part of it in any way. To do so
may be unlawful. If you receive this e-mail by mistake, please advise
the sender immediately.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] stun server

2004-05-05 Thread Klaus Darilion
http://developer.berlios.de/projects/mystun/ works fine for me. Tested 
on debian sarge with one NIC and two IP addresses for this NIC.

Klaus

AJ Grinnell wrote:

What is the best free stun server out there? The one that I have looked at
from vovida requires two NICs. Is this neccessary?


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] stun server

2004-05-04 Thread Olle E. Johansson
AJ Grinnell wrote:

What is the best free stun server out there? The one that I have looked at
from vovida requires two NICs. Is this neccessary?
I don't know which server is the best one, I'm using the one from IPtel.org.

You need two IP addresses for STUN to work, with a proper implementation
you will be able to run both on the same NIC.
/O
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] stun server

2004-05-04 Thread Mike Machado
I just put multiple IPs on the same interface and use -a .
Seems to work fine.


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] stun server

2004-05-04 Thread Brian McSpadden
STUN can be nice when connecting to Asterisk behind
NAT in some situations. X-Lite/Pro softphones,
Grandstream Budgetones and a few other clients make
great use of STUN.

That being said, the only good (free) STUN server I've
seen is the Vovida one that requires two NICs. It
works very well, if that is any consolation.

Brian


--- Jeremy McNamara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AJ Grinnell wrote:
> 
> >What is the best free stun server out there? The
> one that I have looked at
> >from vovida requires two NICs. Is this neccessary?
> >
> >  
> >
> Asterisk does not require STUN.
> 
> 
> Jeremy McNamara
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] stun server

2004-05-04 Thread Jeremy McNamara
AJ Grinnell wrote:

What is the best free stun server out there? The one that I have looked at
from vovida requires two NICs. Is this neccessary?
 

Asterisk does not require STUN.

Jeremy McNamara



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] STUN server from Vovida

2003-09-03 Thread Andres
Only hard phones with STUN support that I am aware of are Grandstream and 
SNOM.  I am sure the Cisco ATA186 does not support STUN.

On Wednesday 03 September 2003 09:11, James Sizemore wrote:
> The client device has to support stun.
> Bugetones  do, ATA do, 7960 don't..etc
>
> Dave Cotton wrote:
> >On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 09:01, WipeOut . wrote:
> >>Sorry to answer a question with a question..
> >>
> >>Can stund and * be loaded on the same server and run at the same time?
> >
> >I've also never been able to figure out stund, if that is possible
> >wouldn't it be the answer to most of the SIP difficulties.
>
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] STUN server from Vovida

2003-09-03 Thread Andres
I would suggest you use the Vovida STUN CVS Version.  It worked fine on our 
RedHat 7.3.   Look though the Vovida mail archives to learn where it is 
exactly.  And no...this is not a fix for all the NAT troubles, STUN does not 
work with Symmetric NATs.  But the good point is that Symmetric NATs are a 
minority.

Regards,
Andres

On Wednesday 03 September 2003 00:51, Paul Lambert wrote:
> Not sure if it's alright to talk about this here???
>
> compiled the STUN server from Vovida on RedHat 7.3. Looks simple to
> configure. It isn't starting...it tries to for a long time and then just
> craps out. Here is my config:/etc/sysconfig/stund
>
> #!/bin/echo Not to execute.
> # Path to stund
> STUND=/usr/sbin/stund
>
> # Set the required args for STUND
> STUNDPRIMARYHOSTNAME=208.x.x.x
>
> # The hostname where another stund server is running on port and
> alternate
> # port.
> STUNDALTERNATEHOSTNAME=127.0.0.1
>
> # The primary response port to user
> STUNDPRIMARYPORT=3478
>
> # The alternate port to use
> STUNDALTERNATEPORT=3479
>
>
> STUNDARGS="-h ${STUNDPRIMARYHOSTNAME} \
> -p ${STUNDPRIMARYPORT} \
> -a ${STUNDALTERNATEHOSTNAME} \
> -o ${STUNDALTERNATEPORT}"
>
>
>
> Any ideas? Any suggestion for another STUN server?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] STUN server from Vovida

2003-09-03 Thread James Sizemore
The client device has to support stun.
Bugetones  do, ATA do, 7960 don't..etc
Dave Cotton wrote:

On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 09:01, WipeOut . wrote:
 

Sorry to answer a question with a question..

Can stund and * be loaded on the same server and run at the same time?

   

I've also never been able to figure out stund, if that is possible
wouldn't it be the answer to most of the SIP difficulties.
 



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] STUN server from Vovida

2003-09-03 Thread Dave Cotton
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 09:01, WipeOut . wrote:
> Sorry to answer a question with a question..
> 
> Can stund and * be loaded on the same server and run at the same time?
> 
I've also never been able to figure out stund, if that is possible
wouldn't it be the answer to most of the SIP difficulties.
-- 
Dave Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] STUN server from Vovida

2003-09-03 Thread WipeOut .
Sorry to answer a question with a question..

Can stund and * be loaded on the same server and run at the same time?

Later..

> Not sure if it's alright to talk about this here???
> 
> compiled the STUN server from Vovida on RedHat 7.3. Looks simple to
> configure. It isn't starting...it tries to for a long time and then just
> craps out. Here is my config:/etc/sysconfig/stund
> 
> #!/bin/echo Not to execute.
> # Path to stund
> STUND=/usr/sbin/stund
> 
> # Set the required args for STUND
> STUNDPRIMARYHOSTNAME=208.x.x.x
> 
> # The hostname where another stund server is running on port and
> alternate
> # port.
> STUNDALTERNATEHOSTNAME=127.0.0.1
> 
> # The primary response port to user
> STUNDPRIMARYPORT=3478
> 
> # The alternate port to use
> STUNDALTERNATEPORT=3479
> 
> 
> STUNDARGS="-h ${STUNDPRIMARYHOSTNAME} \
> -p ${STUNDPRIMARYPORT} \
> -a ${STUNDALTERNATEHOSTNAME} \
> -o ${STUNDALTERNATEPORT}"
> 
> 
> 
> Any ideas? Any suggestion for another STUN server?
> 
> --
> Paul
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

-- 
__
http://www.linuxmail.org/
Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr

Powered by Outblaze
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users